Hello Dr. Debra Kouda 👋🎉
After 4 years, I finally made it through the process of earning a Doctorate of Education in Leadership and Innovation from Arizona State University!
Hooray!
You better believe that when my dissertation was uploaded into ProQuest to be published I felt like this!
One of the major highlights of my research dissertation, Transformative Learning through Virtual Tourism: Exploring West Africa in the Digital Space, was the importance of reflection as a mechanism for change. This is exactly what I have been doing for the last few weeks since finishing this momentous undertaking. Reflecting. And I thought I would share some of those reflections with you - aren’t you lucky!
(Note: this reflection ended up being much longer than I anticipated. But that is what the whole point of reflection is, isn’t it? I wrote about where my thoughts took me. If it seems like a lot to read, I encourage you to push play on the audio version above!)
We might as well start at the beginning. Throughout the four years and even more now, people have been curious as to why I pursued a doctoral degree in the first place.
I can provide this answer to you firsthand with my voice from four years ago when we had to introduce ourselves via a short video in one of the first graduate courses. This was the prompt:
Post a 2- to 3- minute video in the discussion board
Include the following:
* Give your name, current position and the topic of interest that you have been developing.
* Tell us one interesting fact about yourself that will help everyone learn about and remember you.
* Identify one thing you hope to gain in the class. Be specific about areas where you would like to improve your research skills (i.e., strategies for reading, writing, organizing, integrating research.)
And here was my response - it will take 2 minutes of your time:
If you did not feel like watching the video, here is a brief synopsis. My pie-in-the-sky goal was to completely overhaul the education system in Benin, and one of the first milestones I set for myself was to create a center for innovation, research, and practice. However, I realized that I lacked the theory, research, and leadership skills necessary to pull this off in a sustainable way. My initial curiosities were around the indigenous knowledge and history of education in Benin before colonialism. Looking back, I think a lot of this goal centered on wanting to create more jobs and economic development within the region that we call home in Benin. This is something to remember as you keep reading.
Side note here: My intro video intrigued a couple of my classmates in my cohort, and they tried to reach out to learn more. I ignored those initial emails. Did not even respond. However, I eventually realized that was a bit rude, and the single best thing that I did during the last four years was attend a Zoom call at the beginning of my second semester put together by those colleagues whom I had ghosted previously. That first call led to a second and then our little group, known as the Goldilocks Community of Practice, met twice a week for the rest of the four years. This all happened organically. It was not required by the program. But it was with this group of people that I learned more than in any of the courses. We worked on assignments together, had discussions about tough topics, helped each other through amazing and difficult times with our research, and so much more that words just can’t encapsulate. As I wrote in my dissertation acknowledgments, they made me a better person, researcher, leader, and innovator. If you are thinking about doing a doctoral program, especially one that is entirely done online, I could not recommend finding a group of people to go through it with together. It changes absolutely everything.
I also should mention that I am mainly focusing on my dissertation here, but along with this, I took two to three graduate-level courses each semester, including summer, for the last four years.
Within the doctoral program, we went through 3 cycles of action research. The beauty of action research as a methodology is that it is cyclical and involves ongoing iterations to find solutions and address practical problems. Action research is also rooted in its context, which makes it perfect for education. As you will see from my research questions in the first two cycles, I was primarily trying to remain in the vein of the initial purpose of my doctoral studies. I’m sure you would be very interested in seeing the results from the data, however, I’m just going to highlight the RQs.
Cycle 0 (Spring 2022)
Problem of Practice: My problem of practice is concerned with improving education in Benin by drawing upon the Indigenous education frameworks of the 42 ethnic groups who have served as the foundation of The Republic of Benin.
Purpose of the Study:
From the knowledge extracted from a previous set of interviews, I will create a series of virtual professional development workshops for teachers including,
* how to incorporate Indigenous frameworks into their teaching practices;
* how teachers can use reflection to enhance their use of Indigenous teaching frameworks in their classrooms.
