Air Quality Matters

This week, we sit down with Lisa Greenfield, Regional Programme Manager for the Midwest at the Centre for Green Schools at the US Green Building Council, to explore a question that fundamentally challenges how we think about educational environments: What if the single biggest barrier to transforming school air quality isn't our lack of scientific knowledge or technology—but our complete failure to recognise that schools need practical roadmaps, peer networks, and trusted voices who've walked the path before to turn good intentions into real world action?

Coming from a family of educators and having spent almost 20 years in the classroom herself, Lisa brings a deeply personal perspective to this work. After developing allergic asthma from mold exposure in her own classroom, and later experiencing long COVID that kept her out of teaching for three months, she left the profession to make a bigger impact. Now she's building the infrastructure to help hundreds of school districts across the United States navigate the complex journey toward healthier indoor environments.

Key Topics Discussed:

• The Fellowship Network: The Centre for Green Schools is launching its largest cohort yet, bringing on 53 fellows from public school districts across the country. These aren't consultants or outside experts. They're facilities managers, finance directors, operations staff, and district leaders who will learn together, implement the Energy Efficiency Indoor Air Quality Toolkit, and become mentors for the next wave. The goal is simple. Build a peer network where schools that have already navigated this journey can guide those just starting out. Because nobody wants to reinvent the wheel. They just need someone to hold their hand and show them what good looks like.
• The Stakeholder Ecosystem: Improving school air quality requires buy in from decision makers like superintendents and school boards, implementers like facilities managers, the teachers and staff who work in those buildings every day, the students who spend up to 10 hours breathing that air, and the parents who can become powerful advocates. Each group sees the problem through a different lens. But when you frame it properly, fiscal savings from reduced absenteeism, lower health insurance premiums, improved test scores, better teacher retention, the case becomes compelling across every stakeholder group.
• Schools as Workplaces: We often talk about children in schools, but teachers spend entire careers in these buildings. One in 13 students has asthma. But teachers are the ones who may develop COPD, allergic asthma, or long term respiratory illness from decades of exposure. Lisa's story is not uncommon. Too many educators have gotten sick from mold, poor ventilation, or chronic pathogen exposure. These are workplaces. Employers have a responsibility to provide safe environments. Yet air quality is rarely treated with the same urgency as fire safety, water quality, or food standards.
• The Funding Reality: American schools face a $90 billion annual funding gap. They are the second largest infrastructure in the nation after roads and highways. Most school funding comes from local real estate taxes, which creates massive inequity. Title I schools, rural districts, and tribal schools often lack the resources for preventative maintenance, let alone major HVAC upgrades. But here's the thing. You don't need to overhaul an entire system on day one. Start with ventilation and filtration. Measure what's happening. Make small changes. Be transparent. Show progress. The roadmap exists. The toolkit is free. The support network is being built. Funding often follows when expectations are set and schools demonstrate genuine effort.

GUEST:

Lisa Greenfield

Regional Programme Manager, Centre for Green Schools, US Green Building Council

https://centerforgreenschools.org/

The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with

Mann + Hummel https://www.mann-hummel.com/en.html

Particles Plus https://particlesplus.com/

Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) - Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) - Lindab (https://www.lindab.ie/) - S&P UK (https://www.solerpalau.com/en-uk/)

The One Take Podcast in Partnership with

SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) - Inbiot (https://www.inbiot.es/?utm_campaign=simon&utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast) - Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) - iE Electronics (https://www.eielectronics.ie/) and iAir Group (https://iair-group.com/)

Zehnder https://www.zehndergroup.com/en

Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. (https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast)

If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here (https://www.youtube.com/@airqualitymatters-SimonJones). Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

This week, we sit down with David Gottfried, co-founder of the US Green Building Council and founder of the World Green Building Council, a movement now spanning 85 countries that has ignited a trillion-dollar green building economy.

What if the single biggest barrier to transforming the built environment isn't our lack of scientific knowledge or technology—but our complete failure to recognise that green building, while extraordinarily successful, is still just putting solar panels on the Titanic unless we fundamentally rewire how civilisation values life itself? Key Topics Discussed: • The Unlikely Origins of a Movement: It's easy now with hindsight to forget just how unlikely the green building effort was back then.

The idea that buildings could be designed, constructed and operated in ways that meaningfully reduced environmental impact was not a given. David walked into rooms as an early green building consultant and faced the same three developer questions every time. Will it slow my project down? Will it cost more? Will it even work?

The movement spent years fighting that perception, proving that green buildings could be more profitable, lower risk, and deliver better performance.

