Closing Arguments

As we continue our coverage on the State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen case, we take a deeper look into the Original Actions existing within this case.

Original Actions themselves are quite rare to experience, but given the wild nature of this case it's no surprise we've experienced them.

Join us as Jack and Ryan break down the Original Actions, what they mean, and where this case is ultimately headed!

Chapters:

0:00 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day

2:40 - What is an Original Action and how it operates

4:09 - The limitations within Original Actions and how they are disfavored by the courts

7:21 - The two Original Actions filed within the Richard Allen case

13:47 - Why The Supreme Court denied the first writ

18:50 - The fireworks surrounding the Franks Motion filed in this case

26:42 - The Supreme Court granting the second Original Action, in part

33:51 - The case has reached a standstill for now

41:40 - Our plan for covering this case in the future as new developments arise

43:13 - Closing remarks

Connect with John Razumich:

Website

Facebook

YouTube

LinkedIn

In this riveting episode of "Closing Arguments," we continue our dive deep into the intricacies of the State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen case, a legal saga that has captivated the nation.

Join us as we unravel the layers of this complex case, examining the Allen's confession, shady prison guards, and even the theft of crime scene photos!

This case continues to get more twisted each day, leaving our hosts and the audience wondering what type of fireworks will happen next?

Enjoy!

Chapters:

0:00 - Introduction and overview on the episode

1:26 - Recapping the high-level details of the Richard Allen case

6:01 - Richard Allen's custody arrangements

10:44 - Odinism in the prison system

14:36 - How Allen's attorneys handled potential Odinists in the prison system

22:31 - Richard Allen's confession and its value to the prosecution

29:48 - The fallout of this case and what to be on the lookout for

37:46 - The issue of a gag order

46:22 - A tragic suicide enters the picture

59:30 - The battle between judge and attorneys

1:01:35 - The court has the authority to remove an attorney from a given case

1:03:53 - What to expect in our next episode covering this case

1:04:28 - Closing remarks

Connect with John Razumich:

Website

Facebook

YouTube

LinkedIn

If you thought this case was interesting, you haven't heard anything yet!

Welcome back to our multi-part episodic series, where we explore The State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen. This murder case has gained international attention and it continues to get crazier as time goes on.

In Part 2, we explore the pieces of evidence that begin creating cracks in the State's theory on how Richard Allen followed through with murder.

Enjoy!

Timecodes:

0:06 - Introduction and overview on the case

1:06 - Researching the case for the podcast has been exhausting

3:35 - What is a Franks Motion?

6:50 - The Defense attorneys argued that the Sheriff lied to the judge in application for warrant

7:50 - The State's public theory of the case

12:26 - The search warrant application containing false information

15:25 - Time to buckle up your seatbelt!

21:20 - The nature of the crime scene wasn't initially revealed

30:43 - There was no DNA left at the crime scene

34:57 - How Odinism comes into play with this case

39:18 - The red flags that begin popping up in the State's theory

49:14 - Who ultimately will be Richard Allen's attorney at the end of the day?

53:36 - Closing remarks

Connect with John Razumich:

Website

Facebook

YouTube

LinkedIn

In this gripping episode of Closing Arguments, we delve deep into a high-profile legal case that shook the heartland of America. Join us as we unravel the intricacies of the "State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen," a trial that captivated the nation and continues to unfold today.

Richard Allen, an enigmatic figure at the center of the storm, found himself entangled in a web of allegations that would change his life forever. As the trial unfolds, we explore the evidence, the legal strategies, and the key players involved in this complex and emotionally charged case.

Timecodes:

0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the show

1:04 - Background on State of Indiana vs. Richard Allen

4:05 - The landscape and population of Delphi, Indiana

6:30 - The chilling video that was taken from the murder

10:40 - There are many portions of this case that aren't available to the public

16:50 - Richard Allen being charged with two counts of murder

21:40 - The case generating international attention and how that impacted the investigation

28:01 - The judge recusing themself from this massive case

36:00 - Changing the venue of the trial

41:02 - The defense goes nuclear!

49:26 - New details from this case are becoming available

51:18 - Was Richard Allen involved in this murder?

51:57 - Closing remarks

Connect with John Razumich:

Website

Facebook

YouTube

LinkedIn

On the latest episode of Closing Arguments, we delve deep into the heart of the justice system and explore "The Anatomy of a Trial." In this thought-provoking episode, we take our listeners on an enlightening journey through the intricate process of a courtroom trial.

Hosted by John Razumich, this episode sheds light on every phase of a trial, from its inception to its conclusion. We demystify the proceedings and break down the roles of key players, including judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, witnesses, and jurors, to reveal how they shape the outcome of a case.

Timecodes:

0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day

1:53 - What happens before a trial ever begins

7:30 - How jury selection is conducted and why it's such an important part of a trial

16:30 - Diversifying a jury to give multiple perspectives on a given case

21:26 - Preliminary instructions at the pre-trial matters hearing

29:50 - How evidence and exhibits come into play during a trial

35:07 - The various stages at the conclusion of a trial

43:00 - Jury deliberations and the reading of the verdict

50:01 - How you can get in touch with John and his team for representation

51:15 - Closing remarks

Connect with John Razumich:

Website

Facebook

YouTube

LinkedIn

Welcome back to Closing Arguments!

We're back for an all-new season of the show and we're kicking things off with a deep dive into the juvenile law system in Indiana. Join us as we explore the challenges, triumphs, and ongoing debates surrounding the juvenile justice system, with a particular focus on the Hoosier State.

