
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).
4.4
229229 ratings
This week's episode covers two criminal cases with bickering concurrences. Rahimi v. U.S., holding that the Second Amendment does not invalidate a law disarming someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order, shows that a lot can happen in two summers, while Smith v. Arizona, holding that an expert witness cannot testify about a report the expert did not prepare, shows that twenty years is still not enough time to decide what testimonial means. Law starts at (02:22).
5,020 Listeners
9,115 Listeners
1,096 Listeners
32,037 Listeners
3,458 Listeners
1,943 Listeners
680 Listeners
55,866 Listeners
6,741 Listeners
5,523 Listeners
6,443 Listeners
3,753 Listeners
15,294 Listeners
360 Listeners
663 Listeners