Best Of Three

Jannik Sinner's season-ending injury gives us a reason to step back and evaluate what he's actually become. Is Sinner now the best pure tennis player of his generation? Torrey argues that, stroke for stroke, his court positioning, serve, return and baseline game may already give him the edge over Carlos Alcaraz. Alvin agrees that Sinner has the cleaner toolkit—but Alcaraz still possesses something harder to quantify: the ability to find another level when a match becomes unpredictable.

From there, the conversation expands into the ATP hierarchy. We discuss what Sinner's absence means for Alexander Zverev, why Novak Djokovic's current limitation isn't really his tennis, and why having Novak around still matters for the players trying to replace him.

An unexpected conversation about Felix Auger-Aliassime and Ivan Ljubičić then turns into one of our deeper coaching discussions: great players don't simply collect skills—they eventually have to decide what their tennis is designed to do. We finish with Carlos Alcaraz's return to form and why the remarkable run of men's tennis in 2025 may look even better with time.

Send us Fan Mail

Patrick joins Alvin from Japan after spending time at the Japan Open, where Kei Nishikori’s farewell becomes the starting point for a larger discussion about greatness, legacy and how the Big Three altered the careers of the players who came behind them. They debate Nishikori’s Hall of Fame case, the importance of his career across Asia, and why his compact, aggressive baseline game allowed him to compete against much larger players.

The conversation moves across the Asian swing: Daniil Medvedev’s resurgence and unusual tactical discipline, Alexander Zverev’s opportunity to reach No. 1, Ben Shelton’s increasingly distinctive game, and Valentin Vacherot as an example of the depth that exists outside the very top of the rankings.

Patrick also shares what he saw around the Japan Open practice courts—from Jiří Lehečka and Matteo Berrettini’s serve mechanics to Lorenzo Musetti quietly doing shuttle runs away from the crowd. The episode closes with Alex Eala and the unusual competitive dynamic created by her traveling support, which increasingly turns neutral tournaments into home matches.

Send us Fan Mail

What separates a genuine Grand Slam favorite from an elite player who can beat anyone on the right day?

We build a three-tier framework for the current WTA around Slam self-sufficiency, world-class weapons and the ability to impose a game without needing favorable matchups. Aryna Sabalenka and Elena Rybakina establish the standard, while Coco Gauff and Linda Noskova show there is more than one way to reach it.

The real argument begins with the final Tier 1 spot. Has Iga Świątek actually declined, or have Sabalenka, Rybakina and the evolving WTA simply raised the physical and tactical requirements around her? From Marta Kostyuk and Zheng Qinwen to Mirra Andreeva, Iva Jovic and Alex Eala, we examine who has enough weapons for today's game—and who may be waiting for tomorrow's version of it.

Send us Fan Mail

Alvin Owusu is joined by Craig Shapiro to discuss the changing identity of the US Open and the larger tennis ecosystem that casual viewers rarely see. Craig argues that the issue is not tennis becoming bigger or more visible, but whether spectacle, ticket prices, drinking culture, sponsor activations, and crowd behavior are beginning to pull attention away from the players and matches themselves.

The strongest thread of the conversation is Craig’s belief that tennis becomes more meaningful when someone can fill in the blanks around the match. Using Frances Tiafoe as an example, he explains how family background, playing style, relationships, sponsorship, representation, and the player box can turn a casual viewer into an invested fan.

The episode also explores Alexander Zverev through a broader professional lens, connecting his career arc to coaching instability, agent changes, legal distractions, and strained relationships inside the sport. The conversation closes with Craig’s Golden Ticket business, which creates curated tennis travel experiences built around playing, dining, and attending major tournaments.

The Craig Shapiro Tennis Podcast: https://shaptennispod.com/

Welcome to the US Broken: https://shaptennispod.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-us-broken?r=6mv597&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

The Golden Ticket (Paris): https://www.goldentickettennis.com/academy-paris-2026

Send us Fan Mail

Alexander Zverev’s US Open title over Ben Shelton is the kind of result that clarifies the ATP hierarchy. Zverev may not carry the same explosive ceiling as Carlos Alcaraz or Jannik Sinner, but his professional discipline, serve, return, and baseline tolerance make him the most reliable separator beneath that tier.

We break down why Shelton’s loss should not be treated as a failure. His run to the final confirmed real progress in his return, backhand, and week-to-week credibility, but the final also showed the next stage of his development: more tactical variety, cleaner footwork under pace, and better pattern discipline against elite baseline metronomes.

