
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
Today Lt Col Allen Abrams joins to discuss the case of United States v. Shafran. The issue in the case is an Article 134 specification that failed to include words of criminality, such as "wrongfully" or "unlawfully." The case provides an excellent vehicle for Allen to provide defenders with considerations and options for attacking defective specifications. We then hear from the Free Speech Dynamic Duo - Trevor Ward and Sam Castanien who apply the current state of Free Speech law in military justice to the enumerated Article 134 offense of Sexual Harassment.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us a text
Today Lt Col Allen Abrams joins to discuss the case of United States v. Shafran. The issue in the case is an Article 134 specification that failed to include words of criminality, such as "wrongfully" or "unlawfully." The case provides an excellent vehicle for Allen to provide defenders with considerations and options for attacking defective specifications. We then hear from the Free Speech Dynamic Duo - Trevor Ward and Sam Castanien who apply the current state of Free Speech law in military justice to the enumerated Article 134 offense of Sexual Harassment.

91,032 Listeners

43,951 Listeners

229,264 Listeners

38,779 Listeners

26,222 Listeners

154,120 Listeners

1,085 Listeners

1,948 Listeners

112,934 Listeners

56,552 Listeners

16,096 Listeners

26,639 Listeners

45 Listeners

21 Listeners

621 Listeners