• From Green to Regenerative: Green building has become a multi-trillion dollar global movement. We have rating systems in 181 countries. We've saved monstrous amounts of energy. But the slope of climate change is still steep. CO2 is at 430 ppm when scientists say don't go past 350. Global population is 8.2 billion headed to 10.

A billion people still have no electricity, no fresh water. Countries are dropping bombs. AI is consuming electricity at an exponential rate. Green building is flattening the curve, but it's not reversing it. We need to move beyond sustainability, which is neutral, and embrace regeneration. If you're 500 pounds overweight and you change your diet to be neutral, you're going to be 500 pounds till you die. We need to lose weight. We need to regenerate.

• The Architecture of Love and the Codes for Life: David's new book, Regen360, synthesises decades of experience, 200 conversations with AI, 2,600 pages of transcripts, and a lifetime of reflection into 15 fundamental codes for regenerative civilisation. Each code is distilled into a simple equation. If it destroys life, then it is false. Truth equals oxygen. Love equals regeneration. Wealth equals health on planet Earth. These aren't abstract philosophies. They're operational frameworks for rewiring capitalism, governance, technology and human behaviour. The book is David's last lecture, his modern elder contribution, interwoven with personal stories, memoir, and a call to action for the next generation.

• The Role of AI and the Next Generation: David used AI, specifically ChatGPT and Claude, as thought partners to synthesise his ideas, challenge his assumptions, and structure the book. AI can be the differentiator of governance, helping us move from the hot amygdala survival wiring to the smart prefrontal cortex. But AI also consumes electricity and CO2. The tool is phenomenal, but it creates externalities. The book is written for everyone, but especially for college students, the next generation who will inherit this mess. David is teaching sustainable finance at Stanford next spring, but he'll be talking to the soul in the student. He's sorry for the world his generation is handing over, but he's here to help, with tools, maps, compasses, and Regen Circles to create base camps for the change agents climbing the mountain of Earth.

GUEST: David Gottfried https://regen360.net/

Author, Regen360: An Operating System for Regenerative Earth

The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with

MANN +HUMMEL https://www.mann-hummel.com/en.html

Particles Plus https://particlesplus.com/

Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) - Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) - Lindab (https://www.lindab.ie/) - S&P UK (https://www.solerpalau.com/en-uk/)

The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) - Inbiot (https://www.inbiot.es/?utm_campaign=simon&utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast) - Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) - iE Electronics (https://www.eielectronics.ie/) and iAir Group (https://iair-group.com/) Zehnder https://www.zehndergroup.com/en Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website.

This week, we dive into a fascinating study published in Railway Engineering Science titled Study on Air Quality Improvements in Train Compartments by Coordinating Exhaust of Multiple Air Outlets, to explore a question that fundamentally challenges how we think about ventilation in mass transit: What if the single biggest barrier to protecting passengers on high speed trains isn't our lack of technology—but our complete failure to recognise that static, one size fits all ventilation systems can never deliver both thermal comfort and effective infection control across changing seasons?

Key Topics Discussed:

• The Physics of Human Thermal Plumes: Most modern trains pump fresh conditioned air in from vents in the ceiling. But where does that stale air go? Usually it's exhausted through vents down near the floor. This study used CFD modelling to look at what happens if we rethink that. What if we coordinate exhaust at both the top and the bottom of the carriage? Human bodies create thermal plumes. We are basically 100-watt heaters and warm air naturally rises off us, carrying our exhaled breath upwards. In the summer, when the air conditioning is trying to cool the cabin, if you exhaust the air entirely from the top of the carriage, like near the luggage racks, you are working with that natural thermal plume. The hot, polluted air rises off the passengers and gets sucked right out of the top vents. The study found this significantly improves the cooling efficacy and efficiency. You aren't forcing hot air down past passengers to reach the floor vents. It also clears out pollutants near the passengers' breathing zones much faster.
• The Winter Problem: In the winter, the scenario flips. You're trying to heat the cabin. If you pull all the air out from the top vents, you are just sucking all that nice buoyant warm air straight out of the roof before it reaches the passengers, leaving their feet freezing. It creates massive temperature stratification and makes people incredibly uncomfortable. The study found that in winter, a 50 50 split using both the top and the bottom exhaust provides the best balance. The bottom exhaust pulls the warm air down to feet level, maintaining thermal comfort, while the top exhaust still helps capture the rising respiratory pollutants.
• The End of Static Ventilation Design: This proves that static one size fits all vent designs is dead. You cannot have a ventilation system that operates the exact same way in January as it does in July and expect optimal results for both comfort and importantly infection control. We need dynamic systems. If you want to truly manage the risk of airborne transmission in mass transit, while simultaneously hitting our net zero energy efficiency targets, train manufacturers and frankly designers of any large, densely occupied space, need to implement variable exhaust systems that adapt to the season, the thermal load and the occupancy.
• The Future of Mass Transit Ventilation: It's a brilliant example of how nuanced, targeted and responsive our ventilation strategies need to become to protect public health in the built environment, especially technical ones like trains. You can imagine the exact same thinking being applied to buses, to aeroplanes and so on. This is the frontier of mass transit air quality management.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40534-025-00398-0

