Conrad Speaks

(Text adapted from Ernst Jünger’s “The Forest Passage”.)

Heavy floods in Northern Europe have shown that in case of a natural catastrophe, journalists are irrelevant and politicians useless. Faced with a threat, people turn to their heroes. But democratic society doesn’t want heroes, it wants obedient voters.

Democracies as we know them emphasize the confidential nature of casting a vote. Voting is an anonymous act of will without fear of consequences. A sense of security accompanies one to the ballot box. Yet, one can never vote against democracy, no matter how corrupt it has become.

In this way, the corrupt leaders produce proof not only of their support by some anonymous masses but also of an approval grounded in the free will of individuals. Propaganda rests on a situation in which the state enemy, the class enemy, or the enemy of the people has been thoroughly beaten down and made almost ridiculous, yet not altogether eliminated.

Today, this is the fate of ordinary white men, who are blamed for all the problems in the world, and who, forced onto their knees, must sing along with the black national anthem. But they have not yet been eliminated.

A man scraping by, if not in an actual wasteland then perhaps in a wasted zone such as an industrial city, to whom a mere glimmer, a brief whiff of the immense power of Being is imparted—such a man begins to sense that something is wrong in his life. This is the prerequisite for him to start searching.

Now the world is a battlefield for armies of microbes; the apocalypse threatens as it always did, only now as the doings of physics. The old delusions continue to flourish in psychoses and neuroses.

To overcome the fear of death is at once to overcome every other terror. Heroism is, therefore, above all a passage through death. The hero’s journey leads to the brink of death itself. When the line is successfully crossed, the world as a place of life is revealed in all its preternatural fullness.

In his poems, Hölderlin saw Christ as the exaltation of Herculean and Dionysian strength. Hercules is the original prince on whom even the gods depend in their battle with the titans. He drains the swamps and builds canals, and, by defeating the fiends and monsters, he makes the wastelands habitable. He is first among the heroes, on whose graves society is founded, and by whose veneration it is preserved.

Every nation has its Hercules, and even today, graves form the central points from which the state receives its sacred luster. Human greatness must ever and again be won anew. Victory comes when the assault of the ignoble is beaten back in one’s own breast. Here is the authentic substance of history: in man’s encounter with himself, that is, with his own divine power.

What would it now mean for a contemporary man to take his lead from the example of death’s champion, of these gods, heroes, and sages? It would mean that he join the resistance against the times, and not merely against these times, but against all times, whose basic motif has been obedience.

If a man succeeds in overcoming his fear of death, by disobeying with confidence, he will gain freedom also in other spheres that are ruled by fear. Then he will fell the giants whose weapons are terror. This, too, has recurred again and again in history.

It is in the nature of things that education today aims at precisely the opposite of this. Never have such strange ideas prevailed in schools as today. The intention in all systems is to inhibit any metaphysical influx, to tame and train pupils in the interests of the collective. Even in circumstances where the Leviathan finds itself dependent on courage, on the battlefield, for instance, it will seek to simulate a second, even more ominous threat to keep the fighter in check.

How is man to be prepared for paths that lead into darkness and the unknown? It shows a healthy instinct that today’s youth is beginning to show new interest in tradition. Traditional life reveals what was possible in the past, and hence what one may be justified in expecting from the future.

Still more important is the consideration that in many people today a strong need for religious ritual coexists with an aversion to churches. There is a sense of something missing in existence. This is the gullibility of modern man, which coexists with a lack of faith. He believes what he reads in the newspaper but not what is written in the stars.

Giving this man an inkling of what has been taken from him, even in the best possible present circumstances, and of what immense power still rests within him—this is the task of priests.

“Here and now” is the hero’s motto—he is the spirit of free and independent action. Only a small fraction of the mass populace can be counted among this type, and yet these few form a small elite able to resist the automatism on whom the pure use of force must fail.

The resistance of the hero is absolute: He knows no neutrality, no pardon, no confinement. He does not expect the enemy to listen to arguments, let alone act chivalrously. He knows that the death penalty will not be waived for him.

Now it is above all the silence that is conspicuous, particularly the silence of the youth, despite the many extraordinary things they witnessed in the cauldrons and soul-murdering imprisonments of their modern upbringing. This silence weighs more than any development of ideas, more even than any works of art. The youth observed more than just the collapse of the nation-state. They witnessed the fall of man.

