
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


You can use an imperfect measure, name its limits plainly, and still write a report that reads as authoritative. Here is how I decide what to use when no validated test exists in the examinee's language.
You have a referral question to answer, and the person sitting across from you cannot be validly tested in English. The test you normally reach for does not exist in their language, or not in a version you trust.
Throwing up your hands is not rigor, and neither is running the English version and reporting the scores like nothing happened. The real work lives in between.
Over-explaining might feel like diligence, but it quietly works against you. In immigration work your reader is usually an adjudicator, not an opposing expert, and a report buried in qualifications is one they can set aside.
In this episode, you'll learn:
✅ Why an accurate translation still is not an equivalent test ✅ The translation continuum, from best option to the one to avoid ✅ What an elevated validity score may actually mean across cultural lines ✅ How to acknowledge a limitation from authority rather than apology ✅ The essentials for using an interpreter in standardized testing
Your credibility does not come from flawless tools. It comes from the quality of your reasoning and the soundness of your conclusions, and that holds even when conditions are far from ideal. Share this one with a colleague who is wrestling with it.
📘 Not Sure Where to Start as an Evaluator? Download our Free Guide to learn the essentials and see if this work is the right fit for you. 👉 Get the free guide
If you want a clear, ethical, and clinically grounded framework for writing evaluations that protect your clients and your license, the Expert Training in Immigration Evaluations will give you the structure and support you need. 👉 Learn More Here
📲 Stay Connected and Grow Your Expertise 🔹 Instagram 🔹 Facebook🔹 LinkedIn
🌟 Join our private Facebook community for deeper discussions, peer support, and access to valuable training opportunities.
👉 Click here to join the group
🎙️ Monthly Consultation Group
Join our monthly consultation group for case support, guidance, and community with clinicians doing immigration evaluations
📍 Immigration Psych Eval Directory
Get listed in our provider directory and connect with attorneys seeking immigration evaluations. Join the directory.
Knowing whether you're a factual witness or an expert witness is one of the clearest ways to protect your client, your license, and the case itself, and most clinicians were never taught the difference.
On this episode of Beyond Borders, I dig into something I see all the time, when a well-meaning attorney asks a treating therapist to write a letter that answers what is really a legal question. It sounds reasonable, but it quietly asks the clinician to step into a role they never signed up for.
So I slow down and sort out what actually separates these two roles, why the line matters so much for your client and your license, and the cleaner path that protects everyone.
In this episode, you'll learn:
What separates a factual (treating) witness from an expert (forensic) witness
The kinds of letters that quietly cross the line
Confidentiality versus privilege, and who actually holds it
How to know which hat you're wearing before you write a word
If you have ever felt unsure about what you can and can't put in a letter, today's episode brings real clarity.
📘 Not Sure Where to Start as an Evaluator? Download our Free Guide to learn the essentials and see if this work is the right fit for you. 👉 Get the free guide
If you want a clear, ethical, and clinically grounded framework for writing evaluations that protect your clients and your license, the Expert Training in Immigration Evaluations will give you the structure and support you need. 👉 Learn More Here
📲 Stay Connected and Grow Your Expertise 🔹 Instagram 🔹 Facebook🔹 LinkedIn
🌟 Join our private Facebook community for deeper discussions, peer support, and access to valuable training opportunities.👉 Click here to join the group
🎙️ Monthly Consultation Group
Join our monthly consultation group for case support, guidance, and community with clinicians doing immigration evaluations
📍 Immigration Psych Eval Directory
Get listed in our provider directory and connect with attorneys seeking immigration evaluations. Join the directory.
What gets your N-648 approved or quietly denied usually has nothing to do with your diagnosis. I asked Douglas Pierce, who spent 33 years inside USCIS, adjudicated tens of thousands of applications, and trained the very officers who read our forms, and his answers changed how I'll certify from here on.
For twenty years, I've signed N-648s and sent them into a black box, so having someone from the other side of the desk answer my questions honestly was the conversation I wish I'd had two decades ago.
Here's some of what we cover:
✅Why officers can't challenge your diagnosis, only the consistency of your documentation ✅How copy-paste boilerplate quietly invites scrutiny ✅The age and residency exceptions many of us overlook ✅Why a clinical addendum on your letterhead strengthens your work
If you do this work, or you're building toward it, you'll know exactly what to tighten before you sign your next N-648.
