Audio Tidbits

How often do you think, "I got trouble?" It happens for all of us, for some of us more often than for others of us. Even so, the hard truth is that there is seldom much we can do about the trouble we have right now. That fact not withstanding, our typical response to our trouble is to focus on the trouble we have right now.

But what if we are focusing on the wrong thing? Please listen and see if there may not be a better focus for your attention and energy.

When I think of things I want to do, it's easy to get stuck at "how." For example, the mail comes, and I want to read the mail. How do I do that?

I pop the last chip in the bag into my mouth and want more chips. How do I get more chips?

I want to call my friend but don't remember his number. How can I find his number?

I want to wear my red shirt with my black pants. How do I know I selected the right ones?

I want to go for a walk in the park. How do I do that without getting hurt or lost?

I want to do some work on my computer. How is that possible?

I could keep adding to my list as you could to yours. But here's the point. If I could see, the "How?" questions have easy answers.

I just open the mail and read it, run over to the corner store and pick up some more chips, scroll through my contacts on my phone and tap on my friend's number, look in my closet and grab my black pants and red shirt, slip on my walking shoes and head out to the park, pick up my mouse and I'm good to go.

If I could see, the "How?" for most everything on my list is simple. But I can't and the "How?" is not simple.

If you used to be able to see, the first step to get past the "How?" issue will likely be the hardest for you to take. Look and do is not an option anymore. You can't look and read, look and shop, look and tap, look and choose, look and walk, look and click. You can't look and do anything anymore.

That's the bad news. The good news is that you can still do most things you want to do, just not by looking and doing. The challenge is to get unstuck, to get on past the notion that looking is the only way to facilitate doing. I can't see, thus I can't do, is seldom true.

The problem is getting stuck on "How?" But that's not quite it. Close, but not quite. The problem is getting stuck on looking being the only how. It's not. That's some more good news.

Unfortunately, there is also some more bad news. Alternatives for doing, when looking isn't an option, are usually neither obvious nor intuitive. I have had most of a lifetime to learn how to do without seeing, but there are still skills I haven't mastered, strategies I still haven't learned.

Let me close on this episode of Blind How by sharing a simple fact. Not seeing is a nuisance, inconvenient, frustrating, but is what it is. Doing without looking requires a skill set and resources that are neither easy to acquire nor simple to maintain. If you want a quick and easy solution, sit back, relax and hope that someone takes pity and waits on you. Otherwise, here's the deal:

If it is to be, it's up to me, despite my not being able to see.

(Remember to subscribe so you don't miss the next episode of Blind How.)

When I think of things I want to do, it's easy to get stuck at "how." For example, the mail comes, and I want to read the mail. How do I do that?

I pop the last chip in the bag into my mouth and want more chips. How do I get more chips?

I want to call my friend but don't remember his number. How can I find his number?

I want to wear my red shirt with my black pants. How do I know I selected the right ones?

I want to go for a walk in the park. How do I do that without getting hurt or lost?

I want to do some work on my computer. How is that possible?

I could keep adding to my list as you could to yours. But here's the point. If I could see, the "How?" questions have easy answers.

I just open the mail and read it, run over to the corner store and pick up some more chips, scroll through my contacts on my phone and tap on my friend's number, look in my closet and grab my black pants and red shirt, slip on my walking shoes and head out to the park, pick up my mouse and I'm good to go.

If I could see, the "How?" for most everything on my list is simple. But I can't and the "How?" is not simple.

If you used to be able to see, the first step to get past the "How?" issue will likely be the hardest for you to take. Look and do is not an option anymore. You can't look and read, look and shop, look and tap, look and choose, look and walk, look and click. You can't look and do anything anymore.

That's the bad news. The good news is that you can still do most things you want to do, just not by looking and doing. The challenge is to get unstuck, to get on past the notion that looking is the only way to facilitate doing. I can't see, thus I can't do, is seldom true.

