The following information may be of interest to investors regarding the pending SEC case against Ripple.

There has been a great deal of activity surrounding the high-profile Ripple litigation, which has dogged investors in Ripple and the XRP cryptocurrency since late last year. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) stated in December that it was pursuing a lawsuit against Ripple, saying that the company illegally raised $1.3 billion through unregistered securities offerings.

Since then, Ripple has maintained that it committed no wrongdoing and is seeking a hearing in court as soon as possible. Indeed, this case has resulted in a slew of adverse effects. Among these, Coinbase and other exchanges have delisted XRP pending the outcome of this current dispute. As a result, Ripple has advocated for a more expeditious settlement of this matter, which the SEC has been delaying recently.

A recent Decrypt.co post has an intriguing calendar of the current dates investors should be aware of. August 31 and October 15 are two dates investors should mark on their calendars.

This is why.

Upcoming Dates Could Act as Catalysts for the XRP Cryptocurrency

The XRP cryptocurrency community has identified August 31 and October 15 as critical possible turning points for XRP.

August 31 is the deadline for the SEC and Ripple to file their initial arguments and assemble evidence. This procedure, dubbed fact discovery, is time consuming. As a result, the SEC requested an extension of the earlier June 14 deadline in order to gather additional information. Ripple has responded to this request, stating that the litigation poses a "existential threat to the company."

Nonetheless, on Aug. 31, it is believed that we will gain a better understanding of the evidence both sides have. This is expected to act as a catalyst (either upward or downward) for XRP. As a result, investors should anticipate volatility around this day.

The next anticipated day of considerable volatility is Oct. 15, the deadline for expert discovery. This date is the deadline for expert testimony and the evidence that will accompany these expert witnesses. Additional information on each side's position will be acquired. As a result, investors should have a clearer idea of the status of this action.

It remains to be seen how Ripple will fare as a result of this case. However, it's evident that cryptocurrency investors will keenly monitor this decision. Indeed, this might be a watershed moment for the cryptocurrency world. As a result, all eyes are focused on the approaching dates.

Support us!

Several structural changes in know your customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) rules in Europe and around the world have occurred during the last decade. High-profile money laundering cases and the spread of illicit cash into global markets have piqued the interest of authorities and the general public, and rightly so.

The Wirecard affair was a particularly egregious example, with an enquiry into massive fraud revealing a network of shell firms involved in the unlawful trafficking of narcotics and pornography. Danske Bank laundered $227 billion through an Estonian subsidiary, going undiscovered for nearly nine years.

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint against Ripple Labs and two of its executives in the United States, alleging that they raised more than $1.3 billion through an unregistered, ongoing digital asset securities offering. The investigation into that case is continuing.

Traditional mechanisms of regulation from the fiat world do not apply to all aspects of cryptocurrency or the core structure of blockchain technology.

AML regulations have become more stringent as authorities and financial institutions gain a better knowledge of these illegal operations. However, these changes have been largely reactive and trial-and-error in nature.

To address the issues of the rapidly expanding blockchain ecosystem, the European Union has begun to implement more strict financial rules, which will further strengthen the regulatory structure and improve licensing models. Many member states are now regulating crypto assets on their own, with Germany being the first to do so.

These individual regulations clearly outline the procedures for acquiring and keeping a financial licence from the regulator, paving the road for crypto firms. Investor confidence and protection are naturally enhanced by compliance.

The efforts of regulatory organisations to monitor, address, and enforce limits have evolved in tandem with the evolution of these financial crimes and crypto itself. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is the most significant international monitoring body, outlining broad guidelines and determining best practises in anti-money-laundering practises and combatting terrorism financing.

Despite the fact that the FATF is considered soft law, the task force sets the bar for viable laws governing crypto assets. FATF Recommendation 16, sometimes known as the “travel rule,” compels enterprises to acquire and preserve personal data from blockchain transaction participants. Access to this data, in theory, will allow authorities to better oversee and implement crypto market regulations. In other words, people will be aware of who is doing what. It is critical to be open and honest with one another.

The perplexing issue of travel regulations

The FATF's travel regulation affects two categories of businesses: traditional financial institutions (banks, credit firms, and so on) and cryptocurrency enterprises, also known as virtual asset service providers (VASPs).

The travel rule was applied primarily to banks, but it was expanded to include cryptocurrency companies in 2019. Many FATF member countries began incorporating the travel restriction into their local AML regulations in 2021. The crypto industry was rocked by this regulatory move. Refusal has significant consequences: Failure to include the trip requirement results in a service provider being declared noncompliant, which is a significant barrier to conducting business.

