FedSoc Forums

Courthouse Steps: Frank v. Gaos Oral Arguments


Listen Later

The case of Frank v. Gaos presents the question of whether and in what circumstances courts can approve class action settlements that send all or part of the settlement to charity rather than to class members. The payments to charity are known as “cy pres” payments—French for “next best.” The idea is that, if, for some reason, it is not practical to send the money to class members—usually because the money is not sufficient to send more than a few cents or dollars to each class member—the next best thing is to send it to a charity that can serve class members indirectly.
Ted Frank runs an organization that objects to class action settlements he deems problematic. He objected to a settlement in a privacy lawsuit against Google on the ground that all the money that did not go to attorneys’ fees and other transaction costs (some several million dollars) was going to charity. Class members got nothing besides changes to Google’s privacy disclosures. Frank says that cy pres should never be counted when the court assesses whether a settlement is fair. But, if it is counted, courts should always try to distribute money to class members before ever resorting to cy pres. Mr. Frank also takes issues with the charities that received the money in the Google case.
The class action lawyers and Google say cy pres has been used for decades and there is nothing wrong with it when it is impractical to distribute the money (the class here comprises 140 million people); the charity will indirectly serve the class’s interests, and there is no conflict of interest on the part of the judge or lawyers in selecting the charities. The issues of Frank v. Gaos as related in oral arguments are further discussed in this teleforum.
Featuring:
Prof. Brian T. Fitzpatrick, Professor of Law, Vanderbilt University Law School

Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.
...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

FedSoc ForumsBy The Federalist Society

  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5

4.5

83 ratings


More shows like FedSoc Forums

View all
FedSoc Events by The Federalist Society

FedSoc Events

88 Listeners

SCOTUScast by The Federalist Society

SCOTUScast

106 Listeners

Faculty Division Bookshelf by The Federalist Society

Faculty Division Bookshelf

8 Listeners

Cato Podcast by Cato Institute

Cato Podcast

974 Listeners

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

675 Listeners

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke by The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

704 Listeners

We the People by National Constitution Center

We the People

1,113 Listeners

The Libertarian by The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

The Libertarian

985 Listeners

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast by The Federalist Society

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

28 Listeners

Necessary & Proper Podcast by The Federalist Society

Necessary & Proper Podcast

47 Listeners

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture by The Heritage Foundation

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

522 Listeners

The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg by The Dispatch

The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg

6,594 Listeners

What the Hell Is Going On by AEI Podcasts

What the Hell Is Going On

637 Listeners

Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

Advisory Opinions

3,904 Listeners

The Dispatch Podcast by The Dispatch

The Dispatch Podcast

3,337 Listeners

Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

Amarica's Constitution

399 Listeners

Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

Divided Argument

745 Listeners

Supreme Court Oral Arguments by scotusstats.com

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

36 Listeners