The enormous popularity enjoyed by charlatans and miracle workers today is not only explained by the gullibility of the masses; it also reflects their mistrust of the medical industry and in particular of the manner in which it is becoming automated.

In the event of foreign occupation, the hero’s journey presents itself as a possible military tactic. The hero is no soldier. He does not know the military life and its discipline. His life is at once freer and harder than the soldierly one. Heroes are recruited from the ranks of those resolved to fight for freedom, even when the outlook is hopeless. In the ideal case, their personal freedom coincides with the liberation of their land, and of their people.

Also dependent on the hero’s journey are those individuals for whom other forms of existence have become impossible. An invasion is followed by the imposition of measures that threaten large sections of the population: arrests; searches; registration in lists; tracing apps; forced labor; forced medical treatment. This drives people to resistance, secretly or even openly. In this regard, the rebel may not fight according to martial law, but neither does he fight like a bandit. This presupposes strong, self-directing leadership.

The rebel hero conducts his little war along the railway tracks and supply routes, he threatens bridges, pipelines, communication lines, and depots. His presence wears on the enemy’s resources, forces them to multiply their posts. The rebel hero takes care of reconnaissance, sabotage, the spread of information among the population. He disappears into impassable terrain, into anonymity, only to reappear the moment the enemy shows signs of weakness. He propagates unrest, provokes panic. He can lay whole armies lame.

The hero has no access to powerful means of combat, but he knows how a daring strike can destroy weapons that cost billions. He knows their tactical vulnerabilities, the cracks in their armor, where they are inflammable.

The hero is the concrete individual, and he acts in the concrete world. He has no need of theories or of laws concocted by some party jurist to know what is right. He descends to the very springs of morality, where the waters are not yet divided and directed into institutional channels. Matters become simple here—assuming something uncorrupted still lives in him.

Modern man, however, finds himself in the bowels of a great machine devised for his destruction. Only a miracle can save us from such whirlpools. But heroes can make miracles happen.

The origins of aristocracy, the rule of the best, lay in giving protection, protection from the threat of monsters and demons. This is the hallmark of nobility. This cannot be lost, and on this, the world subsists. These are the sacrifices on which it rests.

The real issue is that the great majority of people do not want freedom, are actually afraid of it. One must be free in order to become free, but freedom isn’t won by allowing the dispossessed to vote on how their misery is to be managed by a state bureaucracy.

The West, today, is rich in dispossessed and disenfranchised young men; in this sense, the West holds the greatest riches on earth, for disenfranchisement is a wealth that may be utilized. Great momentum dwells in any movement supported by the dispossessed.

All the people need, now, are the men who wade through flooded lands to find the path that leads to higher grounds. Weak men who have overcome their fear of death shall soon learn that they have become the strong, and that the world, afraid and insecure, is awaiting its heroes’ arrival.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

Confronted with an enemy who strikes like a flood, we shall seek higher grounds. Through patience, we shall overturn the tides.

What is happening in South Africa today should be a grave warning, but a warned man still counts for two. And though our communist friends in media deliberately look the other way, for journalists can barely hide their gloating over the destruction of middle-class white society, the attacks on Western civilization must never force us to bow to down savagery nor take the knee to honor the ingrateful. Rather, these attacks on our peoples compel us to look up and ahead.

This video is not available on YouTube, but you may choose another link:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/bbOnrhLmAiPK/

https://odysee.com/@ConradSpeaks:b/067_race_war:5

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x82psgw

https://www.brighteon.com/86171419-ff73-4728-b183-9eadb5eb1a8d

https://rumble.com/vjvto4-race-war-in-south-africa-the-canary-in-the-coal-mine.html

https://d.tube/v/jmkinfo80/QmZ1ptbLPZUMmnKRQE7ufr1W3jwtL5yF8ysELE1AGUYSMn

Quo vadis, Western man? Where are you going next?

South Africa has proven to be a canary in the coal mine. What are the lessons we can learn from the Afrikaner nation’s collapse? After all, white Afrikaners built their nation for themselves, and yet, they now find that they are driven out by a black mob ruled by an invisible communist hand. Will Australia be next? What about Canada? The USA? Europe? Will the outcome of mass immigration always mean that the more economically productive, and artistically creative minority is driven out of its homelands, replaced by savages?