However, the travel rule is a significant impediment that disregards the novelty of crypto technology. It is difficult for crypto businesses to integrate because of the significant amount of effort required to gather KYC data on the recipient and incorporate it into day-to-day operations.

Data would have to be provided by the client in order for crypto firms to access this information for outbound payments, which would be nearly impossible to verify. This has a significant impact on the cryptocurrency's eponymous efficiency. Furthermore, its implementation poses difficulties in terms of the accuracy of data received by VASPs and banks. Furthermore, it increases data vulnerabilities by establishing extra data silos around the world.

When it comes to international standardisation measures, rather than those isolated within specific communities, there is a significant gap between exclusively on-chain solutions (transactions recorded and verified on a single blockchain) and cross-chain communication, which allows for interactions between different blockchains or the combination of on-chain and off-chain transactions.

We must finally reach a compromise between those who have legitimate worries about the anonymity provided by crypto assets and those who regard regulation as overly burdensome for crypto. Both sides have valid points, but cryptocurrency's sustained legitimacy and viability within bigger financial markets and industries is a nett win for all stakeholders, making this negotiation critical.

Not anti-regulation, rather anti-ineffective regulations.

Finally, we must regulate with efficacy, which involves legislation that is particular to digital assets and does not stymie the market while not truly addressing any AML-related issues.

The already global nature of the traditional financial industry emphasises the importance and necessity of the FATF issuing an international framework for regulatory control of cryptocurrency.

Money laundering, illegal arms sales, human trafficking, and other forms of criminal financial activity are all worldwide in nature. As a result, combating it must be a global endeavour.

The decentralised nature of blockchain, which runs counter to the central-server standard we are all used with and utilise almost everywhere, poses a serious hurdle here. Traditional financial institution rules and regulations are being imposed on cryptocurrency, which is a mistake and misunderstanding that misses the creativity and originality that this economic environment and its underlying technology represents.

Traditional mechanisms of regulation from the fiat world do not apply to all aspects of cryptocurrency or the core structure of blockchain technology. Whatever their intentions, these enforced restrictions must be changed and amended because they are based on an outdated system.

The establishment of reasonable limitations on the use of technology necessitates a fundamental understanding of and cooperation within the constraints and characteristics of those technologies. Blockchain is currently the subject of more passionate hyperbole than true comprehension in traditional banking circles.

The underlying misconception that blockchain transactions are anonymous or untraceable is at the heart of the problem. Blockchain transactions are pseudo-anonymous and can, in most cases, provide greater traceability and transparency than traditional banking. Illegal activities on the blockchain, for example, will always be significantly more traceable than cash transactions.

Technology with such vast potential should be made available, regulated, and useful to all. Blockchain and digital assets are already changing the way we do business, and regulatory measures must catch up. Delivering old-school orders, demanding obedience, and handing out harsh punishments cannot be the way ahead. There is no reason why a new path cannot be found.

The outlaw era is coming to an end.

Activity may already be tracked using a collective database of users who have been verified to follow international standards. This knowledge of authorised users and providers enables the sector to detect wrongdoing or malfeasance much sooner than usual, identifying and restricting unauthorised users.

A verified network can be developed collectively to ensure confidence and correctly harness blockchain's potential, while preventing those bad actors intent on corrupting or manipulating the system, by well-thought-out tweaking of the suggested restrictions. That would be a significant step forwards in investigating international financial crimes and ensuring crypto's global legitimacy.

Crypto's lawless days are over, but it has earned extraordinary credibility, which can only be maintained and strengthened by complying with governmental monitoring.

That regulatory control cannot be copied and pasted onto blockchain transactions. Instead, it should be one that aids in the battle against crime, boosts investor confidence, and throws a bone – not a wrench – into the same mechanisms that make cryptocurrency a worthwhile financial investment.

Support us!

To be quite candid, I continue to be in severe need of cryptocurrency tips. To me, the world has always appeared strange and mystical.

Sure, it's constantly making news for people making or losing money, and it's still going strong despite widespread belief that it was a fad. However, what is crypto and is it still profitable in 2021, or is it time to abandon it and move on?

We spoke with Josh Gilbert, a Market Analyst at eToro, the premier social trading platform, to get some answers.

PEDESTRIAN.TV: What is cryptocurrency, for those of us still in the dark?

Josh Gilbert: A cryptocurrency is a decentralised digital or virtual currency that is not governed by a central authority or government.