Research Questions
The following research questions will guide the conduct of the study.
RQ 1: How and to what extent does implementation of “Project Indigenous Teaching Frameworks” affect teacher participants’ perceptions of their (a) knowledge about and (b) skills for implementing Indigenous teaching practices with their students?
RQ 2: How and to what extent does implementation of “Project Indigenous Teaching Frameworks” affect teacher participants’ perceptions of their (a) attitudes about and (b) self-efficacy for implementing Indigenous teaching practices with their students?
Cycle 1 (Fall 2022)
For this cycle of research, it would have been ideal for me to travel to Benin, however, it was not possible. So I had to make a few changes and look at my questions differently to try and gather some new data that would still have an impact on my problem of practice from Cycle 0.
Research Questions
RQ 1: How does a Participatory Action Research approach during an onboarding process influence the knowledge gathering of indigenous teaching methods?
RQ 2: How does the development of a Community of Practice (CoP) affect the decisions and self-efficacy of the participants to incorporate their indigenous teaching methods to enhance the solutions of community-based problems?
Spring of 2023 brought about our placements into a Learning Scholar Community (LSC), which grouped four or five of us with a professor mentor who would become the chair of our dissertation committee and work with us to get our dissertation finished. Due to some coercing from our little Community of Practice, for the first time in the history of the program, we - as doctoral students - had input into who we wanted to be in an LSC with. I have to say, we were pretty proud of this little achievement. We were a teeny bit rebellious in this group, at least, that is what we thought the rumors might have been around the in-person staff. Anyhow, this is the semester that I was introduced to my mentor and we started working toward putting together my doctoral proposal.
Now, throughout this time, I had been trying to get the educational center, which I had decided to call Ékodjayé off the ground. There had been a couple of investor pitches that I had made as well as speaking with numerous other folks who had begun non-profits. A colleague of mine in the program set me up to speak with one of his friends who had been an investor for many years, just to see if there were any tips or suggestions that I could glean from his knowledge. I explained to him the purpose of the educational center and my why behind doing it (economic development with our community in Benin), and he asked one very important question which I still have engrained in my memory…When people finish with your educational programs, will they have a job waiting for them?
The question stopped me cold. The answer was no. I had not thought that far. But you know the saying, when one door closes…and I started to think of ideas that would include the important element of a job. And then it hit me. Tourism. Although my husband and I started a tourism company in February 2020, it had a tough time getting wings due to the pandemic. What if we were to rebrand and start over? Now the question of how could I incorporate this into my doctoral research began percolating.
Over the years, I have taken trips abroad that have led me to some pretty incredible transformational experiences, working with cheetahs in Namibia and volunteering in Peace Corps to name a few. The hardest part for me always was coming back “home”, surrounded by friends and family who did not understand the experience I had just had or why my perspectives and worldviews had changed. I believe this is fairly common with returned Peace Corps volunteers, and after my service was up, I stayed in contact with fellow volunteers just to have the support to return to the “normal” world. And there was always some part of me that was curious as to how I could help those at “home” understand. In a way, it is somewhat selfish, because I wanted to expand my community on who I could talk to about those experiences and for them to have somewhat of an idea about what I was talking about and why my views were the way they were.
In May of 2023, I broached the idea to my mentor that I was seriously thinking about changing my dissertation topic. Not only did my original problem of practice not solve a problem that I was keen on having an impact on, I was having a hard time piecing it together in a way that made sense to me. And this was a big realization. You have to be 100% in on the topic that you are going to be researching because it will be your life for the next few years - so if it was seeming difficult to find the right research questions and intervention for the study now, it meant that a change was necessary. I thought this was going to be hard, but when I explained my thoughts about the new dissertation topic, my mentor said that my eyes lit up when I was talking about it, showing that this really was a good direction to be going in. She asked for a short write-up of what the purpose and possible intervention could be before we made the final decision to do the big switch. After many discussions with my little CoP and research into various topics, the new dissertation thesis all came together.
