Hello, I’m Paul Franks and I’ve written a conspiracy-thriller called ‘A Dive Into Darkness’, based upon my four years researching HIV/AIDS. In this original podcast series, I’ll tell you everything you need to know about the story behind the story, the four-year research and writing process from inspiration to publication, and all points in between.
In Episode Twenty-One, I examined a paper published in 1974 that contained great detail confirming that CMV had the means to be the cause of AIDS. I have already explained in previous episodes that CMV also had the opportunity to be the cause of AIDS as 90%+ of sexually active gay males were infected with the virus, which is a member of the herpes family of viruses and consequently never expelled from the body.
In Episode Twenty-Two ‘1970 Transplant AIDS - Part Two’, I will examine the second of three papers published in the 1970s, which prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that AIDS was no mystery and no ‘out of the blue’ occurrence.
Like Paper One, Paper Two, ‘Cytomegalovirus: Clinical Virological Correlations in Renal Transplant Recipients’ was also published in 1974. The author states in the abstract that: ‘One-hundred thirty-two renal transplant recipients were systematically screened for viral infections, one-hundred ten patients showed evidence of infection with herpesviruses, and 89 patients showed laboratory evidence of infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV), uncomplicated by bacterial infections or technical complications.
Six of the 89 patients with CMV infections died within a month of viral isolation. Two paradoxical responses to CMV infections are seen in transplant patients: In the relatively immunocompetent patient, the infection is associated with a prompt antibody response to the virus, and recovery. The severely immunosuppressed patient cannot make an antibody response, may be further immunosuppressed by the viral infection, and is susceptible to sequential opportunistic infections leading to death.’
So, exactly the same as in Paper One, severely immunosuppressed patients, further immunosuppressed by the viral infection, are susceptible to sequential opportunistic infections leading to death. Exactly the same as AIDS patients in the early 1980s. The abstract cleared up one mystery. Why did the first UK ‘AIDS’ patient test negative for CMV antibodies when the autopsy revealed extensive evidence of CMV infection? The author tells us that the severely ill patient is unable to make an antibody response. This tells us that autopsy evidence is the gold standard, a subject I will return to in a later episode.
The paper is 10 pages long and far too detailed to describe in full here but what is incredibly important is the section when the author describes ‘the course of a typical lethal CMV infection’. (Don’t forget the CDC’s Don Francis said that CMV could not be the cause of AIDS as it had never killed anybody.) Notice how the symptoms mirror those of the AIDS patients mentioned in ‘And The Band Played On’ and the San Francisco AIDS documentary I referenced in the previous episode.
‘This lethal viral infection characteristically begins with spiking fever associated with mild generalized malaise. Lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia are present.
In the second week of the syndrome, new symptoms such as anorexia, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and abdominal pains appear. During this period, severe muscle wasting, peripheral edema, and lethargy are characteristic. Characteristically, it is during this period that the majority of the patients (75%) presents evidence of CMV infection in cultures of sputum, urine, bone marrow and kidney biopsy; bacterial cultures negative until the third week now become positive for members of the intestinal flora.’
The reference to bone marrow CMV infection is hugely significant – bone marrow is where the immune system’s vital T-cells are produced.
‘In the terminal phase, lasting usually 5-8 days, there is further progression of the symptomatology. The patient is now semi comatose, with rapid progression to deep coma. High fever, arterial hypotention, labored respiration, disproportionately increased heart rate, emaciation, are present. The severe leukopenia, low white blood cell count, still associated with lymphopenia, contributes to the terminal bacterial and fungal invasion. Irreversible pulmonary fluid retention represents the terminal event.
At autopsy, severe malnutrition, edema, petichiae and loss of subcutaneous fat are always present. Pneumonitis and pulmonary fluid retention are universally present, along with CMV inclusion bodies in the lungs.
In the ‘Discussion’ section, the author tells us that ‘CMV infections occur in 70-90% of renal transplant patients. The difference in immunologic responsiveness between patients who recover and those who die when infected with CMV is in harmony with findings that CMV itself is a profoundly immunosuppressive virus. The already immunosuppressed patient appears to be even more profoundly depressed by CMV infections. Such patients appear susceptible to superinfection with gram negative bacteria and other opportunistic organisms which sequentially infect and ultimately kill the patient.
At autopsy a "mixed" infection is frequently found but evidence of organisms other than CMV is usually lacking until the preterminal phase of illness when blood and sputum cultures finally became positive for bacteria.’ The author reiterates that ‘the immuno-incompetent patient may be further immunosuppressed by the virus and develop sequential opportunistic infections and die.’
What can one say except that if members of the CDC’s Task Force had read this paper and Paper One in 1981, there surely would have been no mystery about the early AIDS cases. All these men were immunodeficient, all had CMV infections and all followed similar paths to those trod by the ‘Transplant AIDS’ patients in the 1970s. The KS suffered in addition by early gay male AIDS patients in the 1980s was a result of the excessive use of Poppers at that time by a subset of male homosexuals, the highly sexually active, ‘fast lane’, gay males.
When I contacted the author to ask him if he ever connected his work with the AIDS epidemic, he replied that he knew nothing about AIDS, which tells you something of the compartmentalization afflicting medical science then, and probably now.
Thank you for listening to Episode Twenty-Two of ‘A Dive Into Darkness’. I hope you enjoyed it. If you did, please tell your friends about it. In Episode Twenty-Three of ‘A Dive Into Darkness’, I will conclude my examination of ‘Transplant AIDS’ cases from the 1970s.
Till the next time, goodbye and happy reading.
‘A Dive Into Darkness’ is available both as an ebook and paperback, with Barnes & Noble and Amazon.
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/a-dive-into-darkness-paul-franks/1145527746?ean=9781917129855
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Dive-Into-Darkness-Paul-Franks-ebook/dp/B0D32DP97S
https://www.penroseinquiry.org.uk/finalreport/pdf/LIT0010399.PDF First UK AIDS patient paper.
‘Solved: The 40-year mystery of the first man to die of AIDS in Britain | ITV News’ (the homosexual Paul Brand ignores the CMV aspect of the death, as he has ignored all my correspondence, but he talks about HIV testing and also interviews the charlatan Jonathan Weber)
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1344157/pdf/annsurg00296-0257.pdf ‘Cytomegalovirus: Clinical Virological Correlations in Renal Transplant Recipients’
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit cascades.substack.com