The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with

Particles Plus https://particlesplus.com/

Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) - Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) - Lindab (https://www.lindab.ie/) - S&P UK (https://www.solerpalau.com/en-uk/)

The One Take Podcast in Partnership with

SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) - Inbiot (https://www.inbiot.es/?utm_campaign=simon&utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast) - Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) - iE Electronics (https://www.eielectronics.ie/) and iAir Group (https://iair-group.com/)

Zehnder https://www.zehndergroup.com/en

Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. (https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast)

If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here (https://www.youtube.com/@airqualitymatters-SimonJones). Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

This week, I step back from the interviews to share a personal reflection on a question that has been nagging at me for some time, sparked by recent encounters with dubious manufacturer claims, the fallout from a prominent Cambridge professor scandal, and my own complicity in wielding peer review as a weapon against innovation: What if the single biggest barrier to progress in air quality and the built environment isn't a lack of good ideas or new technology—but our complete failure to recognise that the gold standard we use to validate truth, peer review itself, is fundamentally broken and built on sand?

Key Topics Discussed:

• The Ideal Versus the Reality: In theory, peer review is the guardian of rigorous science. Experts with time and resources deeply interrogate methodology, check references, and provide robust feedback. Papers that genuinely move the field forward are accepted. But the mechanical reality of 2026 is very different. Manuscript submissions have exponentially outpaced the pool of available reviewers. Academics are trapped in a publish or perish hamster wheel. Peer review is unpaid, unrecognised, and unrewarded. Studies suggest just 10% of reviewers handle almost 50% of the global peer review workload. When you have a small pool of incredibly time poor reviewers who are fundamentally overwhelmed, corners get cut.
• The Business Model Problem: Over the last decade, there has been a massive shift towards open access and article processing charges. Publishers now make money based on volume, not subscription exclusivity. When authors or institutions pay upwards of two to four thousand pounds to publish a single paper, the publisher is financially incentivised to publish more, not publish better. This environment has given rise to paper mills, highly sophisticated profit driven organisations that manufacture fake or desperately low quality research and sell authorships to desperate academics who need to meet publication quotas.
• The AI Closed Loop: Paper mills are using generative AI at industrial scale to produce convincing fake papers that slip past exhausted human reviewers. In response to burnout, an increasing number of time poor scholars are using AI to read papers and write their peer reviews. We are rapidly approaching a closed loop where an AI writes a substandard paper to meet a human's academic quota, submits it to a profit driven journal, and another AI reviews and accepts it on behalf of a burned out human reviewer. The fundamental human element, the actual peer in peer review, is being automated out of existence.
• The Consequences for Our Field: In air quality, health and the built environment, bad data passing as peer reviewed science or misleading claims backed up by pseudoscientific marketing has real world consequences. It leads to bad public policy, misallocation of millions of pounds of funding, inadequate ventilation standards, poor building performance and ultimately public harm. We cannot afford a foundation built on sand. We need to rethink the metrics of academic success, recognise peer review as core scholarly labour that needs compensation, and create alternative pathways for validating independent innovation. If we know the traditional peer review monopoly is struggling, we cannot lazily dismiss independent lab data simply because it doesn't carry a specific journal's logo.

