
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In 1876, North Carolina added a felony disenfranchisement provision to its state constitution with the express purpose of disenfranchising Black voters. The provision remains in place today and is being challenged in Community Success Initiative v. Moore. The outcome of the case is currently pending before the North Carolina Supreme Court and will determine if individuals on probation, parole or post-release supervision — over 56,000 North Carolinians — have the right to vote. We’re joined by Forward Justice Co-Director, and attorney in the case, Daryl Atkinson to discuss what’s at stake in this crucial lawsuit.
Support Forward Justice’s work here.
Make sure you’re following us on all platforms:
Related links:
By Democracy Docket4.9
549549 ratings
In 1876, North Carolina added a felony disenfranchisement provision to its state constitution with the express purpose of disenfranchising Black voters. The provision remains in place today and is being challenged in Community Success Initiative v. Moore. The outcome of the case is currently pending before the North Carolina Supreme Court and will determine if individuals on probation, parole or post-release supervision — over 56,000 North Carolinians — have the right to vote. We’re joined by Forward Justice Co-Director, and attorney in the case, Daryl Atkinson to discuss what’s at stake in this crucial lawsuit.
Support Forward Justice’s work here.
Make sure you’re following us on all platforms:
Related links:

36,983 Listeners

7,637 Listeners

12,261 Listeners

4,585 Listeners

5,389 Listeners

48,538 Listeners

7,439 Listeners

208 Listeners

10,455 Listeners

9,199 Listeners

5,699 Listeners

2,275 Listeners

4,064 Listeners

7,062 Listeners

3,506 Listeners