Conrad Speaks

A Universal Basic Income is the first step toward a Universal Income for all mankind. It is a communist invention that means to remove all financial differences between people, starting with their incomes, regardless of skill, effort, motivation, experience, or ability. To secure a future for our people, we have no other choice but to win independence from the global economy, and to become self-sufficient.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

In traditional societies, people move through three fundamental stages, from birth to adulthood. First, you become the property of your parents’ household. Then, your individuation begins, which is the second stage. You become the individual you were born to be. You are no longer a child but not yet an adult. The third stage is your initiation into the tribe of your elders. Then, you cease to be your mother’s object and you become the property of your people and a warrior for your gods. But the modern world frustrates this final stage. Modernity keeps people trapped as isolated individuals in a state of eternal teendom, uprooted from their nations, and severed from their ancestors. If we want to become human again, as a people, we must revolt against the modern world, and free ourselves from the constraints imposed on us by a global, rule-based order.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

Societies of equals yield only average individuals. Without adversity, the strong grow dull. Without competition, the weak win more ground than they should. What follows is a regression to the mean for all participants. And then, a limited society begins to rot.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

Europeans and their colonial offshoots have been told they are descendants of crusading slaveholders who did nothing to stop the Holoc**st. To the world, Europe has become the “mother of monsters”. By submissively embracing guilt, the West has given its enemies a reason to be murdered us with migration. Those unwilling to accept their forthcoming genocide must first look for a new myth.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

When actor John Cleese took to Twitter suggesting London was no longer English, he didn’t mean, as many had misunderstood, that London was no longer white. The comedian had meant to say, as understood by his political allies, that London is no longer part of the nation called England, but rather, part of a Global Open Society.

Major cities such as London, Paris, New York, and many others like them, have concentrated so much financial wealth within their city walls, and so many low-wage immigrants from afar, that they no longer need their host nation, nor its native population. Alliances between several of such multinational firms could easily pool their savings and put together world-conquering armies of their own. Networks of such extremely wealthy cities could act together to secede themselves from the very idea of nation-states, and so, liberate their multinationals firms from the burden of having to maintain national population.

For centuries, national governments, or nation-states, have pursued a business model of taxing citizens’ productivity in exchange for the oft false promise of old age and security. Traditionally, such rent-seeking schemes benefited an inner circle of ruling families and their wealthy lifestyles, the nobility and royalty. But today, nation-states and their ruling classes are in a direct competition with multinational corporations about who should have the right to exploit people.

While a national state can only tax the people that live within its borders, multinationals can, in principle, extract profits the entire world. An old model of governance is being replaced by a new, less scrupulous model. In order to increase profits, powerful multinationals not only seek to evade taxation from national governments, but also aim to expand their revenue stream by taxing and governing citizens themselves.

Big corporations want to have the power to govern their own nations. They want to govern their own affairs but feel that national governments are getting in the way. Since financial capital can be wired across borders more easily than labor can be migrated, in order to escape taxation, national citizens must increasingly carry the burden for corporate tax evasion. It’s age-old principle of privatized profits and socialized costs, but this time, on a global scale.

Globalism has disconnected multinational firms from the economic restrictions imposed on them by traditional nation states. If nations would impose high taxes on such supernational firms, it would simply drive their offices and their job offers elsewhere, offshore. Therefore, if national governments want to retain and attract businesses, and keep jobs within their borders, they must submissively appease to the corporate money men.

As a consequence of globalism, elites once loyal to their kinfolk are now turning their backs on them. When it comes to lifestyles, rich white people feel they have more in common with rich Chinese and Indian people, than with their own lower classes. The rich all speak English, travel in private jets, party on yachts, and live in urban penthouses. The British owners of finance feel, for example, that England’s native population and the requirements for its high maintenance, are dragging their profits down.

Greater profits could be won if British multinationals cut themselves loose from Britain’s rural and small-town populations, or in financial terms, write off the natives. Struggling to tax international capital, national governments have had to cut back on investments in infrastructure, social security, housing, schooling, and healthcare.

Because of this, governments have increasingly come to rely on a growing class of immigrants to do the jobs its own middle classes can no longer afford to do. Jobs no longer earn enough pay to afford middle-class citizens a mortgage and a family. To maintain the standard of living that one has grown accustomed to, middle-class families have been forced to reduce their sizes. We’ve come to prefer the iPhone and the 8K tv set to a second or third child.

