The real rub is not what we see in nature, but how it got here. The debate is about origins.

Evolutionists and Creationists have no disputes regarding the complex coding of the DNA, but the latter see far too much purpose in the biology of life to discount a Creator.

In continuing to contrast the hopefulness of the believer of Scripture with the hopeless and dark doctrines of the materialist, we look at another of the intentional attributes necessary for life: the atmosphere.

Now we look at the worldview of the Christian, who sees each piece of the cosmos as divinely designed by a loving Creator.

We first look at the worldview of believes the order of the universe has created itself: a meaningless universe, life without purpose.

To end our discourse about the history of language, we look at Dr. Henry Morris' two theories to explain the history of language.

Primitive languages are generally more complex than their derivatives, whereas modern languages are increasingly generalized and less precise. This is the opposite of what would happen if language were the product of a positive development process.

To accept evolutionist theories about language development, we must accept that people of ancient cultures were unable to write anything for hundreds of thousands to millions of years! Let's look into the history of written of pictographic and cuneiform writing.

The ability to communicate with our own kind in abstract, symbolic speech is unique to man, and the evolutionist has never been able to bridge the tremendous gulf between this ability and the grunts and barks of animals.

Our DNA is full of directed, purposed information – a code that could not have come from the random chaos of evolution.