BE BOLD with BOULDEN

Today's show is a reminder that we are here. Others are as well, and we are blessed in abundance of the experience. Happy Thanksgiving to each of you, and thank you for being a part of my life through your enjoyment of the show.

Today we dive into the celestial world of Astrology, the Venus Star Point, and Plutonian Energy, featuring the insightful Laurie Elizabeth from the popular Seeker's Insights podcast.

Laurie takes us on a journey to uncover the transformative power of the Venus Star Point, its role in shaping relationships, creativity, and personal growth, and how it’s influencing the energy of the cosmos right now. We’ll also delve deep into Plutonian Energy—its intensity, its shadows, and its capacity to catalyze profound change in our lives.

Whether you’re a seasoned stargazer or just beginning to explore the mysteries of astrology, this episode promises to enlighten and inspire. Tune in to uncover how these cosmic forces might be shaping your world and how you can align with their transformative power.

The election has caused a greater schism in our country and unity is not only something that is sorely needed, there is one side completely abandoning it. The hypocrisy of those siding with the left is now on full display. The democrats and those who have long supported policies that focused on social issues and inclusivity are now left grasping for fallacious claims to comfort their concerns about how Donald Trump was re-elected. To quote a local filmmaker and musician who seems brainwashed and parroted by mentally ill people across the country, those that went into the ballot and voted for Trump were voting for sexism, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, and embrace nazi idealogy. These individuals believe the voters use economy, inflation, taxes, as buzzwords to hide their “inherent sexism and racism”. I voted for Trump last Tuesday, not because I support him as an individual, but because if it was voting for communism or the possibility of liberty, I will vote liberty every day of the week. I’m not alone. I love my friends and family of all sexual orientations, gender, race, economic status, disabilities and more, and that’s why I voted against Harris/Walz on Tuesday. I voted to force the democrat party off the ledge of their extremism and recalibrate to represent liberty. Those that cannot understand my vote and millions more are in for a rude awakening. So sit back grab a cup of coffee, and let’s Get Bold!

Greetings Bold Critical Thinkers! Perhaps you are processing the election last week. There are many implications of the results, but few have been highlighted by the news media. The premise of today’s show is to expose that we at our most basic understanding of humanity are not who we believe we are, nor have many of us processed what we have become over time. In meditating on how to best put together today’s show I struggled with finding a way to be loving and accountable. Often times I use Plato’s allegory of the cave to explain the struggles of humanity to accept a paradigm shift. Each of us believes we have left the cave, and the cruel twist of fate is many are incapable of seeing their view as the chained and shackled watching images on the wall. I do not offer today’s show as a superior view, or to paradigm or red pill anyone with my thoughts. I’m simply hoping we can sit with the information and reflect. If you find this show helpful today, please consider sharing it with a friend or loved one that may need it.

Perhaps what you heard me sat about the filmmaker/musicians comments at the top of the show you’ve seen similar in your own communities. People who are choosing to believe the shadows on the wall instead of venturing outside of their own cave. Sadly, these individuals are cutting off loved ones, long time friendships, work relationships, by choosing a political side over the human experience of loving one another. How did we get here? How does one wake up a political being and stop recognizing a human being? Surely, not everyone who voted for Donald Trump hates their neighbors that are in marginalized and minority groups. Well, the answers are not easy, they take patience, reflection, and questioning our caves reality. Let’s dive into this a bit more by exploring why and how this thought process became prevalent.

For those looking for a progressive voice that is starting to speak up about why Trump won, Senator Bernie Sanders is lashing out at his own party and voters. He recently went on CNN with Dana Bash and said that the economy problem is over 50 years old and you can’t blame Biden or Trump for it. He spoke about how the countries working class experienced the most progressive domestic changes from Biden, but it failed to impact them in practical financial ways, which Trump spoke to on the campaign trail. Bernie Sanders is correct, and the left should be paying attention when I’m quoting an openly socialist progressive on my show. He is the antithesis to the liberty minded content I provide, but yet, even I am able to compliment him when he’s correct. I start here because this is the model the far-left is missing. They are unable to find things they like about any Republican or Trump. The far-left has claimed moral superiority while ignoring major red flags.