The problem is getting stuck on "How?" But that's not quite it. Close, but not quite. The problem is getting stuck on looking being the only how. It's not. That's some more good news.

Unfortunately, there is also some more bad news. Alternatives for doing, when looking isn't an option, are usually neither obvious nor intuitive. I have had most of a lifetime to learn how to do without seeing, but there are still skills I haven't mastered, strategies I still haven't learned.

Let me close on this episode of Blind How by sharing a simple fact. Not seeing is a nuisance, inconvenient, frustrating, but is what it is. Doing without looking requires a skill set and resources that are neither easy to acquire nor simple to maintain. If you want a quick and easy solution, sit back, relax and hope that someone takes pity and waits on you. Otherwise, here's the deal:

If it is to be, it's up to me, despite my not being able to see.

(Remember to subscribe so you don't miss the next episode of Blind How.)

(Guest Post) For those of us who can't see, getting what we need and most of what we want is at times quite challenging. Sure, it's challenging for people who see fine too. But for us, there are a couple of additional factors requiring extra attention. Let's give them some thought here.

First, I'm only talking about those things we need or want that we would simply do or get for ourselves, if we could see. As it turns out, this can be a long list. I have discussed that in earlier episodes on BlindHow.net, so don't need to review the list here. Suffice it to say that we each have a lot of items on our "would be easy if I could see" list.

For any of the items on our list, we have options. The easiest option is to skip the particular item, just get along without doing it or getting it. For me and most likely for you, the do nothing option is sometimes tempting and occasionally the choice we make. What we need or want is just not worth the bother right now. And that's okay occasionally. People who can see do the same thing now and then. Whatever they want or need is just not worth the time and energy it would take right now. Their motivation is not strong enough, although they could do whatever without much extra effort.

But for most of us who can't see and most of the time, doing nothing is not an acceptable option. Even if we can't see, we are determined to do what needs done, determined to get what we want. I discussed that decision in the last episode of Blind How.

But how do we do that, how do we do what we want to do, get what we want? There may be more than three options, but I know of three general approaches that usually cover the challenge for me. First, I can get someone who can see to do it for me or get it for me. Second, I can enlist the help of someone who can see to assist me with doing it myself or getting it myself. Third, I can develop the skills and strategies I need to do it myself or to get it by myself.

It's important for me to emphasize that each of these three options is perfectly legitimate at times and in some situations or circumstances. At other times, insisting on one option over another may be inappropriate or counterproductive. Those of us who can't see need all three options and the ability and determination to use them as needed and as appropriate.

Each of these three options requires good communication skills and especially good conversational skills. Why? For the first option, having someone who can see act on our behalf includes our being able to help them understand what we need or want and what we think would be the best way for them to proceed doing for us.

For the second option, having someone who can see assist us with whatever we need or want involves even more and continuing communication. As for the third option, think of observing someone who can see while he or she does what you want to do, actively participating while you work together to do what you want done and then working increasingly independently over days, months or years to perfect your ability to do it by yourself.

Here's something to consider. Each of us, whether we can see or not, have needs, problems and vulnerabilities beyond our individual ability to cope. We all need other people with skills, talents and resources who are available and willing to help us compensate for our limitations. Our challenge is to learn about those people and resources and then access them for our benefit. Meeting this challenge for those of us who can't see, among other things, rests firmly on our ability, and on the ability of those who advocate on our behalf,to effectively communicate our special and general needs and wants, and the best ways to satisfy those needs and wants. Parents do this for their children who can't see, teachers do this for their students and you and I will either do it for ourselves or it likely ...

For those of us who can't see, getting what we need and most of what we want is at times quite challenging. Sure, it's challenging for people who see fine too. But for us, there are a couple of additional factors requiring extra attention. Let's give them some thought here.

First, I'm only talking about those things we need or want that we would simply do or get for ourselves, if we could see. As it turns out, this can be a long list. I have discussed that in earlier episodes of Blind How, so don't need to review the list here. Suffice it to say that we each have a lot of items on our "would be easy if I could see" list.