To kick off the episode, we lay the foundation by examining the historical development of Juvenile Law in Indiana. We explore the origins of the system and the intentions behind its establishment. As we uncover the key milestones and influential court cases that shaped Indiana's approach, we also assess the evolution of juvenile justice practices over time.

Timecodes:

0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day

1:40 - What is Juvenile Law?

3:06 - The brith of a separate law system between an adult and a juvenile

5:20 - Where the idea of treating adults and kids differently came from

7:58 - The defense of infancy and where it resides within juvenile law

11:20 - How juvenile law differs from adult law in the State of Indiana

15:52 - Juvenile proceedings have differing rights from adult proceedings

20:02 - Can a juvenile be charged as an adult in the State of Indiana

25:50 - Being arrested as an adult for a crime that happened when you were a juvenile

29:16 - The long-term ramifications of a juvenile convicted of a crime

34:50 - How you can get in touch with John and his team

36:15 - Closing remarks

Connect with John Razumich:

Website

Facebook

YouTube

LinkedIn

In the season finale of Closing Arguments, we’re diving into one of the most controversial topics within a courtroom: The Insanity Defense. 

You’ve seen this defense play out within TV and movies, but how does it really work in the real world? We'll explore every avenue of this affirmative defense, including John's very own experiences with defending a client using the insanity defense!

Sit back, relax, and enjoy an exciting season finale!

Timecodes:

0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the show

4:09 - When the insanity defense was first recorded within criminal law

7:50 - These cases were primarily surrounding life or death instances

12:30 - Where the rules around an insanity defense case stemmed from

16:00 - Temporary insanity and how this plays out in a courtroom

22:58 - The shifting of burden within an insanity defense

27:42 - The current state of insanity pleas within American law today

35:14 - When someone should plead insanity within a case

38:55 - Who determines insanity?

45:45 - The ripple effect of an acquittal when using an insanity defense

48:20 - When can someone be declared sane later in life

53:50 - How you can get in touch with Jack's team

55:40 - Closing remarks

Connect with John Razumich:

Website

Facebook

YouTube

LinkedIn

For most people, they're aware of the role a jury plays within a criminal court case. This is likely due to their favorite crime or courtroom drama! However, there's actually a lot of background information that's important for courts to consider when going through jury selection, as well as the power a jury holds within a given case.

On the latest installment of Closing Arguments, we're exploring the various items you should know about juries throughout Indiana, as well as the country as a whole.

Timecodes:

0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day

1:27 - Jack's team has been busy in courtrooms lately

2:15 - Where juries ultimately come from

5:00 - Early English juries and what those looked like

9:10 - The Magna Carta and its role on the modern jury system

13:13 - A Constitutional Right to a jury

17:30 - The various types of juries that exist today

25:00 - What is a Coroner's Jury?

28:12 - Civil vs. Criminal juries in Indiana

35:00 - How are juries selected in Indiana?

38:20 - Compensation for jurors

41:24 - The power of a jury

49:20 - What potential jurors need to know!

55:00 - Closing remarks

Connect with John Razumich:

Website

Facebook

YouTube

LinkedIn

Affirmative defenses and everything in between! That's what we're tackling on the latest installment of Closing Arguments.

Join us for another enlightening conversation, where John Razumich shares his personal experiences with the various affirmative defenses in Indiana and the fundamental differences between them.

We've got another great episode on tap for you. Enjoy!

Timecodes:

0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day

1:35 - What is an affirmative defense?

5:50 - There are ten total affirmative defenses in Indiana

8:17 - The affirmative defense of Legal Authority

11:25 - Self-defense and how this plays out in court

15:00 - The affirmative defense of involuntary intoxication

20:30 - Insanity defenses

26:45 - Mistake of fact

37:21 - Abandonment and how this plays out

40:40 - Battered spouse syndrome

45:25 - The affirmative defense of necessity

50:30 - How you can get in touch with Razumich & Associates

52:40 - Closing remarks

Connect with John Razumich:

Website

Facebook

YouTube

LinkedIn

There are too many legal myths out there, confusing us when it comes to criminal law and its proceedings!

On the latest installment of Closing Arguments, we're exploring a variety of different legal myths and setting the record straight once and for all! Listen as John reviews our audience's feedback on the biggest police-related myths, as well as courtroom myths that many believe to be true.

This episode is bound to leave you with some clarification on legalities you may have wrongfully thought to be true!

Timecodes:

0:06 - Introduction and overview on the topic of the day

1:45 - Receiving legal myths from our audience to review on today's show

2:38 - Do the police have to read me my rights before speaking to me?

5:04 - Do police have to tell me if they are working undercover?

6:50 - Do police have to be honest with me?

10:12 - Do I have to stop and talk to the police?

14:00 - Do I have to consent to a police search?

18:35 - Do I have to get out of the car when I'm told to?

22:31 - Do I have the right to one free phone call when incarcerated?

26:14 - Are you entitled to three plea offers?

28:54 - Are you entitled to three continuances?

32:19 - Do warrants eventually go away?

36:18 - Can alleged victims drop charges?

40:11 - Is it going to cost the state a lot of money to take my case to trial?

43:10 - Are public defenders working for the state and not me?

46:56 - Does hiring an attorney make you look guilty?

52:20 - Closing remarks

Connect with John Razumich:

Website

Facebook

YouTube

LinkedIn