
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Welcome back to Tiers of Scrutiny! On today's episode, we discuss a 2nd Amendment case--United States v. Rahimi. Check out the links below for a little extra reading on the case. See you in two weeks :)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-915
https://www.aclu.org/cases/united-states-v-rahimi
In this episode, hear us discuss McElrath v. Georgia, an upcoming SCOTUS case regarding an acquitted defendant who the state of Georgia wants to retry in criminal court. Sound like a Double Jeopardy issue to you? Us too. Tune in for more.
On today's episode we discuss Alexander v. South Carolina NAACP. The case regards gerrymandering in South Carolina. You can read more about it here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-807
In today's episode we discuss the intersection of the 1st amendment and social media!
Question at hand: Does the refusal to register a trademark under 15 U.S.C. § 1052(c) when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment?
In today's case we discuss the intersection between freedom of speech and internet stalking. You can read the court's full opinion here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-138_43j7.pdf!
In this episode, we discuss the fall of affirmative action and our predictions of what will happen to college applications next. We simultaneously explored the role of Asian Americans and the model minority myth in both upholding and ending the practice. By no means do we have all the answers to the effect that the end of the policy will have on institutions and opportunities for underrepresented minorities and those in the majority. This episode is a contentious one but we didn't want to shy away from our thoughts and opinions so please be respectful when engaging in discourse. At the end of the day, people are sacred and ideas are not.
Here are the references we used:
https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26316/w26316.pdf
https://www.bu.edu/ciss/2023/07/03/college-are-already-unequal-will-ending-affirmative-action-make-it-worse/
https://www.axios.com/local/san-francisco/2023/07/03/affirmative-action-supreme-court-california#
https://www.npr.org/2023/07/02/1183981097/affirmative-action-asian-americans-poc
http://care.gseis.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/care-brief-raceblind.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00284.x
http://www.jstor.org/stable/42956064
http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7rqbv
Fisher v. University of Texas. (n.d.). Oyez. Retrieved July 7, 2023, from https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/11-345
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/15/legacy-colleges-universities-black-brown/
https://www.law.com/almID/1202676210690/
https://calmatters.org/education/2018/07/californias-gone-without-higher-ed-affirmative-action-since-1996-blackenrollment-at-top-ucs-never-recovered/
https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/1062947?show=full%20own%20original%20research.
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College. (n.d.). Oyez. Retrieved July 7, 2023, from https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/20-1199
https://thespearheadmagazine.com/how-the-model-minority-myth-affects-us-all/
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol11/iss2/7
https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/06/29/affirmative-action-banned-what-happens/
Listen to us unpack the decision in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, in which SCOTUS came down in favor of Lori Smith, the Colorado wedding website designer who did not wish to ever design a website for a same-sex couple. Read here for more background information. See you in two weeks!
Welcome back to Tiers of Scrutiny! Listen here for a breakdown of Haaland v. Brackeen, a SCOTUS case regarding ICWA (The Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978). If interested in more background information, check out the following links:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/21-376
https://www.aclu.org/cases/brackeen-v-haaland
This episode of tiers of scrutiny covers the court's recent decision in Allen v. Milligan which regards maps used in the 2022 midterm election in Alabama. You can read the opinion here. If you are interested in more legal analysis we suggest SCOTUS Blog.
From the publisher's feed