The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with

Particles Plus https://particlesplus.com/

Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) - Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) - Lindab (https://www.lindab.ie/) - S&P UK (https://www.solerpalau.com/en-uk/)

The One Take Podcast in Partnership with

SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) - Inbiot (https://www.inbiot.es/?utm_campaign=simon&utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast) - Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) - iE Electronics (https://www.eielectronics.ie/) and iAir Group (https://iair-group.com/)

Zehnder https://www.zehndergroup.com/en

Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. (https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast)

If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here (https://www.youtube.com/@airqualitymatters-SimonJones). Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

This week, we dive into a comprehensive review published in the Science of the Total Environment titled Integration of Air Quality Monitoring Systems with Hybrid Electric Vehicles for Emissions Control in Smart Cities, to explore a question that fundamentally challenges how we think about urban air pollution: What if the single biggest opportunity to tackle air quality in our cities isn't just making vehicles cleaner—but transforming them into intelligent, mobile monitoring networks that actively adapt their behavior based on real-time pollution data

Key Topics Discussed:

• Adaptive Green Zones: Currently, hybrid cars are incredibly smart internally. They switch between internal combustion engine and battery based on efficiency, charge levels, and acceleration. But they are completely blind to environmental conditions outside the windshield. Imagine integrating a miniaturised air quality monitoring system into the car using IoT sensors and vehicle to everything communication. If a smart vehicle drives into a heavily polluted urban zone, say outside a school at drop off time or a congested city centre, the onboard AI reads the local air quality data and automatically forces the car to switch entirely to battery power. It shuts off the combustion engine. It stops contributing to the local pollution hotspot instantly.
• AI Driven Eco Routing: By linking up with smart city infrastructure and using machine learning, these vehicles can use AI driven eco routing. Your GPS wouldn't just find the faster route. It could find a route that minimises your exposure to highly polluted areas, spreading the traffic load and protecting the occupants inside the cabin. It turns the vehicle from a passive polluter into an active dynamic participant in urban air quality management.
• The Technical Hurdles: It's not as simple as strapping a sensor to a bumper. We need incredibly robust, low cost sensors that don't lose their calibration every time a car goes over a pothole or experiences a shift in humidity. There's a massive communication challenge. Do we use 5G or DSRC? The latency has to be milliseconds for cars to communicate effectively. And then there's data privacy. Tracking a car's location, speed, and the air it's driven through raises questions. We need standardised, highly secure cryptographic protocols so that data can be shared with city infrastructure without compromising driver privacy.
• The Future of Urban Air Quality Management: This is the frontier. The future of clean air isn't just about sticking static expensive reference sensors on a few lampposts around the city. It's about leveraging the millions of vehicles already on the road, turning them into dynamic moving networks of data that physically alter how our cities operate in real time. It's a huge technical challenge, but the payoff for urban health could be transformative.

A comprehensive review on the integration of air quality monitoring systems with hybrid electric vehicles for emission control in smart cities

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180022

The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with

Particles Plus https://particlesplus.com/

Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) - Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) - Lindab (https://www.lindab.ie/) - S&P UK (https://www.solerpalau.com/en-uk/)

The One Take Podcast in Partnership with

SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) - Inbiot (https://www.inbiot.es/?utm_campaign=simon&utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast) - Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) - iE Electronics (https://www.eielectronics.ie/) and iAir Group (https://iair-group.com/)

Zehnder https://www.zehndergroup.com/en

Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. (https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast)

If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here (https://www.youtube.com/@airqualitymatters-SimonJones). Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

This week, we dive into a modelling study published in Environmental Science, Processes and Impacts titled Long-Term Prediction of Climate Change Impacts on Indoor Particulate Pollution, a case study of residential buildings, to explore a question that fundamentally challenges how we think about natural ventilation and climate adaptation: What if the single biggest barrier to maintaining healthy indoor air quality in the coming decades isn't just outdoor pollution—but our complete failure to recognise that rising temperatures are transforming our homes into chemical reactors that generate dangerous ultrafine particles right where we breathe?

Key Topics Discussed:

• The Chemistry Problem: Initially, there is some good news. Because of tightening air pollution legislation globally, the baseline outdoor particulate matter, things like PM2.5 and PM10 from traffic and industry, is actually projected to decrease in Europe over the next century. But the chemistry of our indoor spaces is changing. As outdoor temperatures rise, outdoor ozone levels also rise. And as our homes get warmer, the emission rate of volatile organic compounds or VOCs from indoor furnishings increase. When ozone and limonene meet in your living room, they react, and they produce something called secondary organic aerosols, or SOAs, including particulate matter and things like formaldehyde. So while the overall mass of large particles coming in from traffic might drop, the chemistry happening right inside our homes is going to create a whole new soup of ultrafine particles.
• Extreme Weather Events: The study didn't just look at average days. It looked at extreme weather events, which we know are becoming more normal. They simulate a Saharan dust storm and an extreme heat wave accompanied by an ozone episode. During the simulated heat wave, they looked at typical human behaviour. We keep the windows closed during the day, and in the evening when it cools down, we throw the windows wide open to purge the heat. But during an ozone episode, when you open those windows in the evening, you are absolutely flooding your home with ozone. The simulation showed indoor ozone levels spiking dramatically, which then reacts with limonene to create massive spikes in secondary organic aerosols.
• The End of Natural Ventilation as We Know It: This fundamentally challenges our reliance on natural ventilation in the face of climate change. If opening a window to cool down means inviting in extreme heat, extreme ozone or a massive spike in particulate matter from a dust storm, we simply can't rely on that primary strategy anymore. The paper makes an incredibly compelling case that proper strategies of high efficiency filtration, decent ventilation systems and potentially even scrubbers for gases is going to transition from being a luxury in high end office buildings to perhaps an absolute public health necessity in even our residential homes. Our building envelopes may have to act as an environmental shield against increasingly hostile outdoor atmospheres.

