We talk a lot about curiosity as a mindset. Scott Shigeoka lives it as a practice. Right now he’s driving a 25-foot purple van across the country, finding and documenting the stories of ordinary people making their communities better. He's not just curious about what's possible. He's out there finding out.

In this episode, Mina Seetharaman talks with Scott Shigeoka, author of Seek and Head of Curiosity Cultivation at the Eames Institute, about what distinguishes a genuinely curious leader from a performative one, how power dynamics play into curiosity, how the Curious 100 project reveals the many forms curious leadership takes, and why curiosity, when practiced well, can restore your energy rather than drain it.

Scott was previously on the Creative Confidence Podcast to explore why curiosity is a business imperative. That episode is linked below.

This episode is part of an ongoing series on navigating uncertainty. We're exploring this topic from multiple angles with several guests this year. Also in this series: How to Not Know with Simone Stolzoff and The Decisiveness Crisis in Senior Leadership Teams with Sam Conniff.

Related Resources:

Seek: How Curiosity Can Transform Your Life and Change the World, by Scott Shigeoka — https://scottshigeoka.com

The Curious 100 — https://thecurious100.org

Curiosity Club (free newsletter) — https://scottshigeoka.com

Scott Shigeoka on LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottshigeoka

Scott's Curiosity Toolkit (free guide for building curiosity at work) — https://curiosity-toolkit.netlify.app/

Scott's first Creative Confidence interview: Why Curiosity Is a Business Imperative — https://www.ideou.com/blogs/inspiration/why-curiosity-is-a-business-imperative

IDEO U's Foundations in Creative Leadership Certificate — https://www.ideou.com/products/creative-leadership-certificate

More episodes on navigating uncertainty: 

How to Not Know: Simone Stolzoff — https://shows.acast.com/creative-confidence-podcast/episodes/how-to-not-know-simone-stolzoff

The Decisiveness Crisis in Senior Leadership Teams: Sam Conniff — https://shows.acast.com/creative-confidence-podcast/episodes/the-decisiveness-crisis-senior-leadership-teams-sam-conniff 

In This Episode:

Timestamps are approximate due to ad breaks.

(00:00) Cold open — the grace curious leaders earn when they make mistakes

(02:47) The Curiosity Mobile — six months on the road, the belief gap, and why stories close it

(07:36) Stories from the road — a florist, a group of librarians, and rafting across political lines

(12:11) How getting curious refilled Scott's own hope and energy before the trip

(14:57) Busting the echo chamber — curiosity as "what else are we missing"

(15:58) The Curious 100 — what the project is and what separates real curiosity from the performative kind

(20:50) Curiosity looks like many things — storytellers, editors, and activists on the list

(23:10) Being an "admitter" — why owning your mistakes makes leaders more trusted, not less

(28:11) Power and directionality — why the most powerful person in the room needs to be the most curious

(33:28) Inclusion vs. belonging, and why curiosity is the difference

(34:44) The question of the day — a research-backed practice for any meeting

(39:34) Why the curious leadership framework matters — a menu of options, not a personality test

(43:42) The four curious leader archetypes: Explorer, Provocateur, Reflector, Imaginator

(48:11) Your dominant archetype — and why leaders can shift between all four depending on the moment

(48:42) Curiosity vs. conviction — why staying open doesn't mean abandoning your values

(51:28) Predatory curiosity — what it looks like, why it backfires, and deep canvassing as its antidote

(59:16) Lightning round: Queer Eye, Lady Gaga, learning to surf, and curiosity as an act of love

__________

Get episode recaps and register for free live podcast events at ideou.com/podcast.

Build your creative problem-solving skills with IDEO U's online courses in human-centered design, AI, leadership, and more at ideou.com.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We're told more is always better—more options, more resources, more freedom. But David Epstein spent years looking at the science, and what he found challenges that assumption. Constraints don't just force creativity. According to the research, they often generate it.

