Becoming The Solution

5 minute read / listen.

In a diverse world that celebrates a multitude of beliefs and perspectives, the ability to engage in open and respectful dialogue is a cornerstone of a harmonious society. Healthy debate and discussion can lead to mutual understanding and personal growth. However, there are times when engaging in conversation is not only unproductive but potentially harmful. In situations where individuals are staunch, unwavering, and unyielding in their beliefs, commonly referred to as “true believers,” it’s crucial to employ a different set of strategies. Here we explore  practical approaches for navigating interactions with true believers while maintaining peace and civility.

True believers are individuals who hold their beliefs as unwavering, absolute truths. They perceive their viewpoints as the only valid perspective, and they often approach conversations with dogmatic certainty. Whether their convictions revolve around religious beliefs, racial and ethnic superiority, or other deeply held notions, attempting to engage in rational debate can prove fruitless. In such cases, it is recomendable to employ the following strategies:

When confronted with a true believer’s unyielding convictions, the most effective approach is to remain polite and seek opportunities to disengage from the conversation. Politeness maintains a civil tone and avoids unnecessary confrontations. Politely excusing yourself from the conversation, such as mentioning another obligation, can be a graceful exit strategy without causing offense.

In situations where you cannot physically remove yourself from the conversation, it’s valuable to convey disinterest. This subtle signal can indicate that you’d rather not continue the discussion. Should the true believer persist, politely change or request to change the subject. Communicate your lack of interest in debating their particular beliefs. The goal is to redirect the conversation away from contentious topics.

Attempting to challenge a true believer’s beliefs, questioning their logic, or trying to “enlighten” them can escalate the situation. It’s crucial to avoid provocation, as it usually leads to more significant conflict and frustration. The primary objective is to de-escalate the situation and withdraw without fostering further contention.

In cases where you are unable to extricate yourself and the situation becomes uncomfortable or potentially hostile, do not hesitate to seek mediation or assistance from a neutral third party. This can be particularly helpful for young individuals confronted by intolerance from adults or when confined in close quarters.

While engaging in rational discussion is often constructive, it is unlikely to be effective when dealing with true believers. For individuals who steadfastly adhere to irrational and inflexible beliefs, engaging in debates can be counterproductive. The likelihood of changing their viewpoints is minimal, and it’s best to avoid encouraging prolonged discussions that only serve to exacerbate tensions.

So we can say that tolerance and open-mindedness are critical for a peaceful society. In many cases, engaging in debates and conversations can be enlightening and beneficial. However, when dealing with true believers—individuals who adamantly cling to their unwavering beliefs—strategies such as politeness, disinterest, and subject redirection are more effective. The ultimate goal is to defuse potentially explosive situations, foster understanding, and contribute to a world where diversity is embraced and respected, even when not all beliefs align.

Written by Stephen Griffin and with help from ChatGPT

Becoming The Solution is made with Jetpack Podcast. Full show notes and every episode at https://evolvingtogether1.wordpress.com/

5 Minute read / listen.

The expansion of decision space is closely linked to our spiritual and personal growth, paving the way for a life filled with freedom and joy. This essay explores the profound idea that personal evolution and increased decision space are the keys to unlocking a larger reality and a deeper understanding of life.

At the heart of this exploration lies the concept of decision space – the realm in which we make choices and decisions. Every choice we make, every action we take, exists within this decision space. It encompasses our known possibilities, options, and potential outcomes. As we grow and evolve, this decision space expands, granting us access to a broader spectrum of choices.

One of the driving forces behind the expansion of decision space is our innate tendency to evolve towards love. This evolution doesn’t merely involve romantic love but extends to a more profound sense of compassion, empathy, and interconnectedness with others. As we grow emotionally and spiritually, our decision space naturally broadens, allowing us to make choices that align with these higher ideals.

With the growth of decision space comes an expansion of our reality. We begin to perceive connections, patterns, and possibilities that were previously mysterious or non existent. Our worldview undergoes a transformation, and we find ourselves living in a larger, more interconnected reality. This newfound awareness enables us to make choices that resonate with a deeper understanding of life.

Every choice within our decision space presents a challenge. Whether the circumstances are favourable or adverse, we can view each challenge as an opportunity for growth. Even in the face of catastrophes or tragedies, we have the chance to make the right decisions, learn from our experiences, and evolve. Pain, though often unwelcome, can be a potent teacher, prodding us to change and prompting personal growth.

While we possess free will to navigate our decision space, it’s essential to respect the free will of others. Each individual is on their unique path, making choices that align with their readiness for growth. Respecting their choices and allowing them the freedom to evolve at their own pace is crucial, even when it involves our closest relationships, such as children or spouses. Gradually, as children become adults, it becomes necessary to give them the space to make both good and bad decisions, fostering their own growth.

In our pursuit of personal and spiritual growth, we must refrain from creating hierarchies of evolution. Everyone is on their own journey, and while some may appear more evolved than others, this perception should not lead to feelings of superiority or judgment. We must acknowledge that each person’s growth occurs at their own pace and respect their unique journey.

