
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In this episode of "The Trial Lawyer's Handbook" podcast series, litigation attorney Dan Small explains why eliciting facts, not engaging in arguments, is the most effective strategy when cross-examining a witness. He advises against provoking arguments and instead advocates for asking clear, concise questions that aim to extract factual information. Mr. Small also emphasizes the importance of maintaining control during questioning and the impact of skillfully guiding witnesses to provide factual responses on a case's overall strength.
4.9
1010 ratings
In this episode of "The Trial Lawyer's Handbook" podcast series, litigation attorney Dan Small explains why eliciting facts, not engaging in arguments, is the most effective strategy when cross-examining a witness. He advises against provoking arguments and instead advocates for asking clear, concise questions that aim to extract factual information. Mr. Small also emphasizes the importance of maintaining control during questioning and the impact of skillfully guiding witnesses to provide factual responses on a case's overall strength.
1,097 Listeners
8,495 Listeners
457 Listeners
4,757 Listeners
86,090 Listeners
111,049 Listeners
25,056 Listeners
32,433 Listeners
10,059 Listeners
5,507 Listeners
12,131 Listeners
3,747 Listeners
14,993 Listeners
10,259 Listeners
20,758 Listeners