BJGP Interviews

BJGP Interviews

By The British Journal of General PracticeScienceMedicineHealth & Fitness
Download on the App Store

BJGP Interviews episodes

  • Thinking about the best ways to integrate pharmacists into general practice – views of GPs and pharmacists

    In this episode, we talk to Ameerah Ibrahim and Carmel Hughes about the paper they’ve recently published in the BJGP titled, ‘GPs’ and pharmacists’ views of integrating pharmacists into general practices: a qualitative study’

    Title of paper: GPs’ and pharmacists’ views of integrating pharmacists into general practices: a qualitative study

    Available at: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0518

    Little is known about primary healthcare professionals’ views on the impact of practice-based pharmacists (PBPs) in general practice. Participants interviewed in this study reported that PBPs had integrated well and perceived a positive impact on primary healthcare delivery. The findings indicated that continued integration would need PBPs, all members of the practice team, and community pharmacists (CPs) to understand each other's roles well and to communicate clearly to ensure the delivery of efficient PBP-led patient care. A number of areas for development were identified such as patient awareness of the role and communication pathways between PBPs and CPs.

    15 min
  • How the RCGP is supporting research – and how you can get involved

    Today we are talking to Dr Nick Thomas, who is clinical lead for research at the Royal College of General Practice here in the UK.

    Read more about research here at the RCGP: https://www.rcgp.org.uk/representing-you/research-at-rcgp

    And for more information about the Research and Surveillance Centre, look here: https://www.rcgp.org.uk/representing-you/research-at-rcgp/research-surveillance-centre

    If you are looking for research funding opportunities through the RCGP, read more here: https://www.rcgp.org.uk/representing-you/research-at-rcgp/how-rcgp-support-your-research#grants

    11 min
  • Looking at what happens when a GP surgery closes – what are the wider impacts on patients and other practices?

    In this episode, we talk to Dr Joe Hutchinson, an academic clinical fellow at the Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research at the University of Manchester. 

    Title of paper: Consequences of the closure of General Practices: a retrospective cross-sectional study

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0501

    Closures of UK general practices are increasingly common, yet little is known about the consequences. This cross-sectional study of English general practices finds practice closures increase list size in exposed practices, with changes in workforce composition and reductions in patient satisfaction.

    15 min
  • Clinical factors and characteristics of men who see their GP before death by suicide

    In this episode, we talk to Dr Faraz Mughal, who is a practising NHS General Practitioner and NIHR Doctoral Fellow at the School of Medicine at Keele University.

    Title of paper: Recent GP consultation before death by suicide in middle-aged males: a national consecutive case series study

    Available at: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0589

    Preventing suicide in middle-aged males is a global priority. This national case series study found that 43% of middle-aged males who died by suicide had a final GP consultation in the preceding 3 months, and of these males, over half presented with a mental health problem. Males who had recent GP contact before suicide were more likely to have self-harmed in the 3 months before compared with males who had no recent GP contact. Males who had a current physical illness, recent history of self-harm, attended for a mental health problem, and experienced recent work-related problems were more likely to consult with their GP shortly before dying by suicide. GPs and primary care clinicians should be alert to these clinical factors that may be proximal to suicide, and in turn, offer personalised holistic care.

    12 min
  • Who’s at risk of acute kidney injury? Developing a score to use in general practice amongst patients with hypertension

    In this episode, we talk to Dr James Sheppard, who is an Associate Professor at the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences at the University of Oxford. 

    Title of paper: Predicting the risk of acute kidney injury: Derivation and validation of STRATIFY-AKI

    Available at: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0389

    Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the more serious adverse events associated with antihypertensive treatment, reducing an individual’s health-related quality of life and increasing the risk of admission to hospital. Clinical guidelines recommend that when prescribing antihypertensives GPs should take into account the likelihood of both the benefits and harms from treatment, but few data exist in regard to the risk of AKI. A clinical prediction model was developed and externally validated for the risk of AKI up to 10 years in the future in patients eligible for antihypertensive medication, incorporating commonly recorded patient characteristics, comorbidities, and prescribed medications. The model showed good discrimination and good calibration for probabilities up to 20%, enabling GPs to accurately identify patients at higher risk of AKI. This could be useful to reassure the majority of patients starting or continuing treatment that their risk of AKI is very low.

    14 min
  • How can GPs better manage breathlessness symptoms and what is the impact of diagnostic delays?

    In this episode, we talk to Gillian Doe and Rachael Evans, both based at the University of Leicester.