The journey of personal growth and spiritual evolution is not limited to those who favour intuitive, right-brain thinking. Logical, left-brain individuals, such as scientists, doctors, and professionals, also have a path to understanding the importance of consciousness, love, and interconnectedness. It’s essential to offer them logical, evidence-based explanations that resonate with their analytical minds, as they are often the decision-makers in our society.

Whether one’s path is driven by intuition or logical reasoning, the destination remains the same – a deeper understanding of life and the realization that love is the answer. By fostering an inclusive approach to growth, we can collectively move toward a more compassionate, interconnected world.

Written by Stephen Griffin and ChatGPT

Becoming The Solution is made with Jetpack Podcast. Full show notes and every episode at https://evolvingtogether1.wordpress.com/

5 Minute Read / Listen

In the lives of most adults, a domain of unease emerges, often traced back to our earliest years. While some of these apprehensions indeed stem from deeply traumatic experiences, it remains a peculiar facet of the human condition that a significant part of our fears, those unsettling spectres that cast shadows over our daily lives, find their origins in seemingly inconsequential and trivial childhood episodes. These fears, like restless ghosts, persist in the shadows of our psyche, and we unknowingly become their unwitting victims. Yet, our journey towards emancipation from these invisible chains necessitates a courageous exploration of the past.

When confronted with an arduous task or an uncomfortable challenge, the common reaction is to shy away, to circumvent the perceived difficulty. We believe that avoiding the task will preserve our peace, but, in truth, it perpetuates our internal struggle. This avoidance is, in itself, a reflection of the fear that lies deep within us – a fear nurtured and sustained by memories from our past.

It takes remarkable courage to face these fears head-on, to unearth the unadorned truth of our inner landscape. This process begins with an acknowledgment that the origins of our trepidations are often trivial, faint echoes of a long-forgotten moment. For instance, we might trace our sense of inadequacy back to an episode as simple as not receiving a toy at the age of four when a younger sibling did.

As adults, we can logically dismiss these memories as inconsequential, mere blips on the radar of our existence. But we must remember that to a four-year-old, such incidents can take on world-altering proportions. At that tender age, the discernment of fairness, love, and acceptance is governed by simplicity, and we react so. This disconnect between our childlike perceptions and adult comprehension is the crucible in which our fears are forged.

Regrettably, as parents, we unknowingly perpetuate this cycle. We act without realizing that our decisions might leave an indelible mark on our children’s psyches, shaping their choices and fears for years to come. The view from the eyes of a child is a world apart from that of an adult, and this divergence inevitably results in inadvertent actions that become potent triggers in our children’s lives.

The path to transcending these fears does not involve a Herculean battle against deep-rooted monsters. Instead, it hinges on the courage to delve into our past, to uncover these seemingly trivial incidents that have clung to our souls. We must summon the strength to be authentic, to confront and accept our vulnerabilities, and to deal with them head-on.

In doing so, we often find that our fears are not formidable adversaries but ephemeral phantoms, mere puffs of smoke that dissipate when exposed to the light of understanding and acceptance. The true challenge lies not in conquering some profound inadequacy but in mustering the courage to confront and overcome our own self-imposed limitations.

These fears are not preordained karma, as we are tempted to believe. They are not immutable, inescapable destinies. Rather, they are self-imposed limitations, fabricated by the ego, sustained by fear, and hidden behind a veil of belief. We craft these beliefs to avoid shouldering the responsibility for our own happiness, shifting the blame to external forces.

But, this victim mentality is a dead-end road. Victims languish in self-pity, crippled by their perceived helplessness. To escape this cycle, one must take responsibility for their life and the choices they make. This shift from victimhood to empowerment opens the door to a brighter future.

The courage to confront the seemingly insignificant events of our past, to unburden ourselves from the shackles of irrational fears, is the real hero’s journey. It is a testament to our resilience, the strength of character that lies within us all, waiting to be rediscovered. By recognizing that our fears often have their roots in the triviality of childhood, we can embark on a transformative journey to break free from these invisible chains, opening the door to a life unburdened by fear and self-doubt.

Becoming The Solution is made with Jetpack Podcast. Full show notes and every episode at https://evolvingtogether1.wordpress.com/

5 minute read / Listen

It is clear that discussions surrounding privilege have become increasingly prevalent. As a white, heterosexual, northern european male, I have come to recognise the inherent advantages and privileges that my identity and background afford me. But, rather than feeling guilt or shame, I have chosen to embrace this awareness as an opportunity for personal growth and to contribute positively to the world around me. In this essay, I will explore how acknowledging privilege, irrespective of gender, race, creed or colour , can foster empathy and encourage individuals to leverage their advantages for the betterment of society.

If you find yourself concerned with the real or perceived influence of others, it’s essential to make sure that this concern does not negatively impact your decision-making. For instance, if you believe that someone else’s privilege is granting them undue influence or opportunities, it’s important not to let this belief drive you into inaction or resentment. Instead, consider how you can take control of your own actions and choices. For example, in a competitive academic or professional setting, rather than being demotivated by the advantages others might seem to have, you can focus on what you can control—your work ethic, your learning, and your unique contributions. By not allowing the fear of inequality to influence your decisions, you keep your agency and continue to act in ways that reflect your values and aspirations. This proactive approach not only helps you navigate perceived inequities but also encourages a mindset of resilience and personal responsibility, empowering you to thrive regardless of the challenges posed by others’ advantages.