I try to keep religion out of the forefront of my arguments because I like to cast as wide a net as possible when fishing for open minds. However, for part of today’s show I must use the framework of morality in order to expose those selling morality in the form of social justice and inclusion. When you confront issues with a lens of which to study it further you can see details others miss. I understand that this can be a nuanced topic, but we need a framework for the discussion. Many atheist emphasize reason, empathy, and share human values for their morality. There has been a rise in liberal politics and atheist as they combine on a view of individual freedom and non-religious governance, but perhaps this has led to a loss of morality and introspection.

To understand the election results and why someone may have voted for Donald Trump, I believe it is important to define the shifting morality on secular values, as these are rooted in religious beliefs that do not stand with hatred. Atheist move to secular-based morality now prioritizes personal autonomy, equal rights, social justice - however, what is the foundation of these beliefs without framework of religion or ethical standards that are inherent to being human? Morality ceases to be objective, it loses grounding in relativism, and the language and beliefs will shift like the sand beneath the waves of popular thoughts and wants of the day.

The filmmaker/musician wrote these exact words: “if you voted for Trump, you are no friend of mine. I view you as a sexist, racist nazi. Millions of us see you this way. Consider yourself unseen, unheard, and unloved by me, eternally.”

Where does someone learn this labeled behavior? The human brain favors simplicity. To work outside of labels takes cognitive time, and the brain avoids overload. This is why meditation and going on walks in nature can be transformative time when we make it easier to process information and sit in silence. Most people resort to cognitive ease and label when there isn’t time to complete a task, or they have no interest in understanding the full picture. In this case, the full picture is Donald Trump, and how could he be voted back into office.

Russian Collusion - the label itself is dishonest as collusion is not a legal term used by investigators. It was a media and political term. Mueller himself clarified this in his report that he was looking for conspiracy and coordination - none of which he could find evidence of an unlawful act.

Trump supported white supremacist when he said there were “Fine People on both Sides” - Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and the labeling left love to use this quote and they are lying through their teeth each time. They took a sound byte out of context on MSNBC and the entire left ran with it for their confirmation bias. What he really said was “I'm not talking about the Neo-Nazis or the White Nationalists because they should be condemned totally. I'm talking about people other then the Nazis or Nationalists who were treated badly by the press.”

Perhaps you remember the “Russia Bounty on Troops” This story came out in June 2020 and was used against Trump in his re-election campaign - In April 2021, the Biden administration reviewed the intelligence used for these claims and stated there was nothing to substantiate the evidence - after it was used against Trump.

Remember in 2020, the 51 former intelligence officials including former CIA directors who said the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation a month before    the election? Social media removed news sources that cited the laptop as Russian disinformation, and the public never had the laptop formally confirmed until Hunters trial in 2024 where he was found guilty of other charges, and the laptop was used as evidence in his case. This was election interference.

Perhaps you believe he told people to drink bleach to cure Covid… He never said bleach - he asked if there was a way to use a disinfectant in some way inside the body - possibly UV light inside the body - which was being used in studies in other countries at the time. He never said bleach.

Maybe you believe overturning Roe banned abortion - it didn’t - it moved it back to the states since there was no constitutional amendment addressing it.

I can continue on with media lies and progressive left deceit with the “All illegals are vermin” lie, the “Bloodbath” distortion used to claim he’d be a dictator on day one, Lafayette Square, Soldiers as losers and suckers, selling nuclear secrets, and taking control of the beast. Every one of these stories created bias, division, and hatred. It was a deceptive narrative that has people like this musician and filmmaker showing he has failed to have an original thought, instead going with the herd mentality to do the least rock n roll thing ever, conform with other people and worse, the least artistic thing, the group think over individualism.

Earlier in the show I laid a foundation for understanding the left vs the right ideology through atheist vs traditional religious perspective, with outliers somewhere between these two groups. Through this lens we can clearly see that Donald Trump did not win an election over Kamala Harris. The popular vote not only supported a Republican ticket, but also elected a majority Senate, and likely, a Republican house. It was what the media would refer to as a red wave. This is not a vote for Donald Trump, it is a referendum on unchecked progressive measures. Those that do not understand that their ideology was rejected for more conservative traditional measures, and a return to the morality of a larger religious paradigm - that our rights come from no government, rather are inherent with our birth right, will be unable to objectively understand the election results.

