Beyond The Judgement

In this episode we discuss Twitter v. Taamneh and Google v. Gonzalez, two decisions released by the court on May 18th. We hope you enjoy!

A continued discussion of the ethics scandals surrounding the SCOTUS and what the impact is in the court of public opinion.

On April 21st, the Supreme Court released a block on a lower court ruling from April 7th to prohibit the use of Mifepristone (an abortion pill) which contradicted another ruling on the same day which expanded the use of Mifepristone. Tune in to hear our thoughts and opinions of the block along with updates on the NC Supreme Court cases we talked about 2 episodes ago: Harper v. Hall and Holmes v. Moore. The Republican majority court has reversed these decisions which will have a major impact on how we vote in the next election.

Greetings! Today's episode of Barely Legal focuses on recent news! ProPublica released a report revealing that Clarence Thomas failed to disclose multiple trips and a real estate deal made with GOP super donor and billionaire, Harlan Crow. What does this mean for the public's (already eroding) trust in the Supreme Court?

As always, thank you for listening and we'll see you in two weeks.

In today's episode, we discuss the newly Republican majority NC Supreme Court rehearing two voting-related cases, Holmes v. Moore and Harper v. Hall. The former has to do with Voter ID requirements and the latter with allegedly racially discriminatory redistricting. As always, we encourage you to seek out information about your local legislators and justices, and to bear this information in mind when you cast your vote. Thanks for listening, and we'll see you in three weeks.

Welcome to today's episode of Barely Legal, where we discuss the five women suing the state of Texas for not providing them with abortions despite their fetuses being unviable and their lives being at risk. We also discuss the unintended consequences of abortion bans that have sprouted across the country since the release of the Supreme Court's decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the case that overturned Roe v. Wade and returned the decision of abortion to the states. 

Attached is a link to an overview of the Dobbs case. Thank you for listening. 

Today we talk about John Balentine and the role of our courts in determining who lives and who dies. Although this is not a Supreme Court case, there are still many implications from the decision. You can read more about it here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/02/supreme-court-declines-to-halt-execution-of-texas-man-who-said-juror-and-attorneys-were-racist/. We also talked about the Racial Justice Act  and NC Supreme Court case State v. Robinson along with State v. Tucker . 

In today's episode, we discuss the background to Obergefell v. Hodges and previous precedent that regards the LGBTQ+ community in honor of Valentine's Day tomorrow. This is part 1 of a 3 part series regarding court decisions affecting the community. Stay tuned for the next 2 parts!

Santos-Zacaria v. Garland regards a trans woman from Guatemala facing deportation in the United Stations. She filed for stay of deportation based on past persecution in her native country. The episode discusses the responsibilities we have to immigrants and potential deportees, especially when it comes to bodily safety. 

Read more about the case and listen to the oral arguments here:

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/21-1436

We take a dive back in time to 2015 when the landmark decision was made to legalize same-sex marriage across all 50 states. We explore the significance of Obergefell and what's to come for the LGBTQ+ community.