My privileged position was not earned, but rather inherited by circumstances beyond my control. It is crucial to understand that privilege is not something individuals choose or directly control. Apart from the ‘lottery of our birth’ it is a consequence of historical, social, and systemic factors that have shaped our world. It is essential to distinguish this acknowledgment from feelings of guilt or shame, as these emotions hinder progress and can deter productive conversations.

Understanding privilege entails recognising the advantages it brings. My background provided me with a solid foundation in life, access to quality education, and ample opportunities for personal and professional growth. These attributes, although not consciously sought, have undeniably opened doors and facilitated my journey through life, albeit with sweat and toll along the way. Gratitude for these advantages does not diminish the achievements and struggles of others; instead, it cultivates a sense of appreciation and awareness of the disparities that exist.

Acknowledging privilege is the first step towards building a more just and fair society. Being able to tick many of the ‘best boxes,’ I have come to appreciate the advantages bestowed upon me by circumstance. Rejecting guilt or shame, I have instead chosen to channel this awareness into empathy and social responsibility. The term “white privilege” should not be seen as a dirty word but as an opportunity for growth and understanding. Additionally, it’s crucial to recognize that concerns about the real or perceived influence of others should not dictate our actions or deter us from making decisions based on fairness and integrity. By focusing on what we can control—our own behavior, contributions, and the way we use our privilege—we can avoid being paralyzed by fear or resentment. Instead, we can use our advantages for the greater good, contributing to positive social change and creating a more inclusive world for all.

Written by Stephen Griffin and ChatGPT

Becoming The Solution is made with Jetpack Podcast. Full show notes and every episode at https://evolvingtogether1.wordpress.com/

5 minute read / Listen

The question of whether we have the right to influence or change someone’s choices is a complex and delicate one. It revolves around the concept of free will, the capacity for individuals to make decisions and take actions based on their own judgment. While it is a fundamental aspect of human existence, the ethical implications of interfering with someone else’s free will are multifaceted and context-dependent.

In some instances, overriding another person’s free will is not only allowable but also our responsibility, as in the case of young children. When children are too young to make informed decisions and protect themselves, it becomes the duty of caregivers to guide and protect them. This is a form of intervention that serves their best interests, ensuring their safety and well-being.

However, as individuals mature into adulthood, the boundaries of intervention become less clear-cut. Adults possess the autonomy to make choices, even if those choices are harmful or self-destructive. It is at this juncture that the ethical dilemma emerges. Should we intervene to prevent someone from making choices that could harm them?

The answer to this question is not universal and depends on several factors. One crucial factor is the individual’s capacity to make decisions. If someone is mentally incapacitated or lacks the necessary cognitive abilities to make informed choices, there may be a more compelling case for intervention. In such cases, intervening may be seen as a compassionate act aimed at safeguarding their well-being.

Conversely, if an adult is making poor choices but remains mentally competent, the decision to intervene becomes more complex. Here, the motivation behind intervention becomes essential. If the intervention is driven by genuine concern for the individual’s welfare and a desire to help them overcome their destructive behaviour, it may be justifiable.

However, if the motivation stems from personal discomfort, a desire to control, or a need to fulfil one’s own preferences, then intervening in another person’s life becomes ethically questionable. Interfering with someone’s free will should not be about imposing our desires or values on them. It should be driven by a genuine belief that our intervention will lead to their betterment.

Ultimately, the decision to override someone’s free will should be guided by careful consideration of all possibilities and motivations. It should prioritise the individual’s well-being over personal interests. While the outcome of such interventions may be uncertain, it is essential to approach them with due diligence and humility.

Fear of the unknown should not deter us from making difficult decisions when necessary. Life is a journey of learning, and sometimes the only way to grow and evolve is to make choices, even if we are unsure of the outcome. If an intervention leads to unfavourable results, it can still serve as a valuable lesson, helping us refine our judgment and decision-making process.

The question of whether to override someone’s free will is not a straightforward matter. It hinges on factors such as the individual’s capacity to make decisions, the motivation behind intervention, and the potential for positive outcomes. While it may be challenging to navigate these ethical waters, it is imperative to approach such decisions with empathy, selflessness, and a commitment to the well-being of those we seek to help. Making choices, even when uncertain, is an essential part of our journey toward personal growth and understanding

Becoming The Solution is made with Jetpack Podcast. Full show notes and every episode at https://evolvingtogether1.wordpress.com/

5 Minute Read / Listen

The rapid evolution of technology has become an undeniable hallmark of our age. It is an ever-changing landscape that constantly shapes our lives, altering the way we communicate, work, and interact with the world. The idea of slowing down or halting this relentless technological advancement may seem appealing to some, but it is, in reality, an impractical and impossible proposition. Technology’s forward march is inexorable, driven by its innate capacity to create solutions that are immensely useful to humanity.

The real challenge lies not in restraining technology itself, but in harnessing the wisdom necessary to guide its development and deployment responsibly. Here we will explore the notion that technology is neither inherently good nor evil, but rather a tool whose morality is determined by the choices we make and the wisdom we employ in its utilisation.

