Rav Pincus reminds us that a Tefillah without a deep understanding of the names of Hashem is not an incomplete Tefillah.

Rav Pincus points to the Tefillah of Moshe to show the power of a Tefillah that recognizes a specific name of Hashem.

Rav Pincus notes that there are different ways to categorize Hashem's involvement in the world. One way is to categorize it by degree of involvement. The other way is to categorize it by the type of help that we need. This is represented by different names of Hashem.

Rav Pincus starts to put together the discussion of Bitachon and how it relates to Kriah.

Rav Pincus continues to discuss the Midrash with Menashe calling out to Hashem as a prime example of Kriah.

Rav Pincus points to a Midrash with Menashe calling out to Hashem as a prime example of Kriah.

In a footnote, Rav Pincus notes how our understanding of Reshaim needing higher levels of Bitachon can still fit with the approach of the Chovot HaLevavot in regard to Bitachon.

We continue to discuss Bitachon in order to better understand Kriah. Rav Pincus continues to explain how different people require higher or lower levels of Bitachon.

We continue to discuss Bitachon in order to better understand Kriah. Rav Pincus notes that there are varying levels of Bitachon. Different situations and different people require higher or lower levels of Bitachon.

We continue to discuss Bitachon in order to better understand Kriah. Rav Pincus quotes the Griz who notes that Bitachon is incomplete if we don't fully appreciate the degree of our distress.