The change was officially made in July 2023 and I went about putting together my dissertation proposal which would be presented to my committee sometime during the fall semester. This change in topic was a huge shift for me, but I knew that it was the right one. It made for a lot of work, as most of my colleagues were continuing with their research from the first two cycles, I was pretty much starting all over. However, I was excited about diving into all the research to be done into the new ideas. I poured over articles and scoured books putting the proposal together. Although we had written longer papers for the other cycles of research, this proposal felt more like the real deal. It included three chapters which were
* Research Problem and Context
* Review of Scholarly Literature
* Methods
It was also during this time that I was able to select two additional members of my doctoral committee, bringing the total to three, a chair and two committee members. Their role in the doctoral process was to guide me through the dissertation process, ensuring academic rigor and scholarly development through support, feedback, and oversight. My mentor (aka the Chair of the Committee) spoke early on to our LSC group that when she started to see us as colleagues and not students we had gone over the bridge to doctor-hood.
Due to a new addition to the family in December 2023 one day before I was supposed to present my dissertation proposal, I presented my proposal to my committee in January 2024. The purpose of my study was
This study aims to create a transformative learning experience for foreign tourists visiting Benin within a brief travel period. My engagement in various travel experiences throughout the years has inspired ideas that could be integrated to make such a form of tourism viable. To support me in this undertaking, I will draw upon the principles of transformative learning theory and a newly formulated conceptual model of transformative tourism (Kouda, 2024, p. 14) with the following research questions
RQ1: What factors or processes make transformational learning possible for a tourist in a foreign country?
RQ1A: How does prior preparation and post-reflection impact the transformational experience?
RQ1B: How does the incorporation of “knowledge exchanges” impact the transformational experience?
RQ1C: How does the tour coordinator impact the transformational experience? (Kouda, 2024, p. 15)
Now this was a huge undertaking that I had signed up for, to find and give people a live tour in Benin. But I knew that the findings would be rewarding, and they ticked the boxes of providing people with a (hopefully) transformative experience and providing jobs to community members through tourism.
As the spring moved along my study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of ASU the administrative body in existence to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects. Around the same time, after a doctor’s visit, I realized that my youngest son would not be able to travel to Benin because he was unable to get the yellow fever vaccine until 9 months of age, which put it in the last scheduled semester of the program.
Once again, I was at a crossroads.
I went into one of our Zoom CoP calls at the end of May somewhat distraught. I told my friends/colleagues that I thought I was going to have to stop my research until travel to Benin was possible. No way, I remember them saying. There has to be a way for you to do your research without delay.
Conversations with my peers left me with a light bulb moment, and then it was another talk with my mentor - about a year after the previous big change. In June 2024 I presented the idea to my mentor that I would take the research out of in-person and deliver a transformational learning experience to participants in an online tour of Benin. She agreed with the caveat that the two other committee members had to sign off on the change.
The next month was a whirlwind. I rewrote my purpose and research questions and laid out what the online tour (my intervention) would look like. Here were the revisions
The purpose of my study remains the same, with a shift in the location of transformative learning. This study now aims to create a transformative learning experience for tourists visiting Benin through a five-week online tour, drawing on transformative learning theory and the conceptual model of transformative tourism.
RQ1: What factors or processes make transformational learning possible for a tourist in a five-week online tour?
RQ1A: How do tourists’ prior experiences before the five-week online tour influence transformational learning?
RQ1B: What experiences during the five-week online tour contribute to transformational learning?
RQ1C: How do tourists’ reflections throughout the five-week online tour impact their transformational learning? (Kouda, 2024).
My proposed changes were accepted by my committee and the next step was to gain approval from the IRB.
My timeline was tight because I was going to try my hardest to research, analyze, and write up my full dissertation and graduate in December 2024, an awfully lofty goal but I certainly thought that I could pull it off! Wishful thinking is sometimes helpful in these situations.
