FedSoc Forums

Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid


Listen Later

In Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, the Supreme Court will decide whether a California “Access Regulation” violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The Access Regulation allows union organizers to enter the private property of agricultural employers in the state for three hours per day, 120 days per year, for the purposes of soliciting employees to join the union.
Petitioners Cedar Point Nursery and Fowler Packing Company, Inc., are California agricultural employers subject to the Access Regulation. In 2015, union organizers came onto the property of Cedar Point Nursery, a strawberry plant harvester near the Oregon border. The same year, union organizers filed an unfair labor practices charge against Fowler Packing, a citrus and table grape grower, alleging that Fowler denied access to union organizers seeking to enter their property. Petitioners contend that the Access Regulation constitutes a per se taking by appropriating an easement for the benefit of third party union organizers. Petitioners add that, because there is no mechanism for providing just compensation to Petitioners, the Access Regulation violates the Takings Clause.Respondents are members of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board. They argue that per se taking analysis is inappropriate because of time, place, and manner limitations contained in the Access Regulation. They urge the Court to analyze the Access Regulation under the multi-factor balancing test invoked in cases involving regulatory takings.In 1979, a divided California Supreme Court rejected a takings claim brought by other California growers shortly after the Access Regulation went into effect. Petitioners in this case brought this case in federal court. A divided Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision rejecting Petitioners’ Fifth Amendment claim, and Petitioners’ petition for rehearing en banc was denied over the dissent of eight judges. The Supreme Court accepted the case in November 2020, and will hear oral arguments on March 22, 2021.
Featuring:
Wen Fa, Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation

Dial 888-752-3232 to access the call.
...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

FedSoc ForumsBy The Federalist Society

  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5

4.5

83 ratings


More shows like FedSoc Forums

View all
FedSoc Events by The Federalist Society

FedSoc Events

88 Listeners

SCOTUScast by The Federalist Society

SCOTUScast

106 Listeners

Faculty Division Bookshelf by The Federalist Society

Faculty Division Bookshelf

8 Listeners

Cato Podcast by Cato Institute

Cato Podcast

973 Listeners

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

674 Listeners

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke by The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

692 Listeners

We the People by National Constitution Center

We the People

1,113 Listeners

The Libertarian by The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

The Libertarian

987 Listeners

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast by The Federalist Society

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

28 Listeners

Necessary & Proper Podcast by The Federalist Society

Necessary & Proper Podcast

47 Listeners

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture by The Heritage Foundation

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

523 Listeners

The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg by The Dispatch

The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg

6,589 Listeners

What the Hell Is Going On by AEI Podcasts

What the Hell Is Going On

634 Listeners

Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

Advisory Opinions

3,905 Listeners

The Dispatch Podcast by The Dispatch

The Dispatch Podcast

3,336 Listeners

Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

Amarica's Constitution

399 Listeners

Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

Divided Argument

745 Listeners

Supreme Court Oral Arguments by scotusstats.com

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

36 Listeners