The good men of the West have been too distracted trying to keep their societies operating functionally while the mentally ill among our own ranks have used the opportunity to seize political power. This Enemy Within wants to overthrow the Old Order that puts the strong in charge. Driven by revenge fantasies fueled by their own weaknesses, the Left are targeting the middle classes by burning down our neighborhoods. Our roads and farms, our factories, the way we distribute food, clothing, and other goods and services—all of it must melt down to be ‘built back better’. All of it.

The New Marxists in charge of media and education even hate the way we build our homes. We should rather dwell in pods, or in multi-family homes sharing a kitchen and a living room with random others so that diversity can be enforced by the ballot committee, the end game being the total racial miscegenation and the abolition of all white peoples around the globe. They hate us not for the color of our skin, mind you, but for our ability to think for ourselves, our staunch resistance against a rule-based order when the rules make no sense.The rising tide of color against white world dominance does not despise Western men for having been bad but for having been too good for too long. Unable to overthrow us with skill, they go low and seek to undermine our emotional and spiritual lives through a distortion of our art, and of our public domain, primarily through the incessant warfare waged against children’s minds, using children's shows, toys, and the school curriculum as weapons of choice against our future.

You see, a globalist system can only "work" as long as there are no alternatives left to escape to. The existence of even a single white community somewhere atop the hills, still willing to brave its own destiny, endangers the survival of the global left-wing conspiracy against humanity. It is for this reason that globalists dream of implanting people with Elon Musk’s Neuralink chips. They want to upgrade even the dumbest man to a high-functioning lawyer or lab technician. But such a man shall have no understanding of either himself or of the world at large.

This Homo Domesticus, domesticated man, shall truly be a cog in the wheel, a lever pulled by his master's voice. And in the rare case such a barked-down creature dares to question his lowly fate, his masters may, at once, shut down his artificial intellect. In a highly connected world in which the collective human mind has fused with the internet, even thinking the wrong thoughts may win you an instant fine for wrong-think, that is, if your mind hasn’t yet been shut down altogether.

Rewarded with social credits for work he does not understand, this Homo Roboticus must dwell in the netherworld of a self-anointing elite who’ve centralized all human decision-making into the hands of a self-congratulating few.

There is light at the end of the tunnel, though. Judging from the fear globalists express at the mere sighting of rural middle-class white men, it proves there is something they know about us that we are about to re-discover. Namely, that it will only take a small but determined band of Western men to pull the plug from under technocratic rule.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

(Original research and Dutch text by Fré Morel.)

Supported by the usual Marxists, a radical Black Lives Matter movement is rallying against white culture, ‘whiteness’ in general, and even removing statues of men perceived as white. But if we are going to right historical wrongs, perhaps we can stop attacking the pedestal of Robert E. Lee and, instead, have a first look at the role Portuguese Jews played in starting, financing, and profiting from the trans-Atlantic slave trade.

It’s been a household secret, but every self-respecting Dutch historian knows “our national colonial past” centered around a small number of families from the province of Zeeland as well as from the Amsterdam area. Colonialism and slavery had by no means been a national effort but rather the doings of private companies such as the Dutch East India Company and their invested families. Who were they? Who were the families who started the Dutch slave trade?

Let’s take a step back to see the bigger picture. Since their arrival around the fourth century AD, when they settled near present-day Cologne (“colony”), Germany, European Jews had begun to colonize Europe’s riverside and coastal cities situated along the Rhine, the North Sea, and the Baltic Sea. Of particular interest, due to their role in the Dutch slave trade, are Jewish merchants living in Antwerp during the sixteenth century, descendants of Portuguese immigrants, so-called Sephardi Jews or Sephardim.

When troops led by Spanish commander Parma next conquered the now Belgian harbor city of Antwerp in the year 1564, many of its Jewish merchants left for the Catholic province of Zeeland, in the Rhine delta. Having previously been expelled from the Iberian peninsula by the Spanish king, many members of this mercantile community settled in the towns of Vlissingen and Middelburg.

There, they set up trade blockades to try and disrupt Antwerp’s economic affairs as a way of getting back at the Spanish oppressor. Within a few years, some of these merchants moved on to Amsterdam and Rotterdam, and another portion settled in Dutch Guyana, Latin America, now called Surinam.