I received IRB approval in mid-August and started looking for participants right away. The five-week online tour, the crux of my research, was set to begin the first week of September. Everything was falling into place. My husband traveled to Benin and was able to provide me with some new content that I would be able to share during the tour.
I guess I was fairly optimistic at this point that it would be super easy to find 8 participants for the online tour. However, this was not the case. Although I did have a rushed timeline, I was worried after a week that I would not have enough, as I only had 2 weeks to find participants before I had to begin the study. Everything ended up working out (thank goodness!) and I had 7 participants who completed all of their pre-tour interviews before the first official day of the tour. Really though, the pre-tour interviews are a real part of the tour, but in this context, I used them to gather one of my first sets of qualitative data.
By the way, I should have mentioned earlier, that I conducted a qualitative research study, meaning that I used holistic approaches to gather data, focusing on the rich narrative of the experience instead of a more qualitative (numbers-based) approach. One of the main reasons for this choice was that I was trying to understand a human experience, which is easier to understand through interviews and conversations. The data I collected came primarily from pre- and post-tour interviews, reflections from the participants during the online tour, dialogue of participants in the online community chat, and my research journal with notes and observations.
Moving on…the online tour was structured in the following way:
2 Zoom calls per week for 5 weeks (Monday and Thursday) - participants were not required to attend the Zoom calls. Replays were available in the online community.
An online community in Mighty Networks (similar to Facebook, but not attached in any way to social media) where I would post various prompts, and participants would submit reflections, and have access to replays of the Zoom calls that they had access to during the entire time of the tour
The first official day of the tour arrived and I was so nervous. I wanted everything to be perfect. And this is where it fell apart. I started the first Zoom call and it was a disaster. My computer setup was not right, I was having technical difficulties, and the kids were crying. There were three participants in that initial call, 2 of whom I did not know, and I just remember apologizing over and over. During one of the times that I said I was trying to fix the technical difficulties and turned off my video in Zoom, I almost started crying. I ended the call earlier than the hour it was supposed to be and just collapsed in tears.
What a mess it had been! My fear had completely taken over. I gave myself a few minutes and then started talking to my colleagues, and through the conversations realized that what had happened needed to occur for me to be successful with the tour. I had to remember that I was the one guiding the tour and that I was the authority on the content. I was certainly not an imposter. There also was the understanding that I had been very vulnerable in the Zoom, showing my participants I was 100% human!
From there, I knew that I was in charge, and decided to have the next Zoom session as the first official session. I put together my content and would you believe it - it was an amazing session there and going forward through the rest of the tour. When the tour was over, I remember commenting to my mentor, Wow! I never knew that research could be so fun! I had a blast giving the tour!
What I soon found out was that gathering the data was indeed the fun part. Up to this point, I had only done minimal data collection and analysis during my previous research cycles and during my master’s program about a million years ago (jk it was only in 2013, but might as well be a million!).
And here is where I ran into another hiccup. While I was conducting the tour, I became aware of the date November 1st. Why was this date important? Well, November 1st was the cut-off date for the graduate school at ASU to have defended your dissertation. A deadline that was hard for me to swallow. Graduation wasn’t until the middle of December, why was the deadline on November 1st?
November 1st. Okay, it’s gotta be done I told myself.
I finished the last post-tour interview on October 11th.
The clock was ticking.
October 2024 was stressful, to say the least. I began prepping my collected data for analysis. I decided to use thematic analysis to find the best answers to my research questions. This involved deductive as well as inductive in vivo coding so that I could capture the voices of the participants. Coding, if you have never done it before, is the process of labeling or tagging segments of data with descriptive keywords or phrases to categorize and organize information. It might look easy, but man - it is a skill that must get easier over time. And here, with the coding, is where I got stuck. I felt like had themes developing but I was having a tough time organizing my codes down to the right categories which would then nestle under my themes. At this point, October days just kept passing, and I couldn’t figure out what to do with my coding. I chatted with my mentor about my theme ideas and asked if I was going in the right direction, but all the codes. I had a tough time really seeing how it all fit together.