In this episode, Mina Seetharaman talks with David Epstein, author of Inside the Box: How Constraints Make Us Better and the New York Times bestseller Range, about why total freedom tends to produce mediocre work, how the best leaders design limits on purpose, and what the history of companies like General Magic and Pixar reveals about the relationship between boundaries and breakthrough. 

David was previously on the Creative Confidence Podcast to discuss Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World. This conversation picks up where that one left off.

Related Resources: 

Inside the Box: How Constraints Make Us Better, by David Epstein — https://www.davidepstein.com 

Constraint exercises for teams — https://www.davidepstein.com 

David Epstein on LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidepstein 

David’s newsletter, Range Widely — https://www.davidepstein.com 

David’s first Creative Confidence interview: Generalist vs. Specialist: Choosing a Path for Career Success — https://www.ideou.com/blogs/inspiration/generalist-vs-specialist-choosing-a-path-for-career-success 

IDEO U’s course Leading for Creativity: How to create the conditions where great work—and the people doing it—can thrive. — https://www.ideou.com/products/leading-for-creativity  

In This Episode:

Timestamps are approximate due to ad breaks.

(00:00) David on what good leaders actually do with constraints

(00:25) Introducing David Epstein and the through line from Range to Inside the Box

(03:28) The explore-exploit trade-off: why breadth and focus aren't opposites

(05:00) What a constraint actually is and why your brain is designed to avoid thinking whenever possible

(06:45) Two things constraints reliably do: clarify priorities and force new exploration

(07:22) The blank canvas problem: why total creative freedom tends to produce average ideas

(08:09) The green eggs and ham effect: what the research says about constraints

(11:19) Dr. Seuss starts hemming himself in on purpose and changes children's literature in the process

(12:18) General Magic: the most important company nobody's ever heard of, and what happens when engineers are limited only by their imagination

(16:29) "I just couldn't figure out what not to do"—the common thread across dozens of former General Magic employees

(19:30) What leaders who design constraints on purpose actually look like—Pixar, Tony Fadell, and the literal box at Nest

(22:33) The legacy constraint exercise: a thought experiment that gets people to reprioritize without feeling punished

(25:11) When does a constraint go too far? The creativity-killing conditions and what the research on deadlines actually shows

(27:32) "Give me the freedom of a tight brief"—why definitional constraints work and prescriptive ones don't

(28:28) Brooks' Law, additive bias, and why we're wired to add instead of subtract

(29:46) The subtraction audit: how a genetics lab doubled its output by making commitments visible

(32:12) AI, prototyping, and the danger of skipping the thinking-slow phase

(36:23) Designing for edge cases: how the U.S. Army's body armor redesign for women improved gear for everyone

(41:10) The Hemingway Principle: the last-act-of-the-day habit that protects your most important work

(42:51) Audience Q: Can artificial constraints be as useful as real ones? (Yes, and here's why)

(45:04) Audience Q: How do you get buy-in on constraints when people push back?

(48:50) Lightning round: In Praise of Shadows, Daniel Kahneman, shuffle dancing, satisficing, and the decks that are never clear

__________

Get episode recaps and register for free live podcast events at ideou.com/podcast.

Build your creative problem-solving skills with IDEO U's online courses in human-centered design, AI, leadership, and more at ideou.com.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Two thirds of leaders say they would rather be seen as decisive and get it wrong than appear uncertain and get it right. It may sound illogical, but it's actually the result of decades of organizational culture training leaders that decisiveness equals strength and that not knowing is a liability.

In this episode, Mina Seetharaman talks with Sam Conniff, founder of Uncertainty Experts and author of The Uncertainty Toolkit, about the data behind what he calls the decisiveness crisis, why senior leadership teams are the most likely layer in most organizations to get uncertainty wrong, and three learnable questions that help leaders make better decisions without pretending to have answers they don't have.

This is part of an ongoing series of conversations about uncertainty on the Creative Confidence Podcast. Subscribe to catch them all.

