Send us a text

Imagine stepping onto a perfect, hidden beach and feeling your life accelerate—years slipping by in hours, bodies racing ahead of minds, and secrets surfacing as quickly as the tide. That’s the uneasy heart of Sandcastle and Old, and we dig into why the same premise lands so differently on the page and on screen. We trace how the graphic novel’s eerie hints—a watcher on the cliff, a fleeting mention of a hotel—become the film’s full-blown surveillance network and resort pipeline, and we ask whether stitching every clue into a system strengthens the story or drains it of its darkness.

We get candid about the toughest material: accelerated puberty, consent, and the ethical line between portraying horror and exploiting it. The book confronts discomfort with explicit imagery and ambiguous mental ages; the film pulls back, leaning on performance and implication while sticking to strict time rules. From decomposition that speeds up to a devastating “twelve days per minute” calculation that makes caring for a newborn impossible, we test each version’s internal logic and how that logic shapes dread. We also chart character shifts—the refugee becoming a rapper, younger spouses re framing vulnerability—and how those choices steer empathy, suspicion, and agency.

Then we tackle the twist that divided us. The graphic novel flirts with conspiracy; the film names it: a pharmaceutical operation compressing clinical trials into a single day. It’s a pointed critique of profit over people, and it turns random terror into institutional harm. Does that clarity deepen the horror or shrink it to a headline? We close with a verdict rooted in taste: if you love Twilight Zone mood and unanswered questions, the book’s your pick; if you want clean rules, ethical guardrails, and a societal target, the movie makes its case. Press play, then tell us: mystery or meaning? Subscribe, share with a friend who argues about adaptations, and leave a quick review with your winner and why.

All episodes of the podcast can be found on our website: https://booksvsmovies.buzzsprout.com/share

Connect with me: Instagram | Threads | Bookshop | Goodreads | Blog

Send us a text

Ever wonder if passionate love can withstand decades of separation? "The Last Letter from Your Lover" takes us on a journey through time where handwritten correspondence becomes the bridge between star-crossed lovers.

In 1960s London, Jennifer Stirling wakes in a hospital bed with no memory of her life or wealthy husband. When she discovers hidden love letters signed only with the letter "B," she unravels a past filled with forbidden passion and missed opportunities. These letters reveal plans to leave her husband—plans derailed by a tragic accident. Fast forward to present day, where journalist Ellie Haworth stumbles upon these same letters while researching in newspaper archives. As she becomes captivated by this mysterious romance, Ellie's own complicated love life begins to mirror Jennifer's in unexpected ways.

The novel and film adaptation take surprisingly different approaches to this dual-timeline romance. While Jojo Moyes' book unfolds chronologically with rich detail about Jennifer's recovery and detective work, the 2021 film starring Shailene Woodley and Felicity Jones interweaves the timelines from the beginning. The book delves deeper into the societal constraints of being a woman in the 1960s, illustrating why Jennifer remained trapped in her marriage, while adding fascinating subplots completely absent from the film—including corporate scandal and deliberate deception that kept the lovers apart.

Both versions culminate in the poignant possibility of reunion after forty years apart, proving that true connection transcends time. But which telling resonates more deeply? Listen as I break down the significant changes between page and screen, examine how each medium portrays these parallel love stories, and determine whether this is a rare case where the adaptation stands alongside its source material or another example of how books capture emotional complexity that films simply cannot match.

All episodes of the podcast can be found on our website: https://booksvsmovies.buzzsprout.com/share

Connect with me: Instagram | Threads | Bookshop | Goodreads | Blog

Send us a text

Death has never been so captivated by a human as he is by Liesel Meminger, a young girl navigating the treacherous landscape of Nazi Germany with stolen books as her compass. When Death first encounters Liesel at her brother's gravesite, he watches her pilfer her first treasure – The Gravedigger's Handbook – marking the beginning of her journey as the Book Thief.

Words become Liesel's salvation in a world determined to burn them. After arriving at the home of her foster parents, Hans and Rosa Huberman, she finds an unexpected ally in Hans, who patiently teaches her to read in their basement during late-night sessions. As Nazi ideology tightens its grip on their small town of Molching, Liesel's hunger for books grows. She begins stealing them from wherever she can – Nazi book burnings, the mayor's wife's library – each stolen volume a small act of rebellion against the regime that took her biological mother.

