Broken Truth

Boston, MA - In a case that highlights the complexities of institutional policies during the COVID-19 era, John Beaudoin Sr., a self-represented engineer, has brought a lawsuit against the Massachusetts School of Law, its Director of Admissions Rohit Bhasin, and Dean Michael Coyne. The case, which was recently heard in an appeals court, revolves around alleged promises made by the school regarding vaccine exemptions and the subsequent handling of these exemptions.

John Beaudoin had a signed statement from a Catholic Deacon affirming Beaudoin’s desire for a religious exemption.

This case is even more insane because the dean of the school, Michael L. Coyne, contacted the Deacon who wrote Beaudoin’s legal exemption and contradicted his support. He even included articles that promoted Catholic submission to the jabs.

Case Background:

* Initial Promise: In August 2020, before the availability of the COVID-19 vaccine, Beaudoin received an email from Bhasin stating that individuals over 30 would not need to show proof of vaccination, including for flu and COVID-19, which Beaudoin claims influenced his decision to enroll at the school.

* Policy Change: By June 2021, the school implemented a policy requiring all students to provide proof of COVID-19 vaccination or obtain an exemption. Beaudoin sought an exemption based on his religious beliefs and a medical condition, which he claims left him deaf in one ear after a childhood vaccination.

* Exemption Process: Beaudoin utilized the school's online exemption process, filling out forms but also modifying parts of the application he disagreed with. He provided a letter from a deacon but later clarified that this was not an endorsement but merely confirmation of his faith.

broken truth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Legal Arguments:

* Contract Breach: Beaudoin argues that the initial email from Bhasin constituted a contractual promise which the school breached when it later required him to provide vaccination proof or face exclusion from campus. He contends that the promise was an inducement for his enrollment.

* Negligent Misrepresentation: He also claims that the email from Bhasin was a negligent misrepresentation upon which he detrimentally relied.

* Chapter 93A Claim: Beaudoin invokes Massachusetts' consumer protection law, alleging unfair or deceptive acts by the school, although his claim here faces challenges due to the school's nonprofit status potentially removing it from the scope of "trade or commerce" under the law.

Defense's Stance:

* The school's attorney argued that the email's conditions were clear, requiring a doctor's note for exemption, which Beaudoin did not adequately provide. They maintain that the exemption process requires complete and proper documentation, which was not met in this case.

* They also clarified that the school's policy was not a breach but an evolution of health policy in response to changing circumstances during the pandemic.

Court's Deliberation:

* The discussion centered around whether Beaudoin’s claims were sufficient to establish standing in court, focusing on the interpretation of the email exchange as a contractual obligation and the validity of his exemption request process.

* The ambiguity in the contract's interpretation was debated, with justices exploring whether this should be a matter for jury decision due to potential ambiguities.

Outcome and Implications: The case's outcome remains pending, but the hearing revealed a keen interest in whether such informal communications can form binding contracts and the responsibilities of educational institutions in adhering to their stated policies. This case might set a precedent on how statements from admissions personnel can be legally interpreted during rapidly changing health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.

One this is for certain. Massachusetts School of Law certainly gave John Beaudoin an education in the law, just not the one he expected.

Case Summary: John Beaudoin vs. Rohit Bhasin and Others

Parties Involved:

* Plaintiff: John Beaudoin Sr., an engineer acting pro se.

* Defendants: Rohit Bhasin (Director of Admissions), Michael Coyne (Dean), and the Massachusetts School of Law.

Case Background:

* John Beaudoin was involved in a dispute with the Massachusetts School of Law concerning vaccine policies during the 2020-2021 period. The case addresses issues of contract breach and claims under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A (Consumer Protection).

Key Points:

* Initial Contractual Promise:

* Email Correspondence (August 2020): Beaudoin received an assurance from Bhasin that if he was over 30, he would not need to provide proof of vaccination, including for flu and COVID-19. This was pivotal as it allegedly influenced Beaudoin’s decision to enroll at the school.

* Subsequent Policy Change:

* In 2021, the school announced a new policy requiring proof of vaccination, which contradicted the earlier email. This led to Beaudoin seeking an exemption.