The migrating Jews met with fierce competition from the natives. Northern Europe’s local traders had, for many centuries, been trading wood, grain, salt, and herring along a network of so-called Hansa cities. However, the Jewish-Portuguese merchants eventually won the upper hand as they introduced a new type of good, and they called it ‘living ebony’—slaves.

The Jews of Antwerp didn’t have to invent their trade, though. Slave trade had been an identifying hallmark of European Jewry ever since their arrival, often competing for market share against the Turks and Arabs. Pre-Islamic Arabs were the original inventors of black slavery almost a thousand years before pale-skinned men of the North set foot in Africa.

The West Indian Company

After their supplantation of the slave trade to Middelburg, the new Jews of Zeeland founded the West Indian Company (WIC) which later merged with the Middelburg Commercial Company (MCC). With the arrival of the slave trade also came the first introduction of the practice of black slave ownership in the Dutch provinces.

By the late sixteenth century, Sephardi Jews had already established themselves a popular slave market in Liverpool, England. And in the year 1596, a Portuguese ship arrived at the Dutch harbor of Middelburg, carrying a cargo of approximately one-hundred West-African slaves, the first in the region. When Jewish merchants intended to sell their human ebony, they shocked the Catholic Dutch natives.

The local mayor of Middelburg, Adriaan ten Haeff, was forced to shut down the Jews’ slave market. Ten Haeff officially declared that human beings could not be anyone’s property, and that the African subjects, therefore, could not be sold to anyone. On November 15th, 1596, the Dutch Provinces announced by decree that, coming Sunday, all churches across The Netherlands should declare from the pulpit that black slaves were to be released to freedom.

Alas, to no avail. The WIC’s slave trade continued, disregarding their host nation’s laws. By the year 1650, a small but criminal elite was making exorbitant profits off of slavery in North-Western Europe. And they didn’t just trade colored people. Slaves also included white political dissidents, prisoners of war, and Catholic Irishmen.

Regular transports of white slaves disembarked from French harbors of Dieppe, Le Hâvre, and La Rochelle, often “young people, barely out of childhood”, shipping the youngsters to the Dutch Antilles, where Sephardi Jews had set up a distribution center for sending slaves further on to the American inland.

By the year 1760, about 70,000 slaves were being traded each year on British, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, and Arab slave vessels. At this point, the Jewish merchants from Antwerp controlled just about 9% of the total slave trade. A fairly meager score compared to England, which had made itself a global market leader.

The Pirate Rabbi Pallache

While the trans-Atlantic trade was operating in full force, a different breed of slavers was pirating the Mediterranean Sea. Scouring the coastal towns of Italy, Spain, France, and sometimes even England and The Netherlands, they kidnapped and enslaved any able-bodied men, women, and children they could catch.

Even the Irish town of Baltimore and the South-England cities of Devon and Cornwall were frequented by these slavers. With success. Compared to the approximately four million African slaves that ended up being brought to the Americas, up to three million white European slaves also fell victim to the robbers who traded them on the markets of Tripoli, Tunis, and Algiers in North Africa.

Interestingly, these capital cities are now the main points of departure for migrants coming to Europe today. But back then, many of the captured whites ended up living out their whole lives as slaves and as property of predominantly Semitic owners.

One of the most powerful traders in this region sometimes referred to as the Barbary Coast was Samuel Pallache, an unscrupulous rabbi born in the city of Fez, Morocco. He was a merchant, weapons dealer, spy, pirate, and slaver in one. Contemporary Jewish author Edward Kritzler called Pallache the “pirate rabbi”, and he was one of many Jewish pirates that had made the Mediterranean their hunting ground ever since early Roman times.

At the age of thirteen, a white Dutch kid named Jan Dekker (1701-1754), was working as a cabin boy on his first trip out to sea when pirates off of the Barbary Coast captured his ship and all aboard. The captives were brought to the Moroccan harbor of Larache and sold as slaves while under constant physical abuse by black Moors. Jan was put to work in a royal Moroccan arms factory for 28 torturous years before he, finally, on the brink of starvation, was sent home.

White Christian slaves such as Jan Dekker were often ransomed for large sums of money in order to fund the North-African slave economy. European slaves, in general, were not treated well. Most of them were kept as galley slaves, chained to benches and oars for several decades, forced to help their pirate masters in search of greater profits.

Thousands died in chains or simply lost their minds. Others were dumped in overpopulated barns as though they were cattle, fed two pieces of dark bread a day, and barely any water, to weaken them to the point they could neither escape nor revolt. White slaves too old for work were sold off. The least fortunate among them were discarded in the deserts and died of thirst like old dogs.

