Fred Matiang'i, Kenya's former Cabinet Secretary for Interior and Coordination of National Government, is reportedly seeking financial and political assistance in his bid for the Kenyan presidency. According to recently filed documents, Matiang'i has retained the services of Dickens & Madson Canada Inc., a lobbying firm, to garner support from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan for his political aspirations.

• The agreement between Matiang'i and Dickens & Madson Canada Inc. outlines a multifaceted approach to promoting his candidacy on the international stage.
• This includes lobbying efforts directed at the executive and legislative branches of the aforementioned governments.
• Additionally, the firm plans to bolster Matiang'i's global image through public relations and media assistance.

Matiang'i's political career has been marked by both achievements and controversies. His tenure as Cabinet Secretary for Education saw significant reforms in the national examination system, aimed at curbing cheating and streamlining result processing. However, these reforms also led to friction with teachers' unions, who questioned the fairness of the new examination procedures.

• Following the death of Joseph Ole Nkaissery in 2017, Matiang'i was appointed as acting Cabinet Secretary for Interior and Coordination of National Government.
• He quickly gained a reputation as a decisive leader, particularly during the 2017 presidential election.
• However, his tough stance against opposition protests, including the shutdown of media houses during Raila Odinga's symbolic swearing-in as the "People's President," drew criticism from human rights groups.

Matiang'i's potential candidacy is further complicated by allegations of his involvement in the Ruaraka school land saga. This controversy, dating back to his time as Education Secretary, involves the alleged misappropriation of Sh1.5 billion in public funds meant for the acquisition of land for two public schools. While Matiang'i has maintained his innocence and denied any wrongdoing, the issue continues to cast a shadow over his political future.

Elijah Wachira served as the acting Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Social Health Authority (SHA) until he was placed on compulsory leave on November 12, 2024. During Wachira's time in the role, SHA transitioned from the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF). While at SHA, Wachira worked to encourage Kenyans to register for insurance. Wachira believed that in a few years, SHA would cover all medical expenses, eliminating the need for fundraising to cover medical bills. The SHA board sent Wachira on leave in order to investigate concerns about his conduct and performance.

Wachira’s tenure was marked by a chaotic transition from the NHIF to the SHA. When the new insurance system was rolled out, patients with chronic illnesses were turned away from hospitals for lack of payment and many health facilities were not prepared for the transition. In addition, Kenyans expressed concerns over the new system, such as “ghostly spouses and children” on their list of dependents and low limits for services.

The SHA board also raised concerns that Wachira had prioritized settling debts with private facilities, rather than public ones. As a result, the SHA was accused of contradicting its commitment to improving access to healthcare under Universal Health Coverage (UHC).

Wachira is a seasoned professional in the insurance industry. He worked as the managing director of CIC General for four years. He also worked in top management at Madison Insurance Company Kenya Limited and Sanlam. At CIC, he served as the Group CEO on an interim basis from October 2019. Wachira has an MBA from the University of Nairobi.

• Kenya's recent economic slowdown and public dissatisfaction with tax policies have prompted a major shift in the government's approach. The government withdrew its previous Finance Bill due to widespread protests sparked by rising costs of living and perceived unfair taxation.
• The newly proposed Tax Laws Amendment Bill 2024 aims to strike a balance between economic recovery and tax revenue generation. It focuses on:
• Easing pressure on households: by increasing disposable incomes through tax deductions for essential contributions like healthcare, housing, and retirement funds.
• Closing tax loopholes and broadening the tax base: by targeting emerging sectors such as digital services and the gig economy.
• Improving tax compliance: by offering incentives for timely payment and introducing stricter penalties for non-compliance.
• The government argues these reforms will foster sustainable growth, improve Kenyans' quality of life, and align Kenya's tax system with global best practices.
• Critics, including opposition leader Kalonzo Musyoka, argue that Kenyans are already overburdened by taxes and that the new proposals will disproportionately benefit a few. Musyoka has threatened to lead street protests if the government reintroduces elements of the withdrawn Finance Bill.
• The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has softened its push for aggressive revenue targets in Kenya, acknowledging the political sensitivity surrounding taxation. The IMF now emphasizes spending rationalization as a key strategy for balancing Kenya's budget.
• The success of these reforms hinges on effective implementation and the government's ability to build public trust. Only time will tell if these measures will deliver the promised relief, stimulate investment, and put Kenya on a path towards economic resilience and growth.
• Key individuals mentioned:Isaac Mwaura, Government Spokesperson
• Kalonzo Musyoka, Wiper Leader
• John Mbadi, Cabinet Secretary for The National Treasury and Economic Planning
• Relevant Legislation:Tax Laws Amendment Bill 2024
• Tax Procedures (Amendment Bill) 2024
• Finance Bill 2024 (withdrawn)

Cosmetic surgery, specifically liposuction, is gaining popularity, but recent events in Kenya highlight the potential dangers of these procedures when performed in unregulated clinics. The death of Lucy Wambui, after undergoing a liposuction procedure at the 'Body By Design' clinic in Nairobi, has sparked investigations and raised concerns about the safety of these procedures in Kenya.