* Exemption Process:

* Religious and Medical Exemptions: The school's website offered forms for exemptions. Beaudoin completed the forms but encountered issues:

* He crossed out parts of the form he disagreed with.

* He provided a letter from a deacon but later distanced himself from needing the deacon's endorsement for his religious beliefs.

* Allegations:

* Breach of Contract:

* Beaudoin claims the school breached its contract by requiring proof of vaccination contrary to the email promise.

* He also alleges the exemption process was not properly executed; there was no ruling on his exemption, and he was unenrolled without resolution.

* Negligent Misrepresentation:

* Beaudoin alleges that the initial promise by Bhasin was a negligent misrepresentation, influencing his decision to attend the school.

* Chapter 93A Claim:

* This claim is based on the premise that the school's actions constituted unfair or deceptive acts in the conduct of trade or commerce. However, the defense argues that educational institutions generally fall outside the scope of "trade or commerce" under 93A due to their nonprofit status.

* Defense Arguments:

* The defense contends:

* The August 2020 email was conditioned on medical advice, which Beaudoin did not sufficiently provide.

* The exemption process required complete documentation, which was not met, particularly regarding religious endorsement.

* The school's change in policy was within its rights, and any promises made by Bhasin were not enforceable as they were not part of the official policy or contract.

* Legal Considerations:

* The court discusses the ambiguity in contract interpretation, whether Bhasin’s email created a binding contract, and the applicability of 93A to educational institutions and their agents.

Outcome:

* The case focuses on whether Beaudoin’s complaint sufficiently pleads facts for standing, particularly around contractual obligations and the exemption process. The discussion suggests a potential for reversal of the lower court's dismissal on standing if ambiguities or procedural lapses in the exemption process are considered significant enough for a jury to decide.

Andy Kotsanis, is the social media director for the FormerFedsGroup COVID Humanity Betrayal Memory Project, spoke about the tragic and violent death of his father, Dr. Kotsanis, at Baylor Scott and White Hospital. He described how his father, a respected physician who helped build the Baylor name, was put on a ventilator against his wishes and died in what Andy described as a brutal murder by nurse a nurse. The incident was witnessed by Andy and his family through a glass door in the ICU, with police present, threatening and assaulting him during the event. He highlighted the lack of accountability from both the medical staff involved and the legal system, pointing out how attempts to report the incident led to a bureaucratic loop among law enforcement and hospital authorities.

Andy has since taken steps to raise awareness about his father's case, spending over $40,000 on advertising and facing legal threats from Baylor for his efforts. He noted the subsequent movements of those involved: Sarah Grice moved to Ohio, Dr. Reddy closed his practice and reappeared in another medical system, and hospital administrator Chris York moved out of state before returning to a leadership position in Dallas. These movements suggest to Andy a pattern of evasion and lack of transparency within the medical community. He also mentioned a cover-up attempt by suggesting a collaborative effort between the hospital and local police to suppress his allegations.

The broader implications of Andy's ordeal were touched upon, linking his father's death to larger issues like healthcare ethics during crises like COVID-19, and even hinting at conspiracy theories about food supply manipulation. Andy urged the audience to use their First Amendment rights to advocate for change by contacting their representatives, using his unsuccessful attempt to reach Senator Ted Cruz as an example. He promotes his website as a resource for those interested in learning more about his father's legacy and the details of the incident, aiming to prevent similar tragedies through public awareness and activism.

Key Points:

* Introduction: Andy Kotsanis introduces himself, highlighting his role and his connection to the tragic events he's about to discuss.

* Father's Murder: Describes the brutal death of his father, Dr. Kotsanis, a well-respected physician, at Baylor Scott and White Hospital. His father was put on a ventilator against his wishes and died in a manner Andy describes as violent, involving a nurse named Sarah Grice and others.

* Legal and Institutional Response:

* Andy received a threat of a lawsuit from Baylor Scott and White, which he and his attorney viewed as baseless.

* Attempts to seek justice were met with bureaucratic runaround among local police, Texas Rangers, DA's office, and hospital's legal department, suggesting a cover-up.

* Professional Consequences for Involved Parties:

* The nurse implicated in his father's death, has since moved to Ohio.

