Auspol Explained

Auspol Explained

By David CoxEducation
Download on the App Store

Auspol Explained episodes

  • The Referendum Pamphlet - Its History and Usefulness

    The official Yes and No pamphlet for a referendum is there to let the public know the arguments for and against a proposed change to the constitution - but where did it come from? And is the referendum pamphlet useful? Well, let's explore its history and why it is the way it is. This episode is of course about the general concept of the referendum pamphlet that has over a century of history and not about any specific arguments or ideas in any particular referendum pamphlet itself.

    Make sure you're enrolled to vote and your details are up to date with the AEC: https://aec.gov.au
    Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplained
    Like Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388
    Get a copy of the script with citations here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14O55u5QqJa14-nZujcY1vt4AVyA0Le6h/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=102352521871694219008&rtpof=true&sd=true
    Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.

    9 min
  • How to Vote in a Referendum

    To change the constitution in Australia you need a referendum - but how do you vote in a referendum? It's actually incredibly simple! Here's a basic guide as well as a few extra bits of information that's handy to know.

    For up to date information about voting/referendums go to the Australian Electoral Commission website: www.aec.gov.au
    Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplained
    Like Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388
    Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.

    6 min
  • The A Team of the Australian Senate

    In the early years of the Senate there was a loophole only certain people could exploit to get more votes. Four men teamed up together to see if this worked for them.

    Get tickets to Extraordinary Auspol here: https://blueroom.org.au/events/extraordinary-auspol/
    Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplained
    Like Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388
    Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.

    4 min
  • Facebook Won't Let Me Promote This!

    Get tickets here! https://blueroom.org.au/events/extraordinary-auspol/

    Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplained
    Like Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388
    Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.

    5 min
  • Will Private Land Become Native Title if The Voice Passes? Voice Myths Debunked

    Today's claim: the Voice will abolish private land ownership and revert it all to native title if the Voice referendum succeeds. This is, of course, simply not true. This is actually a bit of misinformation that predates the Voice by a couple of decades and is just being rehashed to stir up the same old unfounded fear for a fresh new audience that doesn't have the historical context. Don't worry: the Voice will not lead to the end of private land ownership - that'd require the nation to actually want to change it collectively, and the Voice's existence or non-existence is not relevant.
    For more detail here's an RMIT FactLab article on this myth: https://www.rmit.edu.au/news/factlab-meta/voice-referendum-will-not-end-private-land-ownership
    Additional reliable sources include AAP Fact Check: https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/
    Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplained
    Like Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388
    Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.

    6 min
  • Will The Voice Need to Approve Every Single Bill? Voice Myths Debunked

    There's the claim that the Voice's approval will be required to pass any bill, or that even Parliament would need to consult the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice ahead of time before it could pass anything. In this episode I'll explain why that doesn't work either constitutionally or practically, and why the Voice won't even read or examine every single bill let alone wish to comment on or have an opinion on every bill. It's approval also is not a requirement to pass a bill, as the constitution clearly doesn't put that restriction on Parliament.

    AAP Fact Check labels this bit of misinformation as "absurd gibberish": https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/voice-approval-claim-is-absurd-gibberish/
    Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplained
    Like Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388
    Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.

    6 min
  • Can the Voice Veto a Referendum to Remove it? Voice Myths Debunked

    Claims that the Voice will be so powerful that it'll even be able to stop a future referendum bill from passing, thus ensuring it can never be abolished, are going around the internet - but is there any truth to that? The short answer, of course, is no. The long answer is no - but I explain why it's no so you understand it and can hopefully also explain it to someone who is being misled by this outlandish myth.

    Here's a citation for you: https://www.rmit.edu.au/news/factlab-meta/voice-could-not-veto-a-future-referendum
    Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplained
    Like Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388
    Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.

