Roy L Hales/Cortes Currents - The Strathcona Regional District recognizes ten First Nations as communities within their boundaries, but the Tla’amin are not one of them. This topic arose during last month’s First Nation’s Committee Meeting and arose again when the committee met on February 22.
Most of the Tla’amin lands are within qathet Regional District, but they have a shared history with the Klahoose in southern Cortes Island and were given a large parcel of Mansons Landing by treaty.
However Klahoose is one of the nations recognized by the SRD and Cortes Island is within their traditional boundaries.
Azalea Milwood, the First Nations Liaison, explained, “I don't believe, at this point, we should add the Tla'amin Nation, due to not knowing whether or how the Klahoose Nation feels about that.”
Mark Thaysen, the alternate director for Cortes Island, had correspondence from Steven Brown, Chief of the Klahoose First Nation.
"He says, 'Yikes ... This briefing note is not good,' referring to the discussion paper. 'Scattered, seems to dismiss the point of a land acknowledgement, an oversimplification and glossing over reconciliation. I also don't recall Klahoose who's ever being consulted, which contradicts the note. Tla’amin should be recognized. They've confused 'territory' and 'location of occupation, which they also acknowledge is a problem in the note.’"
“So we're hearing from Chief Brown that it would be appropriate to include the Tla'amin, and I'm understanding that the sort of location of settlement is maybe not the best way to recognize territory, that the broader territory is pretty important as a part of First Nations rights and identities and culture.”
Chief Administrative Officer David Leitch responded, "This is going to be an ongoing challenge for us, when we have staff that have responsibilities. They have in this case, heritage Connections, relationships with First Nations. We task them to do work and we bring back recommendations to the committee. And then we have individual directors going out, doing the work of staff and coming back with contradictory recommendations."
"This is a staff recommendation and I don't know, moving forward if we continue on this path, if we're ever going to get anywhere."
Azalea Milwood: “I would like to comment that I did reach out to Chief Brown. He did not return my call. I also reached out to one of the knowledge keepers from the Klahoose Nation and what they responded was, 'thank you, thank you for asking' and that they would speak to the elders.”
“Once again, I would like to mention that, albeit individuals want this to be pre historical, we know which communities are located within the SRD. We don't know exactly which territories are overlapping. You're going to have a dialogue from one nation's knowledge keeper, from another nation's knowledge keeper, and nobody's going to walk away satisfied. Territorial acknowledgements have been presented by First Nations since I've ever known it, and sometimes what it looks like is it opens up the floor. It's not perfect. We've had 200 years of colonization. It's not going to be perfect. This is pieces of reconciliation. But what a territorial acknowledgement does is it opens a floor for First Nation people like me to say, ‘Wow, thank you for acknowledging. I'd like to tell you who I am now.’”
“What is important is the intent. Perfection is not going to happen. It's just not. And in that, I'm going to mention that First Nations were destabilized by disease, relocations and government assimilation policies that divided them into small sediments, reserves and bands. They no longer operated as a collective. So the passing of oral history and indigenous laws were interrupted.”
“I don't disagree with what the chief of the Klahoose Nation is stating. I'd love for him to give me a call, and talk to me about that. So I continue to keep this recommendation based on that.”