Is screening tourists’ social media legitimate security — or blatant authoritarianism?

In this timely episode, host Niall sits down with American-born social commentator Karl Deeter to unpack the Trump administration’s controversial new proposal to make foreign tourists hand over up to five years of social media history before they can enter the United States. The idea, part of expanded immigration screening, would apply even to visitors from countries that currently travel visa-free — including those using the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA).

ABC

Supporters argue this sweeping vetting is a sovereign right — that the U.S. must do whatever it takes to protect national security and public safety. Critics, though, warn it smacks of authoritarian surveillance, chilling free speech by judging travellers on their online views or political expressions.

South China Morning Post

Niall and Karl dig into the implications for travellers, privacy, free expression, and global perceptions of American openness. Expect sharp analysis on questions like:

What exactly would tourists be required to disclose?

ABC

Could this chill legitimate criticism of U.S. policy or culture abroad?

mint

Is this really about security, or is it a political tool?

With Niall’s cynical edge leading the conversation, the episode asks listeners to confront the heart of the issue:

👉 “To visit the U.S., are you willing to bare your social media history — even if some posts might offend American sensibilities?”

A provocative, globally relevant discussion on freedom, travel, and how far governments should go in policing online life before you even board a plane