We’ve decided to cling to materialist wealth, rather than to free ourselves from financial slavery. Indeed, in both Europe and the United States, despite our material riches, it has become almost unaffordable to stay a member of the middle class, unless we are willing to forgo having any children at all. At the same time, multinational corporations are working hard to escape the yoke of the masses who still expect them to honor their national duties.

Such developments are in line with a darker side of human history that very few dare to discuss. It is the progressive development from chattel slavery, to feudal slavery and then to financial slavery, that is to be topped off with the complete and total domestication of the entire human species. It was Russian author Leo Tolstoy who understood this, writing in his book on The Slavery of Our Time, that the American South resisted the abolition of black slavery because the North had already succumbed to the newer form of financial slavery.

In other words, white Southerners were fighting for their financial freedom, and lost. Had over-reaching transnational partnerships such as the now-defunct TPP and TTIP schemes been put in place, we would have witnessed the advent of a global neo-feudalism trapping the lives of the 99%. Despite that these partnerships were stranded, supporters of globalism never stopped looking for new ways to turn the whole world into a single internal market.

There’s no greater form of vendor lock-in than a global economy in the hands of an elite few exploiting a financially enslaved humanity. The world’s largest multinationals already wield the necessary financial power to compete with smaller nations. For example, Samsung Electronics spent about $14 billion on advertising and marketing in 2013,[i] nearly the equivalent of Iceland’s gross domestic product. Yet, to their frustration, national laws still bind global firms to local taxation. The people still demand to be cared for.

If a collective of powerful multinationals decided to make a successful push to deconstruct national governments, and in the process create a so-called borderless world, such corporations would effectively replace the nation-state model with a privately-owned corporate state of their own. Although some political activists have adopted the phrase ‘world without borders’ to promote their idea of global citizenship, multinational firms embrace the same slogan merely as a first step toward submitting unsuspecting human beings to global corporate rule.

Multinationals aim to ensnare citizens robbed of national an cultural identities in commercial rent-seeking schemes provided by them. Imagine a future where women have ceased having children, a world in which corporations breed babies in plastic bags in commercial incubation facilities, a world requiring of women who wish to be mothers, to rent their child at a monthly subscription from the Apple Empire. Imagine your social security, healthcare, pension plan, even your children’s education will one day come at a life-time subscription from the Republic of Walmart. This dystopian view of the near future will take some time to get accustomed to, but the idea of a political state owned by a commercial enterprise isn’t new.

Founded in the year 1602, the Dutch East India Company quickly rose to power as the world’s first multinational firm, and also the first to be publicly traded on the first stock exchange.

“The [East India Company] was a powerful company, possessing quasi-governmental powers, including the ability to wage war, imprison and execute convicts, negotiate treaties, strike its own coins, and establish colonies.”[ii]

The East India Company was its own state. Its private shareholders, not bound to Dutch law, crowned themselves kings. Today, we can observe a similar power struggle between multinationals and their home nations. In 2014, ING Bank allegedly co-authored a piece of Dutch legislation that awarded banks a fiscal benefit when issuing risky bonds.[iii] Samsung’s 2012 revenue equaled to 17% of South Korea’s gdp,[iv] affording it a degree of involvement in its home nation’s politics. That year, Royal Dutch Shell raised over $555 billion in revenue, equaling to over 84% of Dutch domestic product.[v]

One can’t compare gross national product with corporate revenue, but it is evident that some multinationals could afford to maintain real armies and direct them to invade and usurp lesser nations. Would it really surprise anyone if evidence finally emerged showing that a coalition of U.S. oil companies and weapons manufacturers had in fact pushed for the war on terror in the Middle East? Or if not for oil, then to keep Russia and China out of their markets?

Thanks to globalism, there is now a market for peoples and their nations. If this is the case, then who will be the first people to be written off? Who will be the first people abandoned by their own elites, sold into slavery, or simply driven to extinction? Who are those strong, rebellious individuals clinging to ideals of freedom and self-determination whose demands put a drain on corporate profits? Would it perhaps be us, white people?

A key development driving the transition from public states to privately-owned corporate states has been the historically recent rise of mega-cities. With over half of the world’s population now living in cities, in Western Europe nearly three-quarters, national governments have largely driven their political responsibilities into the hands of commercial enterprise. The privatization of housing, sanitation, transportation and even prisons and pension plans has shifted the center of political power away from democratic representation and toward corporate fascism.

But what was the purpose of establishing democracies only to sell them to the highest bidder? How can we reverse this global feudal trend? People who don’t like the idea of being traded on the stock market have no choice but to rise up and resist their globalist masters. If our financial elites seek to the cut themselves loose from us, perhaps we, can beat them to it, and cut ourselves loose from them. By taking matters in our own hands, at the very least, we shall retain that one aspect of life we seem to value so much, our self-determination.

