We quickly drafted the recommendation and ran around the room to seek consensus. We actually checked wording with the PCC too! The monitoring officer was on hand to make sure it ticked the legal boxes. Then is went to the vote. Only two voted against it.

If you vote not to accept the budget as is and vote only to approve it with conditions, you find yourself in a position where it suddenly dawns on you that have to work out what to say as the recommendation! I'm not good at thinking on the hoof like this... 😦

T/CC again on target, explanation of PRAP Maturity Plan and the Legitimacy Panel has a new name! OK I could detect issues and this is news, actually this was the answer to another question I'd noted from the backing papers. I need to follow up on this response in the community.

To the Chair's annoyance a long rambling build up to the impact on excellent community engagement initiatives because of overtime cuts. I wanted to highlight the we had been a leading force in terms of Community Legitimacy. Things seem to have drifted. This is difficult work.

The PCC response missed the mark, but T/CC Maggie Blyth was more on target.

This meeting was focused on the budget. Precept increase to the max plus some. As it is collected by the Council Tax which is regressive I wanting to point out the impact..........

We talk about switching to Linux, but what about *BSD?

Improvisation with Alwertooo live set at Calafou around 9AM.

Alwertooo audio setup:

xxoossee video setup:

https://codeberg.org/divyaranjan/emacs-reader/

If you have no idea what I'm doing here, please watch the first introductory stream of the series:

Operating System: GNU Guix