Technology, by its very nature, is on a constant trajectory of evolution. This evolution is fuelled by innovation, necessity, and the human desire for progress. Attempts to impede this evolution are akin to trying to halt the flow of a river with bare hands. It is simply not feasible as long as technology continues to offer solutions that improve our lives, whether it be in the form of medical advancements, communication tools, or more efficient transportation systems. The underlying driving force behind this evolution is human ingenuity and the pursuit of solutions to our ever-evolving challenges.

Rather than a contest between different technologies, the true race that matters is the one between technology and human wisdom. As technology grows more powerful and potentially destructive, the onus is on us to develop the wisdom required to use it responsibly. The power of technology, be it in the form of nuclear fusion bombs or environmental pollutants, carries the potential for immense harm if wielded recklessly. Our decisions regarding the use of technology, rooted in our collective wisdom, will ultimately determine our fate as a species and the health of our planet.

It is crucial to recognise that technology itself possesses no inherent moral character. It is neither good nor evil; it simply exists. The moral dimension emerges from the choices we make regarding its use. Technology is a tool, and like any tool, it can be employed for ethical or unethical purposes. If harnessed with a spirit of cooperation, care, and consideration for others, technology can be a force for positive change. However, when driven solely by self-interest, greed, or ignorance of potential consequences, technology can become a destructive force.

The consequences of short sighted decisions in the realm of technology can be dire. Global warming, the threat of nuclear warfare, and environmental degradation are all examples of challenges we face due to past choices driven by a limited perspective. When we view our actions solely through a narrow lens, focused on personal gain and immediate gratification, we often fail to consider the broader implications of our decisions. This lack of foresight can lead to catastrophic outcomes.

To navigate the ever-evolving landscape of technology, we must cultivate wisdom and a broader understanding of our place in the world. Wisdom emerges from a deep understanding of who we are, why we exist, and the nature of our reality. It is only when we embrace this bigger picture that we can make informed decisions that consider the well-being of humanity and the planet.

Technology is a tool whose morality is determined by the choices we make, and it is our collective responsibility to ensure that these choices align with the greater good of humanity and the planet. In the race between technology and wisdom, it is wisdom that will ultimately determine our fate as a species and the legacy we leave for future generations.

Written by Stephen Griffin & ChatGPT

Becoming The Solution is made with Jetpack Podcast. Full show notes and every episode at https://evolvingtogether1.wordpress.com/

4 Minute Read / listen

The decisions we make in life determine who we are and chart the course of our journey. While it may appear that our path is influenced by destiny or circumstances, it is actually a complex interplay of possibilities, probabilities and choices. Every decision we make, from the everyday to the profound, represents a step in our personal evolution.

In this intricate dance of existence, the idea of determinism gives way to the concept of probabilism. It’s not as though our lives are predestined, but rather that they unfold through a web of possibilities. Each choice we encounter is an opportunity for growth, a chance to navigate the complex maze of life.

Our world is a realm of limitless choices, both trivial and monumental. Some choices are born out of necessity, such as adapting to adverse weather conditions, while others are profoundly moral, impacting not only our own lives but also the lives of others. These moral choices carry a greater weight, demanding a heightened sense of responsibility, as they affect the intricate tapestry of human interaction.

We find ourselves in a multiplayer type game called life, where our actions create ripples in the lives of countless others. Even in the face of adversity or privilege, choices persist. The circumstances we are born into may vary greatly, but the common thread is the presence of choice. Whether faced with abundance or scarcity, each choice is an opportunity for personal growth, a chance to shape the quality of our existence.

Material choices, while significant, pale in comparison to the moral decisions that define our character. It’s not about accumulating wealth or possessions but about the motivations that drive our choices. Do we act out of love or fear? This fundamental question underlies our journey towards personal growth. Our choices serve as a mirror reflecting the essence of our souls.

There is no situation devoid of choices or interaction. Every moment offers an opportunity to make decisions that influence our path and the paths of others. We engage with people, animals, and the environment, all of which require us to exercise our power of choice. The responsibility lies in whether we make choices that lead to positive growth or contribute to entropy. In this grand scheme of existence, we are ‘players’ in a larger system. Our choices not only define us but also affect the lives of other players. We are interconnected, and our actions have consequences that reverberate through the fabric of reality. This awareness calls us to make choices that prioritise love over fear and unity over isolation.

Even our dreams and daydreams offer unique realms of choice. They allow us to explore dramatic scenarios without real-world consequences, revealing the potential depth of our character and the choices we might make when faced with extraordinary circumstances. These independent realities serve as laboratories of consciousness, where we test the quality of our choices.

Ultimately, our purpose in this existence is to grow, to decrease entropy, and to move towards love rather than fear. We are endowed with the gift of choice, a tool for personal and collective evolution. These choices, driven by our motivations, are the building blocks of our character and the legacy we leave behind.

As we navigate the labyrinth of life, we must remember that our choices are not isolated events but threads woven into the fabric of existence. They are the means by which we shape ourselves, influence others, and fulfil our role in this grand, interconnected universe. Every choice, no matter how seemingly insignificant, contributes to the cumulative essence of who we become.