The greatest threat to globalist slavery is a single individual who learns to think for himself and decides to leave the plantation.

Just say “no”.

Notes

[i] Benedict Evans, “Samsung’s Still a Marketing Giant: Q2 Run Rate Was $12.7bn. If It Repeats Last Year’s Growth It’ll Spend $4.5bn in Q4pic.Twitter.Com/0WSnRFnIly,” Tweet, @BenedictEvans (blog), September 3, 2013.

[ii] “Dutch East India Company,” Wikipedia, July 15, 2017, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dutch_East_India_Company&oldid=790735968.

[iii] Camil Driessen, “ING Schreef Zelf Wet Die Banken 350 Mln Scheelt,” Nrc.Nl, November 4, 2015, https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2015/11/04/ing-schreef-zelf-wet-die-banken-350-mln-scheel-1554018-a559071.

[iv] Jennifer Daniel, “Shell, Glencore, and Other Multinationals Dominate Their Home Economies,” Bloomberg.Com, April 4, 2013, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-04-04/shell-glencore-and-other-multinationals-dominate-their-home-economies.

[v] Daniel.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

Citizens of the modern world may have no concept of the need for a rite of passage, but since time immemorial, elder tribesmen naturally understood the importance of removing teenage boys from the clutch of their mothers in order to make them men. To save the West, we must reinstate rites of passage for white boys.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

By the year 2050, only 5% of the world will be European. By that time, white Americans will be less than 2%. The most worrisome observation, however, is that Western upper classes are only interested in their survival. The rich are perfectly willing to sacrifice their commonfolk. That means we're on our own.

This video is not available on YouTube, but you may choose a link below:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/sHIvWR63CubN/

https://odysee.com/@ConradSpeaks:b/012_white_decline:f

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x829h2i

https://www.brighteon.com/2f82d086-8d61-4c84-b1ce-8a0c0821d925

https://bittube.tv/post/a8353e52-d3f7-49d5-9784-50e047467862

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/reversing-demographic-decline_dsPEaWsquvhJiVx.html

https://rumble.com/virlcp-reversing-demographic-decline.html

https://d.tube/v/jmkinfo80/QmZdJ8VJERfudrm8PQt3zDHjHLTMDHEFeijzvfPqggUmGP

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

Reminding people of death strengthens their belief in social and moral progress, especially when those people aren’t very religious.[1] Thus, in our spiritless time, a growing number of people has substituted genuine religious belonging for a belief in the politics of progress. They’ve become atheists who believe in technology and the State.

But history warns us. Decades after Karl Marx called religion “the opiate of the people”,[2] Soviet Premier Vladimir Lenin declared war on traditional society. Although the majority of twentieth century Russians were faithful believers, Lenin, and his successor Stalin, waged two decades of anti-religious campaigns against their own people.

According to one historian, anti-religious regimes such as communist Russia “turned mass crime into a full-blown system of government”,[3] leading to the death of over 94 million people worldwide.[4] Neither Stalin, Lenin nor Marx had personally invented this disdain for religion. Anti-religious sentiments had existed since Ancient Greece, but were popularized by irreversible social changes that came about during the Industrial Revolution.

The industrialization of the Europe uprooted millions of Europeans from their traditional rural lifestyles and migrated them into urban centers, and from there into the factories. Without land, these immigrants had been robbed of a means of subsistence to provide themselves. Had they been freemen before, now they had become lower class serfs. Their rural skillset did not qualify them for better jobs such as notaries, doctors and lawyers.

Cunning industrialists had so enslaved the uprooted countryfolk with the false promise of a “better life” in the city — the same lie we still keep tell immigrants coming to the West today. But life never got better for the immigrants. Life in the factories of urban industry was much harder than life in the countryside. Working up to twenty hours a day, every day of the year, lifespans rapidly shortened and disease spread rampantly through the cramped quarters of destitute cities.

The industrial age reduced human beings to mechanical gears fueling a giant soulless machine. By replacing a rural faith in God with an urban belief in the State, urban bureaucrats crowned themselves the high priests of progress. Herein lay the birth of communism and socialism, the anti-human ideologies that would quickly spread their disgusting tentacles all over the world.

This atheist indoctrination has been so successful that after graduating from high school, many of today’s young now say they would rather be “gears in an big machine” than free individuals. Technology has disconnected people from what it once meant to be a human being, namely to be in charge of one’s life by thinking for oneself.

