Arguments for the petitioner in the Supreme Court case Berghuis v. Smith.  The speaker is Kent Scheidegger, representing the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation as amicus curiae.

Berghuis v. Smith: Counsel Supporting the State

News & Politics

Government & Organizations

Non-Profit

National

Regional

Local

SCOTUSblog interviews founding Dean of UC Irvine Law School and constitutional scholar Erwin Chemerinsky about his book The Conservative Assault on the Constitution.

Podcast interview – Erwin Chemerinsky’s

Carter G. Phillips presents the arguments for the petitioners. Mr. Phillips is a partner at Sidley Austin LLP.

Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting: Arguments for Petitioners

Mary R. O'Grady presents the arguments for the respondent. Ms. O'Grady is the Solicitor General of Arizona.

Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting: Arguments for Respondent

Leigh Latherow, VanAntwerp, Monge, Jones, Edwards & McCann, LLP presents arguments for respondent. Ms. Latherow is counsel to respondent North American Stainless, LP.,

Thompson v. North American Stainless: Arguments for respondent

Helen Norton, University of Colorado Law School, counsel to amici National Women’s Law Center et al., presents arguments for petitioner. Professor Norton is counsel to amici National Women’s Law Center et al.

Berghuis v. Smith: Counsel Supporting the State

Download our free app to listen on your phone