The Court held that in civil forfeiture cases involving personal property, the Due Process Clause requires a timely forfeiture hearing but does not require a separate preliminary hearing.

This case, and more, at https://9robes.ai

The Court held that the Copyright Act entitles a copyright owner to obtain monetary relief for any timely infringement claim, no matter when the infringement occurred. The Act's statute of limitations establishes a three-year period for filing suit, which begins when a claim accrues, but does not impose a separate three-year limit on recovering damages.

Find this case and more at https://9robes.ai

The Court held that an employee challenging a job transfer under Title VII must show that the transfer brought about some harm with respect to an identifiable term or condition of employment, but that harm need not be significant. The Court rejected the lower courts' requirement that the employee show a "materially significant disadvantage" from the transfer.

This case and many more at https://9robes.ai

The Court held that servicemembers who accrue educational benefits under both the Montgomery and Post-9/11 GI Bills through separate periods of service may use either one, in any order, up to the 48-month aggregate benefits cap. The Court rejected the government's argument that Rudisill was limited to only the unused portion of his Montgomery GI Bill benefits when he elected to switch to Post-9/11 benefits.

More supreme court opinions at https://9robes.ai

The Supreme Court vacated and remanded the Fifth Circuit's decision, holding that the property owners should be permitted to pursue their Takings Clause claims through the cause of action available under Texas state law, rather than directly under the Fifth Amendment.

Hear this and other cases at https://9robes.ai

The Court held that pure omissions are not actionable under SEC Rule 10b-5(b). The failure to disclose information required by Item 303 can support a Rule 10b-5(b) claim only if the omission renders affirmative statements made misleading.

Read more cases at https://9robes.ai

The Court held that the Takings Clause does not distinguish between legislative and administrative land-use permit conditions. The Court vacated the judgment of the California Court of Appeal and remanded the case for further proceedings.

More SCOTUS cases at https://9robes.ai

The Supreme Court ruled that a transportation worker does not need to work in the transportation industry to be exempt from coverage under Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act. The Court vacated the Second Circuit's decision and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Read the case summaries at https://9robes.ai

The Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit's ruling that the government failed to demonstrate the case was moot after removing Yonas Fikre from the No Fly List. The Court held that the government's declaration that Fikre would not be placed on the list again based on current information was insufficient to show the challenged conduct could not reasonably be expected to recur.

Hear and read more opinions at https://9robes.ai

The Supreme Court vacated the judgment of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion in Lindke v. Freed. The Court found that the Ninth Circuit's approach to determining state action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 differed from the approach elaborated in Lindke v. Freed.