Related Resources:

The Uncertainty Toolkit: How to Feel Calmer, Happier, and More Confident in an Uncertain World, by Sam Conniff — https://www.uncertaintyexperts.com/the-uncertainty-toolkit

Sam Conniff on LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/in/samconniff

Uncertainty Experts — https://www.uncertaintyexperts.com

How to Stop Fighting Uncertainty & Start Working With It (Simone Stolzoff episode) — https://www.ideou.com/blogs/inspiration/how-to-not-know-simone-stolzoff

Read the blog recap — https://www.ideou.com/blogs/inspiration/the-decisiveness-crisis-uncertainty-toolkit-sam-conniff

In This Episode:

(Timestamps are approximate due to ad breaks)

(00:00) Sam on changing your relationship to uncertainty

(01:09) Introducing Sam Conniff and the decisiveness crisis

(02:08) What drew Sam to studying uncertainty and the personal story behind the research

(05:14) The Q-test warm-up: a simple exercise that reveals how your brain handles uncertainty

(10:36) The false brief: why trying to eliminate uncertainty is the wrong goal

(11:24) The top five uncertainty safety behaviors at work and why they feel so familiar

(13:27) Why the best leaders don't try to eliminate uncertainty—they navigate it

(17:00) Fear, fog, and stasis: the three ways uncertainty shows up before it reaches the boardroom

(20:58) What makes Sam and Catherine's research different from the books on your shelf

(21:37) The data: 20,000+ participants, six years, three sources

(24:41) Career is the number one uncertainty every year since 2021

(26:15) The decisiveness question: a binary choice that reveals everything

(29:04) Why two thirds of leaders choose the negative outcome

(30:04) The hierarchy finding and where the numbers go off the scale

(36:41) The decisiveness crisis as an identity problem and why transformation programs keep failing

(39:00) The uncertainty-ready leader: knowing which mode to be in

(40:00) Altitude, horizon, and agency: three questions that transform the pressure

(43:36) Why setting a deadline is actually a decisive act

(44:04) Turning a decision into a hypothesis

(44:12) Obama and Ardern: what saying "I don't know" with authority actually looks like

(46:59) The unlikely experts: what gang leaders, refugees, and recovering addicts know that most leaders don't

(54:13) Lightning round: The Walking Dead, Catherine Templar Lewis, nail polish, and more

(58:20) Mina's takeaways

__________

Get episode recaps and register for free live podcast events at ideou.com/podcast.

Build your creative problem-solving skills with IDEO U's online courses in human-centered design, AI, leadership, and more at ideou.com.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We have more information than any generation in history. And we're more anxious about the future than ever. So what's going wrong?

In this episode, Mina Seetharaman talks with Simone Stolzoff, journalist, author, TED speaker, and former IDEO Design Lead, about why certainty is so seductive, how our hunger for it quietly gets us into trouble, and what it actually looks like to build uncertainty tolerance as a skill.

Simone's new book, How to Not Know, draws on years of reporting to examine the three certainty traps that hold leaders back—comfort, hubris, and control—and offers practical tools for anyone navigating hard decisions, unclear direction, or rapid change. Together, Mina and Simone explore why the most resilient leaders are the ones willing to say "I don't know," how to make decisions when the path isn't clear, and a concept called ghost ships that reframes what it means to choose.

This is one of several conversations on uncertainty coming to the Creative Confidence Podcast this year. Subscribe to catch them all.

Related Resources:

How to Not Know, by Simone Stolzoff — https://simonestolzoff.com/how-to-not-know

Simone Stolzoff on LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/in/simone-stolzoff-5a16b648/ 

Simone’s Harvard Business Review article: Leaders, It’s Time to Build Your Tolerance for Uncertainty — https://hbr.org/2026/01/leaders-its-time-to-build-your-tolerance-for-uncertainty 

Read the blog recap — key ideas from this episode, plus five things to put into practice. ideou.com/blogs/inspiration 

IDEO U All-Access Pass — unlimited access to IDEO U’s on-demand courses. https://www.ideou.com/products/human-ai-leadership-self-paced-course 