While reconstructive plastic surgery is typically covered by the NHS, cosmetic surgery is not, and the availability of reconstructive procedures varies throughout the UK. Plastic surgeons undergo extensive training and often belong to professional associations, such as BAPRAS, ensuring patients receive care from qualified professionals. However, the regulation and oversight of cosmetic surgery clinics may differ, as highlighted by the 'Body By Design' case in Kenya.

Liposuction, the procedure Ms. Wambui underwent, involves removing fat from specific areas of the body, such as the stomach, hips, or thighs, to achieve a contoured appearance. This procedure, while seemingly straightforward, carries inherent risks like any surgical procedure. The sources detail that Ms. Wambui developed complications following the liposuction, including chest pains and difficulty breathing. Despite these concerns, the clinic discharged her, and she tragically passed away a week later.

A post-mortem examination revealed that Ms. Wambui's death was caused by acute pneumonia, likely stemming from an untreated bacterial infection. This finding suggests potential negligence on the part of the clinic, raising concerns about their adherence to proper hygiene and post-operative care protocols. The Kenyan authorities are investigating the clinic and its staff to determine the extent of their culpability in Ms. Wambui's death.

This tragic incident highlights the importance of thoroughly researching and selecting qualified professionals and reputable facilities when considering cosmetic surgery. Patients should inquire about the surgeon's credentials, the clinic's accreditation, and their adherence to safety protocols. Additionally, potential patients must understand the risks associated with any surgical procedure and carefully weigh the benefits against these potential complications.

The Kenyan government is taking action to address the issue of unregulated medical spas by launching a nationwide crackdown. This 30-day operation aims to assess the legitimacy and safety practices of these facilities to protect the public from further harm. This incident serves as a stark reminder that the allure of cosmetic surgery should not overshadow the importance of safety and qualified medical care.

In a showdown between academia and the state, Kenyan university lecturers have taken a stand, demanding better pay and improved working conditions. They argue that they are undervalued and underpaid compared to other public servants. This episode examines the lecturers' reasons for striking, the government's perspective on the dispute, and the potential long-term implications for Kenya's education system and workforce.

Information for Podcast Episode Content:

• The lecturers began their strike on 29 October 2024.
• The strike stems from the government’s refusal to honour a return-to-work formula negotiated with the Universities Academic Staff Union (UASU) on 26 September 2024.
• The agreement included salary increases of 7% to 10% and an automatic annual salary increment of 4%.
• The lecturers also claim that the government has not provided health insurance as promised.
• The strike has disrupted learning at all public universities across the country.
• Students have expressed frustration and uncertainty about their academic futures.
• A recent court ruling has halted the implementation of a new university funding model, exacerbating the financial problems facing the institutions.
• The lecturers have vowed to continue their strike until the government meets their demands.
• UASU Secretary-General Constantine Wasonga has accused the government of playing games with lecturers’ finances and of prioritizing other public servants' salaries over those of lecturers.