📘 Not Sure Where to Start as an Evaluator? Download our Free Guide to learn the essentials and see if this work is the right fit for you. 👉 Get the free guide
If you want a clear, ethical, and clinically grounded framework for writing evaluations that protect your clients and your license, the Expert Training in Immigration Evaluations will give you the structure and support you need. 👉 Learn More Here
📲 Stay Connected and Grow Your Expertise 🔹 Instagram 🔹 Facebook🔹 LinkedIn
🌟 Join our private Facebook community for deeper discussions, peer support, and access to valuable training opportunities.
👉 Click here to join the group
🎙️ Monthly Consultation Group
Join our monthly consultation group for case support, guidance, and community with clinicians doing immigration evaluations
📍 Immigration Psych Eval Directory
Get listed in our provider directory and connect with attorneys seeking immigration evaluations. Join the directory.
Do psychological evaluations still matter under the new USCIS policy? I'm joined today by Maria Lurye, who served on the immigration bench in New York from 2017 through 2025, and has reviewed hundreds of evaluations across asylum, VAWA, U and T visa, and cancellation of removal cases.
Before taking the bench, she spent nearly a decade as assistant chief counsel with ICE, litigating removal cases and writing appellate briefs. She now consults with attorneys on case strategy and removal defense and has seen these cases from every angle.
In today's episode, you'll learn:
✅The recent USCIS policy memo reshaping how officers approach adjustment of status cases ✅Where psychological evaluations fit into this new landscape ✅Three specific questions to anchor your reports on when these cases arrive ✅And why every report you submit is a reflection of your professional reputation that will follow you from case to case (whether you know it or not)
This episode will help you write evaluations that hold up under scrutiny and understand exactly what happens to them once they leave your hands.
📘 Not Sure Where to Start as an Evaluator? Download our Free Guide to learn the essentials and see if this work is the right fit for you. 👉 Get the free guide
If you want a clear, ethical, and clinically grounded framework for writing evaluations that protect your clients and your license, the Expert Training in Immigration Evaluations will give you the structure and support you need. 👉 Learn More Here
📲 Stay Connected and Grow Your Expertise🔹 Instagram 🔹 Facebook🔹 LinkedIn
🌟 Join our private Facebook community for deeper discussions, peer support, and access to valuable training opportunities.
👉 Click here to join the group
🎙️ Monthly Consultation Group
Join our monthly consultation group for case support, guidance, and community with clinicians doing immigration evaluations
📍 Immigration Psych Eval Directory
Get listed in our provider directory and connect with attorneys seeking immigration evaluations. Join the directory.
Immigration evaluations ask you to take everything you already know, like how to assess trauma, document psychological impact, and write a clinical report, and translate it into language that can determine whether someone is deported, separated from their children, or returned to a place where they were harmed. If you've ever been curious about what this work actually involves, this episode will give you the clearest picture yet.
You'll learn:
The major types of immigration evaluations Who each type is for What you'd actually be asked to do as the evaluator A fictional case study that illustrates what a hardship waiver, cancellation of removal, VAWA, U-visa, and asylum cases entail.
Whether you're brand new to this field or just starting to explore it, this is a good place to begin.
📘 Not Sure Where to Start as an Evaluator?Download our Free Guide to learn the essentials and see if this work is the right fit for you. 👉 Get the free guide
If you want a clear, ethical, and clinically grounded framework for writing evaluations that protect your clients and your license, the Expert Training in Immigration Evaluations will give you the structure and support you need. 👉 Learn More Here
📲 Stay Connected and Grow Your Expertise🔹 Instagram 🔹 Facebook🔹 LinkedIn
🌟 Join our private Facebook community for deeper discussions, peer support, and access to valuable training opportunities.
👉 Click here to join the group
🎙️ Monthly Consultation Group
Join our monthly consultation group for case support, guidance, and community with clinicians doing immigration evaluations
📍 Immigration Psych Eval Directory
Get listed in our provider directory and connect with attorneys seeking immigration evaluations. Join the directory.