For any of the items on our list, we have options. The easiest option is to skip the particular item, just get along without doing it or getting it. For me and most likely for you, the do nothing option is sometimes tempting and occasionally the choice we make. What we need or want is just not worth the bother right now. And that's okay occasionally. People who can see do the same thing now and then. Whatever they want or need is just not worth the time and energy it would take right now. Their motivation is not strong enough, although they could do whatever without much extra effort.

But for most of us who can't see and most of the time, doing nothing is not an acceptable option. Even if we can't see, we are determined to do what needs done, determined to get what we want. I discussed that decision in the last episode of Blind How.

But how do we do that, how do we do what we want to do, get what we want? There may be more than three options, but I know of three general approaches that usually cover the challenge for me. First, I can get someone who can see to do it for me or get it for me. Second, I can enlist the help of someone who can see to assist me with doing it myself or getting it myself. Third, I can develop the skills and strategies I need to do it myself or to get it by myself.

It's important for me to emphasize that each of these three options is perfectly legitimate at times and in some situations or circumstances. At other times, insisting on one option over another may be inappropriate or counterproductive. Those of us who can't see need all three options and the ability and determination to use them as needed and as appropriate.

Each of these three options requires good communication skills and especially good conversational skills. Why? For the first option, having someone who can see act on our behalf includes our being able to help them understand what we need or want and what we think would be the best way for them to proceed doing for us.

For the second option, having someone who can see assist us with whatever we need or want involves even more and continuing communication. As for the third option, think of observing someone who can see while he or she does what you want to do, actively participating while you work together to do what you want done and then working increasingly independently over days, months or years to perfect your ability to do it by yourself.

Here's something to consider. Each of us, whether we can see or not, have needs, problems and vulnerabilities beyond our individual ability to cope. We all need other people with skills, talents and resources who are available and willing to help us compensate for our limitations. Our challenge is to learn about those people and resources and then access them for our benefit. Meeting this challenge for those of us who can't see, among other things, rests firmly on our ability, and on the ability of those who advocate on our behalf,to effectively communicate our special and general needs and wants, and the best ways to satisfy those needs and wants. Parents do this for their children who can't see, teachers do this for their students and you and I will either do it for ourselves or it likely will just not happen.

In the last episode of Blind How, I talked with you about BATS: "Best Alternative To Seeing." I'm thinking that we should dig into that a little more before just moving on to how to do this or that without seeing. There is a major issue that we need to think through very carefully.

With few exceptions, one alternative to seeing is to get someone who can see to do whatever we want done. If inclination and resources permit, we could simply have someone drive us wherever we want to go, read whatever needs read, cook whatever needs cooked, clean whatever needs cleaned and on and on. As the saying goes, we could just have someone wait on us hand and foot.

You think this sounds silly? On the one hand, good for you. But on the other hand, many people who can't see, quite easily and without much thought, get into the habit of being waited on. To a significant extent, much of the time and in most situations, having others do things for them becomes their preferred alternative to not being able to see.

Should we always do things for ourselves, without any help from someone who can see? Of course not, especially if there is someone nearby who can and wants to help. Note that I said, "wants to help," and not simply "willing to help." To always refuse help would be as silly as always expecting help.

This is quite a bit more complicated than it may seem at first. I'm not sure I fully understand its complexity, since I struggle some with the issue myself. Even so, there are a few points that pop out for me. Perhaps mentioning those here will help you think about the issues from your perspective. I suspect that the help versus do-it-yourself question is personal and doesn't have the same answer or set of answers for all of us who can't see.

Let's start with something that I think is important or at least of interest to me. That could include a hot cup of coffee or clean clothes, reading my mail or a movie on TV, dinner or using my cell phone, a walk around the block or a visit to my doctor, brushing my guide dog or visiting with friends, doing my banking or ordering a pizza, going out for lunch or making a podcast. I could easily put a hundred items on my list without much thought. I'm sure you could put at least as many on your list, although they wouldn't all be the same as those on my list. We all have things to do, places to go and people to see. Let's call the things on our lists "activities."