The democrat party has increased it’s emphasis on personal autonomy and social justice, but fail to stay within the framework of the constitution and our personal rights in life. You cannot legislate a collective group to have rights. All rights are individual rights. The constitution does not grant any rights, it is a list of protections, and even if they are not listed, the 9th Amendment turns those protections over to the States and protect’s peoples unlisted rights by restricting federal governments power. The Republican Party has resorted to situational ethics based on their desired goals and moral relativism has changed their stance from religious values to values of convenience. They largely stand for populism within their own party while abandoning personal freedom and responsibility. Interesting in this study of the two parties and moral relativism is how quickly the Republicans embraced “My body my choice” over vaccine mandates, while Democrats decided it was only “Your Body Your Choice” if you were a female and wanted an abortion, vaccines that were still in experimental design deemed you against the science by the left.

So who voted for Trump, a man charged with multiple crimes, found guilty of using money illegally… A man that the left labeled Hitler, with MSNBC comparing his Madison Square Gardens rally as a rebirth of nazism in the United States in sensationalized reporting. A man that President Biden repeatedly called a threat to our democracy. A man that is said to be

I could easily just stay quiet and write nothing - and it would cost me nothing. In fact - it would likely be better to say nothing.

Tune in for an interview with award winning Italian filmmaker, Nick Rizzini, as we discuss his new thought-provoking short, The Journalist.

Link to short film since this is audio only: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfjmVzN7XyI

As Hurricane Milton takes aim at Western Florida's coastline many are wondering about weather modification. When this topic is discussed many are quick to label it as conspiracy theories. Tonight we prove that not only is weather modification real, but it has been used in warfare and has been developed since 1891. Next time someone claims that this isn't real, send them this show and the links below.

In 2020 the Trump campaign hired our guest tonight, Ken Block, to investigate for possible election fraud. He wrote about this in his book, "Disproven". He now appears in the 165 page filing by Jack Smith. Did Trump know about Ken's findings during these alleged crimes? Tonight we ask to find out.

I was told that sending my kids to a private Catholic school was a privilege. I myself was sent for parochial education as a child. I've never seen my education as one of privilege for my parents, not for myself making that choice now. Certainly for me as a child I had the great privilege of my parents choice to sacrifice, and for my own children to experience the same. The language and use of the word "privilege" misrepresents what parochial education is and should be, and society would be wise to look closer at their success. Public schools are falling behind on standards when our students are tested. What can we learn when we approach public schooling from the same standards set forth by private and parochial?

THIS EPISODE ORIGINALLY AIRED DEC 22nd, 2022.

Last week, Dr. Paul Thomas retired from pediatric medicine after a 35-year career. The final years of his medical practice had been turbulent, with a constant barrage from the medical board. The accusations and concerns from the board began with his book, “The Vaccine Friendly Plan.” Released in 2016, the book placed a target on him as his research was attacked. This led to the suspension of his medical license in December of 2020.

A simple search of him by name on the internet will give the impression that Dr. Paul is an “anti-vaxxer.” A term coined to discredit those in the medical community as non-science practitioners. However, looking closer at his profile, you can discover he led one of the largest research studies by examining his own patients throughout the years. This research led him to scientifically show that vaccines were having a negative impact on the health of his patients. (Study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7709050/)  He began this research after witnessing several young children that he vaccinated change in the days and weeks after administration of the dose. 

Dr. Paul Thomas

He developed the Dr. Paul Approved Vaccine plan in 2008. This plan was not anti-vaccine, it was a revision of the CDC plan to avoid taxing on the immune system, and vaccines that likely would never be needed, such as Hep B., something he claimed could be eliminated by understanding the health of the mother. As his patients began experiencing superior health, and a significantly lower rate of autism (0 in 1336) than the national average of 1 in 45.

What does it mean to be Human? Is it to err?