The Court has ruled today in two important cases, Matal v. Tam (aka "The Slants" copyright case) and Packingham v. North Carolina, which concerns a North Carolina law that restricts the access of convicted sex offenders to “commercial social networking” websites. Mr. Michael Huston and Mr. Ilya Shapiro joined us for this special Teleforum in which the holdings and reasoning of both cases were discussed. -- Featuring: Mr. Michael R. Huston, Associate Attorney, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Mr. Ilya Shapiro, Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute.

The Court has ruled today in two important cases, Matal v. Tam (aka "The Slants" copyright case) and Packingham v. North Carolina, which concerns a North Carolina law that restricts the access of convicted sex offenders to “commercial social networking” websites. Mr. Michael Huston and Mr. Ilya Shapiro joined us for this special Teleforum in which the holdings and reasoning of both cases were discussed. -- Featuring:Mr. Michael R. Huston, Associate Attorney, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Mr. Ilya Shapiro, Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute.

The Court has ruled today in two important cases, Matal v. Tam (aka "The Slants" copyright case) and Packingham v. North Carolina, which concerns a North Carolina law that restricts the access of convicted sex offenders to “commercial social networking” websites. Mr. Michael Huston and Mr. Ilya Shapiro joined us for this special Teleforum in which the holdings and reasoning of both cases were discussed. -- Featuring: Mr. Michael R. Huston, Associate Attorney, Gibson Dunn &amp; Crutcher LLP and Mr. Ilya Shapiro, Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies, Cato Institute.

Courthouse Steps: Two Cases - Matal v Tam and Packingham v North Carolina

*This series was formerly known as Teleforums. FedSoc Forums is a virtual discussion series dedicated to providing expert analysis and intellectual commentary on today’s most pressing legal and policy issues. Produced by The Federalist Society’s Practice Groups, FedSoc Forum strives to create balanced conversations in various formats, such as monologues, debates, or panel discussions. In addition to regular episodes, FedSoc Forum features special content covering specific topics in the legal world, such as: <ul><li>Courthouse Steps: A series of rapid response discussions breaking down all the latest SCOTUS cases after oral argument or final decision</li><li>A Seat at the Sitting: A monthly series that runs during the Court’s term featuring a panel of constitutional experts discussing the Supreme Court’s upcoming docket sitting by sitting</li><li>Litigation Update: A series that provides the latest updates in important ongoing cases from all levels of government</li></ul> The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

News

Politics

*This series was formerly known as Teleforums. FedSoc Forums is a virtual discussion series dedicated to providing expert analysis and intellectual commentary on today’s most pressing legal and policy issues. Produced by The Federalist Society’s Practice Groups, FedSoc Forum strives to create balanced conversations in various formats, such as monologues, debates, or panel discussions. In addition to regular episodes, FedSoc Forum features special content covering specific topics in the legal world, such as:Courthouse Steps: A series of rapid response discussions breaking down all the latest SCOTUS cases after oral argument or final decisionA Seat at the Sitting: A monthly series that runs during the Court’s term featuring a panel of constitutional experts discussing the Supreme Court’s upcoming docket sitting by sittingLitigation Update: A series that provides the latest updates in important ongoing cases from all levels of governmentThe Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

*This series was formerly known as Teleforums. FedSoc Forums is a virtual discussion series dedicated to providing expert analysis and intellectual commentary on today’s most pressing legal and policy issues. Produced by The Federalist Society’s Practice Groups, FedSoc Forum strives to create balanced conversations in various formats, such as monologues, debates, or panel discussions. In addition to regular episodes, FedSoc Forum features special content covering specific topics in the legal world, such as: <ul><li>Courthouse Steps: A series of rapid response discussions breaking down all the latest SCOTUS cases after oral argument or final decision</li><li>A Seat at the Sitting: A monthly series that runs during the Court’s term featuring a panel of constitutional experts discussing the Supreme Court’s upcoming docket sitting by sitting</li><li>Litigation Update: A series that provides the latest updates in important ongoing cases from all levels of government</li></ul> The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.

Share Courthouse Steps: Two Cases - Matal v Tam and Packingham v North Carolina

Sign up to save your podcasts

Courthouse Steps: Two Cases - Matal v Tam and Packingham v North Carolina

Courthouse Steps: Two Cases - Matal v Tam and Packingham v North Carolina

More shows like FedSoc Forums

FedSoc Events

SCOTUScast

Faculty Division Bookshelf

Cato Podcast

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

We the People

The Libertarian

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

Necessary & Proper Podcast

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg

What the Hell Is Going On

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch Podcast

Amarica's Constitution

Divided Argument

Supreme Court Oral Arguments