
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).
4.4
230230 ratings
This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).
5,026 Listeners
1,108 Listeners
8,506 Listeners
361 Listeners
32,291 Listeners
1,019 Listeners
249 Listeners
3,521 Listeners
3,537 Listeners
2,522 Listeners
1,508 Listeners
5,687 Listeners
726 Listeners
379 Listeners
666 Listeners