FedSoc Forums

Citizen Suits, Separation of Powers, and the Future of the Supreme Court's Standing Jurisprudence


Listen Later

Internal tensions in the Supreme Court's standing doctrine have led to some unexpected fractures. Last term, in Transunion LLC v. Ramirez, the Court considered a class action arising from Transunion's errors in the processing and use of the plaintiffs' personal credit information. By a vote of 5-4, the Court held that, while Congress had created a cause of action that on its face let all of the class members sue, only those whose information was shared with third parties had sufficiently concrete injuries to establish standing. Justice Thomas joined the court's three more liberal justices in dissent, arguing that Congress's creation of a cause of action was sufficient and pointing out numerous inconsistencies in the Court's standing doctrine. Of particular note, Justice Thomas cited a provocative concurring opinion from the 11th Circuit's Judge Newsom, who argued that standing has no basis in the original meaning of Constitution and that courts should instead look at whether a congressionally created cause of action violates the Constitution's separation of powers. Judge Newsom's opinion, and both the majority and the dissent in Transunion, spent considerable time discussing how courts should approach citizen suits, which have always been on the outer edge of the Court's standing jurisprudence and which several justices have said raise other serious separation of powers concerns.

This webinar will have a lively discussion among three leading experts about what the future may hold for citizen suits, standing doctrine, and the separation of powers

Featuring:
--Prof. Richard A. Epstein, Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law and Director, Classical Liberal Institute, New York University School of Law
--Prof. Robin Craig, Robert C. Packard Trustee Chair in Law, USC Gould School of Law
--Jonathan Brightbill, Partner, Winston & Strawn LLP and former Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Environment & Natural Resources Division of the U.S. Department of Justice
--Moderator: Michael Buschbacher, Counsel, Boyden Gray & Associates PLLC
...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

FedSoc ForumsBy The Federalist Society

  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5

4.5

82 ratings


More shows like FedSoc Forums

View all
We the People by National Constitution Center

We the People

1,101 Listeners

Cato Daily Podcast by Cato Institute

Cato Daily Podcast

960 Listeners

FedSoc Events by The Federalist Society

FedSoc Events

88 Listeners

SCOTUScast by The Federalist Society

SCOTUScast

106 Listeners

City Journal Audio by Manhattan Institute

City Journal Audio

598 Listeners

Faculty Division Bookshelf by The Federalist Society

Faculty Division Bookshelf

8 Listeners

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke by Ricochet

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

680 Listeners

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch by Paul Gigot, The Wall Street Journal

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

2,790 Listeners

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

675 Listeners

The Editors by National Review

The Editors

4,790 Listeners

Heritage Explains by Heritage Podcast Network

Heritage Explains

823 Listeners

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast by The Federalist Society

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

28 Listeners

Necessary & Proper Podcast by The Federalist Society

Necessary & Proper Podcast

47 Listeners

The McCarthy Report by National Review

The McCarthy Report

2,806 Listeners

Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

Advisory Opinions

3,757 Listeners

Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

Amarica's Constitution

371 Listeners

Capital Record by National Review

Capital Record

430 Listeners

Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

Divided Argument

666 Listeners

Supreme Court Oral Arguments by scotusstats.com

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

17 Listeners