Long-term prediction of climate change impacts on indoor particle pollution– case study of

a residential building in Germany

https://doi.org/10.1039/d4em00663a

The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with

Particles Plus https://particlesplus.com/

Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) - Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) - Lindab (https://www.lindab.ie/) - S&P UK (https://www.solerpalau.com/en-uk/)

The One Take Podcast in Partnership with

SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) - Inbiot (https://www.inbiot.es/?utm_campaign=simon&utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast) - Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) - iE Electronics (https://www.eielectronics.ie/) and iAir Group (https://iair-group.com/)

Zehnder https://www.zehndergroup.com/en

Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. (https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast)

If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here (https://www.youtube.com/@airqualitymatters-SimonJones). Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

This week, I step back from the interviews to share a personal reflection on the conversations, themes and patterns that have emerged over the last few weeks, both on this podcast and in the halls and sessions of Indoor Air 2026 in Singapore. What if the single biggest barrier to transforming the built environment isn't our lack of scientific knowledge or technology—but our complete failure to recognise the deeply interconnected systemic, linguistic, economic and human forces that keep us locked in the same destructive cycles?

Key Topics Discussed:

• The Linguistic Firewall: During the pandemic, we saw in real time how a single word could paralyse global action. The term airborne became a structural firewall. To an engineer, if a particle is suspended in the air and moves with the air currents, it's airborne. But to the medical community, airborne carries a very specific, high-consequence historical definition. Because of that deeply entrenched medical definition, the engineering and building science communities were effectively locked out of the operational response for months.
• The Tyranny of Efficiency: For the better part of the last 40 or 50 years, the dominant almost tyrannical metric in our industry has been efficiency. We chased energy performance relentlessly. Energy is a hard measurable cost. You get a utility bill every 30 days. It is incredibly difficult to put a hard financial number on human health. So we optimize for what we can measure.
• The Myth of the Average Person: We design multi million dollar HVAC systems to hold a massive commercial floor plate to a highly precise 21 degrees Celsius. The glaring problem is that the average person is a statistical ghost. When you design for the mathematical average, you are effectively designing for nobody. Instead of viewing human comfort and health as a single fragile optimal point on a graph, we need to view it as a geographical landscape.
• The Looming Energy Crisis: The IEA warns of the greatest energy security threat in history. When the grid is constrained, society panics. And when society panics about energy, the built environment is always the first casualty. We know exactly what this looks like because we've been here before. In the wake of the 1973 oil embargo, we sealed our buildings up, slashed ventilation standards and triggered an era of sick building syndrome. The temptation to repeat the mistakes of the 1970s is sitting right in front of us. This is an inflection point. The challenge for all of us is to hold our nerve and fiercely defend the invisible air that sustains us, ensuring that as the world changes around us and as the energy grid strains, we never again compromise the indoor environment.

The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with

Particles Plus https://particlesplus.com/

Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) - Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) - Lindab (https://www.lindab.ie/) - S&P UK (https://www.solerpalau.com/en-uk/)

The One Take Podcast in Partnership with

SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) - Inbiot (https://www.inbiot.es/?utm_campaign=simon&utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast) - Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) - iE Electronics (https://www.eielectronics.ie/) and iAir Group (https://iair-group.com/)

Zehnder https://www.zehndergroup.com/en

Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. (https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast)

If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here (https://www.youtube.com/@airqualitymatters-SimonJones). Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