The episode closes with Elena Rybakina’s win over Aryna Sabalenka and why that matchup may now be the clearest rivalry in the WTA. Rybakina’s ability to absorb pace, redirect cleanly, and pressure Sabalenka’s serve-plus-one patterns creates a problem that feels both tactical and psychological.

Send us Fan Mail

Ben Shelton’s win over Frances Tiafoe was not just a power-player breakthrough. It was a match that showed a more complete version of Shelton: still dominant on serve, but now more disciplined on the backhand, more flexible on return, and more comfortable managing the tactical demands of a Grand Slam semifinal.

Alvin and Torrey break down why Tiafoe was such a meaningful test. His court sense, timing, variety, and ability to redirect pace usually expose incomplete players. Against Shelton, the expected targets were harder to find. The backhand slice bought time, the heavy lefty shape created awkward contact heights, and the surprise backhand line prevented Tiafoe from sitting on one pattern.

The episode closes with a sober look at the US Open final against Alexander Zverev. Zverev remains the favorite because of his serve, backhand, experience, and consistency, but Shelton now enters the matchup with more than just explosiveness. His title chance depends on whether this return-game leap is real under one more level of pressure.

Send us Fan Mail

Coco Gauff’s loss to Elena Rybakina was not a simple regression. In the first set, Gauff showed a version of her game that can absorb elite pace, serve with real pace, defend with purpose, and transition from neutral to offense off both wings. The issue was not whether the forehand and serve exist anymore; the issue was whether Coco fully trusted them when the match became most pressurized.

Alvin and Torrey break down how Rybakina solved the match by becoming more intentional with her patterns, moving away from predictable crosscourt power and using more middle balls, jammed forehands, and selective changes of direction. They also compare the different ways opponents have attacked Coco’s forehand, especially the high, slower ball that still keeps her from hurting opponents consistently.

The episode closes with Aryna Sabalenka’s dominant win over Jessica Pegula and a preview of a fitting US Open final between Rybakina and Sabalenka. It is a true No. 1 vs No. 2 power matchup, but also a test of which player can impose their weapons without giving the other room to breathe.

Send us Fan Mail

Ben Shelton’s win over Carlos Alcaraz was not framed as a simple upset. Alvin and Torrey break down why the result mattered tactically and developmentally: Shelton served big, but he also returned at the highest level of his career, used body serves with discipline, moved forward with purpose, and forced Alcaraz into uncomfortable passing-shot situations.

The larger question is whether Shelton has moved from dangerous Grand Slam threat to legitimate top-tier contender. The hosts stop short of placing him fully beside Alcaraz and Sinner, but argue that beating one of the sport’s defining players in a five-set Grand Slam match gives Shelton the strongest possible résumé point.

The episode also examines Frances Tiafoe’s comeback against Alex Michelsen, the historic significance of Shelton and Tiafoe guaranteeing a Black male finalist at the US Open, and the continued strength of the WTA field through Jessica Pegula, Emma Navarro, Elena Rybakina, Coco Gauff, and Aryna Sabalenka.

Send us Fan Mail

Coco Gauff is still winning, but the way she is winning may matter more than the scoreline. Alvin and Torrey break down her US Open win over Iva Jovic through a tactical lens, focusing on forehand spacing, footwork, court position, and the challenge of becoming a more complete striking counterpuncher.

The episode also examines Aryna Sabalenka’s narrow win over Linda Noskova, especially the second-serve ace that closed the match and reaffirmed Sabalenka’s authority in the biggest points. Noskova’s loss is framed less as a setback and more as evidence that she already belongs near the top of the women’s game.

From there, the conversation widens to the WTA’s deeper major landscape. With players like Rybakina, Zheng, Gauff, Sabalenka, Noskova, Iga, Pegula, and others shaping the late rounds, the women’s tour is no longer defined by a simple top three. It is becoming a true danger tier, where every quarterfinal can become a legitimate Slam test.

Send us Fan Mail

Emma Navarro gives this episode its strongest tactical story. The discussion centers on how her game has shifted from counterpunching, movement, and match management toward more first-strike aggression, heavier ball-striking, and the ability to dictate against players who previously would have tested her rhythm.

The episode also checks in on Carlos Alcaraz, who is moving through the US Open draw efficiently but still raises a more precise question: can he win the tournament without yet being back to the highest version of himself? The hosts separate tournament favoritism from peak-form certainty, with Tommy Paul framed as the first useful benchmark.

Taylor Townsend’s win over Diana Shnaider adds another player-development layer. The hosts connect it to the kind of match Townsend had previously let slip away, pointing to belief, physical readiness, variety, and a more stable singles foundation. The episode closes by widening the lens to Jessica Pegula, the depth of the women’s field, and the many pathways behind the current American surge.

Send us Fan Mail