Best Of Three

Coco Gauff’s win over Paula Badosa was not a finished-product statement, but it was a meaningful one. Badosa has the exact profile to test Coco’s progress: enough movement to stay in rallies, enough pace to rush the forehand, and enough backhand quality to apply pressure without giving away control. Coco still has work to do, especially when the forehand is rushed or when she is caught in transition, but the match showed a player whose weaknesses are no longer as easy to live inside.

Alvin and Torrey also break down Madison Keys’ comeback from 2–5 down in the third set against Anna Bondar, framing it as the purest version of the Madison Keys experience: stressful, volatile, powerful, and ultimately dependent on her willingness to keep swinging. From there, the conversation moves through Naomi Osaka’s win over Siniakova, the upcoming Eva Iovic–Alex Eala matchup, Amanda Anisimova’s improved emotional reset, Lily Tagger’s long-term upside, men’s draw turbulence, and Carlos Alcaraz sharpening his game round by round.

Send us Fan Mail

Ben Shelton’s early US Open matches are becoming a useful test of where he stands among the American men. The question is not whether Shelton is playing flawless tennis, but whether he is now mature enough to absorb pressure, solve problems, and win difficult Grand Slam matches without needing perfect starts.

Alvin and Torrey also examine Rafael Jodar’s heavy loss to Bu Yunchaokete, framing it as a likely freshman-wall moment after a demanding first full year on tour. Torrey gives a detailed technical breakdown of Jodar’s serve, especially the mismatch between his toss, platform stance, racket drop, and leg drive that may be limiting the effectiveness of his second serve.

The episode also covers Alex Michelsen’s straight-sets win over Brandon Nakashima. Rather than treating it as a simple upset, the hosts explain why familiarity, return quality, net-point conversion, and second-serve pressure made Michelsen one of the toughest possible first-round draws for Nakashima.

Send us Fan Mail

Novak Djokovic’s first-round loss to Mariano Navone becomes the center of this episode, not because of the upset alone, but because of what the match revealed. Alvin and Torrey discuss how Djokovic still found tactical solutions early, yet appeared increasingly unable to sustain the physical demands required to impose himself across five sets.

The conversation frames Navone as a difficult opponent for this version of Djokovic: durable, disciplined, and willing to extend points until the match became a test of endurance. The hosts also reflect on the significance of Djokovic finishing the match despite obvious physical distress, reading it as a sign of respect for Navone, the crowd, and the sport itself.

From there, the episode moves into Arthur Fils’ loss to Stefanos Tsitsipas, Carlos Alcaraz’s efficient first-round performance, and Andrey Rublev’s five-set comeback. Across all three, the larger theme is Grand Slam readiness: the difference between having the tools to win matches and having the maturity, variation, and emotional control to survive a major.

Send us Fan Mail

Alvin and Torrey preview the 2026 US Open from the ground level of Fan Week in New York, focusing less on bracket prediction and more on what the tournament looks like before the first ball is struck. From practice-court details to player body language, they discuss how the pace, physicality, and depth of the field are shaping both draws.

The central conversation is Aryna Sabalenka. She remains the WTA standard, but the episode argues that the old gap has narrowed. Marta Kostyuk, Amanda Anisimova, Madison Keys, Elena Rybakina, and Jessica Pegula all represent different versions of the modern Sabalenka problem: some can match or exceed her power, while others can neutralize and punish the wrong serving day.

The episode also turns to Carlos Alcaraz’s return and the ATP window created by Sinner’s absence. If Alcaraz is healthy enough to play, Alvin and Torrey treat him as the favorite — but the larger question is whether players like Arthur Fils, Ben Shelton, Zverev, Djokovic, and others can take advantage before the top of the men’s game closes again.

Send us Fan Mail

Cincinnati gave the Best of Three crew one final look at the US Open field, and the clearest signal came from Coco Gauff. Her title run was not framed as a perfect week, but as a more important proof point: the serve is heavier, the forehand is more functional, and her patterns are mature enough that she can win without playing lights-out tennis.

On the men’s side, Alvin and Torrey debate whether the ATP field is genuinely closing the gap on Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz. Torrey sees a dangerous “dirty dozen” forming below the elite tier, capable of dragging favorites into long early-round matches. Alvin agrees the depth has improved, but argues that none of the next group has yet proven they can beat the Sinner-Alcaraz standard in best-of-five tennis.