The November deadline came and went and I set myself up intending to defend my dissertation by the end of the fall semester. Yet, the analysis was still stumping me. Honestly, I felt like a failure and defeated because the majority of my cohort, including those in my Community of Practice, were graduating this semester. It was when we were “scheduled” to graduate according to the outline of the EdD program. But there I was. Stranded in a puddle of codes. Guess I was going to defend and graduate in Spring 2025.
The holidays came and went and I took a break from my data. I would sit down at the computer every once in a while and organize the codes in another manner (different versions of code mapping they call it) so that maybe it would finally click on what I was going to do. But the November 1st deadline and not graduating the previous December had me down. My little CoP, however, was still there for me. And we would chat at least once a week. Keeping the momentum going, even if it was a slow ooze.
At the beginning of February 2025, I received an email from my mentor outlining the new deadlines for the Spring semester.
March 28 - last day to schedule dissertation defense
April 14 - last day to defend and graduate in the spring semester
Deadlines have always been able to help me light the fuse, and this email did just that. I opened up my data and just started working. Putting it together. Figuring out the themes. Developing the categories. Writing.
The dissertation for us in the EdD program at ASU needed to contain 5 chapters.
* Research Problem and Context
* Review of Scholarly Literature
* Methods
* Results
* Discussion
I had already written the first two chapters for my proposal, and they would only need minor adjustments because my study had changed from an in-person to an online intervention. Chapter 3 had a good outline but basically needed to be rewritten to acknowledge the methods that were used during the study (post-tense). And chapters 4 and 5, they were brand new.
I began with rewriting chapter 3 because it was fairly straightforward. As we liked to say, chapter 3 is like a recipe. If someone wants to, they should be able to read your methods chapter and then replicate the study by following the instructions. Looking back, I’m not sure how I even started with Chapters 4 and 5. Within the program, this was the first time that I had written chapters 4 and 5. It was a bit daunting. Who am I kidding, it was as daunting as running a marathon. I did have exemplars of dissertations, but the problem here was every single one of the dissertations was different. There was not one chapter 4 or 5 that looked similar to another one.
I just started writing. A first draft of chapter 4 was sent to my mentor. It was returned with feedback. This went on for a couple of rounds, and in the meantime, I was writing up a first draft of chapter 5. On March 24th, 2025, I received an email from my mentor letting me know that I could go ahead and schedule my dissertation defense for April 14th. It was risky though, because that was the last day to have a defense for graduating in the spring. I rallied my other committee members and the dissertation date was set on the calendar. I had to have a copy of my full dissertation to my committee for them to read and review to prepare for the defense by April 4th. And my mentor had not even seen the first draft of chapter 5 yet. Gulp.
Even as I’m writing this, I honestly have no idea how I did it.
The two weeks that followed were a blur. Every spare moment I had I was sitting at my desk, staring at the words being written on my gorgeous Apple Studio Display (for those that are wondering, yes, this screen is absolutely amazing and totally worth the money). I probably drank way too much coffee, but I was taking regular walking breaks, and every time I would get back to the house, the walk would bring new ideas into my head about how I could write this or that.
Friday, April 4th arrived, and in the early evening, I sent out a copy of my full dissertation via Google Docs to my committee members. Woohoo! But I was not yet done. That night I also had to submit my dissertation through the formatting wizard that would me know if I had the document formatted correctly. This part was almost more frustrating than finishing up my chapters, but with the help of a friend and a last-minute Zoom call, I was able to move my paper from Google Docs to Microsoft Word and upload it to the wizard. This is when I felt one massive layer of stress fall away as my oldest son gave me the biggest hug asking Are you done writing Mom??!!
There might be a few of you reading this who are curious about the results of the study. As this is more of a reflection tale of my doctoral process, I won’t go through all the details here, but I still would like to share the major findings with you!