Subscribe to the Creative Confidence Podcast — new episodes on creativity, leadership, and innovation every other week. ideou.com/pages/creative-confidence-podcast 

In This Episode:

(Timestamps are approximate due to ad breaks)

(00:00) Welcome and introducing Simone Stolzoff

(03:21) From The Good Enough Job to How to Not Know — the thread between his two books

(05:48) Why uncertainty feels like a threat — the biology behind it

(09:37) Rowing through the fog — what Simone learned at IDEO

(12:17) Why certainty has a narrowing effect on creativity

(15:12) Commitment in spite of doubt — the Rollo May quote

(16:19) The Slack origin story — how Stuart Butterfield trusted his uncertainty

(18:20) Standing on a mountain peak — why you have to descend before you can go higher

(18:42) The three certainty traps: comfort, hubris, and control

(22:38) The AI prediction that aged poorly — Geoffrey Hinton and the radiologists

(25:05) More information, more anxiety — why our phones aren't helping

(30:17) The loss of friction — what we give up when we reach for our phones

(34:09) How to actually build uncertainty tolerance

(37:27) Microdosing the unknown — why small experiments rewire the brain

(42:13) Busting the algorithm — the explore-exploit tradeoff explained

(44:51) How to say "I don't know" without losing the room

(45:40) What Brian Chesky did when Airbnb's entire business shut down overnight

(49:11) Ghost ships and how to let go of the lives you didn't choose

(54:03) The difference between one-way and two-way door decisions

(56:32) What to do when you're in the middle of something genuinely hard

(57:17) Lightning round

(57:38) High Maintenance on HBO

(58:30) Brian Eno on originality

(59:02) Learning salsa dancing

(59:32) The skill of asking questions

(59:52) Leaving the Atlantic for IDEO — the mistake that wasn't

(01:00:38) Always eat the cookie

(01:01:40) Advice for a younger self

__________

Get episode recaps and register for free live podcast events at ideou.com/podcast.

Build your creative problem-solving skills with IDEO U's online courses in human-centered design, AI, leadership, and more at ideou.com.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Angela Kochoska, Design Researcher and Data Scientist at IDEO and co-instructor in IDEO U's new course, Human-Centered Research with AI, joins Mina to answer your questions on how to responsibly and effectively use AI in the research process. 

After her co-instructor Hannah Rosenfeld’s episode on using AI in human-centered research, our audience had so many great questions. We dedicated an entire episode to answering them.

How do you stop AI from flattening nuance? How do you know when you've outsourced your thinking instead of augmenting it? When does AI-assisted synthesis become a real insight, and when doesn't it? What does good prompting actually look like in a research context?

Angela brings a perspective that's rare: she came to design research from a PhD in astrophysics and years building machine learning models for NASA and the European Space Agency. She knows how LLMs actually work, and she also knows why the conversation you have with your team in a coffee shop after a field interview still produces insights no model can replicate.

If you haven't heard Hannah's episode yet, it's a great place to start. If you have, this is the conversation that goes deeper into the questions it raised.

Angela teaches Human-Centered Research with AI alongside Hannah Rosenfeld at IDEO U. Find details and enroll at ideou.com.

Related Resources: 

Angela Kochoska on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/angela-kochoska/

Hannah Rosenfeld's episode: https://shows.acast.com/creative-confidence-podcast/episodes/how-to-use-ai-for-more-human-centered-research-hannah-rosenf

Human-Centered Research with AI — IDEO U Course: https://www.ideou.com/products/human-centered-research-ai 

Read the episode recap on the IDEO U blog: https://www.ideou.com/blog

In This Episode:

(Timestamps are approximate due to ad breaks)

(02:07) From NASA sky surveys to design research — Angela's unlikely path to IDEO

(06:57) What building the course with Hannah unlocked, including a new way to think about AI bias

(13:18) Q&A: How do you tell a real insight apart from an AI-generated pattern?

(16:11) Q&A: How do you stop AI from flattening nuance and overstating confidence?

(22:37) Q&A: Is it self-serving to say AI makes humans more important? How to address the skepticism

(26:09) Q&A: How do you know when you've crossed into outsourcing your thinking to AI?