The stakes escalate dramatically when the Hubermans hide Max Vandenburg, a Jewish refugee, in their basement. The dangerous secret creates an unbreakable bond between Max and Liesel, united by their understanding of words' power to both destroy and heal. While Hitler uses language to incite hatred, Max and Liesel exchange stories to survive. Their friendship becomes the emotional heart of both Markus Zusak's acclaimed novel and its 2013 film adaptation starring Sophie Nélisse, Geoffrey Rush, and Emily Watson.

Though the film makes several notable changes – simplifying some relationships and softening certain blows – both versions powerfully illustrate how literature provides refuge during humanity's darkest hours. The story culminates in the devastating bombing of Himmel Street, a moment that transforms everything for Liesel but cannot destroy the stories she's collected. Through Death's unique narration, we witness how words, whether stolen, shared, or written, ultimately save Liesel when nothing else can. Discover why this tale continues to resonate with readers and viewers alike as we compare the book to its film adaptation and explore which version most powerfully delivers this unforgettable story.

All episodes of the podcast can be found on our website: https://booksvsmovies.buzzsprout.com/share

Connect with me: Instagram | Threads | Bookshop | Goodreads | Blog

Send us a text

What happens when a deeply personal memoir about loss transforms into a Hollywood comedy-drama with Kevin Hart? "Two Kisses for Maddy: A Memoir of Love and Loss" and "Fatherhood" tell the same heartbreaking story from radically different angles, revealing how adaptation can both honor and re imagine true experiences.

Matthew Logelin's raw memoir chronicles the devastating loss of his wife Liz to a pulmonary embolism just 27 hours after giving birth to their daughter. Left suddenly as a grieving single father, Matt documents his journey through that first impossible year with baby Maddy, building a foundation to help others in similar situations. His unfiltered voice—sometimes criticized as pretentious or problematic—nonetheless captures the unvarnished reality of unexpected loss and parenthood.

When Kevin Hart stepped into the role for the film adaptation, he brought deliberate purpose beyond storytelling. Hart specifically chose this project to showcase positive Black fatherhood on screen while bringing awareness to the disproportionately high maternal mortality rates among Black women—the very condition that claimed Liz Logelin's life nearly took Serena Williams' as well. The film expands beyond the book's timeline, creating fictional elements like school uniform battles and relationship struggles that weren't part of Matt's actual experience.

Whether you connect more with the memoir's unflinching grief or the film's hopeful re imagining, both versions ultimately celebrate the same truth: that love transcends loss, and that parenthood requires courage in the face of the unimaginable. Which raises the podcast's central question—is the book really better than the movie when they're telling fundamentally different stories for different purposes?

All episodes of the podcast can be found on our website: https://booksvsmovies.buzzsprout.com/share

Connect with me: Instagram | Threads | Bookshop | Goodreads | Blog

Send us a text

Forty-two may be the answer to life, the universe, and everything, but is the book really better than the movie when it comes to "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"? Join me as I navigate through Douglas Adams' beloved science fiction comedy and its 2005 film adaptation starring Martin Freeman, Zooey Deschanel, and the voice of Alan Rickman.

My relationship with this interstellar adventure has been nothing short of a cosmic journey itself. From absolutely despising it in middle school to gradually appreciating its unique charm over multiple readings, I've come to understand why this particular brand of British humor divides audiences so dramatically. Whether you're encountering the absurdist tale of Arthur Dent's space adventures for the first time or you're a longtime fan, this episode offers fresh perspectives on both versions of the story.

We'll explore the fascinating evolution of "The Hitchhiker's Guide" from its origins as a BBC radio show to its various adaptations, and dive deep into the key differences between the book and film. Does the addition of a romantic subplot between Arthur and Trillian enhance the story? How successfully does the film translate Adams' abstract humor to a visual medium? And of course, which version comes out on top in this intergalactic showdown?

The universe is a vastly bizarre place, filled with infinite improbabilities and peculiar aliens, but perhaps the strangest mystery of all is why some people find this story hilarious while others are left completely cold. Whether you're a fan of science fiction, British comedy, or simply curious about this cultural phenomenon, grab your towel and don't panic – this episode has something for everyone.

All episodes of the podcast can be found on our website: https://booksvsmovies.buzzsprout.com/share

Connect with me: Instagram | Threads | Bookshop | Goodreads | Blog

Send us a text

Delving into Edward Ashton's sci-fi novel "Mickey7" and Bong Joon-ho's film adaptation "Mickey 17," this episode presents a rare case where the movie might outshine its source material. 