Written By Stephen Griffin and ChatGPT

Becoming The Solution is made with Jetpack Podcast. Full show notes and every episode at https://evolvingtogether1.wordpress.com/

26 minute read / listen

Today we will hear Tom Campbell discuss the concept of fear, instincts, and consciousness within the MBT framework.

He challenges the notion that fear is always a natural survival instinct, arguing instead that it often leads to dysfunctional behaviour. Campbell suggests that fear is not an inherent instinct but rather a response that inhibits rational decision-making and locks individuals into unproductive patterns. Through examples and analysis, he emphasises the importance of intelligence, preparation, and awareness in navigating potentially dangerous situations.

Campbell advocates for a shift in perspective away from fear-based reactions towards a more reasoned approach to survival and decision-making.

Interviewer’s Question

Let’s talk about fear. Because this is something that I hear a lot of people object to when they hear about MBT. It’s the idea that fear is always dysfunctional. And usually they objected this idea based on one of the following arguments.

The first is that fear is a natural survival instincts for all animals. And supposedly there are animals that lack fear, such as the dodo, that are now extinct because of it.

The second argument is there are individuals who lost the part of the brain that is responsible for the fear response or emotion and they became more dysfunctional as a result, not less dysfunctional.

And the third argument is that supposedly in psychopaths, psychopaths, the portion of the brain responsible for fear is less responsive and smaller.

So I thought about this and I came up with my own resolution for this conflict, which is the following.Perhaps we need to make a distinction between on the one hand the fighter flight instincts that come with the avatar, and on the other hand fear or fearlessness as a metaphor for the quality of the consciousness that is locked onto that avatar. In other words, a metaphor for the capacity of a consciousness to make low entropy profitable choices within its decision space.

So to make it a bit more concrete, when I see a spider, and my body creates a strong fighter flight response and activate its sympathetic nervous system, that has nothing in another self to do with the level of fear of my consciousness. It’s simply how my avatar is wired, and therefore part of the constraints that my consciousness has to make choices in. So the level of fear or fearlessness of my consciousness, my IOC refers to its capacity to make good choices within those constraints. Would that be a good way of putting things?

Tom Campbell’s Answer.

Yes, that is a good way of putting things, but it doesn’t quite answer all the questions that you created here I think, but that is true.

Language is something that, of course, it’s a wonderful thing, but you can interpret it in many different ways. I think that’s what you’re saying. It’s just kind of the way one interprets the fear and it applies this way in one situation. It kind of flies a different way there and we get confused in how we interpret it. But I would say, if we go up and look at your three things that you said, the first is fears and natural survival instinct for all animals, I would disagree with that. I would say fear is never an instinct that there’s no instincts to be fearful.

Now, there are fear instincts to be careful and to respond to certain things. If a herd of gazelles, here’s a lion roar, they probably all start to run. But we then say, well, that’s because they have fear of the lion. But that’s us. We’re making that up. That’s just a response. They do have a response. An instinctive response that if you hear a lion roar run. Okay, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s fair-based. It’s just a response.

You know how when you crush your leg and the physician takes that little rubber hammer and it hits something Just the right spot, your leg pops out. Well, you didn’t make that happen. It’s just a response. It’s a natural response to the way your central nervous system is wired. Well, the gazelle running when it hears the lion roars the same thing It’s not fear-based.

You don’t make your leg jump because you feel like you’ve got to run or anything. It just happens. It’s just a spot. So yes, the line roars and the gazelles all start to run away from the sound of the line. Just a response. Because they’ll run 100 feet and then they’ll stop. Well, if it was fear, they’d keep on running because they’d say, Oh, there’s a line back there and we’re afraid of that lion. So they don’t, they have a response to run, they do run, nothing happens, they stop.

So it’s just, so I think that’s what’s going on with these instincts. It’s a reaction. Instincts mean that you have learned over for us, it’s like 200,000 years to have automatic responses to things.

The bird automatically goes, Get twigs and stuff and builds a nest. It didn’t have to go to nest building school. It just does it. Because that’s instinct. And it does it just because it feels like that’s what it wants to do. And it’s just a response to things. It doesn’t build the nest because it’s afraid that if it didn’t have an nest, it wouldn’t have any place to lay the eggs in. It’s a fear response. No, it just is a response. So I think there are no instincts for fear. And that’s because, as you said, fear is always dysfunctional. Right?

Fear is always dysfunctional because when you have fear in a way you kind of lose part of your cognitive ability, the fear you just react. Well, how do things react to fear? Well, we all know about the deer who stares at the headlights of the incoming car. That’s how you react to fear, right? That’s not a lion and that’s something unknown. You know, an automobile and it’s roaring and it’s frightened and fear kills. Fear doesn’t help you survive. Fear keeps you from surviving. If you walk into woods and you run into a bear, well, if you’re fearful, you’ll do two things. One, run, which makes the bear think that you’re prey is a wrong thing to do and to that fear will ooze, hormones , out your pores to the point that you smell, like bait, you smell like things that are easily killed and eaten, you smell like prey. It smells that fear.