One of the early charms of cryptocurrencies was the ability to transfer big sums of money anonymously and without the intervention of governments or institutions.

The majority of cryptocurrencies are built on blockchain technology, which is a distributed ledger (or, to put it another way, it's the database that holds the data). In the case of Bitcoin, the blockchain is utilised, which ensures that no single individual or entity retains control. Rather than that, all users control the system jointly.

Why would someone invest in cryptocurrencies rather than traditional stocks?

JG: The appeal of cryptoassets [the umbrella word for all forms of cryptocurrencies or digital assets] to investors is their high returns and lack of correlation with other assets.

While investing in cryptocurrency carries a high level of risk, it has historically yielded tremendous returns. Bitcoin has returned 34% year to far, but other cryptocurrencies have returned even more – for example, Ethereum has returned 209%.

Additionally, cryptoassets are utilised to diversify portfolios. I often warn investors that despite the great returns, they should conduct research, understand the investments they are making, and invest no more than they can afford to lose.

PTV: Is investing in cryptocurrency always worthwhile?

JG: This is completely dependent on the investor's time horizon and investment objectives. Before investing, you should establish objectives and develop a strategy. It's easy to lose sight of these objectives during periods of asset appreciation, but if you invested with a certain return in mind, make an effort to adhere to it.

In other situations, investors seek to purchase Bitcoin as a store of value because they predict that demand will exceed supply in 20 years, resulting in significantly higher prices. On the other hand, some investors with a shorter time horizon are hoping to profit from the volatility.

Cryptoassets, in my opinion, are a long-term investment with an expected increase in use over the next decade.

What aspects should you consider while making an investment decision?

JG: Risk is the primary consideration when investing in any asset, but it is an even more critical consideration when investing in cryptocurrency due to the asset's volatility.

Since 2009, Bitcoin has fallen by 50% fifteen times, demonstrating the asset's volatility. Conduct research to develop a better grasp of the asset's lifetime and the impact of volatility on your investment portfolio.

Recognise your timeline and, as discussed previously, establish a specific objective. Consider the situation in which you require immediate access to liquid funds from your portfolio. In such situation, investing in the significant market volatility associated with cryptocurrency may not be the greatest decision.

Investors should consider dollar-cost averaging in the vast majority of circumstances. This method can be an effective way to avoid the near-impossible effort of attempting to 'timing the market,' while also providing a lower-risk investment plan for a high-risk asset.

Naturally, you'll need a sense of what you believe will happen to cryptocurrency in the future. Therefore, stay informed on current events, particularly what industry experts have to say. Consume as much information as possible to provide yourself with the necessary tools to make sound financial decisions.

Support us!

Alex Saunders, the embattled cryptocurrency social media celebrity, is now facing more inquiries from irate followers over the sale of 100 non-fungible tokens (NFTs) last year, which he sold to support the construction of a virtual corporate headquarters but never paid for.

Tasmania-based Mr Saunders, the founder of subscription cryptocurrency news website Nugget's News, is already in the headlines following an investor's Supreme Court demand for payback of many debts last week.

He did, however, issue 100 tokens in November that could be purchased for one ether each using the cryptocurrency ether.

At the time, one ether cost $777, and he generated $77,700 through the NFTs, which were to serve as exclusive tickets to a virtual Nugget's News headquarters being developed in a digital world, according to documents reviewed by The Australian Financial Review.

Since the tokens were sold, the price of ether has risen dramatically, with 100 ether being worth more than $427,000. However, Polyagonal Mind, the Spanish firm hired to develop the digital headquarters, claims it has never been paid, and investors who purchased NFTs are demanding a refund.

NFTs are tradable digital assets that are frequently used to track and identify the ownership of digital assets such as artwork or other media.

“Alex was an extremely trustworthy individual, and I was excited to be a part of what he was building,” said one Newcastle resident who purchased an NFT from Mr Saunders in November.

“However, the debut date was repeatedly pushed back, and Alex has now gone entirely silent.”

This is a distinct project from another for which Mr Saunders allegedly gathered $9 million in May, sparking a lawsuit in the Victorian Supreme Court. Additionally, there are concerns about the $5 million Mr Saunders may have borrowed from several persons and has not yet repaid.

On November 30, Mr Saunders coined 100 NFTs for this endeavour and sold them all within weeks.

NFTs can be traded in a marketplace, and Mr Saunders had structured each trade so that the "creator" received 50% of subsequent sales.