• 00:00:00 Introduction: Reflections from Indoor Air 2026 and the Power of Conversation
• 00:01:30 The Crisis Cycle: Why We Design for Emergencies but Operate for Peacetime
• 00:04:07 The Airborne Language Barrier: When Medical Definitions Paralyze Engineering Action
• 00:07:11 The Tyranny of Energy Efficiency: How We Optimized Buildings for Spreadsheets Not Humans
• 00:11:49 The Myth of the Average Person: Why Designing for Statistical Ghosts Fails Everyone
• 00:16:44 The Comfort Paradox: Is Thermal Perfection Making Us Biologically Fragile?
• 00:21:46 The Invisibility Problem: Why Data Doesn't Move Hearts and How to Tell Better Stories
• 00:24:38 Proxies and Noise: The Double-Edged Sword of CO2 Sensors and Simple Solutions
• 00:27:47 The Accountability Gap: From Run-to-Failure to Mandatory Building Performance Checks
• 00:32:11 The Global South Crossroads: A Fleeting Window to Leapfrog Western Mistakes
• 00:35:33 The AI Energy Arms Race: When Data Centers Compete with Humans for Cooling Capacity
• 00:37:19 The AMR Connection: How Poor Ventilation Fuels the Antimicrobial Resistance Crisis
• 00:40:10 The Skilled Trades Bottleneck: Why the Workforce Crisis Is Our Greatest Limiting Factor
• 00:43:09 The 1970s Déjà Vu: Navigating the Energy Crisis Without Sacrificing Human Health Again

This week, we dive into a fascinating study from the University of Southampton and Hampshire County Council titled Preliminary Findings of Storytelling in Schools as a Pre-Heatwave Intervention to Enhance Children's Behaviour to Improve Thermal Comfort, to explore a question that fundamentally challenges how we think about overheating in schools: What if the single biggest barrier to protecting children from dangerous heat exposure in classrooms isn't just our aging building stock—but our complete failure to recognize that empowering children themselves to take simple adaptive actions could be the most immediate, scalable solution we have right now?

Let's face it, our school building stock, especially in the UK, is ageing and frankly poorly equipped for the reality of modern summers. A massive portion of schools, about 40% in the UK like Hampshire, are scholar system buildings thrown up in the 1960s and 70s. They were lightweight with huge amounts of single-glazed windows and very low thermal mass. They were designed to keep kids warm in winter with absolutely no thought given for handling the 30 to 35 degree heat waves we are increasingly seeing.

Key Topics Discussed:

• The Temperature Preference Gap: Children actually have a preference for lower temperatures than adults. Studies have shown their comfort temperatures are usually two to three degrees cooler than ours. But who controls the environment in a classroom? Who controls the windows, the blinds, the thermostats? The teachers. So you have adults with a higher thermal threshold making the environmental decisions for children who are already feeling the heat. Younger children, especially those in key stage one aged five to seven, just don't have the agency or confidence to change their environment. They aren't going to stand up in the middle of a lesson and say, Miss, I'm boiling, can I open that window? They just sit there. They overheat. Their cognitive performance drops off a cliff and they become exhausted.
• The Storybook Intervention: The researchers designed a low cost, incredibly creative intervention. They wrote a storybook called The Hottest Day at School. It's a simple, engaging story where different characters through history- a Viking in the North Sea, a gladiator in the Coliseum, and a cowboy in the Wild West- use different strategies to keep cool. The story focused on five key actions: using a fan, removing a layer of clothing, moving to the shade, opening a window, and finding a drink of water. The researchers set up a controlled study right before a yellow heatwave alert was issued by the UK Health Security Agency.
• The Results Were Fantastic: The children in the intervention groups, particularly the younger key stage one kids, were significantly more likely to take or want to take action to improve their thermal comfort. The kids who heard the story were nearly five times more likely to say they wanted to stay in the shade. They were almost eight times more likely to recognise they should drink cold water. And they were almost 12 times more likely to want to use a fan compared to the control group. They actively remembered and understood the behaviours modelled in the story

Preliminary Findings of Storytelling in Schools as a Pre-Heatwave Intervention to Enhance Children's Behaviour to Improve Thermal Comfort https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112337

The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with

Particles Plus https://particlesplus.com/

Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) - Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) - Lindab (https://www.lindab.ie/) - S&P UK (https://www.solerpalau.com/en-uk/)

The One Take Podcast in Partnership with

SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) - Inbiot (https://www.inbiot.es/?utm_campaign=simon&utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast) - Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) - iE Electronics (https://www.eielectronics.ie/) and iAir Group (https://iair-group.com/)

Zehnder https://www.zehndergroup.com/en

Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. (https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast)

If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here (https://www.youtube.com/@airqualitymatters-SimonJones). Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