Unlike North America, which today hosts a thriving population of Negroes, North Africa shows no trace of the millions of white people once enslaved there, suggesting that none survived.

White Men’s Call for Ending Slavery

Now we know who the first slavers were—Jews and Arabs—but then who were the first to call for an end to slavery? Few people know that the mostly Dutch-speaking Boer community of South Africa, the Afrikaners, were the first to call for the abolition of slavery.

The Boer made concrete plans to abolish both the slave trade and slave ownership. In the year 1803, when Mr. Jacob Uytenhage de Mist arrived as Dutch Commissioner to South Africa, and Jan Willem Janssens became the new governor-general, the practice of importing slaves was banned. Thereafter, slavery would be slowly abolished by giving each newborn slave child the status of a free citizen.

But the ruling British classes soon put an end to the early abolition of slavery, and by the year 1806, the English commanded slavery’s reinstatement and the continuation of the slave trade between England and South Africa. This may confuse some, for only a few years later, in 1815, it was Britain, still the global market leader in slavery, that pleaded for the abolition of slavery in the Treaty of Vienna.

What, then, had suddenly changed Britain’s attitude toward slavery between the years 1806 and 1815? Answer: The English had now captured enough black slaves to populate all of its colonies with home-grown black offspring, and subsequently no longer needed to capture any more slaves from its African territories. Britain could thus move to abolish the slave trade, namely to prevent other nations from harvesting cheap African laborers.

On July 1st, 1863, the colonial nation of Surinam announced the abolition of slavery, firing 21 cannon shots. European nations had begun attracting paid day laborers from India instead—people forced to pay for their own trip across the oceans, and willing to work under conditions even black slaves wouldn’t accept. As a result, ethnic conflicts broke out between the African and Indian populations in the European colonies, while plantation owners were taking profits.

It is worth noting that, today, Mexican immigrants are rapidly replacing African Americans as the go-to low-wage labor force for what is, still, a white and Jewish-owned U.S. economy. Now as then, the transition came about for economic reasons. White Democrats are much less concerned with the fate of black Americans than they are with the two-dollars-an-hour rate they pay their Peruvian nanny.

“White-Washing” History

In the end, when the Dutch colonies did finally free the black slaves, the Dutch government agreed to compensate their former owners. Taking ordinary citizens’ tax monies, the Dutch state paid each plantation owner several hundred guilders per freed slave (much more than the slaves were considered worth).

White Dutch taxpayers of the nineteenth century paid for the release of the black slaves in Surinam whose ancestors had once been captured and brought there by Jewish slavers. Perhaps the Black Lives Matter movement can take some time out from rioting to appreciate this fact, and kneel down in honor of ordinary white folk who paid for some of their ancestors’ freedom.

And more, perhaps we can stop pushing Critical Race Theory that continues to portray Jews as victims of white aggression rather than as the planners, perpetrators, financiers, and profiteers of the trans-Atlantic slave trade.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

The Rök stone is an 8-foot tall stone with the longest pre-Christian runic inscription on its face. Researchers believe the inscription dates from around the year 800 AD. It rests near Mjölby and Ödeshög, in Östergötland, Sweden. But what makes the stone interesting is that it appears to contain a riddle. And this riddle has never been solved, until today.

The Text

Let’s start with the text. I will read the English transcription and translation (by MacLeod and Mees, from their 2006 book titled Runic Amulets and Magic Objects). In the text, I have already marked some crucial information to help solve the riddle.

Here it goes:

“In memory of Vamod stand these runes.And Varin painted (them), the father, in memory of his dead son.

/I say/ [1st] the folktale, which the twowar-booties were, which twelve timeswere taken as war-booty, both together from various men.

/I say/ this second [2nd], who nine generations agolost his life with the Hreid-goths;and died with them for his guilt.

Theodoric the bold, chief of sea-warriors,ruled over the shores of the Hreid-sea.Now he sits armed on his horse,his shield strapped, the prince of the Mærings.

/I say/ this as the twelfth [12=1+2=3rd], where the horseof Gunn sees fodder onthe battlefield, where twenty kings lie.

