Consumer Finance Monitor

An Empirical Study of Boilerplate in Consumer Contracts


Listen Later

On January 4 of this year, we released a podcast show entitled; “A look at a new approach to consumer contracts”. Our special guest at that time was Professor Andrea Boyack, a Professor at the University of Missouri School of Law. That podcast was based on a then recent law review article published by Professor Boyack entitled “The Shape of Consumer Contracts, 101 Denv L. Rev. 1 (2023). Today, we are joined again by Professor Boyack who has written a follow-up article entitled: “Abuse of Contract: Boilerplate Erasure of Consumer Counterparty Rights,” University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2024-03, which is the subject of our new show.

The abstract of her article accurately describes the points that Professor Boyack made during the podcast show:

Contract law and the new Restatement of the Law of Consumer Contracts generally treats the entirety of the company’s boilerplate as presumptively binding. Entrusting the content of consumer contracts to companies creates a fertile legal habitat for abuse through boilerplate design.

There is no consensus on how widespread or severe abuse of contract is. Some consumer law scholars have warned of dangers inherent in granting companies unrestrained power to sneak waivers into their online terms, but others contend that market forces adequately constrain potential abuse. On the other hand, in the absence of adequate consumer knowledge and power, market competition might instead fuel the spread of abusive boilerplate provisions as companies compete to insulate themselves from costs. The new Restatement and several prominent scholars claim that existing protective judicial doctrines siphon off the worst abuses among adhesive contracts. They are willing to accept those abuses that slip through the cracks as the unavoidable cost of a functioning, modern economy.

The raging debate over how to best constrain contractual abuse relies mainly on speculation regarding the proliferation and extent of sneak-in waivers. This article provides some necessary missing data by examining the author’s study of 100 companies’ online terms and conditions (the T&C Study). The T&C Study tracked the extent to which the surveyed companies’ boilerplate purported to erase consumer default rights within four different categories, thereby helping to assess the effectiveness of existing market and judicial constraints on company overreach. Evidence from the T&C Study shows that the overwhelming majority of consumer contracts contain multiple categories of abusive terms. The existing uniformity of boilerplate waivers undermines the theory that competition and reputation currently act as effective bulwarks against abuse. After explaining and discussing the T&C Study and its results, this article suggests how such data can assist scholars and advocates in more effectively protecting and empowering consumers.

We also discuss two separate CFPB initiatives pertaining to consumer contracts. On June 4 of this year, the CFPB issued Circular 2024-03 (“Circular”) warning that the use of unlawful or unenforceable terms and conditions in contracts for consumer financial products or services may violate the prohibition on deceptive acts or practices in the Consumer Financial Protection Act. We previously drafted a blog post and Law360 article about this circular.

The CFPB has also issued a proposed rule to establish a system for the registration of nonbanks subject to CFPB supervision that use “certain terms or conditions that seek to waive consumer rights or other legal protections or limit the ability of consumers to enforce their rights.” Arbitration provisions are among the terms that would trigger registration. The CFPB has not yet finalized this proposed rule and it seems likely that it will never be finalized in light of its very controversial nature and the fact that Director Chopra will be replaced on January 20 with a new Acting Director.

Alan Kaplinsky, the former Chair of Ballard Spahr’s Consumer Financial Services Group for 25 years and now Senior Counsel, hosts this episode.

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Consumer Finance MonitorBy Ballard Spahr LLP

  • 4.9
  • 4.9
  • 4.9
  • 4.9
  • 4.9

4.9

45 ratings


More shows like Consumer Finance Monitor

View all
On the Media by WNYC Studios

On the Media

9,168 Listeners

Political Gabfest by Slate Podcasts

Political Gabfest

8,486 Listeners

Marketplace by Marketplace

Marketplace

8,625 Listeners

Bloomberg Law by Bloomberg

Bloomberg Law

359 Listeners

Planet Money by NPR

Planet Money

30,725 Listeners

Freakonomics Radio by Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher

Freakonomics Radio

32,073 Listeners

The Lawfare Podcast by The Lawfare Institute

The Lawfare Podcast

6,281 Listeners

The NPR Politics Podcast by NPR

The NPR Politics Podcast

25,770 Listeners

The Daily by The New York Times

The Daily

110,824 Listeners

Bold Names by The Wall Street Journal

Bold Names

1,458 Listeners

Today, Explained by Vox

Today, Explained

10,139 Listeners

Throughline by NPR

Throughline

16,100 Listeners

The Ezra Klein Show by New York Times Opinion

The Ezra Klein Show

15,363 Listeners

The Consumer Finance Podcast by Chris Willis, Troutman Pepper Locke

The Consumer Finance Podcast

9 Listeners

RegFi Podcast by Orrick

RegFi Podcast

13 Listeners