“So, not only did Alex Saunders receive my money when I purchased this NFT, but he also receives 50% of the price if I resell it,” the investor explained, adding that he was considering legal action.

Enhanced reality

Investors were informed that proceeds from the NFTs would be utilised to create a Nugget's News "metaverse."

A metaverse is a virtual three-dimensional environment that combines augmented and virtual reality and enables individuals to interact.

Mr Saunders announced the headquarters in a post to his paid Facebook group, which is currently undergoing a rebranding as Collective Shift. Additionally, there are professional offices and a function centre.”

“For private events, unique NFT tickets will direct you to designated spots upon entry and will recognise your digital ticket ownership,” the post adds.

Mr Saunders commissioned Polyagonal Mind to construct the digital structure in a rented location in Decentraland, a popular metaverse where virtual property has previously sold for as much as $900,000.

“It wasn't a big work, but once we completed it, the launch date was repeatedly pushed back,” Polygonal Mind CEO Daniel Garcia told the Financial Review.

“When we discovered all of Alex's other issues, we drew a line through this one and let it go. We are not interested in being linked with this type of activity.”

Mr Garcia suggested a price of less than $10,000 for the project, and while he sent a contract to Mr Saunders for signature, it was never returned.

The Financial Review can confirm that Mr Saunders has abandoned the block of property he rented in Crypto Alley, an area of Decentraland, and that the building Polygonal Mind constructed has been demolished.

“We've now made the entire code base open source, allowing anyone to utilise and expand upon it,” Mr Garcia explained.

“I feel he could have made a lot of money operating this lawful firm; hence, why all this sleazy behaviour?”

Support us!

Advances in quantum computing, a prominent industry expert has stated, "represent an existential danger" to cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Quantum computers are advancing at a breakneck pace, and they may one day be used to compromise the digital wallets used by cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Cryptographic technology is used to ensure the integrity and legitimacy of bitcoin transactions, independent of a centralised authority. However, it has been proposed that quantum computers' rapid growth may pose a "existential threat" to the encrypted blockchains that drive the budding bitcoin financial revolution.

“The advent of quantum computing threatens the very existence of blockchain technologies,” David Williams, Chairman and co-founder of Arqit, a pioneer in quantum encryption technology, told This website.

“We've already seen large-scale crypto hacks, including the recent $600 million Poly Network attack, and things are only going to get worse as quantum computers' immense power enables them to easily breach the cryptographic security that protects crypto wallets, exchanges, and other critical infrastructures.

“Crypto foundations, companies, and individuals involved in blockchain initiatives should take this issue seriously and try to strengthen their security systems,” the paper states.

The cryptocurrency ecosystem is expected to have five to ten years to strengthen its security systems in order to survive attacks by hackers employing quantum computers.

On the other hand, these hackers may bring down global financial institutions and central banks that issue fiat currencies, as they too rely on cryptographic protection.

Mr Williams believes that "information is being captured now for future decryption" and that "a universal quantum computer is likely to appear in approximately five years."

“However, what is truly significant is that organisations such as PsiQuantum and IBM made great strides in ‘error correction' this year, decreasing the number of required ‘qubits' or quantum circuits from millions to thousands,” he stated.

“This is not science fiction; it is simply plain old-fashioned product engineering indicating that the industry is nearing completion.

“With so many firms investing in this technology, what academics previously regarded to be feasible timeframes with minuscule static university budgets no longer holds true.

“There is also the chance that nation-states or other businesses are operating in 'black mode,' and their developments are significantly more advanced than.

Support us!

Dogecoin (DOGE), has witnessed its value surge in the last week. By Saturday, the price per token had increased by 26% in a week. And it's nearly doubled in the last few of weeks. That is a substantial return in a relatively short amount of time for anyone who holds it.

Thus, what

It's difficult to pinpoint a precise reason for Dogecoin's meteoric rise. However, there is an important broader pattern worth noting. As it turns out, individual investors are still trading cryptocurrency in large quantities! Coinbase Global, which facilitates cryptocurrency trading, announced its quarterly financial results earlier this week. Monthly transactional users (MTUs) on the company's platform climbed by a stunning 44 percent from the previous quarter. Additionally, trading volume surged by 38% during this time period.

Dogecoin is the seventh-largest cryptocurrency in the world by market valuation, according to the website CoinMarketCap. As more individuals begin trading cryptocurrency, Dogecoin is likely to be high on their list of coins to purchase. Previously, investors could not trade Dogecoin on Coinbase, but the company began supporting the cryptocurrency on June 3, allowing the approximately 9 million MTUs on the platform to trade it. And, as is the case with everything else in economics, if demand for dogecoins exceeds supply, prices will rise, as they have done over the last week.