The episode closes with a caution flag around Aryna Sabalenka. Her top-end level is still unquestioned, but the margins around return games, three-set matches, and match efficiency are thinner than they were. New York may expose the two tours differently: chaos on the ATP side, and a title race on the WTA side where Coco’s improvements are arriving at exactly the right time.

Send us Fan Mail

Iga Świątek’s Toronto title was not simply a form check. Alvin and Torrey argue that her week showed a more tactically complete version of her game: more height, more shape, more patience, and a clearer sense of when to press rather than force.

The episode frames Świątek’s run as a possible entry into a second career cycle. Rather than trying to recreate her previous dominance, she may be building a version better suited to the current WTA landscape — one where the top tier is deeper, the weapons are bigger, and separation requires constant reinvention.

The discussion also covers Coco Gauff’s forehand development, Elena Rybakina’s run to the final, Naomi Osaka’s movement and defensive progress, and why Grand Slams increasingly function as check-ins for where the WTA elite really stand.

Send us Fan Mail

Alex Eala’s DC title run raises a more interesting question than whether she is simply on a good run. Her game already has a recognizable identity: lefty disruption, forehand pressure, return-plus-one patterns, and the competitive steadiness to make opponents uncomfortable. The concern is whether the tour can eventually solve the awkwardness, especially if the second serve remains attackable.

Alvin and Torrey debate Eala’s long-term ceiling, from top-20 sustainability to a possible top-10 trajectory, before turning to Rafael Jodar’s run to the final. Jodar is a different kind of projection case: less finished, less defined, but with size, movement, backhand stability, transition instincts, and composure already in place.

The episode’s larger theme is how to evaluate young players before their games are complete. Eala appears closer to week-to-week sustainability; Jodar may have the larger developmental runway.

Send us Fan Mail

Matt Futterman joins Best of Three to discuss The Cruelest Game, his book on the hidden cost of chasing greatness in professional tennis. The conversation centers on why tennis exposes players so completely: the solitude of competition, the weekly structure of losing, and the pressure placed on young stars before they are fully formed adults.

Novak Djokovic emerges as the episode’s central model. Not simply because of what he has won, but because of how often he has rebuilt himself across eras. From Sinner studying his game to Alcaraz studying his practice habits and Coco Gauff studying his return patterns, Djokovic functions as the clearest blueprint for survival at the top of modern tennis.

The discussion also explores Madison Keys learning to play with permission to lose, Naomi Osaka returning to a changed WTA, Ben Shelton’s gap between athleticism and tennis literacy, and the larger challenge facing the next generation: talent is not enough unless it can keep evolving.

Order 'The Cruelest Game' here: https://www.mattfutterman.com/the-cruelest-game

Send us Fan Mail

American tennis is often judged by outcomes at the professional level, but the more important question begins much earlier: how are young players actually learning the sport? In this episode, Alvin and Torrey examine whether the U.S. development model teaches juniors how to hit shots before it teaches them how to play tennis.

Using American soccer as a parallel, the conversation explores how youth sports in the U.S. often become formalized, expensive, and parent-managed before they become culturally embedded. The hosts contrast that with environments where kids grow up around local clubs, informal play, walls, pickup games, and daily exposure to the sport.

The episode sharpens around academy tennis: should serious development tracks be something families can buy into, or something players must earn through commitment, competitiveness, and ownership? The central distinction is simple but important — many kids play tennis, but fewer become tennis players.

Send us Fan Mail

Wimbledon remains the sport’s most sacred stage, but this episode asks whether it is still the cleanest measure of tennis greatness. Grass demands a specialized version of the game: short points, first-strike precision, elite returning, low-contact movement, and the ability to hold focus when one lapse can decide a set.

That lens leads directly to Jannik Sinner. Patrick and Alvin discuss why Sinner’s game may be uniquely suited to Wimbledon, not because grass reveals the full sport, but because it amplifies his most punishing qualities. The conversation also places Alexander Zverev’s recent surge in context, separating him from the wider field while keeping him a tier below Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz.

The episode closes by widening the frame: Felix Auger-Aliassime as a player whose tennis may still exceed his late-stage belief, and the women’s game as a case study in the difference between tennis excellence and tennis marketability.

Send us Fan Mail