* The doctor involved in his father's care, closed his practice and disappeared for a while before re-emerging at another medical facility.

* The hospital administrator left Texas but returned to a high position in another hospital.

* Advocacy and Public Awareness:

* Andy has spent significant sums on advertising to raise awareness about his father's case, indicating his dedication to exposing the truth.

* He encourages audience members to use their First Amendment rights to write letters and call their congressmen to fight for change, referencing his own attempts to engage with Senator Ted Cruz.

* Broader Implications:

* Andy draws parallels between his personal tragedy and larger systemic issues, hinting at conspiracy theories about deliberate harm during the COVID-19 crisis, including food supply concerns.

* Legacy and Call to Action:

* He mentions his father's legacy through the Kutsanis Institute, urging people to learn about his father's contributions to medicine.

* Ends by distributing contact cards and providing his website for more information on the incident.

Conclusion: Andy Kotsanis’s speech is a call for justice, transparency, and systemic change within the healthcare and legal systems following the traumatic and, in his view, wrongful death of his father. He uses personal tragedy to highlight broader issues of institutional misconduct and encourages public activism.

broken truth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Assuming Kash Patel is serious about releasing classified documents, I’ve been working on a new series concept that would tell the stories of some of the darker parts of our history. Introducing “Sigmas”.

I think this show would be great as a new original scripted series on X.

Would you watch it?

broken truth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Note: If Substack offers a free month of my blog, please sign up for it and cancel after a month. Substack will cover the cost and it’ll help me create more content. Thanks!!

This is Gregory’s recent interaction with Elon Musk earlier this month.

GREGORY STENSTROM BIO

broken truth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Co-founder Patriot.Online. Corporate executive, data scientist, naval officer, technologist, and security expert. Gregory Stenstrom is Co-Founder of Patriot.Online, a digital privacy ecosystem and social media platform. He is a security and fraud expert, and coauthor of "The Parallel Election: A Blueprint for Deception" which documents the massive fraud in the 2020 presidential election. His November 2020 Gettysburg testimony before the Pennsylvania legislative committee investigating election fraud received over 20 million views worldwide. He and Leah Hoopes were codefendants with President Trump in a landmark defamation lawsuit in Philadelphia, PA, which they won in June of 2024, Pro Se (self-represented), using “truth is a complete defense” after 952 days of proceedings. Stenstrom and Hoopes also have the last remaining lawsuit in the courts from the 2020 election that has been stalled over 1,000 days since that election in Stenstrom and Hoopes v Secretary of the Commonwealth of PA, (876 CD2022, CommCt. PA), which will finally be heard in November 4th , 2024. Stenstrom is also known litigatively as a lead plaintiff in Stenstrom et al v Apple, (18-cv-00206) resulting in a $500 million dollar class action settlement. He has recovered over $2 billion dollars in stolen monies for both government and private industry, and exposed public corruption resulting in the incarceration and resignations of multiple public officials. Stenstrom is on the Editorial Board of the Intelligencer.Today. He is a recognized technology leader with a reputation in industry as a quiet professional, Christian, and formidable problem solver. As a US Naval Officer, he served in Commanding and Executive Officer roles in Special Warfare and Special Operations.

broken truth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

He holds a BS from the US Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD.

Download Gregory’s filing with the Supreme Court here.

Follow Gregory at the links below.

Patriot Online

The Parallel Election

Election Fraud Resources

Donations at Give Send Go.

Doctors and experts toured Puerto Rico with a message of hope and healing. Physician Dr. Ben Marble opened this special event in San Sebastián, Puerto Rico with his concerns with modern medicine and how they led him to create MyFreeDoctor.com, a donation-driven website that has helped thousands of Covid patients obtain vital healthcare during the pandemic.

Visit My Free Doctor

broken truth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

11 yrs ago I made a mini-documentary about how local Hawaiians cook in-ground Kalua pigs. This “IMU” was done by my father-in-law and his friends. The documentary features David Cunha and Ron Nishimoto sharing how the process.

I created this documentary as part of a pro bono training series called FCPX On-air. I wanted to teach people how to make documentaries with only what's in their backpack using Apple’s Final Cut Pro software.

