
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In 1876, North Carolina added a felony disenfranchisement provision to its state constitution with the express purpose of disenfranchising Black voters. The provision remains in place today and is being challenged in Community Success Initiative v. Moore. The outcome of the case is currently pending before the North Carolina Supreme Court and will determine if individuals on probation, parole or post-release supervision — over 56,000 North Carolinians — have the right to vote. We’re joined by Forward Justice Co-Director, and attorney in the case, Daryl Atkinson to discuss what’s at stake in this crucial lawsuit.
Support Forward Justice’s work here.
Make sure you’re following us on all platforms:
Related links:
4.9
527527 ratings
In 1876, North Carolina added a felony disenfranchisement provision to its state constitution with the express purpose of disenfranchising Black voters. The provision remains in place today and is being challenged in Community Success Initiative v. Moore. The outcome of the case is currently pending before the North Carolina Supreme Court and will determine if individuals on probation, parole or post-release supervision — over 56,000 North Carolinians — have the right to vote. We’re joined by Forward Justice Co-Director, and attorney in the case, Daryl Atkinson to discuss what’s at stake in this crucial lawsuit.
Support Forward Justice’s work here.
Make sure you’re following us on all platforms:
Related links:
7,533 Listeners
3,593 Listeners
11,615 Listeners
4,582 Listeners
5,156 Listeners
2,920 Listeners
1,850 Listeners
10,321 Listeners
8,950 Listeners
5,488 Listeners
4,233 Listeners
2,156 Listeners
4,075 Listeners
7,072 Listeners
3,410 Listeners