• 00:00:00 Introduction: The One Take Format and the Overheating Schools Crisis
• 00:01:06 The Building Problem: Why UK Schools Weren't Built for Modern Summers
• 00:01:46 The Agency Gap: When Adults Control Environments Designed for Children
• 00:02:47 The Intervention: Teaching Thermal Comfort Through Story
• 00:03:13 The Study Design: Controlled Testing Before a Yellow Heatwave Alert
• 00:03:58 The Results: Five to Twelve Times More Likely to Take Action
• 00:04:44 The Bigger Picture: Why We Can't Wait for Billions in Retrofits
• 00:05:14 Behavioral Adaptation: The Overlooked Tool in Indoor Environmental Quality
• 00:06:11 From Passive Victims to Active Agents: Lessons for Air Quality

This week, we sit down with Professor Ardeshir Mahdavi, an internationally recognised expert in building science, affiliated with Graz University of Technology and the Vienna University of Economics and Business, to explore a question that fundamentally challenges how we think about indoor environmental quality: What if the single biggest barrier to creating healthy, comfortable buildings isn't our lack of scientific models—but our failure to recognise that the search for optimal indoor conditions may be philosophically flawed from the start?

Inspired by his thought provoking keynote at Indoor Air 2026 in Singapore, this conversation unpacks what happens when we bring philosophy, art and science together to critically revisit the prevailing paradigm in indoor environmental quality research. Drawing on insights from Aristotle, Leonardo da Vinci and Werner Heisenberg, Ardeshir challenges us to reconsider how we define adequate indoor environmental conditions, how we develop models to predict human comfort and health, and whether our obsession with precision is actually preventing us from understanding what truly matters.

Key Topics Discussed:

• The Illusion of Sharp Lines: Standards and regulations draw precise thresholds for temperature, humidity, CO2, sound and light. But human requirements are not fixed. They vary by individual, by age, by health status, by time of day, by culture. We all agree people are different, yet we expect models to deliver universal answers. This cognitive dissonance shapes everything from thermal comfort research to building commissioning. Leonardo da Vinci's sfumato technique offers a metaphor: nature doesn't have sharp lines, and neither do human needs.
• Plateau and Escarpment, Not Bell Curves: The traditional view of human response to indoor conditions assumes a bell curve with an optimal peak. But research in lighting and other domains suggests a more accurate model is the plateau and escarpment. Over a wide range of conditions, performance remains stable.
• Health Versus Comfort, and the Ethics of Manipulation: Some argue that comfort is not necessarily healthy. That we should design buildings to challenge occupants thermally, to exercise their metabolic and immune systems. But who decides what is good for people? Designing stairs to be more attractive than lifts, separating buildings to force movement, installing acoustic masking systems without informing occupants.
• The Heisenberg Metaphor and Model Uncertainty: Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states that you cannot simultaneously measure the position and momentum of a particle with unlimited precision. The more precisely you know one, the less precisely you know the other. This offers a powerful metaphor for indoor environmental quality models.

e60PBxooziVGttOyDIeN

GUEST:

Professor Ardeshir Mahdavi

Graz University of Technology | Vienna University of Economics and Business

Indoor Air 2026

The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with

Particles Plus https://particlesplus.com/

Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) - Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) - Lindab (https://www.lindab.ie/) - S&P UK (https://www.solerpalau.com/en-uk/)

The One Take Podcast in Partnership with

SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) - Inbiot (https://www.inbiot.es/?utm_campaign=simon&utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast) - Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) - iE Electronics (https://www.eielectronics.ie/) and iAir Group (https://iair-group.com/)

Zehnder https://www.zehndergroup.com/en

Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. (https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast)

If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here (https://www.youtube.com/@airqualitymatters-SimonJones). Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

• 00:00:00 Introduction: Meeting Ardeshir Mahdavi and the Philosophy of Indoor Environmental Quality
• 00:02:35 The Risk of Narrow Focus: Why Building Science Needs Philosophical Thinking
• 00:15:55 Da Vinci's Sfumato: Sharp Lines Versus the Reality of Human Experience
• 00:22:45 The Problem with Precision: Standards, Negotiation and Boundary Conditions
• 00:36:16 Aristotle's Wisdom: Matching Methods to the Nature of the Inquiry
• 00:41:45 Models and Constructs: The Difference Between Weight and Comfort
• 00:50:01 The Plateau and Escarpment Model: Rethinking Distribution Curves
• 00:59:09 Physiology and Compensation: Why Humans Aren't Precise Instruments
• 01:03:17 Health Versus Comfort: The Ethical Question of What Buildings Should Provide
• 01:07:16 Manipulation and Agency: Staircases, Sound Masking and Cultural Differences
• 01:33:32 The Global South Challenge: Beyond Smart Buildings to Urban Systems
• 01:47:04 Heisenberg's Uncertainty: Precision Limits in Human-Centric Models
• 01:54:22 AI and Understanding: Tools Versus Delegation of Thinking