So what does the fear do? It kills you. It’s harmful. Now, if you walk out in the woods and you see a bear and you’re not fearful, well, you don’t put off those hormones . You might be a frightening thing that could hurt bear. So the bear is a little more wary than if you’re putting out all these, I’m terrified, hormones, and you don’t run. You see? So any, whenever you have fear, if fear is driving you, fear is high entropy, fear isn’t reasoned, fear isn’t informed, fear just drives and you react to the fear. So I’d say there are no instincts that call for fear. Fight or flight. That’s a choice. Okay?

What gives me my best survival? Do I stay in fight? Or do I run and try to get away? Well, you think about that. You come up with a choice of doing one of the other, based on the situations. Your ability to run. It’s ability to run. Your ability to fight. You sort all that out and then you do what’s reasonable. So you may have an instinct for danger. There may be that you just sense that something dangerous is going on here. But mostly that’s not instinct either. But the instincts are never fearful. And two, the d0do bird didn’t go extinct because it didn’t have fear, it went extinct because it didn’t have enough sense to stay away from human beings.

I wouldn’t say that that was because it didn’t have fear. It’s a lack of awareness. It wasn’t smart enough to say, Oh, you’re coming to humans.
Let’s get away. Let’s go someplace else. That was just intelligence. Most animals do have that much intelligence when the humans come up other animals are you know they have the idea that that’s a risk those humans are risky we should leave. Now you can attribute that and say oh that’s fear they’re all afraid of the humans not necessarily. It’s just intelligent that’s an assessment they make should, we stay and see if they give us food or or should we run because they’re likly to hurt us? And the safest thing to do is to run because they might give you food or they might just kill you.

So, if you’re not in real big need of food, then be safe, you know, take the safer course with the higher probability of survival and run. That’s smart. That’s not fear. That’s intelligence. Most critters have enough intelligence to know what might hurt them. And if it’s even something they’ve never seen before, they’re very wary of it because it might hurt them. So it’s not really fear. This reminds me, I had two golden retrievers and they were both only probably about one to two years old so they were still almost puppies. And after a big wind, there was a cardboard box sitting in my backyard. and it wasn’t supposed to be there. And both of those dogs, they barked at it and barked at it. And then finally I put them outside and they got the about like 50 feet away from it and they stretch out, you know, and then they turn around and run. And then because it didn’t chase them, they’d get a little closer and they’d sneak up and maybe another two or three feet closer and they’d turn around and run. And it was just funny watching these dogs and you’d say, well, they’re terrified of that box. They’re really frightened of that box might get them. And it’s just because it didn’t belong there and they didn’t know what it was. It was just an unknown. There’s an unknown thing there. Well, it’s not that they were fearful. It’s that they were smart enough to know that if you don’t know what it is, then be cautious. That’s intelligence. So, we tend to see fear lots of places that it’s not there. It’s either intelligence choices, or it’s a lack of intelligence from the dough does point. It just wasn’t bright enough to put together the humans were dangerous.

That was , yeah, it’s too bad because it did not survive for that reason. And this thing about the brain is no brain. That’s a virtual brain. And when people say that they go in and cut away that part of the brain that has to do with fear, When you cut away part of the brain, we have no idea what that means or what that’s doing. We’re not that smart. Yes, we probably cut away part of their emotional life. We may have cut away some of their rational life. We think we understand a brain and it’s got lobes to do this and over here’s the part for vision and here’s the part for tactile and here’s the part for hearing. We think we know some things about it, but then there are people that really don’t have any brains and they do well with all that stuff. There are people that have a centimeter wide liner inside their skull and that’s the only brain they have. They just have a one centimeter plusy stuff that stuck to the skull and they don’t have this lobe that lobe and all this kind of stuff and you know they’re working on their PhD in mathematics in some university. They’re not retarded. They’re doing just fine.

We don’t know as much about brains and things as we think we do. So anyway the fact that you cut out part of somebody’s brain and now they act in a way that’s difficult, that changes their personality. Well yeah you’ve just missed with the rule set. Those brains evolved and they evolved according to the rule set. And now you cut out a piece of that and what does the rules set say? Well, the rule sets pretty complicated and we don’t understand . Now yes, it does create certain kinds of attitudes, perhaps or lack of attitudes when you do that. That’s a, that’s a rules set thing, but you can’t jump to a conclusion like, oh, we cut out the fear part.

Interviewer

Well, for example, there was, I think I read about some individuals and there, I think there amygdala got calcified, and they did lose a lot of the fear response. For example, they had just no fear regarding approaching strangers in dark alleyways and things like that.

Tom Campbell
They have cut out their ability to respond not fear.

Interviewer
Things that people would be afraid of they would just walk straight into it. But that did also make them less functional in some ways. For example, like they lost their ability to manoeuvre socially. They maybe got too close to people or things like that. I don’t exactly remember the specifics, but in some ways it made them less functional as well. So I found that interesting.