(32:12) Q&A: What does good prompting actually look like in a research context?

(34:35) Q&A: How do you move from AI-generated insights to meaningful human-centered decisions?

(44:51) Q&A: What AI tools do you actually use? (Claude, Perplexity, NotebookLM, SciSpace)

(51:41) Q&A: How do you protect the depth and specificity that makes your research valuable?

(57:07) Q&A: My organization is skeptical of AI — how do I show its value?

(1:03:30) Lightning round: Angela recommends Always Coming Home, James Bridle, crochet, "Don't forget to look up,” and more.

__________

Get episode recaps and register for free live podcast events at ideou.com/podcast.

Build your creative problem-solving skills with IDEO U's online courses in human-centered design, AI, leadership, and more at ideou.com.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

AI is changing what it means to be a researcher. But most teams are only using it one way—to go faster. In this episode, Hannah Rosenfeld, Executive Design Researcher at IDEO, shares a framework for using AI intentionally across your research process: not just to move faster, but to see more, ask bigger questions, and do things you couldn't do before.

Hannah teaches these ideas and more in IDEO U's new course, Human-Centered Research with AI. If this conversation resonates, the course is where you can go deeper and apply the framework to your own work. The first cohort starts May 21 at ideou.com.

Related Resources:

Hannah Rosenfeld on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/hannah-rosenfeld-86805940/

Human-Centered Research with AI — IDEO U Course: https://www.ideou.com/products/human-centered-research-ai

Read the episode recap on the IDEO U blog: https://www.ideou.com/blog

In This Episode:

(Timestamps are approximate due to ad breaks)

(02:16) AI Doesn't Change the Principles of Good Research — It Expands the Definition

(05:04) A Framework for Using AI in Research: The Intersection of Speed and Scale

(09:28) Mode 1: Widen Your Aperture — Use AI to Take In More

(13:01) Mode 2: Notice Nuance — Use AI to See Deeper, Not Just Wider

(19:49) Why Bias Isn't the Problem — Unexamined Bias Is

(21:23) Mode 3: Challenge Your Assumptions — Use AI to Interrogate Your Thinking

(27:50) The Case for Productive Friction — Why Speed Can Work Against You

(29:54) Mode 4: Immerse Yourself in Data — Use AI to Bring Your Thinking to Life

(32:41) Building a Living Research Brain Your Team Can Query for Months

(38:00) How to Sum Up the Framework: Strategic Use Cases, Not Just Efficient Ones

(40:53) The Skills AI Can't Replace: Why Human Judgment Matters More, Not Less

(43:10) Q&A: Moving from AI-Generated Patterns to Human-Centered Decisions

(43:50) Q&A: Can AI Turn a Non-Researcher into a Serious Researcher?

(45:14) Lightning Round: Hannah on Asking Better Questions, Fewer Things, and Perpetual Stew

__________

Get episode recaps and register for free live podcast events at ideou.com/podcast.

Build your creative problem-solving skills with IDEO U's online courses in human-centered design, AI, leadership, and more at ideou.com.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Most organizations don’t fail because their ideas are wrong. They fail because the systems underneath those ideas aren’t designed to support them. In this episode, Mina Seetharaman speaks with Clay Parker Jones, Director of Organizational Design at Airbnb and author of Hidden Patterns, about six things you can do to build a more agile, adaptable, and human-centered organization.

Related Resources:

Hidden Patterns, by Clay Parker Jones: https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Hidden-Patterns/Clay-Parker-Jones/9781637748589 

Clay’s website and pattern library: https://www.cpj.fyi/ 

Designing for Change online course with IDEO U: https://www.ideou.com/products/designing-for-change 

Read the episode recap on the IDEO U blog: https://www.ideou.com/blog

__________

Get episode recaps and register for free live podcast events at ideou.com/podcast.

Build your creative problem-solving skills with IDEO U's online courses in human-centered design, AI, leadership, and more at ideou.com.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Tension on your team isn’t always a problem to solve. In fact, it’s often a signal you’re doing meaningful work.