What is the next step?

Cryptocurrency investors are genuinely curious about the future of Dogecoin. However, the answer is contentious. Finder surveyed 42 bitcoin specialists to ascertain their perspectives. According to the survey, 80% of respondents feel Dogecoin is a bubble. However, some of those analysts anticipate the price will continue to rise this year before bursts next year. Some feel that a Dogecoin price of $1 is achievable this year.

A closer examination of Finder's survey results reveals a diverse spectrum of ideas, including the notion that Dogecoin will be nearly worthless by the end of the year. In short, so-called experts are polarised. However, here's the rub: They're divided because no one (not even you or me) truly knows what the future holds for Dogecoin. The experts are all making educated guesses.

In comparison to equities, developing a strong confidence in a Dogecoin investment is difficult. Stocks allow for the development of strong convictions since they represent ownership holdings in a real-world business. It is significantly easier to forecast the future cash flows of a business with a high recurring revenue stream. Investors can then develop a positive thesis and allocate a significant portion of their portfolios to favourable possibilities. That is not the case with Dogecoin and other cryptocurrencies.

That is not to say Dogecoin cannot go higher — it most certainly can. And this in no way implies that you should refrain from purchasing cryptocurrency. Simply said, it means to anchor your convictions in reality and invest accordingly.

Support us!

eet "The Bitcoin Family," a decentralised nomad family that subsists entirely on Bitcoin. Didi Taihuttu, 43, is married with three children. They are recognised as the family who sold all their possessions in 2017 to repurchase Bitcoin at a price of roughly $900. Taihuttu exemplifies a true Bitcoin fan. According to his website, following the deaths of his mother and father, he "began meditating on life more and more and realised that the life I was living was not the life I desired." I discovered that life can move at a breakneck pace and that I needed to adapt.”

The Dutchman sold his 11-year-old firm, as well as everything else he possessed, including his home and children's toys. He then purchased a camper and took to the road with his family, living a simple nomad lifestyle while waiting for a crypto boom to occur. This occurred in 2017.

Taihuttu's Protracted Engagement With Bitcoin

Didi first learned about Bitcoin in 2013, far before he became famous. He and two of his friends began mining Bitcoin. According to Taihuttu, "I am an entrepreneur, and when I first heard about bitcoin, I thought, 'Let's do this.'" Regrettably, that venture failed, and he closed it down. According to him, he lost faith in BTC following the 2014 crash.

However, his association with Bitcoin did not end there, as he continued to cross paths with the cryptocurrency. When he noticed that more people were purchasing Bitcoins, he surmised that a monetary revolution would ensue. And he was correct. This epiphany drove him to go all in. It is thought that he acquired approximately 100 Bitcoins valued at approximately $350k at the time, after selling all of his possessions.

Secret Crypto Vaults of the Family

The family has amassed considerable wealth through their ventures and has chosen to store it in secret vaults. These vaults are spread over four continents and are located in a variety of countries. According to this CNBC story, Taihuttu has two hiding places in Europe, two in Asia, one in South America, and a sixth in Australia.

“I've spread the hardware wallets across different countries so that I never have to fly very far if I need to access my cold wallet to exit the market,” Taihuttu of the Bitcoin Family explained. According to the family, the crypto stashes are concealed in a variety of ways and locations, ranging from rental apartments and friends' homes to self-storage facilities. Taihuttu remarked, "I prefer a decentralised world in which I am responsible for protecting my capital."

Didi Taihuttu's Nomadic Life With His Family

The Dutch family began a new life in 2017 and documented their adventures on YouTube and other social media channels. “My wife agreed that we were quite content as a travelling family and that we wanted to demonstrate to the children that they, too, can be quite content without all the luxuries we used to have,” Taihuttu explained.

Support us!

Jack Dorsey, the billionaire internet entrepreneur and CEO of Square and Twitter, is well-known in the cryptocurrency field as a Bitcoin maximalist and has declared as much publicly.

He is a Bitcoin maximalist who disregards all other blockchain networks in favour of Bitcoin. His latest comment on Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalisation, reaffirmed this.

However, one cannot deny that the Ethereum network is a significant player in the cryptocurrency market. The network, which was created with the goal of extending the utility of blockchain technology beyond its use as a store of value or a fiat currency substitute like Bitcoin, but as a decentralised runtime environment for developing and operating smart contracts, also known as decentralised applications (DApps), has largely accomplished that goal thus far, as it is currently the largest marketplace for developing DApps.