David died a few years ago. Ron died surrounded by his family yesterday after battling esophageal cancer.

Rest in peace Dad.

broken truth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Robert Barnes

Barnes Law

Owner

From small-town East Ridge, Tennessee, to the elite environs of the Eastern Ivy league, Robert Barnes walks among the humble and the haughty. Traveling from the everyday to the esteemed, representing clients fighting for their civil rights and celebrities taking on the IRS, Barnes heeds the advice of his newspaper-throwing father, Walter, who was fond of reminding, “Never judge a man until you’ve walked a mile in his shoes”.

From Grok: An American lawyer, political commentator, and founder of Barnes Law LLP, known for his representation of controversial figures and cases often centered around constitutional issues. His legal practice and public persona are marked by a willingness to take on cases that challenge mainstream or governmental narratives, earning him a reputation among some as a defender of the underdog. Barnes has been involved in high-profile cases like those of Alex Jones, Kyle Rittenhouse (though he did not represent Rittenhouse at trial), and has represented individuals in disputes against significant governmental or societal pressures. He co-hosts the podcast "Viva & Barnes: Law for the People," where he discusses legal issues from a perspective often critical of establishment views. His background includes a transfer from Yale University to the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, reflecting his early aversion to elitism. Barnes's activities have made him a recognizable figure in legal and political commentary circles, particularly for his engagement with issues that intersect with constitutional rights and freedoms.

broken truth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Stella Paul's husband was treated with hydroxychloroquine and survived COVID in NYC. After a year of isolation in a nursing home he received the COVID vaccine and died a week later.

Notable quotes:

"15,000 nursing residents died in New York and there's been no justice."

"The federal gov put a bounty on your head and the hospitals and medical staff became bounty hunters for your life".

“We fight out battle by not giving up.”

“Our job is to continue bringing goodness into this fight.”

broken truth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Dr. Brian Procter owns and practices at The Well Integrative Medicine in McKinney, Texas. In this presentation in Puerto Rico, Dr. Procter shares his research and treatment protocols for COVID-19 and his concerns about the fear-based leadership surrounding public health policy.

Thanks for reading broken truth! This post is public so feel free to share it.

broken truth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Freedom Counsel Presents a Hospital Whistleblower Attorney Panel featuring:

Jeremy Friedman

Jeremy Friedman is a sole practitioner in Oakland, California, with a focus on False Claims Act, civil rights and attorneys’ fees litigation. In his 35 years of private practice, Mr. Friedman has extensive experience under the False Claims Act at the trial and appellate levels, with primary responsibility in more than two dozen qui tam cases, and he has served as fees counsel and or consultant in dozens of other such cases around the country. He is currently co-counsel in an employment class action challenging the University of California mandatory injection policy under the California constitutional right to privacy and bodily autonomy.

Robert BarnesBarnes Law, Owner

From small-town East Ridge, Tennessee, to the elite environs of the Eastern Ivy league, Robert Barnes walks among the humble and the haughty. Traveling from the everyday to the esteemed, representing clients fighting for their civil rights and celebrities taking on the IRS, Barnes heeds the advice of his newspaper-throwing father, Walter, who was fond of reminding, “Never judge a man until you’ve walked a mile in his shoes”.

Warner MendenhallFreedom CounselCo-FounderAkron, OHWebsite https://warnermendenhall.com

Warner Mendenhall is co-founder of Freedom Counsel and owner of Mendenhall Law Firm. Warner has been active politically all his life. Beginning with two terms on Akron City Council in the early 1990s, Warner has helped citizens fight corruption and the abuse of power by local governments throughout Ohio. During his time on the city council, Warner felt that the city law department was not giving him accurate answers so he went to law school. After getting licensed in the late 1990s, Warner won his first cases exposing block grant fraud and defending Charter Amendments in Akron and knew that he had found his calling.

Since then, Warner has been building a mission-oriented practice to hold local, state government, and corporations accountable. Anchored by a passion for helping to give ordinary people the power to stand up to government abuses, corporate fraud, and bank malfeasance. Being driven by the idea of providing high-quality service to those in need of legal help, his firm and areas of practice have grown over the years into many areas.

broken truth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.