Here's the thing. It's far too easy for many of us to play our blind card. We either wait for someone who can see to help us with the activity or do the task for us, or we simply avoid the activity. Can't or at least won't wins. The outcome is cumulative: we gradually do less and less, avoiding more and more.

Please note that I'm not talking about situations where people live or work together, situations where work and other activities are divided up – I'll do this and you do that. Rather, I'm focusing on situations where a person who can't see comes to be dependent on others doing most things for him or her, or perhaps he or she just avoids whatever the activity is.

I am simply struggling to describe what can happen to many, if not most of us who can't see, if we don't actively resist. Sure, I'm talking about me, but may also be talking about you. Fortunately, knowing the best, and likely only way to prevent drifting down the slippery slope to dependence and non-participation turns out to be simple. But knowing and doing can be far apart at times.

Here it is in the proverbial nutshell. The best alternative to not seeing is to figure out how to do whatever you want done, by yourself, without depending on sighted assistance, unless necessary. Here's the good news. Most everything you want to do is being done somewhere and being done independently, by a person who can't see. For those times when sighted assistance is necessary,

In the last episode of Blind How, I talked with you about BATS: "Best Alternative To Seeing." I'm thinking that we should dig into that a little more before just moving on to how to do this or that without seeing. There is a major issue that we need to think through very carefully.

With few exceptions, one alternative to seeing is to get someone who can see to do whatever we want done. If inclination and resources permit, we could simply have someone drive us wherever we want to go, read whatever needs read, cook whatever needs cooked, clean whatever needs cleaned and on and on. As the saying goes, we could just have someone wait on us hand and foot.

You think this sounds silly? On the one hand, good for you. But on the other hand, many people who can't see, quite easily and without much thought, get into the habit of being waited on. To a significant extent, much of the time and in most situations, having others do things for them becomes their preferred alternative to not being able to see.

Should we always do things for ourselves, without any help from someone who can see? Of course not, especially if there is someone nearby who can and wants to help. Note that I said, "wants to help," and not simply "willing to help." To always refuse help would be as silly as always expecting help.

This is quite a bit more complicated than it may seem at first. I'm not sure I fully understand its complexity, since I struggle some with the issue myself. Even so, there are a few points that pop out for me. Perhaps mentioning those here will help you think about the issues from your perspective. I suspect that the help versus do-it-yourself question is personal and doesn't have the same answer or set of answers for all of us who can't see.

Let's start with something that I think is important or at least of interest to me. That could include a hot cup of coffee or clean clothes, reading my mail or a movie on TV, dinner or using my cell phone, a walk around the block or a visit to my doctor, brushing my guide dog or visiting with friends, doing my banking or ordering a pizza, going out for lunch or making a podcast. I could easily put a hundred items on my list without much thought. I'm sure you could put at least as many on your list, although they wouldn't all be the same as those on my list. We all have things to do, places to go and people to see. Let's call the things on our lists "activities."

Here's the thing. It's far too easy for many of us to play our blind card. We either wait for someone who can see to help us with the activity or do the task for us, or we simply avoid the activity. Can't or at least won't wins. The outcome is cumulative: we gradually do less and less, avoiding more and more.

Please note that I'm not talking about situations where people live or work together, situations where work and other activities are divided up – I'll do this and you do that. Rather, I'm focusing on situations where a person who can't see comes to be dependent on others doing most things for him or her, or perhaps he or she just avoids whatever the activity is.

I am simply struggling to describe what can happen to many, if not most of us who can't see, if we don't actively resist. Sure, I'm talking about me, but may also be talking about you. Fortunately, knowing the best, and likely only way to prevent drifting down the slippery slope to dependence and non-participation turns out to be simple. But knowing and doing can be far apart at times.

