On June 29, 2022, the Supreme Court decided Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta. In a 5-4 decision, the Court reversed and remanded the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. The Court held that the federal government and the state have concurrent jurisdiction to prosecute crimes committed by non-Indians against Indians in Indian country. Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion of the Court. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined. Please join our legal expert to discuss the case, the legal issues involved, and the implications going forward. Featuring: David Casazza, Associate Attorney, Gibson Dunn Anthony J. Ferate, Of Counsel, Spencer Fane LLP Jason Manion, Associate Attorney, Gibson Dunn Jennifer Weddle, Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig

On June 29, 2022, the Supreme Court decided Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta. In a 5-4 decision, the Court reversed and remanded the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. The Court held that the federal government and the state have concurrent jurisdiction to prosecute crimes committed by non-Indians against Indians in Indian country. Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion of the Court. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined.Please join our legal expert to discuss the case, the legal issues involved, and the implications going forward.Featuring:David Casazza, Associate Attorney, Gibson DunnAnthony J. Ferate, Of Counsel, Spencer Fane LLPJason Manion, Associate Attorney, Gibson DunnJennifer Weddle, Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig

On June 29, 2022, the Supreme Court decided Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta. In a 5-4 decision, the Court reversed and remanded the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. The Court held that the federal government and the state have concurrent jurisdiction to prosecute crimes committed by non-Indians against Indians in Indian country. Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion of the Court. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined. Please join our legal expert to discuss the case, the legal issues involved, and the implications going forward. Featuring: David Casazza, Associate Attorney, Gibson Dunn Anthony J. Ferate, Of Counsel, Spencer Fane LLP Jason Manion, Associate Attorney, Gibson Dunn Jennifer Weddle, Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig

Courthouse Steps Decision: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta

*This series was formerly known as Teleforums. FedSoc Forums is a virtual discussion series dedicated to providing expert analysis and intellectual commentary on today’s most pressing legal and policy issues. Produced by The Federalist Society’s Practice Groups, FedSoc Forum strives to create balanced conversations in various formats, such as monologues, debates, or panel discussions. In addition to regular episodes, FedSoc Forum features special content covering specific topics in the legal world, such as: <ul><li>Courthouse Steps: A series of rapid response discussions breaking down all the latest SCOTUS cases after oral argument or final decision</li><li>A Seat at the Sitting: A monthly series that runs during the Court’s term featuring a panel of constitutional experts discussing the Supreme Court’s upcoming docket sitting by sitting</li><li>Litigation Update: A series that provides the latest updates in important ongoing cases from all levels of government</li></ul> The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

News

Politics

*This series was formerly known as Teleforums. FedSoc Forums is a virtual discussion series dedicated to providing expert analysis and intellectual commentary on today’s most pressing legal and policy issues. Produced by The Federalist Society’s Practice Groups, FedSoc Forum strives to create balanced conversations in various formats, such as monologues, debates, or panel discussions. In addition to regular episodes, FedSoc Forum features special content covering specific topics in the legal world, such as:Courthouse Steps: A series of rapid response discussions breaking down all the latest SCOTUS cases after oral argument or final decisionA Seat at the Sitting: A monthly series that runs during the Court’s term featuring a panel of constitutional experts discussing the Supreme Court’s upcoming docket sitting by sittingLitigation Update: A series that provides the latest updates in important ongoing cases from all levels of governmentThe Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

*This series was formerly known as Teleforums. FedSoc Forums is a virtual discussion series dedicated to providing expert analysis and intellectual commentary on today’s most pressing legal and policy issues. Produced by The Federalist Society’s Practice Groups, FedSoc Forum strives to create balanced conversations in various formats, such as monologues, debates, or panel discussions. In addition to regular episodes, FedSoc Forum features special content covering specific topics in the legal world, such as: <ul><li>Courthouse Steps: A series of rapid response discussions breaking down all the latest SCOTUS cases after oral argument or final decision</li><li>A Seat at the Sitting: A monthly series that runs during the Court’s term featuring a panel of constitutional experts discussing the Supreme Court’s upcoming docket sitting by sitting</li><li>Litigation Update: A series that provides the latest updates in important ongoing cases from all levels of government</li></ul> The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

Share Courthouse Steps Decision: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta

Sign up to save your podcasts

Courthouse Steps Decision: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta

Courthouse Steps Decision: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta

More shows like FedSoc Forums

We the People

Cato Daily Podcast

FedSoc Events

SCOTUScast

City Journal Audio

Faculty Division Bookshelf

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

The Editors

Heritage Explains

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

Necessary & Proper Podcast

The McCarthy Report

Advisory Opinions

Amarica's Constitution

Capital Record

Divided Argument

Supreme Court Oral Arguments