    6 min
  • Will The Voice to Parliament have Veto Power? Voice Myths Debunked

    A common claim is that the Voice to Parliament will have veto power - but does that have any basis in reality? What argument is there to be had over it? The answer is: none. The wording of the amendment prevents such an interpretation and clearly limits it to just being an advisory body, but on top of that we'd need to radically alter SEVERAL sections across multiple chapters of the constitution for the claim to make sense. Simply put: the idea it has any veto power over the decisions of Parliament, or could hold up/delay/introduce a bill, is just baseless. It's entirely up to Parliament whether or not to vote a bill through, or to send it off for consultation and examination with other groups/bodies (Voice or no Voice).
    On top of this: the idea that it could just manipulate the High Court for its own purposes fundamentally also misrepresents the role and powers of the High Court - and so this claim that such a constitutional or legal power exists requires us to ignore/misrepresent every single element involved in every single way. I can't be clearer about this. The only thing the Voice has is the ability to inform and, arguably, influence the decisions of Parliament - but ultimately it still rests in the general public as to whether or not that decision is accepted at the polls next election and so the voters nationwide remain, as always, the ones in control of the democratic process.
    The claim that the Voice's approval is needed for a bill was labelled "absurd gibberish" by AAP Fact Check, but I'll be a bit kinder about it: https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/voice-approval-claim-is-absurd-gibberish/
    Experts outright reject these claims (because they don't make sense): https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/constitutional-experts-reject-claims-the-voice-would-have-veto-power-or-invite-legal-action-20220811-p5b92t.html
    For more information I recommend reliable sources such as RMIT FactLab: https://www.rmit.edu.au/about/schools-colleges/media-and-communication/industry/factlab/debunking-misinformation
    And AAP Fact Check: https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/
    Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplained
    Like Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388
    Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.

    9 min
  • Understanding Misinformation: Voice Myths Debunked (an introduction)

    Welcome to the first in a series of several debunking episodes where I'll be fact checking and addressing misinformation that's floating around the internet (and maybe the family dinner table). Misinformation naturally happens when there's a gap in someone's understanding, or even just develops out of accidental misrepresentations of something. It's understandable. But we should also try to do our best to combat the spread of these misunderstandings to make sure as many people as possible are informed.
    For more information I recommend reliable sources such as RMIT FactLab: https://www.rmit.edu.au/about/schools-colleges/media-and-communication/industry/factlab/debunking-misinformation
    And AAP Fact Check: https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/
    Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplained
    Like Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388
    Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.

    7 min
  • Asking a Constitutional Expert About the Voice to Parliament Part 2: High Court and Legal Impact

    Will the Voice to Parliament be a third chamber? Can it veto legislation or be given veto power? And will we see a bunch of High Court challenges as a result of the Voice to Parliament if it passes? Well, instead of wild speculation in the comments section - why don't we ask Professor Anne Twomey, a constitutional expert, and dispel some misinformation and learn what experts ACTUALLY believe about the Voice to Parliament.
    Listen to Part 1 here if you missed it: https://spotifyanchor-web.app.link/e/NNEV4w23kBb
    I highly recommend you watch Anne Twomey's Youtube channel Constitution Clarion to learn more: https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalclarion1901
    Here are some other reliable resources on the Voice to Parliament:
    ANU Info: https://reporter.anu.edu.au/all-stories/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-voice
    University of Melbourne VoiceFACTS: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhOObpoQndRmwcXPvddSgZWKBt4ewtBJF
    Conversations About the Voice: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhOObpoQndRl0hyqVOvENjNdjULrFkcn8
    RMIT FactLab: https://www.rmit.edu.au/about/schools-colleges/media-and-communication/industry/factlab/debunking-misinformation
    Enjoy!
    Support the channel on patreon here: https://www.patreon.com/AuspolExplained
    Like Auspol Explained on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Auspol-Explained-107892180702388
    Auspol Explained would like to acknowledge the Whadjuk Nyoongar people and their Elders as the owners and custodians of the Land that the episode was recorded and edited on. This Land was stolen and never ceded. It always was and always will be Aboriginal Land.

    23 min

About Auspol Explained

From the publisher's feed

Auspol Explained is an educational podcast aimed at helping you understand the Australian political system in an easy and simple way. It's also a Youtube series, so I occasionally say "video" and…

More shows like Auspol Explained

Insiders by ABC News and Current Affairs

Insiders

19 Listeners

Politics Now by ABC Australia

Politics Now

80 Listeners

Australian Politics by The Guardian

Australian Politics

51 Listeners

ABC News Daily by ABC Australia

ABC News Daily

148 Listeners

Democracy Sausage with Mark Kenny by The Australian National University

Democracy Sausage with Mark Kenny

25 Listeners

7am by Solstice Media

7am

110 Listeners

Full Story by The Guardian

Full Story

164 Listeners

Cut Through by Crikey

Cut Through

3 Listeners

Lamestream by Lamestream Media

Lamestream

6 Listeners

We Used to be Journos by Ette Media

We Used to be Journos

25 Listeners