The story follows an "expendable" human—Mickey—whose job is to die repeatedly for the colony's benefit on the ice planet Niflheim. Each death results in a new Mickey with the previous memories, until an unexpected survival creates two simultaneous Mickeys, something strictly forbidden in their world.

Director Bong Joon-ho made fascinating changes that transform the narrative. By increasing Mickey's iterations from 7 to 17, the film creates more opportunities for character development. Robert Pattinson delivers a standout performance, portraying distinct personalities for different Mickey versions—something absent in the book where the duplicates are virtually identical.

The native "creepers" evolve from somewhat menacing creatures in the novel to largely peaceful beings in the film, creating a nuanced exploration of colonial encounters. Supporting characters receive enriched story lines, with Mark Ruffalo and Toni Collette bringing theatrical flair to their roles as the colony's leaders.

Where the book occasionally gets bogged down in technical explanations and flashbacks, the film maintains a streamlined focus on questions about identity, sacrifice, and what makes us human. Bong's visual storytelling eliminates the need for extensive exposition while preserving the philosophical core.

Whether you're a sci-fi enthusiast or someone who typically avoids the genre, "Mickey 17" offers accessible storytelling with emotional depth. After comparing both versions, I gave the film 3.5 stars and the book 3 stars, making this a clear victory for the adaptation.

All episodes of the podcast can be found on our website: https://booksvsmovies.buzzsprout.com/share

Connect with me: Instagram | Threads | Bookshop | Goodreads | Blog

Send us a text

That age-old question haunts every book lover who's watched their favorite novel get adapted to film: "Is the book really better?" For Shirley Jackson's masterpiece "The Haunting of Hill House" and its 1999 film adaptation "The Haunting," the answer is complicated by fascinating behind-the-scenes copyright issues that forced filmmakers to create something almost entirely different from both the source novel and the beloved 1963 film adaptation.

Orlando and I dive into this strange case study, exploring how a psychologically complex novel about a lonely woman named Eleanor finding belonging in a subtly unsettling house transformed into a bombastic late-90s horror film featuring ghost children, CGI griffins, and Catherine Zeta-Jones in increasingly revealing outfits. The discussion reveals how the film's inability to officially remake the 1963 version led to bizarre creative choices - from making Eleanor a direct descendant of the house's builder to filling the mansion with elaborate supernatural rooms that defy architectural logic.

What makes this comparison particularly interesting is how the changes shift the entire nature of the story. Jackson's novel leaves readers questioning how much of the haunting might exist in Eleanor's mind, creating an enduring sense of unease about Hill House itself. The film discards this ambiguity entirely, presenting explicit supernatural manifestations and a clear villain in Hugh Crane (not Craine, as in the book), culminating in an effects-heavy showdown involving the literal gates of hell installed in the mansion for reasons never adequately explained.

Despite their criticism of the adaptation, we both acknowledge our nostalgic attachment to the 1999 film and suggest it can be enjoyed as campy entertainment if viewed completely separate from its source material. Whether you're a literary horror fan or just curious about the adaptation process, this episode offers a fascinating look at how Hollywood transforms subtle psychological terror into something very, very different. Ready to decide which version of Hill House you'd rather visit? Listen now and join the conversation about books, movies, and the strange journeys between them.

All episodes of the podcast can be found on our website: https://booksvsmovies.buzzsprout.com/share

Connect with me: Instagram | Threads | Bookshop | Goodreads | Blog

Send us a text

Lawrence Wright's "Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood and the Prison of Belief" pulls back the curtain on Scientology's most guarded secrets, revealing a world where science fiction becomes religious doctrine and Hollywood celebrities become powerful pawns in a global organization.

The journey begins with Lafayette Ronald Hubbard—a charismatic science fiction writer whose creation of Dianetics evolved into a belief system involving alien spirits called Thetans and promises of supernatural abilities through "going clear." What makes this investigation so compelling is the meticulous research behind every shocking revelation. Wright's book and its documentary adaptation don't just make allegations; they substantiate them through extensive interviews with former high-ranking members who witnessed the inner workings firsthand.

