
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode of "The Trial Lawyer's Handbook" podcast series, litigation attorney Dan Small explains why eliciting facts, not engaging in arguments, is the most effective strategy when cross-examining a witness. He advises against provoking arguments and instead advocates for asking clear, concise questions that aim to extract factual information. Mr. Small also emphasizes the importance of maintaining control during questioning and the impact of skillfully guiding witnesses to provide factual responses on a case's overall strength.
By Holland & Knight4.7
1111 ratings
In this episode of "The Trial Lawyer's Handbook" podcast series, litigation attorney Dan Small explains why eliciting facts, not engaging in arguments, is the most effective strategy when cross-examining a witness. He advises against provoking arguments and instead advocates for asking clear, concise questions that aim to extract factual information. Mr. Small also emphasizes the importance of maintaining control during questioning and the impact of skillfully guiding witnesses to provide factual responses on a case's overall strength.

154,400 Listeners

2,820 Listeners

4,368 Listeners

31 Listeners

112,351 Listeners

675 Listeners

56,429 Listeners

47,997 Listeners

6,056 Listeners

17 Listeners

40,288 Listeners

61,260 Listeners

147 Listeners

26,670 Listeners

16,801 Listeners

0 Listeners

5 Listeners

0 Listeners

2 Listeners

0 Listeners

0 Listeners

2 Listeners

8 Listeners

5 Listeners

2 Listeners