
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In this episode of "The Trial Lawyer's Handbook" podcast series, litigation attorney Dan Small explains why eliciting facts, not engaging in arguments, is the most effective strategy when cross-examining a witness. He advises against provoking arguments and instead advocates for asking clear, concise questions that aim to extract factual information. Mr. Small also emphasizes the importance of maintaining control during questioning and the impact of skillfully guiding witnesses to provide factual responses on a case's overall strength.
4.7
1111 ratings
In this episode of "The Trial Lawyer's Handbook" podcast series, litigation attorney Dan Small explains why eliciting facts, not engaging in arguments, is the most effective strategy when cross-examining a witness. He advises against provoking arguments and instead advocates for asking clear, concise questions that aim to extract factual information. Mr. Small also emphasizes the importance of maintaining control during questioning and the impact of skillfully guiding witnesses to provide factual responses on a case's overall strength.
4,364 Listeners
43,969 Listeners
2,831 Listeners
90,949 Listeners
8,680 Listeners
30,845 Listeners
32,291 Listeners
463 Listeners
86,750 Listeners
111,917 Listeners
38,676 Listeners
15,335 Listeners
10,613 Listeners
18 Listeners
2 Listeners
0 Listeners
5 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
0 Listeners
5 Listeners
2 Listeners
8 Listeners
0 Listeners
15,521 Listeners