
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


For this week’s Rapid Response Friday we take up three major judicial rulings pushing back against executive overreach on three completely different topics: removals under the Alien Enemies Act, the use of the National Guard to conduct domestic law enforcement, and the imposition of tariffs as an executive action under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Also: it turns out a DC grand jury really can't indict a ham sandwich, and why Brazil is so much better at prosecuting insurrectionists than the US is.
Fifth Circuit's decision in W.M.M. et al (9/2/25)
Judge Charles Breyer’s decision in Newson v. Trump (9/2/25)
Federal Circuit’s decision in V.O.S. Selections v. Trump (8/29/25)
By Opening Arguments Media LLC4.3
35523,552 ratings
For this week’s Rapid Response Friday we take up three major judicial rulings pushing back against executive overreach on three completely different topics: removals under the Alien Enemies Act, the use of the National Guard to conduct domestic law enforcement, and the imposition of tariffs as an executive action under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Also: it turns out a DC grand jury really can't indict a ham sandwich, and why Brazil is so much better at prosecuting insurrectionists than the US is.
Fifth Circuit's decision in W.M.M. et al (9/2/25)
Judge Charles Breyer’s decision in Newson v. Trump (9/2/25)
Federal Circuit’s decision in V.O.S. Selections v. Trump (8/29/25)

3,523 Listeners

4,035 Listeners

3,207 Listeners

431 Listeners

2,599 Listeners

1,985 Listeners

6,300 Listeners

4,642 Listeners

2,664 Listeners

7,635 Listeners

1,888 Listeners

525 Listeners

268 Listeners

363 Listeners

773 Listeners