Here are the four themes:
* Where Design Meets Discovery: Shaping the Tour Experience
* The Interplay of Prior Experience and Motivation
* Reflection as a Mechanism for Change
* Transformational Learning Happens: Experiences, Reflections, and Mezirow’s Ten Phases
I found that transformational learning in an online tour IS possible, and this was done through the incorporation of five key strategies:
* There was flexibility in the learning design
* I used a participant-centered approach
* There were meaningful reflection activities
* I created a sense of cultural immersion through the use of photos, videos, original sound, and storytelling
* I allowed for ongoing feedback from participants and adapted the tour allowing them to guide the content
At some point, I would love to write more about this to a wider audience than just those in the academic sphere who have or know where to find my dissertation. It’s on the list of things to do (a book or article perhaps?).
So, where were we? I finished writing. I now had one week to put together my dissertation defense presentation. I love presenting. Putting together the presentation and speaking in front of a group of people, are two of my favorite things in the world to do.
April 14th dawned a beautiful sunny day. I put on a brightly colored dress and ran through my presentation one more time, making sure that all my ducks were in a row. At ten AM, my dissertation defense began. I was nervous, but also very excited to be presenting the research that I had designed, conducted, analyzed, and written about. Remember that disaster of a first day that I had with the online tour? Without that day, I don’t think I would have been as confident as I was on this glorious day.
I gave my presentation which was around 20 minutes or so, I never looked at the clock, and then it was time for questions from my committee. If anything, answering questions has always been difficult for me, but as it is with most things - the more you practice the better you get at it. I felt that I had improved at answering questions, which made me smile inside. Following the questions, the committee went into another Zoom room and discussed how I had done. This time is truly excruciating because I just thought about all the things that I could have done or answered differently. For the defense, I did have some friends watching, so it was comforting to be able to talk to them while waiting for the committee to return with the results…Pass or Fail.
After a time, the committee returned and said the words I think will stay in my head for a while…Congratulations Dr. Kouda! You have passed your defense with minor revisions to your dissertation. Wow. Wow. Wow. A huge smile appeared on my face and I really wanted to have a dance party. But I kept my composure, somehow!
I should probably explain the minor revisions to your dissertation part. When you defend, here are the responses that you can be given and their meanings:
Pass with no revisions - meaning that your dissertation is awesome the way it is and the committee members have officially signed off
Pass with minor revisions - the committee has a few minor tweaks they would like you to make before officially signing off
Pass with major revisions - the committee has some concerns and some major tweaks that need to happen before they officially sign off
Fail - I think we all know what this means
At the end of the Zoom for my dissertation defense, my chair (mentor) stayed with me to discuss the minor revisions to be made to my paper. I had less than one week to complete what needed to be rewritten and then be officially approved by my committee, making my deadline Monday, April 21st. Talk about nail biting. With these sorts of things, I always need at least a day to process the feedback and then how I would address it. Once again, somehow I was able to write and have feedback on my new revisions, and the revised dissertation was sent to my committee by the Friday before the deadline.
On the afternoon of Monday, April 21st, I received an email from my chair confirming that my dissertation was officially approved by all of my committee members. I was ecstatic! Pretty sure I did a bit of jumping and dancing - it was a moment to revel in my achievement.
But, I was not yet finished.
The last steps I had to complete were having my dissertation given the okay by the formatting wizards and then uploading it to ProQuest, the platform where all dissertations from ASU are published. Truth be told, I was tired by this point, while at the same time energized that I was almost finished with this process. Microsoft Word has to be my least favorite writing application for a multitude of reasons and I had not used it in years. I downloaded it to my computer just to complete the formatting process of my dissertation. I finally was able to work out all the formatting issues with my dissertation, and on Friday, April 25th, I uploaded my magnificent piece of work to ProQuest.
I’m not sure exactly what I did when I uploaded my document, but I’m sure that I breathed a huge sigh of relief.
