Send us a text

On this week’s MedEvidence Monday Minute, Dr. Michael Koren and Kevin Geddings discuss the superbowl and how the predictions around the outcome - based on past experiences - were no substitute for knowing how the actual game would turn out. They relate this to clinical trials, where a hypothesis can sound sensible and have logical underpinnings, but a randomized, controlled clinical trial is needed to test that hypothesis and see if the outcome matches our predictions.

Be a part of advancing science by participating in clinical research.

Have a question for Dr. Koren? Email him at [email protected]

Listen on Spotify
Listen on Apple Podcasts
Watch on YouTube

Share with a friend. Rate, Review, and Subscribe to the MedEvidence! podcast to be notified when new episodes are released.

Follow us on Social Media:
Facebook
Instagram
X (Formerly Twitter)
LinkedIn

Want to learn more? Checkout our entire library of podcasts, videos, articles and presentations at www.MedEvidence.com

Music: Storyblocks - Corporate Inspired

Thank you for listening!