Most fascinating is Scientology's calculated infiltration of Hollywood. The documentary exposes how the church allegedly manipulated Tom Cruise's relationships, including orchestrating his breakup with Nicole Kidman and later "auditioning" potential partners without their knowledge. These celebrity connections provided the organization with both legitimacy and protection, even as troubling allegations of abuse mounted under David Miscavige's leadership.

The most disturbing aspects involve the "Sea Org," where members sign billion-year contracts and reportedly face harsh punishment for questioning authority. Former members describe a sophisticated system of control where deeply personal information gathered during "auditing" sessions becomes potential blackmail material against those who might leave. This creates a true "prison of belief" where psychological chains prove stronger than physical ones.

Whether you choose the comprehensive book or its condensed documentary version, you'll find yourself unable to look away from this fascinating exploration of how seemingly intelligent people can become entrapped in a web of belief that defies conventional understanding. After experiencing either, you'll never view Scientology—or organized belief systems in general—quite the same way again.

All episodes of the podcast can be found on our website: https://booksvsmovies.buzzsprout.com/share

Connect with me: Instagram | Threads | Bookshop | Goodreads | Blog

Send us a text

Margaret Atwood's chilling vision of a dystopian America transformed into the theocratic Republic of Gilead has captivated readers since 1985, but how does this haunting story translate from page to screen? Diving deep into both the original novel and its acclaimed Hulu adaptation, this episode explores the fascinating creative choices that shape our understanding of Offred's nightmare.

From the stunning watercolor imagery of Renee Nault's graphic novel adaptation to the controversial casting of younger actors as the Commander and Serena Joy, each artistic decision fundamentally alters our perception of Gilead's power dynamics. The television series makes explicit what Atwood merely implies - showing us Janine's eye removal and Ofglen's genital mutilation while expanding character journeys beyond the novel's boundaries.

The most profound differences emerge in how each medium handles hope and resistance. While both end with the same ambiguous cliffhanger of Offred entering a van to an unknown fate, the novel frames her story as historical testimony studied in a post-Gilead future. The series, needing to continue beyond season one, transforms her journey into an ongoing resistance narrative with expanded roles for characters like Moira, who escapes to Canada rather than remaining broken at Jezebel's.

Whether you're a longtime fan of Atwood's prose or discovered this world through Elisabeth Moss's powerful performance, this episode illuminates how different storytelling approaches can reveal different truths about the same cautionary tale. What changes strengthened the adaptation? What was lost in translation? And most importantly - is the book really always better than the adaptation? Listen now and join the conversation about one of our most urgent and relevant dystopian visions.

All episodes of the podcast can be found on our website: https://booksvsmovies.buzzsprout.com/share

Connect with me: Instagram | Threads | Bookshop | Goodreads | Blog

Send us a text

In a snow-covered suburb of 1981 Sweden, a bullied boy finds an unlikely ally in the mysterious girl next door who only appears after dark. This seemingly simple premise launches us into the haunting world of "Let the Right One In," a vampire tale unlike any other.

John Ajvide Lindqvist's 2004 novel and its acclaimed 2008 Swedish film adaptation both weave an unforgettable story of childhood loneliness, predation, and the desperate human need for connection. While most vampire narratives glamorize immortality, this story presents it as a tragic, isolated existence—where a centuries-old being trapped in a child's body must constantly relocate and depend on others to survive.

The genius of both versions lies in their emotional authenticity. Oscar's bullied existence feels painfully real, while Eli's otherworldly presence comes with genuine consequences rather than supernatural perks. Their relationship exists in a morally gray territory that challenges readers and viewers alike—is this friendship, manipulation, or something altogether more complex?

What makes this episode particularly fascinating is exploring how the film adaptation differs from its source material. Certain disturbing elements from the novel were wisely modified for the screen, yet the Swedish film maintains the story's emotional core and bleak atmosphere far better than its later American remake. The performances by child actors Kåre Hedebrant and Lina Leandersson are nothing short of extraordinary, conveying complex emotions through minimal dialogue and haunting expressions.

Whether you're drawn to psychological horror, coming-of-age narratives, or vampire mythology that breaks from tired tropes, "Let the Right One In" delivers a story that will linger in your thoughts long after the final page is turned or the credits roll. Have you experienced both versions? Which aspect of this dark fairy tale resonated most with you?

All episodes of the podcast can be found on our website: https://booksvsmovies.buzzsprout.com/share

Connect with me: Instagram | Threads | Bookshop | Goodreads | Blog