2A Cops

2A Cops articles https://2acops.com

Facebook: https://facebook.com/2acops

Twitter: https://twitter.com/2acops

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2acops

Check out my other channel, https://youtube.com/@christianwarriortraining

In this episode of "2A Cops Supporting Gun Rights", the hosts provide their perspective on California Governor Gavin Newsom's proposed 28th Amendment aimed at implementing common sense gun safety measures. The hosts question Newsom's intentions and discuss the potential negative consequences of the proposed amendment. They also touch on Newsom's previous actions as Governor and share their own experiences. In addition, the hosts discuss a proposed 28th Amendment that aims to increase the minimum age for purchasing firearms, mandate universal background checks, and institute a waiting period. The hosts weigh in on these measures and discuss their effectiveness in California, where similar measures are already in place. The hosts encourage listeners to subscribe, like, and leave comments to support their podcast.

1. What is the proposed 28th Amendment to the Constitution and who is supporting it?

Answer: The proposed 28th Amendment aims to implement common sense gun safety measures and is being supported by Gavin Newsom, the current Governor of California.

2. What is the perspective of cops on Gavin Newsom's proposed 28th Amendment?

Answer: The podcast "Two Cops Supporting Gun Rights" will provide a perspective from the point of view of cops and what they think of the Governor's proposal.

3. Why does the speaker believe that fighting against a particular politician is necessary to protect the Second Amendment?

Answer: The speaker believes that the politician's ideas are absurd and fighting against them is necessary to protect the Second Amendment.

4. What is constitutional carry and how does the speaker propose to solve the crime problem in California through it?

Answer: Constitutional carry is the proposal to allow gun owners to carry concealed, lawfully purchased guns. The speaker proposes instituting constitutional carry in California to solve the crime problem.

5. What are the common sense gun safety measures proposed in the 20th Amendment, and why do gun owners overwhelmingly support them in California?

Answer: The proposed common sense gun safety measures include increasing the minimum age for purchasing firearms from 18 to 21, mandating universal background checks, and instating waiting periods for all gun purchases. Gun owners overwhelmingly support these measures in California.

6. Why are the speakers skeptical about the idea of calling for an Article Five convention of States?

Answer: The speakers are skeptical that this proposal will garner enough support.

8. What are the concerns regarding the 28th Amendment potentially taking away the Second Amendment, and why does the speaker believe it won't pass?

Answer: There are concerns that the 28th Amendment may violate the Second Amendment, but the speaker believes it won't pass.

9. What is Gavin Newsom's stance on gun control, and what has he already implemented in California?

Answer: Gavin Newsom advocates for gun control and has already implemented measures such as banning assault weapons in California.

#rifle #igmilitia #gunrights #pewpewpew #kag #tactical #shooting #constitution #keepamericagreat #ccw #gunporn #politics #guncontrol #backtheblue #military #shallnotbeinfringed #gunstagram #x #gunlife #weapons #selfdefense #pro #handgun #donaldtrump #progun #libertarian #wethepeople #righttobeararms #bluelivesmatter #makeamericagreatagain #police #thinblueline #lawenforcement #cops #policeofficer #k #military #policia #army #backtheblue #cop #sheriff #bluelivesmatter #tactical #polizei #usa #firstresponders #policecar #love #policiamilitar #instagram #firefighter #covid #a #india #policeman #swat #fire #upsc #news

Don't forget to follow us on social media:

2A Cops articles https://2acops.com

Facebook: https://facebook.com/2acops

Twitter: https://twitter.com/2acops

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2acops

In this episode, which is audio from our YouTube channel at https://youtube.com/@2acops, we answer the most common viewer comments in the comments section.

So, what is HR88 and why is it bad? It is titled the “Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021” and it was introduced by Mike Thompson (D-CA). The claimed purpose of this bill is “To require a background check for every firearm sale.” The claimed reason for this is to prevent people who should not have guns from buying guns.

On the surface, that seems like a laudable goal. As a retired cop and a responsible gun owner, I don’t want crazy people and/or felons to have guns.

The problem becomes, how does one enforce such a goal? Being from California where “universal background checks” already exist, I can tell you how this will work and what legislation will follow “in order to strengthen the background check law.” This is yet another step down the slippery slope.

How do I know what will come? Because I already lived through this once.

Follow us on social media @2Acops

Subscribe to our newsletter at https://2acops.com/newsletter

#HR8​ #HR1446​ #guncontrol​

Matt and Keith have lost a lot of friends who were killed in the line of duty. Many people ask us how we can support the Second Amendment in light of these tragedies.

Matt and Keith talk about the friends they lost and why they still support the second amendment. It's important to not let the gun grabbers use our friends in the name of gun control.

Don’t forget to subscribe, rate and review us on iTunes today. It helps people find us!

To get weekly updates on 2A news from a cop’s perspective, subscribe to our newsletter at https://2acops.com/newsletter/

Follow us on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter @2Acops

Most cops don't like "red flag laws." Matt and Keith will talk about what red flag laws are and what they aren't and why cops hate these laws so much. We will also talk about legislation to prevent red flag laws from being implemented in your state.