There are already over 1,000 apps for the Ethereum blockchain listed in the platform's primary application repository, including financial, arts and collectibles, gaming, and technology-related applications, with more being developed.

While many participants in the cryptocurrency market view these as major selling points for Ethereum, critics remain constant, and Jack Dorsey is one of them.

Dorsey recently expressed scepticism about Ethereum's ability to disrupt the "giant tech" industry in a tweet. In response to a tweet by Ethereum proponent and mathematician "Cory.eth" alleging that big tech [including Twitter] was afraid of Ethereum because it disrupted their industry, Dorsey stated that, while the big tech industry was in desperate need of disruption, Ethereum alone was not going to bring it about.

Notably, the topic was initiated by a statement he made on another tweet concerning the prospect of connecting Twitter accounts to blockchains and authenticating their authenticity using non-transferable tokens. Dorsey claimed that he agreed with the concept, but that the only blockchain he considered was Bitcoin, as the accounts would prefer to connect to the blockchain via the lightning network.

“Disrupting "Big Tech" is just what is required and desired. However, no single technology will accomplish that.”

Dorsey has long been interested in Bitcoin, therefore the community is unsurprised by his attitude. He has now clarified his antipathy towards other networks, noting that he did not inherently despise them but had picked Bitcoin as his focal point.

“Focus on one item does not imply contempt for the others. I've expressed my reservations about other cryptocurrencies in compared to Bitcoin. The founding values, security, and centralisation are critical,” he added in a subsequent tweet.

While there is some doubt about the Ethereum network, the network has grown significantly over the years and is continually evolving to accomplish its objectives. One certain evidence of this is the network's progress towards its ETH 2.0 upgrade – a potential game changer – which will convert it to a proof-of-stake network, removing highly inefficient miners from its ecosystem, as well as the scaling solutions it aims to adopt as part of the upgrade.

Despite this, many market participants, including Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian, appear to believe in Ether. Musk and Alexis Ohanian both admitted to holding Ether. The former even acknowledged that his Ether holdings were the highest in his cryptocurrency portfolio, showing that both players believe in Ethereum's future.

Support us!

On Friday, the Cardano (ADA) token crossed the $2 mark, nearly matching the digital asset's all-time high price from a few months ago. This is in advance of the platform's upgrade, which will boost the project's smart contract solutions, making them more advanced and fully functional by the time it goes live.

The meteoric rise in the price of Cardano's ADA

At approximately 9:00 a.m. on Friday, Cardano's ADA rallied to $2.08 ($2.12 as of press). As recently as May, the coin reached a high of $2.31. For 24 hours, the price of ADA increased by 16 percent, bringing Cardano's market capitalisation to $65 billion ($67.8 billion as of this press). This puts Cardano in a close race with tether (USDT) and Binance coin (BNB) for third place in terms of market capitalisation among all cryptocurrencies. This increased Cardano's market capitalisation by 3.3 percent relative to all +10,000 crypto assets valued at $1.9 trillion.

Notably, while Cardano increased by 16 percent, the crypto asset has also increased by more than 45 percent in the last seven days. Additionally, the coin's one-month performance shows a 61 percent gain, while its year-to-date performance shows a 1,365 percent gain. Indeed, quite impressive.

Date of Alonzo's debut

Nigel Hemsley, Cardano's Head of Delivery, revealed in a video from developer Input Output that the Alonzo upgrade now has a launch date of September 12. Having said that, the smart contract functionality of Cardano will enable the development of additional applications, such as decentralised finance platforms that facilitate automated cryptocurrency trading and lending. The upcoming system change could position the network as a legitimate challenger to Ethereum, the current market leader in terms of smart contract functionality.

CEX.IO's Head of Data Analytics, Yuri Mazur, stated in an email that "any increase in the price of cryptocurrencies is either directly related to positive news that boosts buyer sentiment or is a result of the overall market trend." Additionally, he stated, "Cardano's much-anticipated Alonzo upgrade is another reason for investors to accumulate the coin."

To respond to detractors

Cardano's recent price surge was the first in three months, as its chief developer announced a firm release date for the so-called Alonzo update. Apart from the previously-mentioned full smart contract functionality that the upcoming upgrade will bring, this is also to address Cardano sceptics who have cited the said functionality as a significant shortcoming of the network.

