
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In 1876, North Carolina added a felony disenfranchisement provision to its state constitution with the express purpose of disenfranchising Black voters. The provision remains in place today and is being challenged in Community Success Initiative v. Moore. The outcome of the case is currently pending before the North Carolina Supreme Court and will determine if individuals on probation, parole or post-release supervision — over 56,000 North Carolinians — have the right to vote. We’re joined by Forward Justice Co-Director, and attorney in the case, Daryl Atkinson to discuss what’s at stake in this crucial lawsuit.
Support Forward Justice’s work here.
Make sure you’re following us on all platforms:
Related links:
4.9
527527 ratings
In 1876, North Carolina added a felony disenfranchisement provision to its state constitution with the express purpose of disenfranchising Black voters. The provision remains in place today and is being challenged in Community Success Initiative v. Moore. The outcome of the case is currently pending before the North Carolina Supreme Court and will determine if individuals on probation, parole or post-release supervision — over 56,000 North Carolinians — have the right to vote. We’re joined by Forward Justice Co-Director, and attorney in the case, Daryl Atkinson to discuss what’s at stake in this crucial lawsuit.
Support Forward Justice’s work here.
Make sure you’re following us on all platforms:
Related links:
7,569 Listeners
3,441 Listeners
11,866 Listeners
4,591 Listeners
5,312 Listeners
2,904 Listeners
1,857 Listeners
10,430 Listeners
8,963 Listeners
5,586 Listeners
4,250 Listeners
2,228 Listeners
4,078 Listeners
7,037 Listeners
3,453 Listeners