Oklahoma's Anti Red Flag Law can be seen at https://legiscan.com/OK/text/SB1081/200

Don't forget to subscribe, rate and review us on iTunes today. It helps people find us!

To get weekly updates on 2A news from a cop's perspective, subscribe to our newsletter at https://2acops.com/newsletter/

Follow us on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter @2Acops

Our politicians love pitting the police against the public and our officers will be put in awkward positions. This podcast episode is not for non Law Enforcement Officers (LEO's). If you are a citizen listening, our officers need your support. Listen away. But the best thing you can do is show support for them so they can keep their job while maintaining the constitution. For our active cops, this is for you.

At some point while cruising social media you've read a post made by someone proclaiming they were "red flagged" and the cops "stole their guns." The term "red flagged" has become an adjective for any instance of seizure of firearms by police. Some people say that the police have no reason to take a firearm from anyone for any reason and that any seizure is an "infringement."

So why would the police take a firearm from someone? We asked officers what instigated the seizure of firearms by police and we bring those reasons here to you. Here you will find this easy to follow list of how to keep your gun from getting seized by the police. 

Don't forget to subscribe, rate and review us on iTunes. Follow us on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter @2Acops. Get our latest news at 2acops.com.

It's been about 24 hours since the shooting of a "protestor" at the US Capitol. Since that time, The New York Daily News has identified the person shot as Ashli Babbitt, a San Diego resident and a US Air Force Veteran.

Since that time, social media has been flooded with comments from people saying "she should have been shot" or "why are the police shooting unarmed protestors?" The comments show how polarized our country is right now. After seeing so many people comment and so much misinformation being spread, I feel it is necessary to bring light to this incident and break this shooting down.

The Scene

First, it's important to set the scene of where the shooting is and to look at the totality of the circumstance. It is not fair, in any shooting, to judge one factor. The US Capitol is a secure US Government facility which I assume has secret, top secret and SCI material. Use of force standards for protecting these items is not the same as a use of force policy for a beat cop. Keep in mind that the capitol police aren't really cops in the strictest sense. Yes, they meet the definition of a cop in some US code somewhere. But, they are indeed protectors of the capitol and everything there. They safeguard those materials and the people inside.

You also had our federal leadership at the capitol. You had the Vice President and the VP Elect as well as senators and representatives. All of these people could not leave because of the crowds outside. When you have that kind of situation (think Benghazi), you lock your protectee down in as secure position as you can.

So, you have high profile targets hunkered down in a secure location as well as government material that needs to be safeguarded. All are protected in a different use of force policy than a street cop. Who would know more than Ashli Babbitt about those protocols? According to a USA Today article, Ashli Babbitt was a security forces veteran. SF is tasked with just this mission. She did it on active duty and knows the consequences of breaching security like this.

The Shooting

People are complaining that Ashli Babbitt was "unarmed." However, just because someone is unarmed does not make them less of a threat. History is replete with victims killed by an "unarmed person." If you want to see what a mob can do while unarmed, google Reginald Denny in the Rodney King Riots.

Watch this newly released video to get an idea of what we will talk about next.

https://twitter.com/dancohen3000/status/1347076676342185984?s=21

The shooter in this incident appears to be a plain clothes officer. At the capitol, most plain clothes officers are on a dignitary protection detail. He's also pointing his weapon at the crowd. Pro tip: this is the international sign to get back. The doors are barricaded, which shows that people inside are protecting themselves from an angry mob violently tearing the door apart. What if you were at home and someone was doing this to you? Would you shoot?

It appears that the officer has done everything that he can do to protect what is behind that door. He has no other options, but the crowd continues the assault. This officer has retreated and now has no where else to go.

At :25 seconds in, you see a few officers that appear to be part of a counter assault team converging on the door. That tells me that they were already enroute because they were called to help protect what was behind the door. All indications point to a dignitary (maybe several) behind that door. All of their options were exhausted, yet the crowd continued the assault.

I ask you, what other options did they have? None.

The Investigation

There is an investigation going on now. The Capitol police as well as the Metropolitan Police are doing the investigation. It will not be done anytime soon. These investigations take time. While the investigation continues, the officer is on admin leave and is probably at home recounting this endlessly in his head.

Our sponsor is Guns.com. They have a ready supply of firearms at a decent price. You can find what you are looking for by clicking here.

The ATF just filed a new document with the Federal Register about arm braces on pistols. This has the potential of making felons out of millions of gun owners and is a back door gun registration scheme. Learn what the ATF is doing, what it means to you and what you can do about it.

Here's a link to the video we mention about the arm brace on the TAC13 that we did.

Our sponsor is Guns.com. They have a ready supply of firearms at a decent price. You can find what you are looking for by clicking here.

In this episode, we talk about the search warrant served at Polymer 80 by the ATF. We will talk about what exactly happened and if you need to worry if you bought something from them. We will talk about the ATF and the future of 80% lowers.