There is even a betting game on whether Cardano will be able to implement smart contract functionality by October 1. According to reports, the betting contract offering $1 of the USDC stablecoin if Cardano meets the deadline was trading at $0.85.

Cardano was founded by Charles Hoskinson – a co-founder of Ethereum – with the goal of competing with the Ethereum network and other decentralised application platforms, but as a more openly scalable, efficient, and secure alternative.

Support us!

The successful implementation of the Chinese digital currency model would limit the United States' ability to impose sanctions and blockades.

People all over the world witnessed a significant drop in the market for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in mid-May 2021. This precipitous drop was interpreted as a reaction to China's most recent crackdown. The People's Bank of China (PBOC) has taken this step to emphasise the importance of orienting its actions towards financial and investment stability. The move comes at a time when the world is experiencing widespread economic insecurity as a result of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. All of this has led to an increase in geopolitical tensions and commodity prices. The recent actions came at a time when the market for various cryptocurrencies was on a roll. For some time now, cryptocurrencies have shown unstoppable growth; for example, the value of Bitcoin has increased by more than 300 percent in the last year. Such growth patterns point to the formation of a bubble, which could make commodity markets more volatile. Chinese regulators' measures to restrict crypto activity sparked a global selloff of digital assets, resulting in a price drop. This is not, however, the first time China has attempted to regulate its domestic cryptocurrency market. For the past few years, China's relationship with cryptocurrency has evolved gradually. China, the world's most populous country, has also grown to become one of the most important cryptocurrency mining hubs. According to some estimates, the Chinese account for two-thirds of global production in crypto mining. Despite such a large market share, the Chinese government appears to be opposed to the rising popularity of these currencies. The various containment measures implemented by Chinese authorities, first in 2013, then in 2017, and now in 2021, are evidence of efforts to restrict the services of these assets through tighter regulations.

IN CHINA, THERE ARE REGULATIONS AGAINST CRYPTOCURRENCIES

Before delving into the legalities, it is important to note that China does not recognise cryptocurrencies as legal tender. As a result, it is not accepted by the banking system or any other transaction. The first regulations were issued in 2013, when digital currency was still in its infancy. The government defined bitcoin as a virtual commodity in its 2013 regulations. It had made it possible for individuals to freely participate in the online trading of these commodities. Within a year, however, several financial regulators, including the PBOC, barred banks and other payment companies from providing any services related to these currencies. In September 2017, China again imposed a ban on Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). The trading platforms were prohibited from converting legal tender into cryptocurrencies and vice versa under the rules. As a result, several cryptocurrency trading platforms have either shut down or relocated offshore. According to the PBOC, 88 virtual currency trading platforms and 85 ICO platforms had already exited the market by 2018.

The recent ban was a reiteration of the 2017 measures that barred banks and online payment companies from providing any crypto-related services. A new measure, however, was the inclusion of institutions within the scope of restrictive regulations. The PBOC has directed various institutions not to accept virtual currencies or use them as a means of payment or settlement under the new policy measures. Institutions cannot also provide exchange services between cryptocurrencies and the yuan or other foreign currencies. Furthermore, the institutions are prohibited from providing trust or pledging services or from issuing crypto-related financial products.

CHINA'S BLOCKCHAIN MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

Looking at the various restrictive measures imposed by the Chinese authorities, it appears that China is wary of cryptocurrency. This is not the case, as China appears to have embraced blockchain technology and is actively working to achieve global dominance in both blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. As long as these technologies can be controlled, China appears to be tolerant of them. This approach contradicts the original concept of blockchain, which is envisioned as a rigid system resistant to any form of government intervention.

China is developing a blockchain technology that it can control on its own. It employs two prongs for this purpose: a Blockchain-Based Service Network (BSN) framework for building enterprise blockchain products and a digital yuan, which is China's Central Bank's digital currency. The BSN was launched less than a year after President Xi declared blockchain technology to be a national priority. It was backed by the State Information Center, China Mobile, China UnionPay, and Red Date Technology, which oversees the national network's development and operation.

One of the most important aspects of blockchain technology is the ability to use smart contracts. As a result, there is always the possibility of people posting content on the network that is contrary to the interests of the Chinese government. To address these issues, China has developed a blockchain system that can be controlled by the authorities via a process known as open permissioned service. The service in this case is a hybrid of several permissioned and permissionless approaches aimed at controlling the entire network's activities. Another distinguishing feature of the service that is available to Chinese users is that it does not support cryptocurrency. This means that when a user is required to pay a transaction fee, they cannot do so with blockchain tokens but must instead use fiat. This is accomplished by interconnecting the traditional payment system with public chain infrastructure. As a result, if someone needs to pay for something, they must go to a specific portal and enter their wallets. These wallets can only be refilled with real money. As a result, the entire system is still regulated and under the authority of the authorities. Furthermore, BSN is designed in such a way that it can halt any smart contract that violates Chinese law.

