
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us Fan Mail
In this week's episode we break down United States v. Valentin-Andino, which is a published opinion from the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals. In it, the court clarifies that a deferment request is not a request for clemency, and then relies on fairness and procedural due process to find that, like clemency, where a convening authority considers matters submitted by a victim when acting on a deferment request, the convening authority must provide notice and an opportunity to respond to the defense. Major Allen Abrams then discusses how to ensure "gotcha" statements are admitted for the proper purpose at courts-martial.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us Fan Mail
In this week's episode we break down United States v. Valentin-Andino, which is a published opinion from the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals. In it, the court clarifies that a deferment request is not a request for clemency, and then relies on fairness and procedural due process to find that, like clemency, where a convening authority considers matters submitted by a victim when acting on a deferment request, the convening authority must provide notice and an opportunity to respond to the defense. Major Allen Abrams then discusses how to ensure "gotcha" statements are admitted for the proper purpose at courts-martial.

113,272 Listeners

56,991 Listeners

14,337 Listeners

15,491 Listeners

29,273 Listeners

16,489 Listeners