Here it is in the proverbial nutshell. The best alternative to not seeing is to figure out how to do whatever you want done, by yourself, without depending on sighted assistance, unless necessary. Here's the good news.

There is a critical difference between can't and haven't yet figured out how. This is true for most everyone, but especially true if we can't see. Sure, there are some things that depend on seeing, with no way of getting around that. Picking a few of the obvious: driving, playing professional baseball, visually appreciating a spectacular sunset and looking around the room to see who came to the party are currently not in the cards for us if we can't see. Even so, the list of things that require seeing is a lot shorter than most people think. And even for those things we can't do, we still have options.

Driving is out for me, but I still can get to wherever I need to go. Playing baseball is out for me, but I still can be a baseball fan and enjoy the games. Watching a spectacular sunset is out for me, but I still can appreciate the joy others have when they describe what they are seeing. Visually scanning the room is out for me, but I still can listen and have conversations, gradually figuring out who all is there.

Let me suggest that you think about BATS whenever you are frustrated or annoyed by not being able to see, when you want to do something and think you can't because you can't see. What do BATS have to do with it, you ask?

Thanks for asking. BATS stands for "Best Alternative To Seeing."

When we put BATS first, "I can't see" is never the end of it. Any time there is something we need to do or just want to do, the challenge is to figure out what our best alternative to seeing is, while still being able to do whatever it is we need or want.

Step one is to remind ourselves that we are only blind in so far as we can't see. Others may at times relate to us as if our limitations are more extensive, but we know that is not the case. Can't see is where it starts and ends.

I do understand that any of us might have more than one limitation, but even so, each limitation is what it is, no more, no less. Our challenge is to figure out how to do what we need or want to do, in spite of our specific limitation.

Of course the alternatives to seeing depend on exactly what we want to do. The available alternatives when we want to go to school are not the same as when we want to go shopping, not the same when we want to go for a walk in the park as when we want to see what's happening on Facebook. Our needs and wants range from little things to really big things, from the fairly easy to the complex and difficult.

Sure, we need to know what those alternatives are and how to access them. That's the easier part of the success equation. The harder part is deciding just how much we really want whatever we have identified for ourselves. The issue is that it is always easier and simpler to just stay at home and do nothing. Let me share a very brief story from my past. I think you will get the point.

I was a Freshman at Ohio University and sitting in the office of my academic counceler. I was frustrated and generally feeling sorry for myself. He said, "Here's what you need to know. No one, with the possible exception of your mother, cares much one way or the other about whether you graduate or not. All the caring is up to you. This time next year, only you will really understand how much you did or did not care."

The point indeed relates to big wants, but it applies to those little wants that come up every day; but I'll bet you get the point, don't you?

There is a critical difference between can't and haven't yet figured out how. This is true for most everyone, but especially true if we can't see. Sure, there are some things that depend on seeing, with no way of getting around that. Picking a few of the obvious: driving, playing professional baseball, visually appreciating a spectacular sunset and looking around the room to see who came to the party are currently not in the cards for us if we can't see. Even so, the list of things that require seeing is a lot shorter than most people think. And even for those things we can't do, we still have options.

Driving is out for me, but I still can get to wherever I need to go. Playing baseball is out for me, but I still can be a baseball fan and enjoy the games. Watching a spectacular sunset is out for me, but I still can appreciate the joy others have when they describe what they are seeing. Visually scanning the room is out for me, but I still can listen and have conversations, gradually figuring out who all is there.

Let me suggest that you think about BATS whenever you are frustrated or annoyed by not being able to see, when you want to do something and think you can't because you can't see. What do BATS have to do with it, you ask?

Thanks for asking. BATS stands for "Best Alternative To Seeing."

When we put BATS first, "I can't see" is never the end of it. Any time there is something we need to do or just want to do, the challenge is to figure out what our best alternative to seeing is, while still being able to do whatever it is we need or want.

Step one is to remind ourselves that we are only blind in so far as we can't see. Others may at times relate to us as if our limitations are more extensive, but we know that is not the case. Can't see is where it starts and ends.