In this replay episode, bestselling author Daniel Coyle (The Culture Code) shares how the most successful teams channel friction into forward motion, instead of avoiding it. Drawing on research and real-world examples from places like Pixar, the Navy SEALs, and professional sports, Daniel breaks down how tension can become a powerful source of energy, learning, and innovation.

In this conversation, you’ll learn:

• Why conflict and disagreement are essential for high-performing teams
• The key moments that shape team culture early on
• How vulnerability builds trust (and why leaders need to go first)
• A simple framework for turning tension into productive experimentation
• How storytelling helps reinforce and scale strong team behaviors

This episode offers practical ways to rethink how your team approaches friction. If this topic resonates, explore more episodes on healthy friction and creative tension with guests like Ben Swire, Mike Peng, Heather Currier Hunt, Takashi Wickes, and Bob Sutton.

Related resources:

The Culture Code, by Daniel Coyle: https://danielcoyle.com/the-culture-code/ 

Cultivating Creative Collaboration online course with IDEO U, taught by IDEO CEO Mike Peng: https://www.ideou.com/products/cultivating-creative-collaboration 

Read the episode recap on the IDEO U blog: https://www.ideou.com/blogs/inspiration/how-great-teams-leverage-tension-as-a-source-for-innovation

__________

Get episode recaps and register for free live podcast events at ideou.com/podcast.

Build your creative problem-solving skills with IDEO U's online courses in human-centered design, AI, leadership, and more at ideou.com.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

There are many hidden barriers to building trust on teams, and sometimes we don’t see them until something breaks down.

In this episode of the Creative Confidence Podcast, Mina Seetharaman sits down again with Ben Swire—co-founder of Make Believe Works and author of Safe Danger—for a practical Q&A on what actually gets in the way of trust on teams.

Drawing on his experience designing team experiences for organizations around the world, Ben answers questions from the Creative Confidence community. Why does trust break down even on high-performing teams? What makes feedback feel risky? How do you create space for honest conversation without forcing vulnerability? And what can leaders do in the moment when trust starts to erode?

Related resources:

Safe Danger, by Ben Swire

Make Believe Works – Unique team building that actually makes an impact.

Cultivating Creative Collaboration online course with IDEO U, taught by IDEO CEO Mike Peng

Read the episode recap on the IDEO U blog: ideou.com/blog

__________

Get episode recaps and register for free live podcast events at ideou.com/podcast.

Build your creative problem-solving skills with IDEO U's online courses in human-centered design, AI, leadership, and more at ideou.com.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Team building often feels like a necessary evil. Leaders know it matters, but too often it feels awkward, forced, or disconnected from real work.

In this episode of the Creative Confidence Podcast, Mina Seetharaman speaks with Ben Swire, co-founder of Make Believe Works and author of Safe Danger, about what actually builds trust, psychological safety, and creative collaboration on teams.

Ben introduces the concept of “safe danger”—the emotional sweet spot between comfort and fear—where teams feel secure enough to take risks, practice vulnerability, and grow together. He explains why most team building fails, why psychological safety is not the same as comfort, and why risk-taking is a muscle that teams need to practice before the stakes are high.

If you’re a leader who wants to encourage better ideas, stronger trust, and an innovation culture, this episode offers practical tools and mindset shifts you can use immediately.

To go deeper, explore IDEO U’s course and subscribe to the Creative Confidence Podcast for more conversations with today’s most thoughtful creative leaders.

Related resources:

Safe Danger, by Ben Swire

Make Believe Works – Unique team building that actually makes an impact.

Cultivating Creative Collaboration online course with IDEO U, taught by IDEO CEO Mike Peng

Read the episode recap on the IDEO U blog: ideou.com/blog

__________

Get episode recaps and register for free live podcast events at ideou.com/podcast.

Build your creative problem-solving skills with IDEO U's online courses in human-centered design, AI, leadership, and more at ideou.com.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.