I was done. And I was Dr. Debra Kouda. I had achieved the goal of earning a doctorate that I had set out to do four years prior.
As I sit here typing those words I am getting emotional. The transitions from doctoral student to doctoral candidate, to doctor are real, and I am just now starting to embrace the reality of this title that I worked so hard to receive. I was lucky enough to have a mentor who started talking to me about this shift in identity about a year ago - otherwise, this part is not really discussed in any course. But it truly is an identity shift that will take a bit of time, at least for me, to fully own. I most certainly deserve it but I have to constantly remind myself that I am Dr. Debra Kouda, Doctor of Education in Leadership and Innovation.
And now it is time to put this new identity to work. What are my plans for the future? I’m glad you asked!
I’ll give you a little teaser…My mission going forward is to help people incorporate transformational learning into their online courses.
Writing all of this down in this reflective process has been incredibly beneficial for me and I would like to thank you if you made it this far!
If you happen to be pursuing a Doctorate shortly, especially a Doctorate of Education in a fully online program, here are a few pieces of advice I could offer.
Find a group to go through the program with. I dare to say that my experience would not have nearly been as incredible - or maybe would I have even finished - if it had not been for the Community of Practice. Going to school online can be a lonely experience, and even if you think you want to do it alone, trust me, you don’t. Humans are meant to learn together.
Be okay with making adjustments or completing changing your problem of practice or the purpose of your research, even if it means a lot more work for you. You absolutely have to be passionate about what you are researching because your focus is like a needle in a haystack that you will be searching for for quite a while.
The ebbs and flows are a natural part of the doctoral journey. There were certainly moments when I was not sure what in the world I was doing or how I was going to work through a certain situation. However, it is in these moments when innovation can happen. Looking back, if I had not had the conversation with the investor, I would not have had the idea to change my research topic. Had the new addition to my family not happened, I would not have had to innovate and change my research intervention to the online space. What I finally landed on was absolutely perfect for me and my future plans.
When it comes to writing, just write. I heard that over and over again, however, I am a perfectionist when it comes to writing and it was very hard for me (and it still is) to write knowing that it is not perfect the first time around. I had to tell myself time and time again, to just start writing. Get the first draft done. Have the first round of feedback, and then the second, and third, and then you will be done. But you have to start writing first.
Don’t be afraid to be creative. One of the best books that I read during the last 4 years was Creativity, Inc.: Overcoming the Unseen Forces that Stand in the Way of True Inspiration by Ed Catmull with Amy Wallace. In so many ways I feel that higher education is on the straight and narrow with very little wiggle room for creativity. Why do I feel that way, well that is for another newsletter, but when it came to the doctoral process it sometimes felt the more creative my colleagues and I became, the wall put in front of us became bigger and stronger. Education, of all disciplines, should be one of the most creative. We are dealing with human beings and to help each one of them learn we have to pull from every creative bone we have. But, like I said, that is for another newsletter. Just be creative! It might make people ask more questions but that just means that you are moving in the right direction.
I am sure there are things that I will think of in the future that would be helpful, but I suppose one of the biggest things to do is…
Persevere.
You know how people choose a word of the year, persevere would be my word for the doctoral process. You just have to keep going, kind of like the Energizer Bunny.
I think we are nearing the end of this reflection piece. Finally, I’m sure you are thinking. So let us go back to the beginning question of why I pursued a doctoral degree.
Here is one reason that I have now, an analogy to sports, which I learned from a friend whom I met during my courses at ASU. When someone is talented or good at basketball, they want to be in the NBA; hockey, the NHL; soccer (aka futbol), the Premier League, and so on. I have always been good and felt comfortable in the academic environment, especially when I reached higher education. And I’m not talking about taking tests well or getting good grades, both of which I honestly deplore, it is the fact that I am challenged by so many people who have different views than I do. It allows me to expand and grow and change, to not be forced or want to hide my intellectual prowess, but to embrace it. I wanted to be in the Premier League. I wanted to be in the NBA - and I made it, in the academic context.
The second and probably the most important is that I figured out what my purpose is. I suppose four years ago I was going through some sort of mid-life crisis, trying to figure out what my purpose was - I mean, I think I have been trying to figure that out since I was about 10. I am a wife, mother, daughter, and sister, but there was something that I was missing - the work part, where I am creating value and being able to see the value that I am creating to serve people (and I will diving into more of this later after I’m finished reading the book Build the Life you Want: The Art and Science of Getting Happy by Arthur C. Brooks and Oprah Winfrey). I am a natural teacher and have been for a long time, but I was never quite sure what I was supposed to teach.
Throughout this dissertation process, I was led to it through leadership and innovation on my part and wound up with transformational learning in online education (formal and informal) being what I love to teach, and feel that it is certainly needed in the online education environment.
And I guess I should clarify what definition of leadership I am referring to in the above paragraph. I had the great honor of working with a colleague over the past four years who clarified and gave sense to what leadership is. His dissertation was all about leadership and innovation, looking at them in completely new ways. Freshly published in ProQuest, here is the definition by Steven Nash (2025) from his dissertation PROMETHEUS FIRE A Study Considering and Enabling Innovative Agency for Canadian Special Operations NCOs,
Leadership is a social dynamic of human interaction and relationships that causes people to engage with a leader and others in the pursuit of a common goal. It is predicated on the subjective emotional trust relationships which tend to be emotional and subjective. It is a naturally occurring dynamic, in that leaders need not be formally named nor appointed to have influence on others (p. 67).
And now, here is Nash’s (2025) definition of innovation, where he uses a metaphor for explanation. As I want to be very clear about what the definition is, I am giving it to you in his words. It is rather long and we would be highly discouraged from doing this in our dissertation, I feel that clarity on the topic is important here - and this is not a dissertation I am writing.
I offer another metaphor for my distilled definition of creativity and innovation. As an example, consider a balloon, since it can be filled up with air in a highly predictive manner. This context is merely a common process, and the balloon will tend to remain inert unless the contained air escapes by puncture or other means, initiating some movement according to the effects of physics. However, if we fill the same balloon with helium, it will tend to then come to life in Earth’s atmosphere and float or bounce around quite randomly. This helium filled balloon, in my view, is creativity or creative thought, as it is on the move, taking itself to new places in unpredictable, largely meandering ways, but without any specific direction or purpose. If I tie a string to the same balloon and take the string in my hand, I suggest that I have now created innovation, which is creativity with a designated purpose.
Following from this, and related to the upcoming discussion of innovative suppression, if the string is more like a heavy steel bar (perhaps representing the tyranny of bureaucratic process, policy, and procedures), then even the helium (representing creativity in the system) cannot elevate the balloon to anywhere new and interesting. In the converse case, too light a string can snap, perhaps without me knowing, and the balloon/creativity will likely return to randomized and potentially interesting wandering (p.79).
Wow. Chew on those new definitions and let me know what you think.
I am absolutely amazed at how wonderful it has been to write all of this down. Reflection truly is a wonderful mechanism for change.
I will leave you here now, but just know that there will be more newsletters coming as I work on owning my new identity (Dr. Debra Kouda - woohoo!) and living life with my family and friends. As we read in the very first semester - the doctorate is just the arduous first process in this journey of being a practitioner-scholar.
On that note, thank you so much to everyone who has supported me throughout these last 4 years, whether through discussions and words of encouragement or financially through a subscription to this newsletter.
Gratefully yours - Debra Kouda, EdD
References
Kouda, D. (2025). Transformative Learning Through Virtual Tourism: Exploring West Africa in the Digital Space. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. https://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.2.N.2015445
Nash, S. (2025). PROMETHEUS FIRE A Study Considering and Enabling Innovative Agency for Canadian Special Operations NCOs. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. https://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.2.N.201243
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit debrakouda.substack.com