Paul Ricoeur's text explores the complex relationships between rhetoric, poetics, and hermeneutics as distinct yet overlapping disciplines. He defines each by its origin, method, and aim concerning discourse. Rhetoric is presented as the art of persuasive argumentation, originating in specific situations like assemblies and tribunals. Poetics, rooted in the creation of plots and fables, seeks to expand the imaginary through creative imitation. Hermeneutics focuses on interpreting texts across cultural and temporal distances, aiming to uncover new dimensions of reality. While each discipline possesses a totalizing ambition, Ricoeur argues for recognizing their distinct foundations and complementary roles in understanding discourse.

This text explores the challenges of maintaining faith and prayer in a world that often feels self-sufficient and disconnected from God. It suggests that while prayer should be natural, human sin and God's perceived hiddenness make it a struggle. The author highlights the tension between the Kingdom of God and the secular world, arguing that believers are called to live their faith within this world, even though it presents an imbalance favoring the tangible over the abstract. Maintaining faith is described as an ongoing effort given the world's pervasive influence and the abstract nature of belief. The text concludes that acts of faith are counter-cultural within the modern secular world.

Drawing from Josef Pieper's "Leisure, the Basis of Culture," here are his core arguments concerning leisure, work, philosophy, and culture:

• Leisure as the foundation of culture: Pieper posits that leisure is not mere idleness but the very basis of culture. He argues that a culture's foundation depends on leisure, which, in turn, requires a strong connection to "cultus, with divine worship". The "gods gave them regularly recurring divine festivals, as a means of refreshment from their fatigue".
• Critique of "total work": Pieper critiques the modern world's overemphasis on work, where individuals live for the sake of work, inverting the natural order. He sees this "total work" concept invading all aspects of human existence, including intellectual and philosophical pursuits.
• The essence of leisure: Leisure is a condition of the soul marked by inner stillness, absence of preoccupation, and the ability to let things go. It is characterized by a "celebrating spirit" and an affirmation of the world's meaning. Leisure is linked to the festival, which provides a source of joy and effortlessness.
• Philosophy and leisure: Pieper connects philosophy with leisure, arguing that the philosophical act requires stepping outside the "working world" to allow for insights and a broader perspective. Philosophy, like the liberal arts, should not be at the disposal of purposes and, in this sense, is "free".
• The nature of philosophical inquiry: Genuine philosophical questions transcend the working world, addressing the totality of existence and engaging with fundamental questions. Pieper suggests that philosophy involves a "loving search for wisdom," recognizing the mysterious character of the world.
• Work's true meaning: Work, when separated from genuine festivity and true leisure, becomes inhuman, resembling the labor of Sisyphus. Pieper distinguishes between "liberal arts" and "servile arts," the former having justification in themselves and the latter having a purpose outside themselves, such as a useful effect.
• Worship and celebration: Authentic leisure is rooted in worshipful celebration. In times when a cultic order is not in undisputed validity, it is necessary to justify leisure at a humanistic level. The origin of leisure is found in worship, with man regaining his true worth "in festive consort with the gods".
• The "proletarian" condition: Pieper defines "being proletarian" as being bound to the work process, advocating for making available meaningful activity that is not work, thus opening up an area of true leisure and de-proletarianization.
• Impact on society: Pieper warns that unless society regains the art of silence and insight, substituting true leisure for hectic amusements, it risks destroying its culture and itself.

These sources describe interlinked research projects exploring the intersection of AI, culture, and human experience in the year 2049. The projects focus on preserving and revitalizing traditional Taiwanese music and language through innovative AI technologies. One project uses AI to create future scenarios blending art, technology, and humanity, while another explores AI-driven interfaces for linguistic and artistic expression. Another seeks to develop immersive, multi-sensory storytelling via AI, using a "Tabula Rasa" concept to promote cultural memory and innovation. These projects aim to address language extinction, enhance cross-cultural communication, and foster a deeper understanding of human emotions through technology. Ultimately, the goal is to create a future where technology amplifies cultural richness and enables greater creative expression.

Alina Birzache's article "Cinematic Holy Foolishness: Orthodox Peacemaking in Russian Film" explores the concept of reconciliation through the lens of Orthodox spirituality and its representation in Russian cinema. The author analyzes how the "holy fool" archetype, deeply rooted in Russian Christianity, functions as a peacemaking figure in films by Tarkovsky, Konchalovsky, and Lungin. Birzache argues that these films present a model of peacemaking that begins with inner reconciliation and extends to relationships with others and God. She examines how these films portray the struggle against human passions and the embrace of charity as paths toward healing and unity. Ultimately, the article suggests that the "holy fool" offers a unique perspective on conflict resolution by prioritizing personal transformation and divine love over worldly concerns. Birzache suggests this foolishness can be a manifestation of the human spirit.

This talk explores the intersection of logic and aesthetics within St. John of Damascus's theology, focusing on his work The True Exposition of the Orthodox Faith. It argues that the symbol concept is central to St. John's theological approach, acting as a bridge between logic and religious experience. The author suggests that St. John uses symbols to navigate the tension between the unknowable divine and human understanding, creating a unique logical syntax for theology. Two types of symbols, bodily and those with greater meaning, are identified as key to his method. Ultimately, the study connects St. John's symbolic theology to an eschatological vision, where theology anticipates the Kingdom of God, thus framing Orthodox theology as an aesthetic pursuit.

Vladislav Andrejev explores the relationship between creativity, art, and religion, particularly through the perspective of the Orthodox icon. The author suggests that life itself is a form of art, a creative process of seeking God and manifesting faith. He examines the tension between religion and secular art, advocating for a synergy in which faith inspires creativity and art becomes a means of expressing divine truth.

Andrejev identifies four types of creativity, culminating in religious art that embodies divine revelation. For Andrejev, the icon is not merely a work of art but a symbol that unites the visible and invisible worlds, reflecting the image of God in humanity. The ultimate goal is harmony between divine, human, and cosmic creativity, leading to a life of holiness and communion with God.

The talk explores the complex relationship between cinema and architecture, examining how these two media influence our perception of space and movement. The author argues that cinema and architecture share narrative and semiotic connections, shaping our experience of the world around us. The study investigates how cinematic concepts such as editing and mise-en-scène can be applied to the analysis of urban space.

Furthermore, the talk examines the influence of language on the creation of places and the built environment, considering how language structures our perception of the material world. The work also explores McLuhan’s theory of hot and cold media, as well as the ideas of Bergson and Merleau-Ponty on the body, movement, and memory in relation to cinema and architecture.

Finally, the analysis considers the notion of the cinematic image as a space we inhabit, or whether architecture is a world we observe through screens.