I just returned from presenting at the Federal Bar Association Immigration Conference, and what I learned there matters for every clinician doing immigration evaluations right now. Attorneys are scrutinizing reports more carefully than ever, not because they don't trust you, but because the stakes are higher and the margin for error is smaller.
The landscape is shifting in significant ways. Your report may not just go to an immigration judge anymore. It may end up as part of an appellate record. Referral patterns are changing, cases are being built with appeals in mind, and that means your summary section must be bulletproof and your conclusions must directly answer the referral question with zero ambiguity.
In this episode, you'll learn:
✅ What attorneys are experiencing right now and why it matters for how you show up ✅ How referral patterns are shifting across different case types ✅ Why your report may end up in an appellate record ✅ What to do when an attorney asks you to change something in your report ✅ Why report length matters more than you think ✅ How to write a summary section that leaves no room for misinterpretation
I also share a recent case involving an inconsistent PTSD diagnosis and how I handled it in a way that protected both clinical integrity and the client's case.
If you're doing immigration evaluations currently, this episode will help you understand what attorneys need from you and how to write reports that serve your clients when scrutiny is at its highest.
📘 Not Sure Where to Start as an Evaluator?Download our Free Guide to learn the essentials and see if this work is the right fit for you. 👉 Get the free guide
If you want a clear, ethical, and clinically grounded framework for writing evaluations that protect your clients and your license, the Expert Training in Immigration Evaluations will give you the structure and support you need. 👉 Learn More Here
📲 Stay Connected and Grow Your Expertise🔹 Instagram 🔹 Facebook🔹 LinkedIn
🌟 Join our private Facebook community for deeper discussions, peer support, and access to valuable training opportunities.
👉 Click here to join the group
🎙️ Monthly Consultation Group
Join our monthly consultation group for case support, guidance, and community with clinicians doing immigration evaluations
📍 Immigration Psych Eval Directory
Get listed in our provider directory and connect with attorneys seeking immigration evaluations. Join the directory.
Your role is to educate adjudicators about trauma science, not to advocate. And when done well, forensic mental health reports can increase approval rates from 42% to 82%.
In this episode, I sit down with Professor Raquel Aldana, the Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law at UC Davis and a scholar who has spent years examining the intersection of immigration law, trauma science, and credibility adjudication. She recently published groundbreaking research in the American Journal of Law and Medicine on the role of mental health forensic assessments in credibility determinations.
Professor Aldana explains the fundamental gap between what the law expects from someone telling their story and what science actually tells us about how trauma affects memory and narration.
You'll learn:
✅ Why post-9/11 credibility standards (consistency, demeanor, plausibility) don't align with trauma science ✅ What attorneys are really looking for when they refer clients for evaluations ✅ How to negotiate expectations with attorneys before you even meet the client ✅ Why trauma survivors often present inconsistencies the legal system misinterprets as dishonesty ✅ How to write reports that educate rather than advocate ✅ Why clinicians should never do this work alone
If you've ever wondered how a judge reads your report, whether you're writing in ways that actually serve your clients legally, or what the law really needs from you that you may not be delivering, this conversation will give you a sharper sense of how your work lands on the legal side of the table.
Skwara A, Howard S, Velazquez C, Aldana R. Adjudicating Credibility: Documenting the Role of Mental Health Immigration Forensic Assessments. American Journal of Law & Medicine. 2025;51(2):217-251. doi:10.1017/amj.2025.10066
📘 Not Sure Where to Start as an Evaluator?Download our Free Guide to learn the essentials and see if this work is the right fit for you. 👉 Get the free guide
If you want a clear, ethical, and clinically grounded framework for writing evaluations that protect your clients and your license, the Expert Training in Immigration Evaluations will give you the structure and support you need. 👉 Learn More Here
📲 Stay Connected and Grow Your Expertise🔹 Instagram 🔹 Facebook🔹 LinkedIn
🌟 Join our private Facebook community for deeper discussions, peer support, and access to valuable training opportunities.
👉 Click here to join the group
🎙️ Monthly Consultation Group
Join our monthly consultation group for case support, guidance, and community with clinicians doing immigration evaluations
📍 Immigration Psych Eval Directory
Get listed in our provider directory and connect with attorneys seeking immigration evaluations. Join the directory.
Understanding what makes your clinical methodology sound gives you confidence in every evaluation you conduct.
