Israelis don’t just disagree about judicial reform, they’re losing faith in the entire governing machine: how laws get made, who actually represents voters and why unelected legal power keeps swallowing elected authority. Guest Amiad Cohen lays out a provocative “reset button” idea: a second legislative chamber, an Israeli-style Senate, built to slow legislation, force compromise, restore trust and break the hostage-taking dynamics of coalition politics, while also reshaping appointments, oversight and even how prosecutions of elected officials should work. You’ll come away understanding why the current system incentivizes chaos and why this proposed fix could either cool Israel’s internal civil war… or ignite an even bigger one.

Just when Israel finally closes the chapter on October 7th and brings every hostage home, a far bigger geopolitical gamble quietly takes center stage. In this episode of Basic Law, Middle East expert Dr. Mike Doran unpacks President Trump’s controversial new “Board of Peace” a sweeping international framework that could redefine how Gaza is governed, how Hamas is disarmed and even how global conflict is managed beyond the Middle East. Viewers will learn why this plan bypasses the UN, why Arab states are hesitant to enforce it and the uncomfortable truth about who (if anyone) is actually willing to take Hamas’s weapons away....revealing a high-stakes experiment that may shape Israel’s security and the future world order itself.

As Iran’s streets fill with protesters paying in blood for the basic right to vote, speak and dissent, Basic Law turns the camera inward and asks a sharper question: are Israelis, in the middle of their own democratic trench warfare, about to rewrite criminal law for principled reasons or for perfectly timed political gain? Host Aylana Meisel uses a “magic trick” to strip the personalities out of the debate and walk you through the real issue: Israel’s fraud and breach of trust offense is so vague it can turn “unethical” into “criminal” after the fact, empowering prosecutors and judges to enforce intuition instead of clear rules. You’ll learn why top legal scholars across Israel’s ideological spectrum have warned about this for decades, how a landmark Supreme Court case exposed the law’s arbitrariness and why global democracies are moving away from catch-all corruption charges. The result is a gripping framework for spotting the difference between rule of law and rule by headline...right when it matters most.

New York City changed overnight and for many Jews, the warning signs are flashing red.

Aylana Meisel-Diament sits down with former Palau Supreme Court Justice and U.S. constitutional scholar Greg Dolin to tackle one of the most uncomfortable and urgent questions facing Jewish communities today. As cities like London and possibly Sydney begin criminalizing antisemitic slogans, America’s First Amendment protections collide with real-world threats to Jews in public, at universities and even in religious institutions. Can free speech coexist with safety? Or is censorship feeding the very extremism it seeks to contain? And what course of action should American Jews pursue?

Israel is once again confronting the unthinkable: should terrorists be executed? Amid the chaos of political drama, like Itamar Ben-Gvir’s noose pin stunt, the real debate is getting lost. This episode of "Basic Law" slices through the noise to examine the moral, legal and strategic stakes of a renewed push for the death penalty. From historical trauma to October 7th, from Jewish law to the failures of past prisoner swaps, Aylana discusses all the factors behind this landmark debate in Israel. Is the bill a genuine shift or just a signal in an election year culture war?

Israel’s latest legal scandal isn’t just about one leaked video or one reckless military advocate general, it’s a flashing red warning light for the entire constitutional future of the Jewish state. In this episode of "Basic Law," Aylana Meisel-Diament exposes how a single alleged cover‑up spiraled into a labyrinth of judicial self‑policing, political power struggles and a legal system so insulated it may no longer answer to the people it governs. From Supreme Court justices sitting atop every major decision‑making body to a MAG office investigating itself, this case reveals a deeper crisis: can the rule of law survive when those who enforce it are accountable only to themselves?