/I say/ this as the thirteenth [13=1+3=4th], which twenty kingssat on Sjölund for four winters,of four names, born of four brothers:

Five Valkis, sons of Hradulf,five Hreidulfs, sons of Rugulf,five Haisls, sons of Hord,five Gunnmunds, sons of Bjorn.

Now /I say/ the tales in full. [Hint: addition!]Someone… which… from after.

/I say/ the folktale, which of the line of Ingoldwas repaid by a wife’s sacrifice./I say/ the folktale, to whom is born a relative,to a valiant man.

It is Vilin. He could crush a giant.It is Vilin…

/I say/ the folktale.Thor.Sibbi of the holy guard, nonagenarian, begot (a son).”

The Riddle and the Solution

As you can see, the text contains a lot of numbers. And some of these numbers are just there to confuse us.

For example, where the author says “I say this as the twelfth”, it is really the third thing he says. How can this be? The answer is that 12 can be written as 1 & 2, which makes 3, or the third. The same is true for “I say this as the thirteenth”, which is the fourth thing he says, but 13 is also 1 & 3, which makes 4. I choose to ignore these numbers, as they were probably meant as a distraction.

Then, the riddle also contains a hint: “Now I say the tales in full.” Here, the author is telling you to do addition! Now, if we add up all of the numbers up to here, but excluding the numbering first, second, twelth and thirteenth, (the four things he says up to “tales in full”), then you get the following sum:

2 war-booties + 12 times + 9 generations + 20 kings + 20 kings + 4 winters + 4 names + 4 brothers + 5 Valkis + 5 Hreidulfs + 5 Haisls + 5 Gummunds = 95. What does this number refer to? Well, it is the age of the nonagenarian who begot a son!

The riddle then was to find out at what high age Sibbi begot a son, and the answer is at the age of 95.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

Ever since the advent of cities, ruling families have won power by building great public works that inspired both awe and obedience to "higher forces". But today, buildings fail to impress, and so, our elites have gone one step further, by completely re-arranging our social order through mass media and mass deception.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

Great Britain has officially left the European Union, and Switzerland, shortly thereafter, definitively refused to join this communist experiment. But those aren’t the only signs of the EU’s impending collapse. Many Central and Eastern European nations, and this includes former empires such as Austria and Athens, refused to support the EU bureaucrats’ call to punish Hungary for a law its President Viktor Orbán passed, namely a law banning children from being taught about pedophilia, gender surgery, and other deviancies, at least before the age of eighteen.

Hungary believes childrens’ parents are the sole educators on matters of sexuality, not classroom communists. Unsurprisingly, it was Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte who most fiercely attacked Orbán, claiming “we all had tears in our eyes” when Western European leaders confronted Hungary in the Brussels parliament. Crocodile tears, of course, for when Mark Rutte was a student studying history in the city of Leiden, he was known to argue for the legalization of pedophilia, and worse. “Why not?” is the liberal answer to everything.

If The Netherlands is now the world’s Sodom, Eastern Europe has no interest in becoming its Gomorrah. Hungary and Poland, for example, still happily cling to a Catholic interpretation of life, and the EU bureacrats are absolutely powerless to do anything about it. That is because the EU legal charter specifically allows for member states to interpret and teach sexuality each their own way. And although no one in Europe wanted to expell Hungary from the EU for its refusal to indoctrinate children, Western media somehow felt the need to explain its leftish audience why, legally speaking, the EU couldn’t expell Hungary anyway.

The row over children’s clownfish rights then exploded right during UEFA’s 2020 Eurocup Soccer when a gay Germany lit up but almost lost to the straight-shooting Hungarian Mannschaft, while later ignoring the brutal slaughter of three white women by a Somali immigrant in favor of donning a rainbow-colored armband to commemorate sexual progress, rather than wearing a black armband to mourn the victims. After a homogenously white soccer team from the Czech Republic humiliated an oh so multicultural The Netherlands, media asked Czech prime minister, Milos Zeman, about his opinion on the human centipede question. He called them “disgusting”, mentally ill, and engaged in acts of self-mutilation.

You see, people with healthy beliefs instantly recognize that clownfish who remove their genitals are mentally ill. How else do you grow to hate your own body?

Either way, now that Hungary and Czech Republic drew their lines in the sand against the sickness of the West, Slovenian premier Janez Jansa couldn’t stay behind. At a meeting with the EU’s chief rabbi Frans Timmermans, Jansa took aim at several newly appointed Slovenian judges who had been backed by the EU in order to push for more communism in Slovenia. The premier wanted nothing of it. Rabbi Timmermans then refused to have his picture taken with Jansa, even though, for the next six months, Slovenia will preside the EU.

