
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).
By The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court4.4
230230 ratings
This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).

32,103 Listeners

8,468 Listeners

5,081 Listeners

3,485 Listeners

1,005 Listeners

378 Listeners

1,116 Listeners

3,565 Listeners

246 Listeners

2,525 Listeners

1,484 Listeners

5,758 Listeners

729 Listeners

381 Listeners

737 Listeners