
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In 1876, North Carolina added a felony disenfranchisement provision to its state constitution with the express purpose of disenfranchising Black voters. The provision remains in place today and is being challenged in Community Success Initiative v. Moore. The outcome of the case is currently pending before the North Carolina Supreme Court and will determine if individuals on probation, parole or post-release supervision — over 56,000 North Carolinians — have the right to vote. We’re joined by Forward Justice Co-Director, and attorney in the case, Daryl Atkinson to discuss what’s at stake in this crucial lawsuit.
Support Forward Justice’s work here.
Make sure you’re following us on all platforms:
Related links:
4.9
499499 ratings
In 1876, North Carolina added a felony disenfranchisement provision to its state constitution with the express purpose of disenfranchising Black voters. The provision remains in place today and is being challenged in Community Success Initiative v. Moore. The outcome of the case is currently pending before the North Carolina Supreme Court and will determine if individuals on probation, parole or post-release supervision — over 56,000 North Carolinians — have the right to vote. We’re joined by Forward Justice Co-Director, and attorney in the case, Daryl Atkinson to discuss what’s at stake in this crucial lawsuit.
Support Forward Justice’s work here.
Make sure you’re following us on all platforms:
Related links:
7,551 Listeners
4,559 Listeners
5,033 Listeners
312 Listeners
1,828 Listeners
10,301 Listeners
8,909 Listeners
5,010 Listeners
4,065 Listeners
2,132 Listeners
4,032 Listeners
7,079 Listeners
3,386 Listeners
315 Listeners
603 Listeners