It was a hat-trick then, three goals for Eastern Europe, nil for the West. I am delighted to see this rebellious Eastern Europe eager to prove they can stand up to the failing Western order and get away with it. Is the balance of power perhaps shifting? As true conservatives, Eastern Europeans once joined the EU in order to preserve Europe’s Christian culture, and its native peoples, not to pursue the Hooton Plan that aimed to “breed the war strain” out of the Europeans.

Easterners, though still comparatively poor, won’t stand by passively while Western lunatics are aggressively pushing the clownfish ideology onto their children. What makes the West think its Satanic morals should now, somehow, become the global standard? When did this begin? And who are behind it? More importantly, why are Western elites so afraid of white Christians?

The Netherlands, where I was born, has long succumbed to a suicidal cult. People in power here deliberately want to sabotage children in order to prevent them now from ever having healthy offspring in the future. It makes no sense, unless your end game is to erase the native population, neuter the males, and miscegenate the remaining women with immigrants to create a “man of the future”. Oh, wait, that is the EU’s end game!

But Eastern Europe is not interested. Why, then, you may ask, did Eastern European nations ever bother to join such a morally declining and dying West? Well, the answer is: to take over. And I don’t blame them. The West may be filthy rich, or at least appear to be so on paper, it certainly has lost its mind, as well as its status in the eyes of the world. No one fears Europe anymore. A bunch of rainbow-clad clowfish surely don’t threaten the Chinese. It turns out money doesn’t buy power, but it does buy you classroom propaganda.

Western European “elites” are no longer an aristocracy. They are no longer the best at anything. All they have left to do now is to uphold some sort of narrative that makes themselves look progressive while the world around them is collapsing. Western media are engaged in what is called ‘perception management’. It matters not what is true. All that matters is what media can make people believe is true. Western Europe, today, is a sick old dog waiting to be put down to prevent it from starving.

The two halves of Europe, East and West, do not form a whole. If the European Union continues to be dominated by Germany, France, and The Netherlands (the latter undeservingly taking the place of Great Britain since Brexit), then all of Europe’s children may succumb to an agenda that seeks to erase our lineages for good. The New World Order means to put women of color in charge of the world.

And for that reason, I argue, European culture and its people, or what’s left of it, can only be “saved”, quote-unquote, by sacrificing the West. We, the last men of the West, must do all we can to defend the East. It is in Eastern Europe where the resistance begins.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

People who evolved for colder climates traditionally can eat lots of meat and dairy products. A high protein and fatty diet keeps their bodies warm in the winter. Digesting milk also offers a nutrient boost as well as a vitamin D boost. But most people who evolved for hotter climates can't even digest the lactose in milk. Their ancestors were fruitarians and vegans, such as Central Africans and East Asians. In conclusion, there is no such thing as a universal diet for all mankind.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

Science denies the existence of souls, a free will, or even a human consciousness as though it were the urine of the brain, a mechanical byproduct. I say that science is wrong. If you want to dive deep into these topics, I've written two books: 'The Ignorant God', and 'Eternal Struggle'. In the first one, I explain what time and nothingness really are. And in the second book, I show that the scientific worldview is based on the false assumption of materialism.

Socials Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, Discord, Amazon, Teespring, PayPal.Me, Crypto

Videos YouTube, BitChute, Odysee, Brighteon, Rumble

Books Amazon, Apple, Google, Barnes & Noble, or Kobo

More Links

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

The phrase "the New World Order" has become a conspiracy theorist meme, even though it was late U.S. President George H.W. Bush who spoke it out loud. But what *is* the new world order? Radical feminists want to transition a world of nations led by men (the patriarchy) into a world ruled by women (the matriarchy), namely to install global communism.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

We are told to work from home, use public transportation instead of a private car, and stop taking the plane to holiday destinations. If we add up the 'unicorn measures' put in place, we discover that we are being immobilized. Globalists do not want us to have freedom of movement anymore. Why not? So they can migrate millions more people into our small, rural, or suburban communities, and force-feed us diversity. A social credit score system tied to a travel permit will prevent you from escaping. Those of us who care about their survival shall have to seek higher grounds.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe