
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Two years ago, the Trump administration decided to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) — a policy enacted under President Obama that deferred the deportation of undocumented people brought to the United States as children. Earlier this week, the Supreme Court heard challenges to that decision and was faced with the questions: can the Court even review the decision to end DACA, since it was an action taken by the Department of Homeland Security, an executive branch agency? If it can, was the decision to rescind DACA legal? And is DACA itself legal and constitutional? Brianne Gorod of the Constitutional Accountability Center and Josh Blackman of the South Texas College of Law Houston join host Jeffrey Rosen to dive into the questions.
Questions or comments about the podcast? Email us at [email protected].
By National Constitution Center4.6
10811,081 ratings
Two years ago, the Trump administration decided to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) — a policy enacted under President Obama that deferred the deportation of undocumented people brought to the United States as children. Earlier this week, the Supreme Court heard challenges to that decision and was faced with the questions: can the Court even review the decision to end DACA, since it was an action taken by the Department of Homeland Security, an executive branch agency? If it can, was the decision to rescind DACA legal? And is DACA itself legal and constitutional? Brianne Gorod of the Constitutional Accountability Center and Josh Blackman of the South Texas College of Law Houston join host Jeffrey Rosen to dive into the questions.
Questions or comments about the podcast? Email us at [email protected].

8,474 Listeners

4,113 Listeners

3,530 Listeners

2,031 Listeners

146 Listeners

6,304 Listeners

2,550 Listeners

2,380 Listeners

32,354 Listeners

7,244 Listeners

5,832 Listeners

3,946 Listeners

16,525 Listeners

746 Listeners

632 Listeners