• Introduction: Kenya is on the verge of a major shift in its energy sector. For decades, Kenya Power (KPLC) has held a monopoly on the sale of electricity. However, new regulations are set to open the market to competition in early 2025, allowing private companies to generate, transmit, and sell power directly to consumers.
• The Promise of Competition: Proponents of the liberalization argue it will bring numerous benefits.
• Lower prices: Increased competition could drive down prices for consumers, who have faced rising electricity costs in recent years.
• Improved Service: Competition could incentivize providers to improve service quality and reliability, addressing frequent outages that have plagued Kenya's power grid.
• Economic Growth: Opening the market could attract new investments in the energy sector, boosting economic growth and creating jobs.
• The World Bank's Concerns: The World Bank, through the International Monetary Fund (IMF), has raised concerns about the potential negative consequences of ending KPLC’s monopoly.
• Higher Prices for Some: The World Bank argues that while large consumers might benefit from lower prices, smaller consumers, especially households, could see their bills increase due to the end of cross-subsidies.
• Financial Strain on KPLC: KPLC has long-term contracts with power producers that oblige it to purchase electricity at fixed prices, regardless of demand. The World Bank warns that if large consumers switch to new providers, KPLC might struggle to meet its financial obligations.
• The Kenyan Government's Perspective: Despite the World Bank's warnings, the Kenyan government appears committed to moving forward with the liberalization plan. The government believes that increased competition will ultimately benefit consumers and contribute to the growth of the East African Power Pool, a regional electricity market.
• Looking Ahead: The end of Kenya Power's monopoly is a complex issue with potential benefits and risks. The success of this transition will depend on how the government addresses the World Bank's concerns and implements the new regulations. Will this move lead to a more efficient and affordable electricity sector for all Kenyans, or will it create new challenges?
• Call to Action: Encourage listeners to share their thoughts on the upcoming changes in Kenya's energy sector.
• What are their expectations and concerns?
• What steps can the government and industry stakeholders take to ensure a smooth transition and maximize the benefits of a competitive energy market?

This podcast episode will examine the debate surrounding the end of Kenya Power's monopoly, exploring the arguments from both sides and the potential implications for Kenya's economy and energy future.

October 31, 2024

This episode explores the challenges and opportunities of public participation in Kenya's legislative process.

Key Discussion Points:

• The Finance Bill 2024 and the Public Backlash:
• The bill was met with widespread opposition and protests, particularly from young people.
• Majority Leader Kimani Ichung'wah blames the private sector for not effectively communicating the bill's benefits.
• He argues that the private sector’s endorsement could have swayed public opinion due to a "trust deficit" in the government.
• Ichung'wah's Call for a Public Participation Law:
• He highlights the judiciary's tendency to invalidate bills based on alleged lack of public participation.
• He proposes enacting a law to establish clear guidelines and a structured framework for public participation.
• This law would aim to ensure that parliamentary procedures align with public participation standards, potentially mitigating judicial challenges.
• Constitutional and Legal Framework for Public Participation:
• Kenya's Constitution emphasizes public participation as a national value and principle of governance.
• Article 118 mandates Parliament to facilitate public involvement in its legislative and other business.
• The Public Participation Act of 2018 provides guidelines for citizen involvement in decision-making.
• The “Factsheet No. 14” published by the Kenyan Parliament emphasizes the right to petition Parliament, the right to access information, and the importance of equality and freedom of expression in public participation.
• Challenges to Effective Public Participation:
• Limited public awareness, inadequate access to information, and insufficient mechanisms for incorporating public feedback.
• Logistical barriers, such as geographical constraints and the digital divide, hinder broader participation, particularly among marginalized and rural communities.
• Expert Opinion: Dennis Ondieki, a Monitoring and Evaluation Professional at ICJ Kenya, emphasizes that public participation should be more than a formality. It requires proactive engagement, transparent information dissemination, and genuine incorporation of public input.
• Recommendations for Improvement:
• Raising public awareness of participation rights and processes.
• Enhancing government transparency and accessibility of information in various formats and languages.
• Expanding digital platforms while addressing the digital divide.
• Creating accessible platforms for dialogue and demonstrating a willingness to adjust policies based on citizen input.
• Call to Action:
• Public participation is essential for a functioning democracy in Kenya.
• Both government and citizens must actively embrace public participation to uphold the principles of the Constitution.
• Through genuine and inclusive participation, Kenya can better reflect the will and aspirations of its people.

After 16 years as a fugitive, Yagnesh Devani, the director of Triton Petroleum Company Limited, was extradited from the United Kingdom to Kenya in January 2024 to face charges in the Sh7.6 billion Triton oil scam. The Kenyan government had sought his extradition after he fled the country in 2008 to avoid prosecution. Devani was facing charges of fraudulent disposition of mortgaged goods, conspiracy to defraud, and obtaining by false pretenses. However, on October 28, 2024, a Kenyan court allowed the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to withdraw the case. A key witness, former Energy Minister Kiraitu Murungi, expressed reluctance to testify, and the DPP cited the death of some witnesses and the relocation of the main complainant to Singapore as reasons for the withdrawal. The magistrate, Harrison Barasa, stated that the DPP and the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) could not be forced to proceed with the case without sufficient evidence. The court's decision to discharge Devani means that he may still be prosecuted in the future if new evidence becomes available.

October 25, 2024

Top news making headlines.