
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).
By The Citizens Guide to the Supreme Court4.4
230230 ratings
This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).

8,465 Listeners

4,011 Listeners

5,138 Listeners

3,545 Listeners

2,059 Listeners

671 Listeners

6,300 Listeners

4,669 Listeners

87,968 Listeners

25,142 Listeners

2,411 Listeners

5,868 Listeners

6,125 Listeners

10,519 Listeners

38 Listeners