Tego Venturi:
Well, there's two bills right now that are working or we're trying to work their way through. Oh, there's Damon. So perfect timing. Let me talk about HB-19 first. So HB-19 was a, or in Damon, correct me if I'm wrong, but HB-19 got postponed. Correct. Is what I understand. Yeah. And I'll introduce you in a minute, Damon, but so HB 19 was they were trying to put a transfer tax on real estate sales. So basically wanted to tax you when you sell or buy a property. And at this point that one has been shot down. So thank goodness for that. But anyway, Damon, Maddox, medics management, if you've been around Albuquerque Ben and you know, around the city, you've probably seen Maddox manage it. Mint signs. I mean, God's statement. How long has your family been in the real estate business?
Damon Maddox:
45 years.
Tego Venturi:
Yeah. There you go. So you guys are kind of legendary in Albuquerque and especially on the property management side. But your, your father has done so much in yourself so much for the real estate world and real estate industry. So thank you for that. But the reason I got you on Damon is we want to talk about HB 1-11 which is, which is out there right now. And so first off, Damon, if somebody wants to reach out to you talk about private property management, how do they get ahold of you?
Damon Maddox:
They give us a call here Maddox management, (505) 242-0989. Or visit our website MaddoxMGMT.com.
Tego Venturi:
Awesome. Tell us about HB 1-11.
Damon Maddox:
So HB 1-11 it's revamping the uniform owner resident relations act which is, you know, the landlord tenant laws for the state of New Mexico. It's definitely something that needs to be looked at from time to time. You know, we, we, last time it was revised was almost 20 years ago. So when we heard that, you know, something was coming along, we, you know, we weren't you know, it was, it didn't catch us off guard, but when we finally saw the actual bill that they're proposing the changes they're proposing there's a lot of unintended consequences.
Tego Venturi:
That was one of my takeaways when I saw it, I started going through it going, Oh my gosh, this is going to backfire especially on, you know, what I would consider some of the, you know, the, the people on the margins, both as property owners, as well as potential tenants and, and stuff. I don't know, is that, was that your take?
Damon Maddox:
That was definitely my take, you know their, their intent is to help grow the workforce housing help us you know, the industry combat the, you know you know, homeless issue that we have in our state in particular, in our bigger cities, but the way they're trying to go about it is, is just, it's, it's going to cause much bigger problems than, than it's not going to fix what they're trying to fix. Yeah.
Tego Venturi:
So, give us just a, some of the proposals that are out there that, that concern the property management community and landlord,
Damon Maddox:
The big concerns that we're having with, with the, these changes is the amount of time for, for an eviction both for nonpayment of rent and, and for lease violations right now start to finish, you know, it can take about 28 days to, to go through that whole process from the time you serve that, that first notice if this passes it's, you know, 56 days for you know, for an eviction process for, for, you know, somebody that's been destroying the property, you know violation other than non-payment of rent. They're, they're taking that initial seven day notice and making it a 14 day notice, and you've got to do that twice before you can even, you know, file with the courts. Wow. the other, you know notable things that they want is they they're, they're adding they want to add a source of income as a protected class. Which, you know, it in and of itself is not a bad thing. Right.
Tego Venturi:
Sounds good. On the surface. Yeah.
Damon Maddox:
When, when you're, when you're forcing when Lords to, to take the