Tom Campbell
But that doesn’t mean that it had anything to do specifically with fear. See, that’s a conclusion that’s jump to, that’s not necessarily a fact. It could have taken out that part that had the instincts for response. See something coming at you, you jump. That’s a response, not necessarily because you’re afraid, because you’re intelligent, you have those instincts to get out of the way when something’s coming for you. Well, that may have been gone. Or that may have been part of the brain that did processing that was relevant to action, you know, and how you did that.
And the fact that something’s coming at you went to process that in a brain and well, that part that it has to travel through to get processed or that part that processes what’s there anymore? So it didn’t, but what we look at is we say, Oh, they’re fearless. They’re not afraid of things. We see a lot of fear places that it’s not really fear. It’s something else. Like the antelopes that run, they run because they’re afraid. Instincts are about fear. Well, I don’t think any of that’s true. I think it’s our assumption that it’s fear is what’s involved. But there could be other explanations besides that it’s fear. So I don’t really think that any of those are very convincing, very convincing arguments. I think fear is high entropy, it tends to lock you up. It makes you not rational, it makes you incapable of doing the things you need to do to save your life.

All the chop chop and shoot them up and the you know the tough guys the good guys and a bad guys. Well the good guys who are really very successful all have to be fearless right because that’s how they’re so successful because when it looks like they’re surrounded by a hundred people. How could they possibly get out? Well, they don’t just sit down and cry because they’re frightened, you know, they think they’re smart. They never get they never become afraid they always become resourceful and figure things out. So it’s you know fear is a thing that keeps you from figuring things out it locks you up It makes you stupid. Makes you unresponsive like the deer standing in the headlights. So there is never a valuable thing.

You could maybe make a case that young girls are told to be afraid of sexuality and afraid of men and afraid of things like that because they’re young. They’re only 13 14 15, you know, so parents tend to frighten them away from getting involved, you know, having sexual relationships and that fear keeps them safe. Well not necessarily that fear may also ruin the rest of their life. You know, it that those in in grain fears live on. And you may have done more damage there than you’ve done good. Fear isn’t the thing that’s helpful. Fear is an unhelpful thing, it tends to do more harm than it does good?

Interviewer
So let’s look at a very concrete example. So let’s say I’m standing on top of a very tall building. And I can feel that my hands are starting to sweat and my heart starts pounding. And is this my instinct or is this my fear? Or is it a combination of both?

Tom Campbell
Well, your instincts probably tell you danger. There’s a 200 foot fall on the other side of that fence that’s fatal. Watch out. That’s your instincts. Now, if you have your palms sweat and all the rest of that stuff, then that’s just your fear. Now once you have that fear, that fear makes you clumsy. If you notice that when your palm sweat and everything, you’re not real, loose and able to move and do things and you don’t think much, you kind of just wedge you up, and I can’t move, which is what people do when they’re really terrified like at a height, they just can’t move. So someone has to go and get them and bring them down. They can’t do it themselves because they’re too clumsy. They can’t really function. Their muscles don’t work, right? Their nervous system, the reaction times are gone. Well, that’s what the fear does, and the fear backs you away from the, you know, from the, from the thing that frightens you.

So that’s fear. Yes. But that’s not what keeps you safe. What keeps you safe is intelligence. That says, don’t climb the fence. Don’t try to walk on top of the top rail of the fence. Don’t, this is not a good place to run and play catch. You know, this is a place to pay attention into where you are and what you’re doing because there’s only a three foot high fence and you know it’s two hundred feet to the ground. So that intelligence is
what saves you and the fear is what raises your risk of falling because you’ll tend to not hold onto the ladder very well because your muscle functions are all locked up and fear. So the fear always makes you less survivable, not more survivable. So instincts of fear will be counterproductive. It makes the critter less survivable, not more survivable. And fear on top of tall building will make it more likely that you’re going to have an accident up there because you’re not in your right mind, you’re not able to function well. You’re clumsy, you know, when you’re real fearful, you start tripping over your own feet. You get clumsy, you get dysfunctional, and that means your probability of ending over the rail somehow goes up. Whereas if you’re not fearful, there’s no reason for you to fall over that rail. You can just stay on the inside and you’re perfectly in control of yourself and everything’s fine. So yes, that would just be fear if you feel that way and that would be a fear of high places. Fear of death.

Interviewer
If I was in that same situation, but completely fearless, then my instincts would probably still activate me to the point of being able to be functional. Maybe there’s a little bit of adrenaline and so my body is alert and adjust. Just pause. Reduce. So it’s only the functional part remains and the dysfunctional part goes away. Would that makes sense?

