
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).
By The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court4.4
230230 ratings
This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).

32,143 Listeners

8,476 Listeners

5,102 Listeners

3,528 Listeners

1,000 Listeners

373 Listeners

1,118 Listeners

3,567 Listeners

251 Listeners

2,546 Listeners

1,485 Listeners

5,774 Listeners

728 Listeners

378 Listeners

737 Listeners