Send us a text

In this week's episode we  catch up on some CAAF cases, including United States v. King (excusing a member after assembly), United States v. Vargas (standard for selecting a remedy for discovery violations), United States v. Behunin (sentence comparison in "closely related" cases), and United States v. McAlhaney (CCA standard of review regarding the content of a reprimand).  Major Allen Abrams then brings us a discussion of prior inconsistent statements in situations where it gets complicated because there are a number of inconsistencies in a single assertion.