THE YUAN DIGITAL

The digital yuan is a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) that is primarily intended to replace cash in circulation. This digital currency concept will not rely on blockchain technology, as do other cryptocurrencies. The PBOC intends to distribute digital currency to users through commercial banks. Unlike cryptocurrencies, the Chinese concept of digital currency preserves the traditional role of banks. Bitcoin, for example, employs distributed ledger technology, which allows transactions to be validated without the involvement of banks. This is regarded as a significant distinction between the Chinese use of digital currency. The push for widespread adoption of the digital yuan is seen as another method of state control, as it will provide greater visibility into money flow in China's economy. The successful application would also aid in the tracking of illicit funds while providing an opportunity to experiment with monetary policy.

Hainan is a south Chinese province that has been designated as a blockchain pilot zone. The tests were carried out from April 12 to April 25, 2021, with the goal of advancing blockchain technology. The tests in Hainan are part of the second round of cities to be tested. Shenzhen, Beijing, Suzhou, and Chengdu were among the first batch cities. This is a traditional way for the Chinese government to operate, in which cities or provinces are designated as experimental zones. Because technological advancement has been heavily subsidised by the state, particularly through the active participation of state-owned enterprises, it is regarded as a matter of prestige, and the test is used as a buffer. If the blockchain technology proves to be a revolution in the way that the government intended, it will be rolled out across the country; if the test proves to be a failure, it will be shut down without affecting the country.

THE RESULTS FOR THE REST OF THE WORLD

China is seen as confidently moving towards taking the lead in blockchain technology, owing to President Xi Jinping's strong support. The road to supremacy in the field has been made easier by two factors: first, the lack of significant competition from other countries or even regions; and second, the domestic push to develop the nascent technology. China has mentioned blockchain technology and digital currency in its 14th five-year plan for 2021-2025. In the document, a chapter titled “Accelerating Digitalisation Development and Building a Digital China” discusses the government's plans to strengthen these fields in depth. This is also the first time the term "blockchain technology" appears in a five-year plan. The plan also outlines China's intention to use blockchain technology in a variety of sectors ranging from fintech to supply-chain management and even government affairs. However, the idea is to advance the digital yuan.

The successful implementation of the Chinese digital currency model would limit the US's ability to impose sanctions and blockades. The United States currently does this in accordance with the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT). It is controlled by the United States, which also has the ability to obtain information about SWIFT transactions. Beijing's move is seen as a step towards greater monetary sovereignty. The widespread use of this technology would limit the ability of the United States and other Western powers to influence international transactions, particularly those involving the dollar. This will also allow Chinese entities to conduct business with companies and states sanctioned by the US.

The rapid digitalisation of Chinese currency, combined with other political and macroeconomic factors, has the potential to accelerate the decline of the US dollar's dominance, both in international transactions and as a reserve currency. The steps taken by China in introducing digital currency technology via its Central Bank have prompted other central banks to devise similar strategies. The fundamental aspect of anonymity and the decentralised nature of blockchain-ledger cryptocurrencies would be eliminated by such a currency, which would be overseen by the central banks of respective countries. The possibility of exerting control in China's approach has prompted several central banks around the world to investigate the prospects of such digital assets.

CBDC appears to have piqued the interest of India as well. Over the last decade, the Indian economy has made significant progress in adopting financial technologies. China's growing dominance should serve as a wake-up call for India. The successful application of Chinese CBDC would allow China to strengthen its control over India's neighbouring countries. As a result, India should ensure that it does not fall behind in terms of monetary leadership by forging a path into the digital realm. T. Rabi Sankar (Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India) indicated in a July 2021 conference that digital currency would be introduced gradually. If successful, this move would aid India's quest to become a global economic power.

In the international arena, China has grown to become the largest country to issue a comprehensive blockchain policy. Aside from China, a few states and territories, such as Switzerland and Gibraltar, have enacted policies to encourage the establishment of blockchain firms. Other countries, however, do not pose a serious threat to China. Even a superpower like the United States is seen trailing China in the field of blockchain technology, where the push is coming from individual companies rather than the state. In fact, these firms have been seen to face regulatory pressure even before the start of their projects.

Support us!