In part 2, Danielle, Olivia and Brandt delve deeper into forensic science as they question the validity of Fingerprint, Hair, and fire evidence.

In part 1, Brandt, Danielle and Olivia explore the dubious nature of polygraphs, bite marks and blood spatter analysis evidence.

Danielle, Olivia and Brandt discuss the continued push to punish people for not having a home and whether there is perhaps a better way.

Danielle , Olivia, and Brandt discuss Twitter. Where it started, where it is, where it's going, why we use it, and how nice it is that Trump was banned. We also discuss Gold Stars and how you can use them to purchase livestock from Olivia's mom.

It was kindly pointed out to us that we never properly introduced ourselves. We would like to take a few minutes and tell you a little something about ourselves.

Brandt tries to talk about the ethics of pet keeping but Olivia and Danielle mostly want to talk about interesting dog facts. Also poop. For some reason there are a lot of poop stories. (warning: there are also discussions of animal abuse.)

When is a lawsuit frivolous? In this episode, Brandt, Olivia and Danielle discuss some silly lawsuits, some fraudulent, some frivolous, and a couple that perhaps should be taken a little more seriously.

Do we care when a pedestrian is killed by a vehicle? In this episode, Danielle, Brandt, and Olivia discuss the 2017 case where an Uber automated vehicle struck and killed a woman, look back at what brought us to this point, and wonder about responsibility when there is a car crash.

Almost on Topic is coming April 5th.