German philosopher Martin Heidegger recognized this danger, warning of its consequences in a speech given in 1955. Heidegger foresaw the power of nuclear technology, even warned of Third World War. But man, he believed, would overcome war. The real danger lay not in a potential nuclear holocaust, but in what would come after:

“Modern man’s down-to-earthness,” he said, “is deeply threatened. […] This is because a change of all leading ideas has been taking place for several centuries. […] Nature will become a single gigantic gas station, an energy source for modern technology and industry. […] And then what? Then, mankind would have denied and discarded his own self, namely that he is a thinking being.”[5]

Modern technology, Heidegger believed, is in the process of transforming human beings into living calculators who spend little thought on meaningful activity. Radio, television and social media have since standardized the human experience. We all watch the same shows, see the same movies, listen to the same commercialized music and like the same news online.

As a consequence, our political, religious, and moral convictions have begun to converge into a global two-party system of good versus evil, of well-thinking progressives versus “the others”. In a world where urban populations represent the democratic majorities in nearly every part of the world, the few rural outsiders who still dare to think for themselves are quickly branded racists, fascists, and xenophobes.

Racism is the new heresy.

To be called a racist means to oppose mass immigration flowing into the cities, and to oppose immigration means to oppose progress, or, more aptly put, to oppose one’s progressive dehumanization, one’s refusal to be made into a cog. This standardization of mankind has, however, made it a lot easier for our globalist masters to shepherd mankind into meaningless jobs and careers.

By seeking to efface all religious, ethnic, national and racial differences, progressive politics has molded people into a dull gray mass primed for mindless consumption. When Facebook’s Zuckerberg is promoting a future where people can upload themselves, their minds, to the internet after their bodies die, we know that our dehumanization is nearing completion.

The globalist class believe all nation states should one day be replaced by a single global open society. But how can a global society be ‘open’ if all people are automatically born into it and no one can ever escape from it? The open society is a totalitarian State no different from the Soviet Union, the Islamic Ummah, or Star Trek’s The Borg. This State worships technology more than humanity. It is like the Matrix, but we’re never given a choice between a blue or a red pill.

That’s not a life worth living.

That’s collective slavery.

Replacing a personal belief in God with a collective submission to the State seems the crucial step to achieving the total domestication of the human species.

If there are still men and women willing and able to live off the land, to sustain a traditional community founded on a belief in the human God, they will have to fight a guerilla war against the urban machines coming their way, lest they become the harvest.

Notes

[1]Bastiaan T. Rutjens et al., “A March to a Better World? Religiosity and the Existential Function of Belief in Social-Moral Progress,” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 26, no. 1 (January 2, 2016): 1, doi:10.1080/10508619.2014.990345.

[2]Karl Marx, “Zur Kritik Der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie,” in Karl Marx/ Friedrich Engels — Werke, Band 1 (Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1976), 378.

[3]Stéphane Courtois, The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression (Harvard University Press, 1999), 2.

[4]Ibid., 4.

[5]Martin Heidegger, “Gelassenheit,” in Reden Und Andere Zeugnisse Eines Lebenswegens, vol. 16, Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2000), 517–29.

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

Globalists reason that if European women won’t give birth to the children of immigrant men willingly, mass rapes will make sure they do. The rape of Europa was planned. The EU wants to replace its native white population with Arabs and Africans, using rape against teenage white girls as its weapon.

This video is not available on YouTube, but you can try the following alternative links:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/oRUbIPnymtZ5/

https://odysee.com/@ConradSpeaks:b/009_the_rape_of_europa:a

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x829goz

https://www.brighteon.com/9138b768-f4c9-4b22-9b11-eb5b3268eabb

https://bittube.tv/post/a2694934-7bc9-443d-8156-00267662cad8

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/rising-up-against-the-failures-of-liberalism_Yn82QrxrNzdI1G8.html

https://rumble.com/virkdr-rising-up-against-the-failures-of-liberalism.html

https://d.tube/v/jmkinfo80/QmUu9K6xmLnQu6sCf28v1g89PhEWgxK96NneXRcrsMu75u

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe

I wrote this short speech for my book 'Behold the Wanderer: A Novel against Modernity'. Cities have uprooted us and our communities. Without roots, we can have no past. Without a past, we have no future. We must root ourselves again, firmly, in the lands where we belong

Links Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Apple Podcast

Subscribe www.jmk.info

Get full access to Conrad Speaks at www.jmk.info/subscribe