You are the expert on clinical methodology. And when your methods are grounded in clinical training, ethically sound, and clearly explained, they meet the legal standard.
In this episode, I break down what the Federal Rules of Evidence actually say about expert testimony, why I like to think of psychological testing as the spice (not the main dish), and how immigration evaluations are fundamentally different from other forensic work where standardized tools are typically expected.
You'll learn
✔️ How to build methodology that is both clinically sound and legally defensible ✔️ How to explain your approach clearly in your reports ✔️ What to do if your methods are ever questioned ✔️ How to write a response that reinforces your expertise while protecting your client's case.
This isn't about defending yourself after the fact. It's about conducting evaluations with confidence because you understand what makes your methodology unquestionable.
📘 Not Sure Where to Start as an Evaluator?Download our Free Guide to learn the essentials and see if this work is the right fit for you. 👉 Get the free guide
If you want a clear, ethical, and clinically grounded framework for writing evaluations that protect your clients and your license, the Expert Training in Immigration Evaluations will give you the structure and support you need. 👉 Learn More Here
📲 Stay Connected and Grow Your Expertise🔹 Instagram 🔹 Facebook🔹 LinkedIn
🌟 Join our private Facebook community for deeper discussions, peer support, and access to valuable training opportunities.
👉 Click here to join the group
🎙️ Monthly Consultation Group
Join our monthly consultation group for case support, guidance, and community with clinicians doing immigration evaluations
📍 Immigration Psych Eval Directory
Get listed in our provider directory and connect with attorneys seeking immigration evaluations. Join the directory.
The way you conduct an immigration evaluation can either recreate the powerlessness your client experienced during their trauma, or it can restore a sense of agency and safety they desperately need.
In this episode, I walk through the core principles of trauma-informed interviewing in immigration evaluations.
You'll learn how to:
✅ Give clients control from the moment they walk in ✅ Structure the interview so their nervous system can settle ✅ And what to do when someone becomes visibly dysregulated
If you've ever wondered how to balance gathering information with creating safety for someone sharing the most painful experiences of their life, this episode will give you a clear framework.
📘 Not Sure Where to Start as an Evaluator?Download our Free Guide to learn the essentials and see if this work is the right fit for you. 👉 Get the free guide
If you want a clear, ethical, and clinically grounded framework for writing evaluations that protect your clients and your license, the Expert Training in Immigration Evaluations will give you the structure and support you need. 👉 Learn More Here
📲 Stay Connected and Grow Your Expertise🔹 Instagram 🔹 Facebook🔹 LinkedIn
🌟 Join our private Facebook community for deeper discussions, peer support, and access to valuable training opportunities.
👉 Click here to join the group
Reading your client's declaration before the evaluation could save you from weeks of report revisions and protect the case from credibility issues. Not reading it could mean you're retraumatizing your client by forcing them to repeat graphic details that are already documented.
So which approach is right?
This question comes up constantly in training and consultation, and the answer isn't what most clinicians expect. It touches on trauma-informed care, objectivity, role boundaries, and how immigration cases actually get undermined by seemingly small inconsistencies.
In this episode, I break down what declarations actually are, how they're created, who really writes them, and why the choice to read or not read has bigger implications than you might think.
You'll learn how to:
✅ Catch inconsistencies before they become credibility problems ✅ Stay trauma-informed without forcing unnecessary repetition ✅ Protect your reports from the revision requests that derail timelines and frustrate attorneys
If you've ever submitted a report only to have it sent back because it didn't match the affidavit, or if you've wondered whether you're approaching this the right way, this episode will give you a clear framework.
The declaration tells the story of what happened. Your report explains what that story did to the human being living inside it.
📘 Not Sure Where to Start as an Evaluator?Download our Free Guide to learn the essentials and see if this work is the right fit for you. 👉 Get the free guide
If you want a clear, ethical, and clinically grounded framework for writing evaluations that protect your clients and your license, the Expert Training in Immigration Evaluations will give you the structure and support you need. 👉 Learn More Here
📲 Stay Connected and Grow Your Expertise🔹 Instagram 🔹 Facebook🔹 LinkedIn
🌟 Join our private Facebook community for deeper discussions, peer support, and access to valuable training opportunities.
👉 Click here to join the group
From the publisher's feed