This week, we dive into a study published in the Journal of Environmental Research titled Summer Heat Wave, Ozone Pollution and Ischemic Stroke Mortality: An Individual Level Case Crossover Study, to explore a question that fundamentally challenges how we think about climate, air quality, and public health: What if the single biggest barrier to protecting vulnerable populations isn't our lack of understanding about heat waves or air pollution individually—but our complete failure to recognize that when they occur together, they create a deadly synergy that multiplies stroke mortality risk?

Key Topics Discussed:

• The Perfect Storm for Clotting: When you are exposed to a heat wave, your body kicks into thermoregulation mode. You sweat, you lose water. And if you aren't replacing that water, your blood viscosity goes up. Your blood literally gets thicker, which promotes the formation of clots. At the same time, short term exposure to ozone enhances the blood coagulation process. It triggers systemic inflammation and oxidative stress. You have the heat making your blood thicker and the ozone promoting a chemical pathway for clotting. Put them together in a human body and you have the perfect storm for a cerebrovascular event.
• The Synergistic Effect: When you have a heatwave and high ozone levels at the same time, the effects don't just add together, they multiply. It's not 1 plus 1 equals 2, it's 1 plus 1 equals 3. The paper estimates that up to 4.19% of ischemic stroke deaths in their study could be attributed to these joint exposures, and the majority of those exposure attributed deaths were due to co exposure of extreme heat and high level ozone. The study tracked over 59,000 ischemic stroke deaths across four years in Jiangsu province, China.
• The Elderly Are Most Vulnerable: The study broke the data down by age and sex. While gender didn't make a huge difference, age absolutely did. The elderly, specifically those aged 85 and older, were at significantly higher vulnerability to these co exposure events. As we age, our thermoregulatory capacity declines. We don't sweat as much, our skin blood flow is reduced, so our bodies struggle to cool down. Older adults are much more likely to have pre existing conditions like hypertension or atherosclerosis. Add social isolation or limited mobility into the mix, meaning they can't easily leave a sweltering apartment or get to a cooling centre, and the risk profile skyrockets.
• The Ventilation Paradox: If we are relying on natural ventilation, opening windows to deal with summer overheating, what happens on the day when there is a heat wave and an ozone spike? You open up the window to let the heat out and you let the ozone in, or you keep the window closed to keep the ozone out and the building overheats. It reinforces the need for mechanical ventilation strategies with proper filtration and thermal conditioning in our homes, particularly in social housing and care facilities where the most vulnerable populations live. We cannot rely on building envelopes alone when the outside air is effectively dangerous on multiple fronts.

Summer Heat Wave, Ozone Pollution and Ischemic Stroke Mortality: An Individual Level Case Crossover Study  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.120818

The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with

Particles Plus https://particlesplus.com/

Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) - Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) - Lindab (https://www.lindab.ie/) - S&P UK (https://www.solerpalau.com/en-uk/)

The One Take Podcast in Partnership with

SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) - Inbiot (https://www.inbiot.es/?utm_campaign=simon&utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast) - Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) - iE Electronics (https://www.eielectronics.ie/) and iAir Group (https://iair-group.com/)

Zehnder https://www.zehndergroup.com/en

Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website. (https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast)

If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here (https://www.youtube.com/@airqualitymatters-SimonJones). Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

• 00:00:00 Introduction: The One Take Format and Compound Environmental Risks
• 00:00:35 The Study: Summer Heat Waves, Ozone and Stroke Mortality
• 00:00:53 Beyond Buildings: The Broader Public Health Question
• 00:01:20 Understanding Ischemic Stroke: The Second Leading Killer Globally
• 00:02:32 The Research Setting: 59,000 Deaths in Jiangsu Province
• 00:03:13 The Methodology: Comparing John to Himself, Not to Dave
• 00:04:08 The Findings: When 1 Plus 1 Equals 3
• 00:05:33 The Biology: Blood Thickening Meets Clot Promotion
• 00:06:29 Who's Most Vulnerable: The Elderly in the Eye of the Storm
• 00:07:24 The Built Environment Challenge: Windows Open or Closed?
• 00:09:03 The Future: Creating Safe Harbours From Deadly Outdoor Conditions