    Title of paper: Diagnostic delays for breathlessness in primary care: a qualitative study to investigate current care and inform future pathways

    Available at: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0475

    Delays to diagnosis for patients presenting with chronic breathlessness are well described. This study set out to investigate current care for patients awaiting a diagnosis to inform future diagnostic pathways. The data highlight the challenges of symptom recognition, timely investigations, making a positive diagnosis, and difficult consultations. To achieve earlier diagnosis and better outcomes for patients with breathlessness, clinicians need to Ask, Act, and Advise: Ask to understand and validate symptoms, Act to initiate timely investigations, and Advise a positive diagnosis while offering breathlessness relief strategies.

    15 min
  • How can we improve our care for ethnic minority women through the menopause?

    In this episode, we talk to Jennifer MacLellan and Sultana Bi about the paper they have recently published here in the BJGP.

    Title of paper: Primary care practitioners’ experiences of peri/menopause help-seeking among ethnic minority women

    Available at: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0569

    Ethnic minority women may have different experiences of the peri/menopause from their white peers. Ethnic minority women may face language, inhibition and health literacy barriers to primary care. There is a need for increased awareness and trustworthy information resources to help ethnic minority women prepare for the menopause and advocate for their health. Resources, training and quality interpreter support are needed to help clinicians recognise ethnic minority women’s experiences and offer support, improving quality of life and potentially reducing future disease risk.

    15 min
  • The consequences of online access to patient records – what are the views of practice staff?

    In this episode, we talk to Dr Gail Davidge and Dr Brian McMillan, who are both based at the Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research at the University of Manchester.

    Title of paper: Putting principles into practice: A qualitative exploration of the views and experiences of primary care staff regarding patients having online access to their electronic health record

    Available at: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0436

    Previous research has noted primary care staff concerns about patients having online access to their health record, relating to issues such as: workload, safeguarding, patient confusion or distress, and health inequities. This study provides additional insights in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic and in the light of NHS England’s plans to enable full prospective records access for patients by default. Findings highlight that most primary care staff agree with patient records access in principle, and can see its potential benefits, but remain concerned about the impact on patient centred care, safeguarding, and how to navigate this change. This study underlines the need for additional training and support for primary care staff to adapt their practice so they can address the needs of patients and protect patient safety and well-being whilst maintaining the clinical integrity of health records.

    15 min
  • Better colorectal cancer screening - lessons from the CRISP RCT

    In this episode, we talk to Professor Jon Emery, who is the Herman Chair of Primary Care Cancer Research at the University of Melbourne. 

    Title of paper: The CRISP Trial: RCT of a decision support tool for risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening

    Available at: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0480

    Using risk models that account for family history, lifestyle and medical history could tailor CRC screening and determine starting age and screening test. This could be more cost-effective than population screening. In this RCT, we showed that using the CRISP risk tool in general practice can increase risk-appropriate CRC screening in those due screening. Its effect is more uncertain in patients who are up-to-date with screening. The CRISP intervention could be used in people in their fifth decade to ensure people start CRC screening at the optimal age with the most cost-effective screening test.

    18 min
  • Continuity in the remote age – what is the impact on patients and GPs?

    In this episode, we talk to Dr Emma Ladds, who is a Primary Care In-Practice Fellow and GP based at the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences at the University of Oxford.

    Title of paper: ‘How have remote care approaches impacted continuity? A mixed-studies systematic review’

    Available at: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0398

    The value of continuity in primary care has been repeatedly demonstrated for multiple outcomes. However little is known about how the expansion of remote and digital care models have impacted continuity. Here we demonstrate a disturbing lack of systematic research in this area and emphasize the need for real world explorations of the links between the shift to remote care, continuity and equity to ascertain when and for whom continuity adds most value and how this can be enabled or maintained.

    18 min

About BJGP Interviews

From the publisher's feed

Listen to BJGP Interviews for the latest updates on primary care and general practice research. Hear from researchers and clinicians who will update and guide you to the best practice. We all want to deliver better care to patients and improve health through better research and its translation into practice and policy.

More shows like BJGP Interviews

RCGP eLearning Podcast by RCGP eLearning Podcast

RCGP eLearning Podcast

3 Listeners

Talking General Practice by GPonline.com

Talking General Practice

2 Listeners

The Rest Is Politics by Goalhanger

The Rest Is Politics

3,140 Listeners

The News Agents by Global

The News Agents

1,204 Listeners

The Rest Is Money by Goalhanger

The Rest Is Money

164 Listeners