In this episode of AI Ethics with Fexingo, Lucas and Luna explore the growing use of AI risk assessment tools in courtroom sentencing. They focus on the case of Paul Zilly, a man whose sentence was influenced by an algorithm's recidivism score, and the controversy surrounding COMPAS, the tool developed by Northpointe. The conversation unpacks how these algorithms learn bias from historical crime data, the impossibility of perfect fairness when the data itself is biased, and the profound implications of delegating moral judgment to a black box. The hosts discuss the need for transparency, the dangers of over-reliance on algorithmic predictions, and the human cost of automation in the justice system. This is essential listening for anyone concerned about the intersection of technology and civil liberties.