
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


After reviewing the proposal’s statutory basis, coverage, and operative requirements, Mr. Court explains the basis for BPI’s position that the proposal is inconsistent with how banking is regularly conducted and will undermine rather than promote safety and soundness, provides examples of how the proposal would impose unworkable requirements, and discusses BPI’s Freedom of Information Act request to the OCC for data supporting its assertions about banks in the proposal.
By Ballard Spahr LLP4.9
4545 ratings
After reviewing the proposal’s statutory basis, coverage, and operative requirements, Mr. Court explains the basis for BPI’s position that the proposal is inconsistent with how banking is regularly conducted and will undermine rather than promote safety and soundness, provides examples of how the proposal would impose unworkable requirements, and discusses BPI’s Freedom of Information Act request to the OCC for data supporting its assertions about banks in the proposal.

32,156 Listeners

30,650 Listeners

25,874 Listeners

8,755 Listeners

9,177 Listeners

8,474 Listeners

372 Listeners

6,295 Listeners

112,617 Listeners

1,450 Listeners

10,236 Listeners

16,241 Listeners

16,056 Listeners

10 Listeners

13 Listeners