I do understand that any of us might have more than one limitation, but even so, each limitation is what it is, no more, no less. Our challenge is to figure out how to do what we need or want to do, in spite of our specific limitation.

Of course the alternatives to seeing depend on exactly what we want to do. The available alternatives when we want to go to school are not the same as when we want to go shopping, not the same when we want to go for a walk in the park as when we want to see what's happening on Facebook. Our needs and wants range from little things to really big things, from the fairly easy to the complex and difficult.

Sure, we need to know what those alternatives are and how to access them. That's the easier part of the success equation. The harder part is deciding just how much we really want whatever we have identified for ourselves. The issue is that it is always easier and simpler to just stay at home and do nothing. Let me share a very brief story from my past. I think you will get the point.

I was a Freshman at Ohio University and sitting in the office of my academic counceler. I was frustrated and generally feeling sorry for myself. He said, "Here's what you need to know. No one, with the possible exception of your mother, cares much one way or the other about whether you graduate or not. All the caring is up to you. This time next year, only you will really understand how much you did or did not care."

The point indeed relates to big wants, but it applies to those little wants that come up every day; but I'll bet you get the point, don't you?

If you've been listening to the earlier episodes of Blind How, you know to focus on the 3 ups: Stand or sit up straight, look up at others when you or they are talking and speak up so others can hear you without needing to make any special effort. This is useful advice for anyone, but it's particularly important for those of us who can't see. Why? Because some of us who can't see, if not most of us, tend not to look at people with whom we are talking, are apt to not talk loudly enough and clearly enough to be heard easily and may get a little lazy and not sit or stand up straight.

Why does it matter? We want to be taken seriously and may not be if we neglect the 3 Ups. It's no more complicated than that.

There is a fourth element for effective communication that I'd like to tuck in as the fourth up, but I can't figure out any way to make it an up. Even so, it's pretty important, important enough to label it as the key to effective communication. Without it, the 3 ups still matter, but even if you look up, sit up and speak up, it is still hard to be taken seriously or to let others know that you are taking them seriously.

It goes back to that blind thing. Certainly not everyone who can see, but many who can, make assumptions about blind people that are generally not true. Ask someone who can see to finish the sentence, "Blind people…." The likelihood is that they will finish the sentence with things that they assume blind people cannot do.

The additional issue is that they likely don't personally know anyone who is blind. They probably know of a blind ccelebrity but still think of him or her in terms of what he or she can't do, seeing the celebrity's musical or other special talent as separate from his or her blindness. Blindness is typically not seen as a simple fact but rather as a complex handicap.

Of course the same types of assumptions are made about people with other physical limitations such as not being able to hear or not being able to walk. This is the issue. People who can see, can hear, can walk, reflexively think of what they would not be able to do if they suddenly couldn't see, couldn't hear, couldn't walk. They then project their perceived inabilities onto those of us who can't see, can't hear or can't walk.

It's worth noting that many people who see fine but then can't see later in life for some reason are apt to do the same thing; but they project their false assumptions onto themselves. They think of themselves as blind and unable to do much of anything. Since they haven't yet learned how to manage without being able to see, it feels like not being able to do much of anything may be permanent.

I'll get back to that in future episodes of Blind How; but here I want to share the key to effective communication, when you can't see.

Listen and learn.

The single best way to be taken seriously in any conversation is to make it clear that you are taking other people and what they say seriously. If you first attend to taking the other person seriously, he or she will be more apt to take you and what you say seriously. The more seriously they take you and what you say, the more your not seeing moves into the background. You know you are being taken seriously when someone tells you that they forget that you can't see.

I know. You were expecting something a little more profound. Here's the thing. Being seen as blind can lead to people projecting a lot of their own feelings about what they couldn't do onto you. The result is that they may tend not to take you and what you say as seriously as you deserve. They don't get past blind.

Listen and learn is not a magic solution to the blind prejudice of some people,