
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).
4.4
230230 ratings
This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).
5,061 Listeners
1,110 Listeners
8,487 Listeners
362 Listeners
32,094 Listeners
1,012 Listeners
247 Listeners
3,469 Listeners
3,564 Listeners
2,526 Listeners
1,485 Listeners
5,669 Listeners
722 Listeners
372 Listeners
666 Listeners