Tom Campbell
That’s true. You do have instincts that will tell you to be careful. This is a situation that could be harmful. You’re a 200 feet near. Be careful being 200 feet up near you can’t fly. So if you 200 feet up near you be careful, be cautious. And what you do is that you look down at where you were walking and see if there were any obstacles to trip over where things lying on the floor. You’d notice that. You’d notice the rail and you’d notice how strongly it looked like it was built. You may even walk over to the rail and give it a little shake to see that if you stumble and hit it would it go over with you. So you start gathering information. You start looking at the possibilities and then you come to the kind of conclusions, well the rails are sturdy. I don’t see any hazards laying on a floor. There’s really not a problem here. All I have to do is not, if I go real near the rail, be cognitive of what you’re doing. Don’t have conversations and be walking backwards. Don’t do that kind of things there. So your instinct say, Be careful. This is a dangerous situation. Then your mind looks at it and says, Got it. I can take, you know, I can handle it. I got it. The fear comes in and says, No, no, I’m going to fall. Save me, you know, and it’s totally dysfunctional. That’s the difference. So fear is always dysfunctional. It never helps. It always just gets in a way. What you need when you run into a bear in the woods is intelligence and preparation. So you’ve read all about bears and what do you do with a bear of woods? Do you stare at them and stare him down? Will that make him go away? Will that make him angry and want to fight? Well, if you don’t know, then you ought to stay out of the woods. If you have to go into the woods then educate yourself. You know, educate yourself. Go over and rattle that fence and say, is that a strong fence? So if I trip and fell against it, or somebody pushed me and I hit it would it crumble and you’re probably fin, no, that fence has been designed to be very strong.

So be smart, you prepare yourself, you look at the possibilities to decide what you’re going to do. You still may not survive, you know, the bear might still get you, but at least you optimise your probability for survival by being smart. And you optimise your probability for dying by not being smart and by being fearful. Okay, good.

Interviewer
Yes, that makes a lot of sense. And I think that that clarified a lot.

Becoming The Solution is made with Jetpack Podcast. Full show notes and every episode at https://evolvingtogether1.wordpress.com/

3 minute read and 45 minute watch / listen :

Tom Campbell, in his “My Big Toe” theory, explores the concept of databases in our virtual reality existence, emphasizing their crucial role in shaping our reality. These databases include those that represent the past, unactualized past, present, and future probabilities. They act as information repositories that support the efficient rendering of our perceived world.

Campbell explains that these databases are necessary for the system’s functionality. When we encounter unknown situations, the system uses these databases to provide the relevant information. For example, when you open a refrigerator without recalling its contents, the system pulls from a probability distribution to determine what’s inside.

The “probable future database” allows the system to anticipate and respond to possible future scenarios, enabling quick rendering of new measurements. These probabilities are flexible and can change with new information, allowing the system to adapt to evolving circumstances.

Campbell also discusses the “unactualized past database,” which contains a wealth of historical information. Although the past seems fixed, this database enables “what-if” analyses, letting individuals explore alternate outcomes of past choices. This feature aids learning and helps people make informed decisions in the present.

In his research, Campbell actively engages with these databases, testing their reliability. He finds that they remain consistent even when he deliberately attempts different actions in the virtual past, suggesting these databases are non-sentient repositories that can be accessed with specific intentions.

Beyond the database concept, Campbell’s insights cover various aspects of consciousness, future probabilities, and personal growth. He promotes a shift in perspective to address underlying fears and negative emotions, encouraging a positive response to life’s challenges. His teachings suggest that many experiences are metaphorical, urging individuals to seek deeper meanings for personal growth and happiness.

Becoming The Solution is made with Jetpack Podcast. Full show notes and every episode at https://evolvingtogether1.wordpress.com/

4 Minute read/listen

In a world where knowledge is highly prized and often equated with intelligence, it is essential to explore the distinction between knowledge and wisdom. While these two concepts may seem similar at first glance, they represent fundamentally different aspects of human understanding and experience. This essay delves into the unique characteristics that set knowledge and wisdom apart, shedding light on their individual significance in our lives.

Knowledge can be described as the accumulation of information, facts, and data acquired through learning, education, and experience. It is the cognitive foundation upon which human understanding is built. Knowledge is objective and often measurable, making it a crucial aspect of intellectual growth. People with extensive knowledge in specific domains are often considered experts in their fields.

However, knowledge alone does not necessarily lead to wisdom. One can possess a vast amount of information but lack the ability to apply it effectively or make meaningful connections between different pieces of knowledge. This limitation highlights the need to distinguish between knowledge and wisdom.

Wisdom, on the other hand, transcends mere accumulation of information. It is the ability to discern deeper truths, recognize patterns, and make sound judgments based on a broad understanding of life’s complexities. Wisdom is subjective, rooted in intuition and emotional intelligence, and it often emerges from reflection on one’s experiences and the world around them.

While knowledge is concrete and factual, wisdom is abstract and rooted in human insight. Wise individuals possess a profound understanding of human nature, empathy, and the interconnectedness of life. They can navigate complex moral dilemmas, offer valuable guidance to others, and make choices that prioritize long-term well-being over immediate gains.

In contemporary society, there is a prevailing misconception that intelligence is synonymous with knowledge. Highly knowledgeable individuals are often admired and rewarded for their expertise, yet this does not necessarily make them wise. The attachment to knowledge, especially in specialised fields, can lead to a narrow worldview, overlooking the broader context of human existence and values.

Conversely, wisdom often emerges from a well-rounded perspective that incorporates both intellectual and emotional dimensions. It values compassion, humility, and a deep appreciation for the interconnectedness of all living beings. Wisdom recognizes that the pursuit of knowledge should be guided by ethical considerations and the greater good.

Written By Stephen Griffin and ChatGPT

Becoming The Solution is made with Jetpack Podcast. Full show notes and every episode at https://evolvingtogether1.wordpress.com/